Skip to main content

The SCARY Truth About Trying to Get Rich Quick Gambling

Freepik

Two years ago, last October 2023, I wrote an article where I described that the pera-normal settings are resultss of mismanagement. I was running out of ideas, but thankfully, Gemini AI, with its combination of right and wrong answers (that's why double-checking is important), has helped me out of writer's block. I would like to state that because October means Halloween for some, I decided to write this post where I address the scary truth about gambling. This reminds me of the irony of turning down investing in favor of gambling, such as the irony of "investing" in Axie Infinity after pulling out of AXA, or the stupidity of buying lottery tickets in hopes of getting rich.

Back in 2012, I remember losing a huge sum of money to a family friend, who was a habitual gamber. Some people even play mahjong until the crack of dawn, hoping to get rich fast. In another situation, I remember hearing of people who keep playing the lottery, hoping to get rich. This reminds me of the sob story of some crazy female working student, who mentioned how her family keeps buying lottery tickets after work, and she contributes via her silly song and dance. I got mad at her sob story back then. However, after realizing that trying to discipline every single Filipino isn't a sound economic plan, I realized that the crazy girl and her family were but symptoms of a much higher problem. They were the effect and not the cause of bad economic policies, such as the Filipino First Policy. But let's not dwell on that. Instead, I would like to focus on gambling for now.

The mathematics of probability shows the scary truth about gambling

A gamble means to bet on an uncertain outcome. This is the problem with gambling. When you're going gambling, it means that anything you gamble is based on an uncertain outcome. In the study of statistics, we have the mathematics of probability. This time, I'll cite from Investopedia, which is again, another material that my socialist hippie critics hate. This is the sad truth about gambling probabilities of winning:
Math is the universal language, and it rarely ever lies. Each game you play at a casino has a statistical probability against you winning—every single time. While this house advantage varies for each game, it ultimately helps to ensure that over time, the casino won’t lose money to gamblers.

For people who are really good at blackjack, the advantage for the casino might be only 0.5%, but certain types of slot machines might have a 35% edge over a player—and other games fall somewhere in between. The slot machine odds are often some of the worst, ranging from a one-in-5,000 to one-in-about-34-million chance of winning the top prize when using the maximum coin play. 
The house advantage obviously isn’t insurmountable—people do win, sometimes substantially. However, it does mean that the more you play, the more the math works against you, and the better the chances are of you walking out of the casino with less money in your wallet than when you came in.

In fact, playing the lottery is gambling. I tend to laugh (and cringe) whenever that incorrigible female working student, who kept talking about her family woes, and how they've been buying some lottery tickets, hoping to get rich. In fact, Investopedia reveals this sad data about lottery tickets:

Independent Probability

Of course, someone has to win the jackpot. But don't let that certainty cloud your judgment. The rules of probability dictate you do not increase your lottery odds by playing more frequently, nor by betting larger amounts on each drawing. Each lottery ticket has the same odds of winning no matter how many you buy. Each one has independent probability not altered by the frequency of play or how many other tickets you bought for the same drawing.

Buying more tickets certainly increases the overall likelihood of claiming a prize of some sort, even if it's extremely likely to end up below what you spent on the tickets. Spending $1,000 on Mega Millions tickets carries a nearly 50% probability of getting back $64 or less, a nearly 90% chance the prizes won won't total more than $92, and a 99% likelihood they won't top $554.

When the jackpots carry over and grow in size, those who buy tickets to the latest drawing can hope to claim some of the money spent by the luckless players on the prior ones. That may initially improve the expected return on a ticket, but as the higher jackpots and attendant publicity draw other players, the increased likelihood of having to share a jackpot, if you win, can lower expected returns below those on much lower jackpots.

Keep in mind that lottery game prizes account for only 50% of ticket receipts, like the Powerball.

This is scary information, mind you. Investopedia's blunt approach to addressing financial illiteracy, such as people who think supply and demand is just capitalist propaganda, aligns with my style of rhetoric. If we must look into the scary truth that you can never laugh away basic economic laws. Just think of the fact that a good example of a country that tried to ignore the laws of economics is Venezuela.

There's a statement, "Nobody gets rich from gambling but the casino!" Back to Investopedia, this is also one dangerous fact that we need to consider:

How Do Casinos Make Their Money?

Although casinos may earn some money from food, entertainment, and other venues, the breadwinner for the industry is the games. A significant portion of casino profits are the result of the accrual of all of the losses from casino patrons each year.

Does Playing More Increase the Odds of Winning?

The odds for each game are stacked in favor of the casino. This means that, the more you play, the more the math works against you, and the better the chances are of you walking out of the casino with less money in your wallet than when you came in.

Why doesn't the jackpot guarantee that you'll become rich?

This reminds me of a hypothetical scenario with my incident with that, what if the crazy female working student won the jackpot in between the time we met (2006) and up to this present day (2025). It would soon be 20 years since the incident. I heard that winning the jackpot doesn't guarantee a stop of gambling. It's like, for example, I look at my current investments at ATRAM (I will not disclose the amount, and neither should you disclose your investments in public), the more I think, "Rise some more!" However, given the amount of time equities (stocks) rise or fall, their volatility is nothing compared to gambling. In fact, one must always think that stocks aren't lottery tickets! I have the feeling of a high whenever the NAVPU goes up.

If there's something to think about, gambling is indeed addictive. What's even more tragic is when you realize that gamblers get a high even when they lose. It's an interesting piece of information that has become a clue as to why the jackpot couldn't guarantee you'll become rich. Now, time for a bit of truly scary information from the Gateway Foundation:
Compulsive gambling shows signs of measurable changes in your brain chemistry. As a behavioral addiction, gambling addiction is closely connected with how the brain’s reward system functions. Specifically, the effect that gambling has on your brain’s levels of dopamine — a chemical messenger that causes feelings of pleasure — is what makes gambling so addicting.

Hitting the jackpot releases dopamine, generating exceptionally good feelings each time a gambler wins. Once you’ve experienced the rush of dopamine brought on by a gambling win, you’ll do almost anything to experience that same amount of pleasure again.

The dopamine release from gambling makes it easy to gamble repetitively without a second thought. Before you know it, gambling can become a habit and an addiction. Those with a severe gambling addiction can even get caught up in the “dark flow” — a trance-like state in which players get absorbed into a gambling game for hours.

However, as someone gambles more and more, their brain begins to build up a tolerance for the dopamine released by gambling. Over time, the brain’s reward system gets overused, and betting the exact amounts does not produce the rush of good feelings that it once did. When the brain’s reward system is blunted, those craving more dopamine must take bigger and bigger risks to achieve the same high.

Once a gambling addiction reaches this point, people will struggle to stop placing bets. Since gambling triggers the same dopamine release as using a drug, compulsive gamblers can also experience withdrawal symptoms when they stop. In these cases, people need professional help and support to recover from their addiction.

Let's just say I hit the jackpot. What happens next is that because of a gambling win, the dopamine surge may be a lot higher than when somebody had stock market gains from 5-10 years of boring investment. The same could be true for the day trader who might get a 20% increase of the money within the day. However, that's all by chance, not financial discipline. In short, a day trader who gets a 20% increase would now hope to get more than 20% increase also within the day. If I invest my coupons from a bond to GInvest is reinvesting, the jackpot money is regambled all over again.

Given the chances of losing vs. winning, hitting the jackpot means, "Okay, I got the jackpot but it's not enough." It might result in more than just overspending the jackpot money. The dopamine surge would mean that instead of stopping after winning the jackpot, the dopamine surge from winning the jacpot, will encourage the gambler, to well, regamble the money

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Many MORE Unmitigated Typhoon Disasters Before Filipinos Realize That the Filipino First Policy is FAILING Them?!

GMA Network I remember surviving through Typhoon Odette last 2022. Tino happened on November 6, 2025, which also reminds me that Yolanda's anniversary came two days later . Yolanda was even worse than Odette! Thankfully, Cebu City's impact wasn't as bad, and power didn't take too long to return, unlike Yolanda. However, seeing news reports such as an investigation done against Slater Young's project in Monterazzas de Cebu should highlight a bigger problem. Looking at the photos of floods on Facebook makes me think, "How many more unmitigated typhoon disasters until Filipinos realize that the Filipino First Policy is failing them and that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines  badly needs updates?"  For die-hard defenders like Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (who will turn 90 this December 20) or Atty. Christian Monsod (who's 89 this year), they're prone to saying that it's just a matter of implementation . However, whether we want to admit it...

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...

Filipino First Policy Also Responsible That ONLY 2/10 Pinoys Have Emergency Funds

Yes, it's been a day since Typhoon Tino. It was a stormy, scary time, and I thought about how expenses were piling up after I was hit by Typhoon Odette . Thankfully, I had contingency savings at that time. However, with Uswan moving upwards and entering another area of the Philippine Area of Responsibility, I considered the issue of emergency savings. I thought about how Christmas can be the most stressful time of the year, with issues such as traffic caused by last-minute Christmas shopping . This time, I thought about some not-so-surprising statistics on Filipinos. It turns out that   only 2/10  Filipinos have enough emergency savings .  This should be considered disturbing,  and this is another thing I failed to consider in my younger, more foolish years, according to the Philippine Star : Commissioned by insurance firm EastWest Ageas, the PURPLE Report conducted by consumer intelligence company NielsenIQ showed that most Filipinos only have P50,000 in emerg...

Davide Contradicts Himself by Having Experience as a UN DIPLOMAT While Supporting the Filipino First Policy

October is United Nations Month. I would like to bring up the issue of Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr., the favorite source and echo chamber of the anti-constitutional reform groups. I wrote an earlier post where I asked to whom Filipinos should listen to between Kishore Mahbubani and Davide, that Davide was actually a former UN diplomat , until such time of his honorable resignation . I Googled "Hilario Davide Jr. United Nations" and discovered Davide actually studied in SOKA University, during the time he was a UN diplomat ! I would even want to share these words written by Davide, 50 years after Soka University was founded. In just fifty years from its founding on April 2, 1971, our SOKA University has more than fully proven itself as the "highest seat of learning for humanistic education; cradle of a new culture; and a fortress of peace for mankind." It has gone beyond the borders of a great nation through various units in other parts of the world and its comprehens...

Instead of Hating Successful Chinese-Filipinos, Why Not LEARN from Their SUCCESS Instead?

It's Chinese New Year and I can remember some crazy stuff back in my childhood. Right now though, there are still some Filipinos of brown descent (either Malay or Indonesian) who still have their typical bitter attitude towards successful people. I was reminded of someone who blamed the rich, rather than their poor attitude towards money, as to why she had to work as a working student. There are still some who have their attitude of hating the rich for simply being rich . I don't deny that some rich people deserve hate. But why hate the rich person who has gotten rich through honest gain and hard work? Why not learn from good rich people who can offer sound advice instead of being bitter about their success?  Some Filipinos of non-Chinese origin may feel too proud about their being "Pure Filipino". However, any study of Filipino history will reveal that their brown skin isn't too unique. We can see Malaysians and Indonesians tend to have brown skin. Some of the ea...

Phishing Can Be Done By the LEGALLY EMPLOYED in LEGITIMATE Financial Institutions

It might be easy for some to ignore the obvious phishing emails such as a complete stranger asking for money, a too-good-to-be-true employment offer, a Ponzi scheme offering huge returns in such a short time, a pyramid scam that promises to pay you every time you recruit, etc. when you've guilt some experience. I was once hit by a pyramid scam and lost a small amount of money. I decided not to pursue recruiting because I was too busy trying to get my bachelor's degree in business administration. However, what's so often ignored is the world of employee fraud. Besides, some phishing activities can be done by legally employed financial institution employees. Don't believe me? Well, I believe that's what happened to me today when I lost some money in a GCash "verification" process since it looked so legitimate. Apparently, the GCash scam was done were legally employed staff and not some programmer. Some people are so greedy that they want money fast regardles...

My Experience with Mr. India and Its Successor, Bollywood Tandoor

#NindotKaayo I could remember back then when Mr. India opened in Gaisano Country Mall before it was closed down and replaced by Rusty's. Back then, I was quite wary of Indian restaurants because of my experience with a restaurant I'll not name but I felt I was five-sixed by it. I remembered learning to drive and going to Gaisano Country Mall to try Mr. India around in 2014. It was a nice, cozy place that served affordable Indian food.  The owner, Gulab "Soni" Vasnani was the one to try and challenge the stereotypes. I think one of the best strategies he did was to allow some customization in spicy levels. Some like it spicy and some like it mild. I did try to eat at Little India and had my food ordered mild . Indian food can be too spicy for some such as how the South Indian style restaurants carry theirs. My first picks were chicken curry, vegetable shawarma (which had tofu), Indian bread (especially their paratha), and some of their biryani. It was pretty much a goo...

Refuting the Myth that Only FDIs Will Get Rich If You Invite Them to Do Business in Your Home Country

Assignment Point 2022 is just around the corner. It's really something to think that some Filipinos still don't understand economics. I remembered talking about the need for economic liberalization. However, the common misconception about foreign direct investment (FDI) can be linked to nonsense such as, "Why will you let them invest here? Only they will get rich!" This is baloney when you've got access to the rich digital media to access real great constitutional experts who made their country great. I would be referring to great men such as former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir bin Mohamad, the late Lee Kuan Yew of Singapore, Deng Xiaoping of China, Kishore Mahbubani the former dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore. Maybe, we can also talk about how foreign investments played a role with the administrations of Fidel V. Ramos, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, and the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III (Noynoy).  Foreig...

The STUPIDITY of Insisting that Equity Restrictions in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines Exist for "National Security"

As the call for economic charter change goes on, I feel the need to educate some people with common sense . I'm reading comments on Facebook that 60-40 (or any similar ownership restrictions) is for the "security of the Philippines" or that certain sectors can't be allowed 100% ownership on the part of the MNC. Once again, do I need to remind people for the nth time that 100% FDI ownership is all about share ownership ? Sadly, many Filipinos misunderstand what 100% FDI means (read here ). What 100% FDI ownership means is that MNCs don't need to look for a Filipino partner, only to be burdened with having to give up 60% (or more) of the net profits after taxes  and they only keep 40% (or less). That's why I called such an arrangement as overpriced rent (read here ). Some of these people I ran into on Facebook (of all places) are too beholden to Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. It was last 2018 when Davide Jr. also said that the Philippines may become a "colony ...

Talking Economics with an Overeating Glutton

Two years ago, I wrote an entry about why discussing economics with an overspender is frustrating . Now, I was looking at certain fat people who say really dumb things about economics. Just recently, I was looking at a certain fat idiot (fortunately, he only has 1K+ followers) who posted on Facebook that not only will the parliamentary system cause the Philippines to become a dictatorship, but he also says that changing economic provisions will cause the Philippines to collapse and the country to fall into the hands of foreigners. I won't name the person out to avoid getting personal. However, the person is apparently very fat and he blames capitalism day in and day out. The person even says that businessmen do nothing and it's the employers that do everything. Has that fat slob ever heard that businesses are run by bosses and that if the bosses do screw up, they're the ones who are the most answerable? The employees are the cogs and the boss runs the cogs. I was looking at...