Skip to main content

Don't Criticize the Marcoses IF You Love Living a DEBT-DRIVEN, EXTRAVAGANT LIFESTYLE

BBC News

It's September and some people are already starting what I call a premature Christmas countdown. The thought of having an extended Christmas season used to thrill me as a child. For those who celebrate Christmas, we just need to admit that we're more often than not, looking forward to what we can receive, to the Christmas party (and my goodness, many of them are full of calorie-dense meals), and then we can all look forward to angry creditors running after debtors in January (read here)! In my case, September gives me the chills for reasons. One can think of September 11, 2001, which happened when I was in high school under the K+10 curriculum. The other would be remembering that on September 21, 1972, when martial law was declared, some of my folks, out of the blue. I wasn't born yet, but the narrative against Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. focused on human rights violations.

It's crazy how people can afford to badmouth the Marcoses. One must ask, "Where did Bongbong (the current president) get the money for that car? Where did Imelda get that money to buy that many shoes?" Just hearing that kind of talk makes me think of Lee Kuan Yew's encounter with Marcos. LKY wouldn't even lend the money to Marcos, very certain that he would never see the money again. LKY must've observed that President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. was living like a crown prince during that era. Not to mention, the Marcos regime was driven by rampant economic protectionism.

This claim by Emmanuel S. De Dios (and sadly, the link is down, and hopefully it'll be up and running again) says this from the UP School of Economics:
It is instructive that neither Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, nor any major Asian country catastrophically experienced negative growth in the early 1980s. The Philippines was the exception, following instead the example of protectionist and over-borrowed Latin American countries. This suggests that there was nothing unavoidable about the crisis the Philippines suffered, and that it was the result instead of failed policies. In 1977 the Philippines’ total debt was all of $8.2 billion. Only five years later, in 1982, this had risen to $24.4 billion. Thailand’s debt in 1982 was still only half that amount. Thailand and other countries of the region thus avoided a debt crisis and ultimately went on to attract foreign direct investments in export-oriented industries in the now-familiar East Asian pattern. But no such thing happened under Ferdinand E. Marcos, notwithstanding the arguments and exhortations of people like Gerardo P. Sicat (who would cease to be active in the regime by 1980). By the early 1980s, the pattern would be set where foreign direct investments in neighboring countries regularly outstripped those in the Philippines. (The intermittent coups d’etat post-Marcos did us no favors either.)
Is it me, or does having an extravagant lifestyle usually follow up with a debt-driven lifestyle? I've heard someone who was having such extravagant parties was actually not as rich as he claimed. Instead, it was a debt-driven lifestyle. The people I heard about were partying on a yacht, but they borrowed tons of money. I've heard of people who have so much flamboyancy (that is, extravagance beyond reason) are the type to get buried in debt so soon. Of course, not all extravagant people would party on a yacht. However, the one thing in common with all types of overspending and extravagance is that they're usually debt-driven.

Funny enough, I've met some people who don't know how to prioritize money, who also hate the Marcoses. These are the types of contradictions that I could see:
  1. Complaining about Imelda's 3,000 pairs of shoes, all the while, the wife has expensive taste. A woman doesn't need to own 3,000 pairs of shoes to be an overspender!
  2. Complaining about Bongbong living like a prince, all the while, they keep giving in to their children's whims. One doesn't need to give their son a yacht party to make a spoiled brat, because there are other ways to do so.
  3. Complaining about Marcos' national debt (which affects the country) all the while one is also borrowing money without paying it back. One doesn't need to be a dictator to accumulate lots of debt! You just need to be an overspender who doesn't know how to value money! 
Think about how overspending is really the norm in the country. Sure, the wife may not own 3,000 pairs of shoes like Imelda. Sure, the son isn't having a yacht party. However, if the wife has expensive taste, if the son keeps getting treated like a little prince, and if the head of the household keeps borrowing money just to impress others--it puts that family in a similar situation as the Marcoses! The family may not be stealing away from the national coffers. 

Even funnier, such people are still blaming the long-dead Marcos for the country's current ills (read here). These people definitely have no moral high ground. I'm not saying that the Marcos wealth isn't real. I'm disappointed to think of how the Supreme Court of the Philippines dismissed the case. It's already stupid enough to hate the Marcoses but love their protectionist policies that led to crony capitalism. 

Sure, not all debt can land you in jail. However, think about that people with debt-driven, extravagant lifestyles might be guilty of estafa (borrowing without the intention to pay back), or absconding with the intent to defraud. Some people, whether they're in business or in the working class, may be able to commit these acts of fraud. Really, why demand the Marcoses to pay back the debt if you're unwilling to pay back that debt? 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...
Read more

Overspending as a Narcotic of the Filipino Masses

Harvard Health Publishing It's almost time for the New Year, right? However, there's the problem that so many Filipinos just refuse to do any financial New Year's resolutions . It's a continued series of broken New Year's resolutions year after year , such as not doing anything about one's financial and economic literacy . Then again, can Filipinos learn financial literacy when the school environment is  too theoretical ? As I observe the same cycle in the Philippines, from January to December, it has always been a financial mess for many Filipinos. The problem starts with mishandling money, such as how paychecks are often handled by people .  There's always some joy in spending, whether we want to admit it or not We can't deny that if we bought what we want (especially with one's own money), there's some feeling of satisfaction . For example, a person who stops begging from their parents and starts buying what they want, with  their money , can ...
Read more

Is Christmas Toxic Positivity a Cause or an Effect of the Philippines' Lack of Progress?

Lessandra When it's Christmas, it's so easy to think of the song of the late Andy Williams, "It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year". The music itself reeks of toxic positivity,  whether one likes it or not. It's a shame, really, because December 20 was also the anniversary of Asia's Titanic, the sinking of the Doña Paz ! We live in a society that somehow never learns from its mistakes, like a person who's stuck in gambling debt, is still hoping to get rich gambling . Despite all that, Christmas toxic positivity still abounds in the Philippines. We still have a lot of ongoing bad habits, such as starting Christmas in September and then doing last-minute Christmas shopping during the week of Christmas. That's why every time I drive on the road on Christmas, I tend to shout, "Isn't it any wonder why the Philippines never improves?" The term Noche Buena has evolved over time . For some, it's simply the Christmas dinner. However, so...
Read more

Why the Old Chinese Education System in the Philippines Can't Pass the HSK Standard Today

Bahay Tsinoy, museum of Chinese life in the Philippines There are a lot of cavemen-minded people out there. Some would argue that Pinyin is making things too easy, never mind that Mainland China was the first to  move to abolish Zhuyin. I was looking at the comments on the Bahay Tsinoy Facebook page, and I was not surprised by them. I try to talk about Pinyin and even ask, "Can you get your business permit with Zhuyin?" I guess I was being too blunt in what I did or not. Those old books above were useless . It's because they required people to learn Chinese first and an overdose of memorization . Memorization helps but without understanding, it doesn't help. Besides, you can't even use those textbooks above to teach Mandarin in the language centers (read why here ). People who graduated from Chinese schools talk about their experiences. Some of them even said, "We just memorized so we don't get whacked at the ruler by the siansi (Hokkien for teacher). Fo...
Read more

Why I Don't Intend (or Even Recommend to Anyone) to Invest in Cryptocurrencies

I remembered the time when I started to do some monetary investments (bonds, mutual funds), got scammed by a bad customer who hasn't paid me back until now, and how the journey of personal finance is no easy task. I feel like it's time to talk about another Ponzi scheme called cryptocurrency. First, we need to define it before I will state why I don't even intend to invest in it.   Cryptocurrency is defined by Investopedia as follows: A cryptocurrency is a digital or virtual currency that is secured by cryptography, which makes it nearly impossible to counterfeit or double-spend. Many cryptocurrencies are decentralized networks based on blockchain technology—a distributed ledger enforced by a disparate network of computers. A defining feature of cryptocurrencies is that they are generally not issued by any central authority, rendering them theoretically immune to government interference or manipulation . A clear lack of regulation and extreme volatility make it very dangero...
Read more