Skip to main content

The SCARY Truth About Trying to Get Rich Quick Gambling

Freepik

Two years ago, last October 2023, I wrote an article where I described that the pera-normal settings are resultss of mismanagement. I was running out of ideas, but thankfully, Gemini AI, with its combination of right and wrong answers (that's why double-checking is important), has helped me out of writer's block. I would like to state that because October means Halloween for some, I decided to write this post where I address the scary truth about gambling. This reminds me of the irony of turning down investing in favor of gambling, such as the irony of "investing" in Axie Infinity after pulling out of AXA, or the stupidity of buying lottery tickets in hopes of getting rich.

Back in 2012, I remember losing a huge sum of money to a family friend, who was a habitual gamber. Some people even play mahjong until the crack of dawn, hoping to get rich fast. In another situation, I remember hearing of people who keep playing the lottery, hoping to get rich. This reminds me of the sob story of some crazy female working student, who mentioned how her family keeps buying lottery tickets after work, and she contributes via her silly song and dance. I got mad at her sob story back then. However, after realizing that trying to discipline every single Filipino isn't a sound economic plan, I realized that the crazy girl and her family were but symptoms of a much higher problem. They were the effect and not the cause of bad economic policies, such as the Filipino First Policy. But let's not dwell on that. Instead, I would like to focus on gambling for now.

The mathematics of probability shows the scary truth about gambling

A gamble means to bet on an uncertain outcome. This is the problem with gambling. When you're going gambling, it means that anything you gamble is based on an uncertain outcome. In the study of statistics, we have the mathematics of probability. This time, I'll cite from Investopedia, which is again, another material that my socialist hippie critics hate. This is the sad truth about gambling probabilities of winning:
Math is the universal language, and it rarely ever lies. Each game you play at a casino has a statistical probability against you winning—every single time. While this house advantage varies for each game, it ultimately helps to ensure that over time, the casino won’t lose money to gamblers.

For people who are really good at blackjack, the advantage for the casino might be only 0.5%, but certain types of slot machines might have a 35% edge over a player—and other games fall somewhere in between. The slot machine odds are often some of the worst, ranging from a one-in-5,000 to one-in-about-34-million chance of winning the top prize when using the maximum coin play. 
The house advantage obviously isn’t insurmountable—people do win, sometimes substantially. However, it does mean that the more you play, the more the math works against you, and the better the chances are of you walking out of the casino with less money in your wallet than when you came in.

In fact, playing the lottery is gambling. I tend to laugh (and cringe) whenever that incorrigible female working student, who kept talking about her family woes, and how they've been buying some lottery tickets, hoping to get rich. In fact, Investopedia reveals this sad data about lottery tickets:

Independent Probability

Of course, someone has to win the jackpot. But don't let that certainty cloud your judgment. The rules of probability dictate you do not increase your lottery odds by playing more frequently, nor by betting larger amounts on each drawing. Each lottery ticket has the same odds of winning no matter how many you buy. Each one has independent probability not altered by the frequency of play or how many other tickets you bought for the same drawing.

Buying more tickets certainly increases the overall likelihood of claiming a prize of some sort, even if it's extremely likely to end up below what you spent on the tickets. Spending $1,000 on Mega Millions tickets carries a nearly 50% probability of getting back $64 or less, a nearly 90% chance the prizes won won't total more than $92, and a 99% likelihood they won't top $554.

When the jackpots carry over and grow in size, those who buy tickets to the latest drawing can hope to claim some of the money spent by the luckless players on the prior ones. That may initially improve the expected return on a ticket, but as the higher jackpots and attendant publicity draw other players, the increased likelihood of having to share a jackpot, if you win, can lower expected returns below those on much lower jackpots.

Keep in mind that lottery game prizes account for only 50% of ticket receipts, like the Powerball.

This is scary information, mind you. Investopedia's blunt approach to addressing financial illiteracy, such as people who think supply and demand is just capitalist propaganda, aligns with my style of rhetoric. If we must look into the scary truth that you can never laugh away basic economic laws. Just think of the fact that a good example of a country that tried to ignore the laws of economics is Venezuela.

There's a statement, "Nobody gets rich from gambling but the casino!" Back to Investopedia, this is also one dangerous fact that we need to consider:

How Do Casinos Make Their Money?

Although casinos may earn some money from food, entertainment, and other venues, the breadwinner for the industry is the games. A significant portion of casino profits are the result of the accrual of all of the losses from casino patrons each year.

Does Playing More Increase the Odds of Winning?

The odds for each game are stacked in favor of the casino. This means that, the more you play, the more the math works against you, and the better the chances are of you walking out of the casino with less money in your wallet than when you came in.

Why doesn't the jackpot guarantee that you'll become rich?

This reminds me of a hypothetical scenario with my incident with that, what if the crazy female working student won the jackpot in between the time we met (2006) and up to this present day (2025). It would soon be 20 years since the incident. I heard that winning the jackpot doesn't guarantee a stop of gambling. It's like, for example, I look at my current investments at ATRAM (I will not disclose the amount, and neither should you disclose your investments in public), the more I think, "Rise some more!" However, given the amount of time equities (stocks) rise or fall, their volatility is nothing compared to gambling. In fact, one must always think that stocks aren't lottery tickets! I have the feeling of a high whenever the NAVPU goes up.

If there's something to think about, gambling is indeed addictive. What's even more tragic is when you realize that gamblers get a high even when they lose. It's an interesting piece of information that has become a clue as to why the jackpot couldn't guarantee you'll become rich. Now, time for a bit of truly scary information from the Gateway Foundation:
Compulsive gambling shows signs of measurable changes in your brain chemistry. As a behavioral addiction, gambling addiction is closely connected with how the brain’s reward system functions. Specifically, the effect that gambling has on your brain’s levels of dopamine — a chemical messenger that causes feelings of pleasure — is what makes gambling so addicting.

Hitting the jackpot releases dopamine, generating exceptionally good feelings each time a gambler wins. Once you’ve experienced the rush of dopamine brought on by a gambling win, you’ll do almost anything to experience that same amount of pleasure again.

The dopamine release from gambling makes it easy to gamble repetitively without a second thought. Before you know it, gambling can become a habit and an addiction. Those with a severe gambling addiction can even get caught up in the “dark flow” — a trance-like state in which players get absorbed into a gambling game for hours.

However, as someone gambles more and more, their brain begins to build up a tolerance for the dopamine released by gambling. Over time, the brain’s reward system gets overused, and betting the exact amounts does not produce the rush of good feelings that it once did. When the brain’s reward system is blunted, those craving more dopamine must take bigger and bigger risks to achieve the same high.

Once a gambling addiction reaches this point, people will struggle to stop placing bets. Since gambling triggers the same dopamine release as using a drug, compulsive gamblers can also experience withdrawal symptoms when they stop. In these cases, people need professional help and support to recover from their addiction.

Let's just say I hit the jackpot. What happens next is that because of a gambling win, the dopamine surge may be a lot higher than when somebody had stock market gains from 5-10 years of boring investment. The same could be true for the day trader who might get a 20% increase of the money within the day. However, that's all by chance, not financial discipline. In short, a day trader who gets a 20% increase would now hope to get more than 20% increase also within the day. If I invest my coupons from a bond to GInvest is reinvesting, the jackpot money is regambled all over again.

Given the chances of losing vs. winning, hitting the jackpot means, "Okay, I got the jackpot but it's not enough." It might result in more than just overspending the jackpot money. The dopamine surge would mean that instead of stopping after winning the jackpot, the dopamine surge from winning the jacpot, will encourage the gambler, to well, regamble the money

Popular posts from this blog

Opening #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Stores Nationwide Increases POGO-Related Risks (NOT FDI)

Alice Guo aka Guo Hua-Ping may be in jail now . However, I believe the saga is far from over . It reminds me that I actually wrote about how several idiots on Facebook go so far as to say, " Alice Guo should be a warning about open FDI! " Some have even gone as far as to say that POGO and Chinese spies should "justify" the Filipino First Policy . However, the harsher reality is that the Filipino First Policy may actually be encouraging dummy investors instead ! As the saga continues, I've decided to write what I might call my harshest entry yet. It's going to be Chinese New Year this year. This might be an entry that may need to be shared before the Lunar New Year! My grievances are  still ongoing because some people still demand #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, no matter how destructive it  will be . That's why I use Venezuela as an example, especially during Nicolas Maduro's downfall . Back to the topic, I remember writing a joke post where I said, "Wh...

Social Media Gossipers' Ad Hominems Against Actor Robin Padilla Regarding His Proposal to Remove 60-40

Make no mistake that I didn't vote for Robin Padilla. I feel like I've had enough of voting for celebrities, athletes, and those who I felt are know-nothings in the legislative. However, Padilla recently had his proposal to remove the 60-40 restrictions regarding foreign direct investments (FDIs) . Former Philippine Vice President Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo was even in favor of that amendment. I guess that's why Philippine economist Andrew James Masigan endorsed Robredo. I may have not endorsed Robredo while Masigan remains to be one of my favorite local sources. The news from GMA News Online reveals these plans by Padilla himself: Senator Robin Padilla said he wanted to revise the Constitution to scrap the 60-40 rule on foreign ownership of businesses to accelerate job creation and competition among industries . In a Monday interview, Padilla said the move would attract more foreign investments to support the country’s economic recovery. “Para sa akin mas...

Should Noynoy Aquino be a Valid Excuse to Reject Econ Cha Cha?

Philippine Star   Updated January 25, 2025 This may be a touchy post. Politics is often a source of fights during parties. That's why we're told not to talk about politics during parties. Unfortunately, some people on Facebook are now using the late Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino Jr. as an excuse not to execute even economic charter change. Never mind that blatant supporter of Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo, Andrew James Masigan, supports economic charter change . The late Charles Edward P. Celdran was also an anti-Duterte critic. As I looked at some okay boomer posts, I'm not surprised at people who still use Noynoy as an excuse to shout with all their might, "No to economic charter change!" Somebody posted on Facebook the following. As always, I won't publicly shame anyone. If possible, I will only refer to them by codenames or use the name Anonymous. I want to remain as professional as possible. This person said that under N...

The Great Reversal: Democratic Philippines Became MORE Dependent on COMMUNIST Vietnam for Rice

Bao Thanh Nien On January 24, 2026, I read from the Philippine Star Facebook page  that a vendor from Baseco, Tondo, is selling Vietnamese rice at PHP 20.00 per kilo. Honestly, it made me laugh over President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr.'s promise. Was this rice from Vietnam a rice surplus if it wasn't premium rice? My experience with rice selling was with wholesale,  and it was a very different time. What I learned in the late 2000s to 2012 may no longer be applicable today.  Taking a look back at the history of Vietnam and the Philippines before Doi Moi This time, I decided to go with history because a certain someone on Facebook (as always, I will not mention names as much as possible) has actually called it that the Philippines' dependency on Vietnam for rice, despite the International Rice Research Institute being actually located in Pili Drive, Los Baños, Laguna 4031, Philippines. This guy (whom I nickname Porky due to his obesity) I just mentioned, sp...

An Interesting Mental Exercise for Chinese as Second Language Class

Back in my day, I remember we kept memorizing what was called bon toi (written as 问题, Wèntí in Mandarin) without understanding them. I hated memorizing those. I guess another reason was to parrot what one can't understand. We had the biak diam too which is Hokkien for oral recitation. Memorizing the question and answer (written as 问题和答案, Wèntí hé dá'àn in Mandarin) would actually not be so tedious if Chinese was taught as a second language. My bizarre idea is to think about having only one bon toi but there are five answers to memorize.  Memorizing (and understanding) why some don't want to learn Chinese These five reasons (above) have to be memorized in both Chinese and English. The teacher (老师, Lǎoshī) would say the question,  "不学中文的最大借口是什么?" (Bù xué zhōngwén de zuìdà jièkǒu shì shénme?). The question can't be answered  until  the student actually translated it as, "What are the top excuses not to learn Chinese?"  The student will eval...