Skip to main content

It'd Be Very Foolish to Attempt Getting a Loan from an Indian Restaurant

As a fan of Indian food (depends on the type actually), I also remembered the time when people talked about the 5-6 lending scheme. I had a few Indian-Filipino classmates during my business administration days. It was funny to think that some people attempted to borrow money from my Indian classmates. I went to Indian restaurants and met again some Indian-Filipino peers there. I remembered eating at Mr. India before they became Bollywood Tandoor. There's also Cherry's the Spice, Bharat Spice, and Little India Healthy Cuisine. I could also remember attempting to eat at an Indian restaurant early in January, only to find that the place have been jam-packed with motorcycles. Some people who went in and out were wearing turbans. Ah yes, the very feeling when January becomes a busy month to collect Christmas loans (read here). There's also that long weekend last April this year (read here).

I could remember a few songs that addressed the issue. There's a Cebuano song by Max Surban called "Pasko sa Binilanggo" (The Prisoner's Christmas). The original song talked about someone who was wrongly in jail. The other was where a prisoner went home but the parents weren't thrilled about it. The song went on to even wish Merry Christmas to the Indian lenders (called Bombay in the lyrics, read why here). The other was called "Dayang Daya" (daya means cheat) by the late Yoyoy Villame. The song also mentioned the use of the 5-6 lending scheme. 

Let's imagine a scene that goes like this. It's almost a stereotype for Indian-Filipinos to be lending money. I could imagine if someone went into an Indian restaurant not to dine on the delicious food but to borrow money from the owner. So far, I haven't encountered that while eating at Indian restaurants during the -ber months. However, I heard that 5-6 lending schemes tend to intensify when it's near Christmas, near Holy Week, and when it's near summer break. I could imagine if while I'm eating there, somebody would foolishly ask the owner, "Can I open a loan here?" That would be funny (and irritating) at the same time. 

After the COVID-19 pandemic, I did ask a service crew member at an Indian restaurant if somebody ever tried to borrow money from their boss. The service crew member said that they haven't tried it. I haven't experienced anyone trying to borrow money from the owner or if the owner was around. Most people usually just went there to dine in or take out. I haven't experienced anybody who tried to borrow money from an Indian restaurant. If there was, the Indian-Filipino restaurant owners would probably rather not talk about it. I don't blame them if they refuse to talk about it. Maybe, somebody may end up admitting it happened but so far, there seems to be none. 

I heard that 5-6 lenders usually don't have a fixed location. An Indian restaurant usually relocates for valid reasons. Mr. India shut down, relocated to another place near Talamban, and named their place Bollywood Tandoor. I think 5-6 lenders don't have a fixed location because they don't want to get caught. Meanwhile, all the Indian restaurants I've eaten in are duly registered. Indian restaurant owners usually drive cars, not motorcycles. Most of their delivery services are through Foodpanda and Grab. The 5-6 lenders drive motorcycles so they can easily reach locations where a car would be impractical. 

Popular posts from this blog

Real Talk: No MNCs In Their Right Mind, Would Ever AGREE to That Ridiculous 60-40 Proposal

Here's another art I found on Facebook. Some time ago, I wrote about how the 60-40 policy may not prohibit, while still discouraging FDIs from entering . It's plain common sense, really, that nobody would want to rent a space if they had to part with 60% of their net profits to the lessor (read here ).  It annoys me to think that certain Netizens on Facebook are still blaming government corruption over the 60-40 policy. That can get annoying. I can link the 60-40 policy to government corruption . After all, corrupt officials want to perpetuate their stay in power through an ignorant and impoverished population. However, blaming corruption alone is really downright stupid. Some say investors are going to Communist Vietnam because the Communist Party of Vietnam-Vietnam People's Army is serious about cracking corruption. However, the reality is that, ironically, Communist Vietnam has more reasonable economic restrictions compared to the Philippines (read here ). Only a few sec...

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

Kabataan Partylist Seriously Needs to Learn ECONOMICS from the Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth Union

Vietnam National University, Hanoi Kabataan Partylist, is that you? No, it's actually the Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth Union (Đoàn Thanh niên Cộng sản Hồ Chí Minh), or alternatively, it can be called the Vietnam Youth Union . The color blue may remind some of Kabataan Partylist. Both Kabataan Partylist and the Vietnam Youth Union are involved with recruiting youths into the organization. However, there's a crucial difference between Kabataan Partylist and the Youth Union in how they view economics. The  Kabataan Partylist Laguna's blog  even writes this: It believes that the Philippines, as a semi-colonial and semi-feudal country, is plagued by a system which allows foreign and big business interests to dominate, while the majority of our countrymen are left poor and hungry . We are living in a society where foreign subservience, peasant landlessness, and rampant corruption are the top three ills. To that end, Kabataan Party-list strives to galvanize the Filipino youth in u...

Communist Vietnam's Great Leap Forward in Agricultural Production

I remember reading through Third World to First by the late Lee Kuan Yew. It's very easy to use the book to badmouth the Marcoses but not to learn from the rest of it. The book also talks about Vietnam and LKY's encounter with the late Nguyen Duy Cong aka Do Muoi. It's often said that Singapore only opened because of its lack of natural resources. On the contrary, Do Muoi decided to learn from Singapore how to turn the Communist Party of Vietnam into a powerhouse. Do Muoi, though a communist , was impressed by Singapore during his October 1993 state visit. Vietnam, unlike Singapore, is a country rich in natural resources. The third-world mentality said that MNCs are there to rape the resources .  A very huge misconception especially if you know Singapore's history Some Filipinos on social media even say that FDIs will destroy agriculture and nature. This is a meme by the Philippine Anti-Fascist League on Facebook. They say that FDIs equals environmental degradation. Yet...

60-40 Foreign Direct Investment Ownership is Nothing More Than OVERPRICED Rent

I'm amazed that there are some people who still insist that the Philippines should retain the 60-40 investment scheme or even lesser shares  ownership for foreign investments. The argument always goes such as (1) Filipinos must be the majority shareholder because it's their country, (2) only foreign investors will get rich if you let them invest in here 100%, and (3) you're basically selling land. This is the problem when people can't tell the difference between shares ownership and land ownership . Shares ownership means owning a percentage of the company. Land ownership is where the land is leased upon. This is where I would like to argue why easing certain foreign investment restrictions is necessary. An illustration that will help see why 60-40 is nothing more than overpriced rent I would like to give this picture. Let's imagine you're a businessman and you're looking for a space to rent. Not everyone is willing to sell their commercial space but there ...