Skip to main content

Why the Old Chinese Education System in the Philippines Can't Pass the HSK Standard Today

Bahay Tsinoy, museum of Chinese life in the Philippines

There are a lot of cavemen-minded people out there. Some would argue that Pinyin is making things too easy, never mind that Mainland China was the first to move to abolish Zhuyin. I was looking at the comments on the Bahay Tsinoy Facebook page, and I was not surprised by them. I try to talk about Pinyin and even ask, "Can you get your business permit with Zhuyin?" I guess I was being too blunt in what I did or not. Those old books above were useless. It's because they required people to learn Chinese first and an overdose of memorization. Memorization helps but without understanding, it doesn't help. Besides, you can't even use those textbooks above to teach Mandarin in the language centers (read why here).

People who graduated from Chinese schools talk about their experiences. Some of them even said, "We just memorized so we don't get whacked at the ruler by the siansi (Hokkien for teacher). For some time, there was Language 1, Fuhao Zhuyin, Chinese math (which may rather redundant until now), and Language 2. I was evaluating my past and why I even started to hate Chinese. I did have some ideas back then but I was afraid to speak them out. The school system tends to encourage people to be robotic. All of it was focused on too much memorization. We were too stuck on Zhuyin and we were never taught Pinyin. The problem with the Chinese school was that the Chinese class taught Mandarin as a first-hand language rather than a second-hand language. Also, I must admit that Zhuyin is becoming very obsolete. It's like using typewriters in typing classes or demanding students to use a typewriter to make their reports. It didn't matter how strict the Chinese teachers were if the system itself was faulty. Having reasonably strict teachers is good but they can become monsters in a bad system. 

HSK means Hànyǔ shuǐpíng kǎoshì (汉语水平考试) which means Chinese level test or Chinese proficiency test. The problem that was with Chinese was how it was focused on reading stories in Chinese (and switching back between Mandarin and Amoy instead of Mandarin and English), we had to memorize even when we didn't know how to read, and the Zhuyin just complicated things. Later, Language 2 or History was removed so there were only three subjects left. However, a lack of practicality was still the issue. Reading and memorizing Chinese isn't meaningful until you understand what you're memorizing. Some people even got two Chinese diplomas but still can't speak proper Mandarin. The valedictorian may have memorized the speech. However, has the valedictorian even understood it? Some people memorize Chinese songs but never understand the meaning. 

There's really no real proficiency when you think about it. The purpose of memorizing Bon Toi (question and answer in Hokkien) is supposed to teach how to speak right? However, if the people can't understand then getting a high grade without understanding what was spoken, isn't a good grade. A good grade is only good when it's a grade that's accompanied by learning. However, with too much focus on grades over learning then that's why students cheat. I couldn't get over how many cheating incidents happen inside Chinese classes too. I tried cheating and the siansi crumpled my test paper. I had a classmate who got suspended for cheating in Chinese. Other stuff I remember is I had a classmate who repeated Grade 2 Chinese four times and another failed Grade 3 Chinese twice. Grade 2-3 Chinese soon become the reason why some transfer to non-Chinese schools. It was a common sight for the students to cry when they had to do the Biak Diam (memorization). Yet, the decades-long problem had persisted since it was the way that the Chinese language subject was taught "since time immemorial" (read here). Some people even say that Pinyin is lazy and that Zhuyin is "more accurate". Do they even have the guts to tell that to the Chinese language schools where foreigners are learning to speak better Mandarin than they are? 

Can those old schoolers really pass the HSK standard then? Chances are that they're probably too focused on Amoy to speak proper Mandarin. They may have been good at memorizing Bon Toi but not understanding the Bon Toi. That's why I hated memorizing Bon Toi too. Though, memorizing Bon Toi, if taught correctly, can help people. That's what I recommended in the bilingual approach (read here). Katrina Liu's books have both Pinyin and English. As the Chinese community grows, the elders can't keep on using those old books that they were so used to. Assimilation was always bound to happen. Sure, there's Chinatown but can the businesses in Chinatown force the City Hall to read Chinese characters for their business permit? Can they use Zhuyin to secure their business permit (read here)? I'm seeing a lot of Chinese businesses spell out their names in Pinyin such as Xiaomi, Chatime, Gong Cha, and Yi Fang to name a few.  

Instead, the approach to teaching the Chinese language subject is to make it more accessible and practical (read here). In turn, it prepares them to master a difficult subject fully prepared. The system itself needs to change and Chinese language teachers can do a better job. The teachers are bent and driven by a syllabus. A good syllabus will produce better teachers. A bad one will end up derailing even the best teachers. The whole memorization thing should be to speak Chinese. That's why I'm glad that Zhuyin was replaced with Pinyin. Now, it might be to have a more practical approach especially with Mandarin being the most widely spoken language in Asia. 

Popular posts from this blog

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...

Filipino First Policy Linked with Crab Mentality

Having sea crab yesterday or just eating crab, I always think of that old commercial in the 1990s. It was called, "Iwasan ang crab mentality." or "Avoid crab mentality." This makes me recall a scene when I was a child. I saw a pail full of mud crabs (called alimango in Filipino) and if one crab got out, the others pulled it down. The TV commercial showed how if the crabs got together, they could all escape their grizzly fate of becoming eaten for human consumption. Chefs are just lucky crabs pull each other down. However, it also shows that the crabs would rather all be cooked together than let that crab escape.  Unfortunately, crab mentality is one of the biggest problems in the Philippines. It's not all that unique among Filipinos. However, it doesn't Filipinos should ever take comfort in engaging in a crab mentality, just because other people do it . Here's an interesting excerpt from Inquirer   by Jerry Peres de Tagle PhD: Studies in human behavior ...

"First Bitter, Later Sweet" Beats "If It's Bitter, Just Add Sugar" Mindset ANY DAY

Back then, I wrote an article where I discussed the stupidity of the "If it's bitter, just add sugar." mindset . In Cebuano, it's, "Kung pait, butangi lang ug asukal". The mentality itself has kept many people poor. It would go with how people just want to have a good time. It can be observed in how people deal with their salary hence explaining their financial situation (read here ). With Christmas just around the corner (read here ), it's very easy to land into the dreaded Holiday Debt Trap (read here ). What's next? Would those members of the labor union blame the government and entrepreneurs for the bad decisions they made themselves?  What's with the typical Filipino mindset about money (and sugar)?  Please note that I'm not attacking every single Filipino  there are Filipinos who are mindful of their money. Instead, I'm tackling the predominant mindset brought about by the "Kung pait, butangi lang ug asukal" mindset. It se...