Skip to main content

Don't Criticize the Marcoses IF You Love Living a DEBT-DRIVEN, EXTRAVAGANT LIFESTYLE

BBC News

It's September and some people are already starting what I call a premature Christmas countdown. The thought of having an extended Christmas season used to thrill me as a child. For those who celebrate Christmas, we just need to admit that we're more often than not, looking forward to what we can receive, to the Christmas party (and my goodness, many of them are full of calorie-dense meals), and then we can all look forward to angry creditors running after debtors in January (read here)! In my case, September gives me the chills for reasons. One can think of September 11, 2001, which happened when I was in high school under the K+10 curriculum. The other would be remembering that on September 21, 1972, when martial law was declared, some of my folks, out of the blue. I wasn't born yet, but the narrative against Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. focused on human rights violations.

It's crazy how people can afford to badmouth the Marcoses. One must ask, "Where did Bongbong (the current president) get the money for that car? Where did Imelda get that money to buy that many shoes?" Just hearing that kind of talk makes me think of Lee Kuan Yew's encounter with Marcos. LKY wouldn't even lend the money to Marcos, very certain that he would never see the money again. LKY must've observed that President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. was living like a crown prince during that era. Not to mention, the Marcos regime was driven by rampant economic protectionism.

This claim by Emmanuel S. De Dios (and sadly, the link is down, and hopefully it'll be up and running again) says this from the UP School of Economics:
It is instructive that neither Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, nor any major Asian country catastrophically experienced negative growth in the early 1980s. The Philippines was the exception, following instead the example of protectionist and over-borrowed Latin American countries. This suggests that there was nothing unavoidable about the crisis the Philippines suffered, and that it was the result instead of failed policies. In 1977 the Philippines’ total debt was all of $8.2 billion. Only five years later, in 1982, this had risen to $24.4 billion. Thailand’s debt in 1982 was still only half that amount. Thailand and other countries of the region thus avoided a debt crisis and ultimately went on to attract foreign direct investments in export-oriented industries in the now-familiar East Asian pattern. But no such thing happened under Ferdinand E. Marcos, notwithstanding the arguments and exhortations of people like Gerardo P. Sicat (who would cease to be active in the regime by 1980). By the early 1980s, the pattern would be set where foreign direct investments in neighboring countries regularly outstripped those in the Philippines. (The intermittent coups d’etat post-Marcos did us no favors either.)
Is it me, or does having an extravagant lifestyle usually follow up with a debt-driven lifestyle? I've heard someone who was having such extravagant parties was actually not as rich as he claimed. Instead, it was a debt-driven lifestyle. The people I heard about were partying on a yacht, but they borrowed tons of money. I've heard of people who have so much flamboyancy (that is, extravagance beyond reason) are the type to get buried in debt so soon. Of course, not all extravagant people would party on a yacht. However, the one thing in common with all types of overspending and extravagance is that they're usually debt-driven.

Funny enough, I've met some people who don't know how to prioritize money, who also hate the Marcoses. These are the types of contradictions that I could see:
  1. Complaining about Imelda's 3,000 pairs of shoes, all the while, the wife has expensive taste. A woman doesn't need to own 3,000 pairs of shoes to be an overspender!
  2. Complaining about Bongbong living like a prince, all the while, they keep giving in to their children's whims. One doesn't need to give their son a yacht party to make a spoiled brat, because there are other ways to do so.
  3. Complaining about Marcos' national debt (which affects the country) all the while one is also borrowing money without paying it back. One doesn't need to be a dictator to accumulate lots of debt! You just need to be an overspender who doesn't know how to value money! 
Think about how overspending is really the norm in the country. Sure, the wife may not own 3,000 pairs of shoes like Imelda. Sure, the son isn't having a yacht party. However, if the wife has expensive taste, if the son keeps getting treated like a little prince, and if the head of the household keeps borrowing money just to impress others--it puts that family in a similar situation as the Marcoses! The family may not be stealing away from the national coffers. 

Even funnier, such people are still blaming the long-dead Marcos for the country's current ills (read here). These people definitely have no moral high ground. I'm not saying that the Marcos wealth isn't real. I'm disappointed to think of how the Supreme Court of the Philippines dismissed the case. It's already stupid enough to hate the Marcoses but love their protectionist policies that led to crony capitalism. 

Sure, not all debt can land you in jail. However, think about that people with debt-driven, extravagant lifestyles might be guilty of estafa (borrowing without the intention to pay back), or absconding with the intent to defraud. Some people, whether they're in business or in the working class, may be able to commit these acts of fraud. Really, why demand the Marcoses to pay back the debt if you're unwilling to pay back that debt? 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

"Will #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics Lower Philippine Gas Prices?

Inquirer Gasoline prices have increased again, haven't they?  A few days ago, I wrote  why #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba's view of gas prices is questionable . Today, I feel like writing this after several complaints on Facebook. I would like to create a follow-up post. People are complaining too much without understanding the real reason why some countries have lower prices of gasoline. Real talk. We need to talk about economic policies,  and  of course, please do a study on supply-demand analysis  on supply chain management . Let's examine the complaints made by Bulatlat Bulatlat Here's a chart from Bulatlat that compares the increase in prices of gasoline between the Philippines, Thailand, and Malaysia. It's always problematic when people ignore simple economics. It's funny, but Bulatlat mentions this on their website: Note also how expensive our diesel and gasoline products are compared to those of our ASEAN neighbors. The estimated common price today of diesel in...
Read more

The Good Old Days when Gasoline was Cheaper Under the Late Noynoy Aquino

Millennials' Voice I would like to clarify first and foremost that this post isn't an attempt to say that the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III's legacy was all bad. Some good things happened. However, let me be clear that it's stupid to say, " We don't need economic cha-cha because of the late Noynoy. " However, let me clear that I decided to write this because of a Facebook post called Millennials' Voice , which wrote this: Did you know that during President Noynoy Aquino's time, the price of oil in the world market was high, between $100 and $110 per barrel. But even with those high prices, gasoline and diesel at local pumps in the country were still relatively affordable.  Under President Duterte, world oil prices went up and down, from a low of $41 to a high of $101 per barrel. The big jump to $101 in 2022 happened because of the war between Russia and Ukraine.   Now, under the current president, world oil prices have gone up again to around $...
Read more

#SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics' Understanding of How Gasoline Prices Work

International State College of the Philippines Today is Flor Contempacion Day , and rallies are expected. However, whether it's Flor's death anniversary or not, rallies are expected for the wrongest of reasons. I would like to address this photo from the International State College of the Philippines' Facebook page. The demands here are rather clunky and stupid. We have the following demands that would naturally clash with each other, such as: No to the oil deregulation law while demanding lower oil prices. This is simply ignoring the basic fundamentals of economics, namely the law of supply and demand . They say that oil companies are greedy for gain. These rallyists probably don't really understand the difference between revenues and profits . Let's understand the Oil Deregulation Law  The Oil Deregulation Law, or the Republic Act No. 8479 , passed on February 10, 1998, under the late Fidel Valdez Ramos. Here's how the liberalization works: CHAPTER II  LIBERAL...
Read more

The Myth of "Invading" Other Countries Through Foreign Investors and Overseas Filipino Workers

BoardGameGeek Years ago, I could remember how "Filipino pride" seems to be required by the DECS. Some songs in the Filipino subject (or called Tagalog) tend to glorify it. One of the songs was called "Ako'y Isang Pinoy" (or "I'm Pinoy") feels ironic since it was played on an imported music player. We had discussions for years about how Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) are often the unsung heroes or the new heroes. The mentality kept going on with how people desired to take a particular course not because they wanted to--it's because they wanted to go abroad. Why I wanted to take Bachelor of Science in Information Technology (BSIT) was not just to impress people but also to go abroad . However, more people shifted away from BSIT either because they were eliminated (common cause) or because it was too hard for them. Some of them flat out admitted that they took BSIT in hopes of going abroad. Some were taking nursing in hopes of again-- going abro...
Read more

Learning from the Late Lee Kuan Yew's Proving Protectionist-Driven Economists Wrong About Multinational Corporations

Reading the book From Third World to First is really a must. The late Lee Kuan Yew was faced with the mentality of the development economists of his day. Here's an excerpt from "Chapter 4--Surviving Without a Hinterland" which I'd like to share from Pages 57-58: After several years of disheartening trial and error, we concluded that Singapore's best hope lay with the American multinational corporations (MNCs). When the Taiwanese and Hong Kong entrepreneurs came in the 1960s, they brought low technology such as textile and toy manufacturing, labor-intensive but not large-scale. American MNCs brought higher technology in large-scale operations, creating many jobs. They had weight and confidence. They believed that their government was going to stay in Southeast Asia and their businesses were safe from confiscation or war loss. I gradually crystallized my thoughts and settled on a two-pronged strategy to overcome our disadvantages. The first was to leapfrog the reg...
Read more