Skip to main content

The Chinese Filipino Education System's Decades-Long Not Making Mandarin Accessible to Non-Chinese Speakers

 

Yesterday, I wrote about traditional Chinese textbooks and why they can't be used in teaching Mandarin anymore. Today, I feel like writing about the root cause of the problem. There was a time when Chinese Filipinos never accepted that they were both Chinese and Filipino. Filipino citizenship while being ethnically Chinese. Right now, think that Bryan Loo may be Chinese ethnically but his new brand, Tealive, is considered Malaysian by international standards. Jollibee's owner Ton Tancaktiong may be ethnically Chinese but it's a Filipino firm. In the past, there have been some Chinese who were still stubborn to be called "Filipino". Maybe, one can view the film Mano Po (the first film anyway) and notice how some of the children wanted to "return to China". Maybe, one can view The Joy Luck Club to try and understand the struggles of Chinese Americans in finding their identity.

The Chinese schools in the Philippines needed to be Filipinized for a good reason. A Chinese school in America needs to teach American English. A Chinese school in Malaysia needs to teach the Bahasa Malaysia language. A Chinese school in the Philippines has to teach Tagalog. Yet, some ethnic Chinese who are no longer considered Chinese by international standards refused to be referred to by their citizens. There was a time some Chinese Filipinos refused to say they were Filipino and may have had a longing to go to China, even if they hardly spoke Mandarin. As a result, Chinese schools in the Philippines tend to teach Mandarin as a hermetic sacred language than something that should be made accessible to anyone. 

Bahay Tsinoy, museum of Chinese life in the Philippines

The result was the use of traditional Chinese textbooks. Chinese classes handled Chinese as a primary language than a secondary language. It required students to learn Chinese first when they should be entering Chinese classes to learn Chinese. I remember getting my hand spanked with a ruler whenever I failed to recite it properly. The Chinese teachers (and even the Chinese principal of any Chinese Filipino school) have very little choice but to follow the lousy curriculum. I thought it was just an isolated problem. Instead, I did some talks with some Chinese Filipinos that the Chinese schools used more or less the same textbooks.

When we tried to Romanize on our own, we were told to stick to Zhuyin. Obviously, the wrong Romanization leads to the wrong pronunciation. It's like B is not P and D is not T. It requires discipline not to read Pinyin like it was English. Whether we want to admit it or not, the Filipinization of Chinese Filipino academies and sticking to traditional Chinese education is a bad mix. I remember complaining openly about what's the use of studying Chinese if I could never learn to speak it? I studied and as long as I passed, that was it. Chinese language teachers had no choice but to let a student pass the written exam if they could write it down but not read it. There was too much focus on rote memorization. We need to memorize like I need to memorize the standardized Pinyin (and I used the Bopomofo sequence to memorize it), and I need to memorize the basic greetings and basic grammar. We need to memorize but we also need to understand.

The end result is that when these people graduate in Chinese (maybe at least Grade 6, and take note that I never got my diploma because I failed in Zhuyin and I'm fine with it and I still get along fine with my former Chinese language teacher)--they still can't speak Mandarin or write in Chinese. It was always the drill of any Chinese teacher to talk about the benefits and the importance. However, by teaching Chinese in that one size fits all system--students without Chinese background are bound to be overwhelmed. I always felt stupid whether I passed or I failed. It was even worse when previous-generation Chinese Filipinos complain about why their children can't be as "good as them". It's like a secretary from the 1950s complaining why her children can't use the typewriter as well as he or she does. Do they even realize that they can't register their businesses using Zhuyin? I wonder how many of the previous generation Chinese Filipinos can really speak English well enough to communicate in both languages for non-Chinese speakers?

It should be noted that some of the architects of Filipino protectionism are Chinese Filipinos. There were the late Manuel Lim and Alejandro Lichauco during the reign of the late Carlos P. Garcia. Garcia did lose the re-election bid but his Filipino First Policy still lived on. Ironic that several older generations of Chinese Filipinos didn't want to be identified with the "ethnic Filipinos" (who are Malay and Indo) while trying to build their empires in the Philippines. Those are the times when I feel ashamed of my own ethnicity. I even wonder if both Lim and Lichauco had their own interests? Lichauco even lied that Garcia's Filipino First Policy was effective. I believe Filipino First Policy was also an enabler as to why Chinese Filipino schools got stuck in that kind of education system for decades. Yes, the price that the public pays for protectionist policies. As a result, the rich vs. poor gap increases as well as the number of uneducated people. Even if all the poor unite to overthrow the rich, can they really do it without any basic literacy? 

What should've been done was that Chinese Filipino Schools should teach Chinese as a secondary language. It's because when the literacy of American English and Tagalog increases, Mandarin Chinese is taught to people who can't even speak the language. It's how low the schools should've shifted to Pinyin long ago (read here). Mandarin isn't a subject that's meant to be in a hermetic chamber. If it were, will those Chinese Filipino schools explain how they intend to get people ready as the number of Mandarin speakers worldwide is over a billion? That's why I even wrote an entry about making Mandarin Chinese more accessible and learnable in the Philippines. Just imagine that I only saw the beauty of Mandarin when I entered college. I did only share my regret but never started to question what really went wrong.

It's all about bridging the gaps. The use of bilingual Chinese textbooks will make it more practical to memorize increasingly difficult conversational questions and answers. Hopefully, the 华语 (huá yǔ) subject will focus on practical speaking. It would also mean having a Chinese-English dictionary as a requirement for the class. Having bilingual Mandarin textbooks would be helpful in making people memorize certain stuff. It might be the standard question and answer. It might be filling in the blanks. This would require students to translate the question in Mandarin to English, answer in Mandarin, and translate the answer into English. During tests, they should also write down the Pinyin and English translation to see if they can translate back and forth.

I really see the importance of 华语 (huá yǔ) more than ever. I want to stress that we need to make Chinese education more accessible. Also, it's time to make Chinese education focus more on learning than just simply grading. A good grade coming from learning something is a real good grade. A good grade that only came from rote memorization or cheating should never be considered a good grade. 

Popular posts from this blog

Honoring the Recently Deceased Jose de Venecia Jr. in a Business/Economics Perspective

That's right. Jose de Venecia  recently passed away yesterday. As an advocate for reform, it's sad but true that de Venecia didn't win because he was boring . It was easy to think of him as a boring guy. I remember the time when he was called in ISPUP as Yoda De Venecia (after the Star Wars character). I was just a clueless college student at that time when the ISPUP episode was shown. I was only 13 years old when de Venecia ran for president. It was also that era when Joseph Estrada (who's now 88 years old) ran for president, and it was that time when Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (who turned 90 last year) became the chief justice.  Just recently, I found this eulogy   for JDV. I will not post the whole eulogy, but only the one from the one that would "fit better" for a business-economics blog: He helped advance policies that enabled major infrastructure projects through public private partnerships, converted former military bases into thriving economic centers...

Yes to Filipinas Marrying Foreign Men, No to 100% FDI Shares Ownership?!

Today is Valentine's Day. I feel Valentine's Day is plain overrated. Some people just get a date for the sake of it--even if it means enduring that materialistic girlfriend or abusive boyfriend! Isn't romance a year-round thing? A few Valentine's Day ago, I wrote about Filipinas marrying foreigners and that FDI doesn't include Filipinas dating foreigners . This time to add some comedy, I wrote this post. It's something to say, "Yes! Somebody is married to a foreigner!" It's the hype to get job opportunities abroad or to marry a foreigner. Blossoms Why do Filipinos want to marry foreigners? The Blossoms blog writes down the following: Love and Affection: Love is often the primary reason for marriage, and Filipinas who marry foreigners may do so because they have fallen in love with someone from another country.  Financial Stability: Some Filipinas may marry foreigners because they believe a foreign husband can provide financial stability and secur...

China's Real Great Leap Forward and Economic Cultural Revolution Under Deng Xiaoping

Nobody can dare deny that China has become a big superpower. I remembered I went to China last 2007 (which would be more than 10 years ago). China had become such a huge metropolis of power that I'm amazed at it. I was thinking about how Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Beijing were truly magnificent cities before the pollution problem (which should call for eco-capitalist measures). I was thinking about how I never realized China was once dirt poor.  Did you know China used to be so dirt-poor? The "economic legacy" of Mao Zedong was a disaster with the so-called "Great Leap Forward". It was a great leap forward all right--a great leap forward to ruin. Mao seeking to avoid the use of foreign resources to launch China proved disastrous. The 1970s would see a dramatic change when Deng Xiaoping finally took over the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The beginning of the rise of Communist China under Deng's new political policy would pave the way to China becoming a great s...

Should Noynoy Aquino be a Valid Excuse to Reject Econ Cha Cha?

Philippine Star   Updated January 25, 2025 This may be a touchy post. Politics is often a source of fights during parties. That's why we're told not to talk about politics during parties. Unfortunately, some people on Facebook are now using the late Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino Jr. as an excuse not to execute even economic charter change. Never mind that blatant supporter of Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo, Andrew James Masigan, supports economic charter change . The late Charles Edward P. Celdran was also an anti-Duterte critic. As I looked at some okay boomer posts, I'm not surprised at people who still use Noynoy as an excuse to shout with all their might, "No to economic charter change!" Somebody posted on Facebook the following. As always, I won't publicly shame anyone. If possible, I will only refer to them by codenames or use the name Anonymous. I want to remain as professional as possible. This person said that under N...

Teaching Mandarin by Recalling How Much Chinoy School Students Complained, "Hay, Chinese!"

It's time for a bit of Chinese language Throwback Thursday. I remember how the Chinese school can be summarized as students  memorizing without understanding . The problem wasn't the Lǎoshīs (老師) but the system that ran them as persons . I decided to write this article to " bring up a trauma " associated with the Chinese education system. From Kiko Chinese, this picture shows the common complaints from children. Standard Chinese is so hard! The Chinese schools tend to lose students because they keep failing in Grade 2 or Grade 2 in Chinese. In fact, I remember someone failing Chinese four times back in the 1990s. Another one was three years in Grade 3 Chinese, where the Chinese teacher was even stricter than the Grade 2 Chinese teacher. The real issue was that there wasn't any real learning because the old traditional Chinese system wasn't doing anything right . People were treated as if Hokkien were their first language. However, we realize that people can...