Skip to main content

The SCARY Truth About Trying to Get Rich Quick Gambling

Freepik

Two years ago, last October 2023, I wrote an article where I described that the pera-normal settings are resultss of mismanagement. I was running out of ideas, but thankfully, Gemini AI, with its combination of right and wrong answers (that's why double-checking is important), has helped me out of writer's block. I would like to state that because October means Halloween for some, I decided to write this post where I address the scary truth about gambling. This reminds me of the irony of turning down investing in favor of gambling, such as the irony of "investing" in Axie Infinity after pulling out of AXA, or the stupidity of buying lottery tickets in hopes of getting rich.

Back in 2012, I remember losing a huge sum of money to a family friend, who was a habitual gamber. Some people even play mahjong until the crack of dawn, hoping to get rich fast. In another situation, I remember hearing of people who keep playing the lottery, hoping to get rich. This reminds me of the sob story of some crazy female working student, who mentioned how her family keeps buying lottery tickets after work, and she contributes via her silly song and dance. I got mad at her sob story back then. However, after realizing that trying to discipline every single Filipino isn't a sound economic plan, I realized that the crazy girl and her family were but symptoms of a much higher problem. They were the effect and not the cause of bad economic policies, such as the Filipino First Policy. But let's not dwell on that. Instead, I would like to focus on gambling for now.

The mathematics of probability shows the scary truth about gambling

A gamble means to bet on an uncertain outcome. This is the problem with gambling. When you're going gambling, it means that anything you gamble is based on an uncertain outcome. In the study of statistics, we have the mathematics of probability. This time, I'll cite from Investopedia, which is again, another material that my socialist hippie critics hate. This is the sad truth about gambling probabilities of winning:
Math is the universal language, and it rarely ever lies. Each game you play at a casino has a statistical probability against you winning—every single time. While this house advantage varies for each game, it ultimately helps to ensure that over time, the casino won’t lose money to gamblers.

For people who are really good at blackjack, the advantage for the casino might be only 0.5%, but certain types of slot machines might have a 35% edge over a player—and other games fall somewhere in between. The slot machine odds are often some of the worst, ranging from a one-in-5,000 to one-in-about-34-million chance of winning the top prize when using the maximum coin play. 
The house advantage obviously isn’t insurmountable—people do win, sometimes substantially. However, it does mean that the more you play, the more the math works against you, and the better the chances are of you walking out of the casino with less money in your wallet than when you came in.

In fact, playing the lottery is gambling. I tend to laugh (and cringe) whenever that incorrigible female working student, who kept talking about her family woes, and how they've been buying some lottery tickets, hoping to get rich. In fact, Investopedia reveals this sad data about lottery tickets:

Independent Probability

Of course, someone has to win the jackpot. But don't let that certainty cloud your judgment. The rules of probability dictate you do not increase your lottery odds by playing more frequently, nor by betting larger amounts on each drawing. Each lottery ticket has the same odds of winning no matter how many you buy. Each one has independent probability not altered by the frequency of play or how many other tickets you bought for the same drawing.

Buying more tickets certainly increases the overall likelihood of claiming a prize of some sort, even if it's extremely likely to end up below what you spent on the tickets. Spending $1,000 on Mega Millions tickets carries a nearly 50% probability of getting back $64 or less, a nearly 90% chance the prizes won won't total more than $92, and a 99% likelihood they won't top $554.

When the jackpots carry over and grow in size, those who buy tickets to the latest drawing can hope to claim some of the money spent by the luckless players on the prior ones. That may initially improve the expected return on a ticket, but as the higher jackpots and attendant publicity draw other players, the increased likelihood of having to share a jackpot, if you win, can lower expected returns below those on much lower jackpots.

Keep in mind that lottery game prizes account for only 50% of ticket receipts, like the Powerball.

This is scary information, mind you. Investopedia's blunt approach to addressing financial illiteracy, such as people who think supply and demand is just capitalist propaganda, aligns with my style of rhetoric. If we must look into the scary truth that you can never laugh away basic economic laws. Just think of the fact that a good example of a country that tried to ignore the laws of economics is Venezuela.

There's a statement, "Nobody gets rich from gambling but the casino!" Back to Investopedia, this is also one dangerous fact that we need to consider:

How Do Casinos Make Their Money?

Although casinos may earn some money from food, entertainment, and other venues, the breadwinner for the industry is the games. A significant portion of casino profits are the result of the accrual of all of the losses from casino patrons each year.

Does Playing More Increase the Odds of Winning?

The odds for each game are stacked in favor of the casino. This means that, the more you play, the more the math works against you, and the better the chances are of you walking out of the casino with less money in your wallet than when you came in.

Why doesn't the jackpot guarantee that you'll become rich?

This reminds me of a hypothetical scenario with my incident with that, what if the crazy female working student won the jackpot in between the time we met (2006) and up to this present day (2025). It would soon be 20 years since the incident. I heard that winning the jackpot doesn't guarantee a stop of gambling. It's like, for example, I look at my current investments at ATRAM (I will not disclose the amount, and neither should you disclose your investments in public), the more I think, "Rise some more!" However, given the amount of time equities (stocks) rise or fall, their volatility is nothing compared to gambling. In fact, one must always think that stocks aren't lottery tickets! I have the feeling of a high whenever the NAVPU goes up.

If there's something to think about, gambling is indeed addictive. What's even more tragic is when you realize that gamblers get a high even when they lose. It's an interesting piece of information that has become a clue as to why the jackpot couldn't guarantee you'll become rich. Now, time for a bit of truly scary information from the Gateway Foundation:
Compulsive gambling shows signs of measurable changes in your brain chemistry. As a behavioral addiction, gambling addiction is closely connected with how the brain’s reward system functions. Specifically, the effect that gambling has on your brain’s levels of dopamine — a chemical messenger that causes feelings of pleasure — is what makes gambling so addicting.

Hitting the jackpot releases dopamine, generating exceptionally good feelings each time a gambler wins. Once you’ve experienced the rush of dopamine brought on by a gambling win, you’ll do almost anything to experience that same amount of pleasure again.

The dopamine release from gambling makes it easy to gamble repetitively without a second thought. Before you know it, gambling can become a habit and an addiction. Those with a severe gambling addiction can even get caught up in the “dark flow” — a trance-like state in which players get absorbed into a gambling game for hours.

However, as someone gambles more and more, their brain begins to build up a tolerance for the dopamine released by gambling. Over time, the brain’s reward system gets overused, and betting the exact amounts does not produce the rush of good feelings that it once did. When the brain’s reward system is blunted, those craving more dopamine must take bigger and bigger risks to achieve the same high.

Once a gambling addiction reaches this point, people will struggle to stop placing bets. Since gambling triggers the same dopamine release as using a drug, compulsive gamblers can also experience withdrawal symptoms when they stop. In these cases, people need professional help and support to recover from their addiction.

Let's just say I hit the jackpot. What happens next is that because of a gambling win, the dopamine surge may be a lot higher than when somebody had stock market gains from 5-10 years of boring investment. The same could be true for the day trader who might get a 20% increase of the money within the day. However, that's all by chance, not financial discipline. In short, a day trader who gets a 20% increase would now hope to get more than 20% increase also within the day. If I invest my coupons from a bond to GInvest is reinvesting, the jackpot money is regambled all over again.

Given the chances of losing vs. winning, hitting the jackpot means, "Okay, I got the jackpot but it's not enough." It might result in more than just overspending the jackpot money. The dopamine surge would mean that instead of stopping after winning the jackpot, the dopamine surge from winning the jacpot, will encourage the gambler, to well, regamble the money. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

"Will #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics Lower Philippine Gas Prices?

Inquirer Gasoline prices have increased again, haven't they?  A few days ago, I wrote  why #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba's view of gas prices is questionable . Today, I feel like writing this after several complaints on Facebook. I would like to create a follow-up post. People are complaining too much without understanding the real reason why some countries have lower prices of gasoline. Real talk. We need to talk about economic policies,  and  of course, please do a study on supply-demand analysis  on supply chain management . Let's examine the complaints made by Bulatlat Bulatlat Here's a chart from Bulatlat that compares the increase in prices of gasoline between the Philippines, Thailand, and Malaysia. It's always problematic when people ignore simple economics. It's funny, but Bulatlat mentions this on their website: Note also how expensive our diesel and gasoline products are compared to those of our ASEAN neighbors. The estimated common price today of diesel in...
Read more

The Good Old Days when Gasoline was Cheaper Under the Late Noynoy Aquino

Millennials' Voice I would like to clarify first and foremost that this post isn't an attempt to say that the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III's legacy was all bad. Some good things happened. However, let me be clear that it's stupid to say, " We don't need economic cha-cha because of the late Noynoy. " However, let me clear that I decided to write this because of a Facebook post called Millennials' Voice , which wrote this: Did you know that during President Noynoy Aquino's time, the price of oil in the world market was high, between $100 and $110 per barrel. But even with those high prices, gasoline and diesel at local pumps in the country were still relatively affordable.  Under President Duterte, world oil prices went up and down, from a low of $41 to a high of $101 per barrel. The big jump to $101 in 2022 happened because of the war between Russia and Ukraine.   Now, under the current president, world oil prices have gone up again to around $...
Read more

#SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics' Understanding of How Gasoline Prices Work

International State College of the Philippines Today is Flor Contempacion Day , and rallies are expected. However, whether it's Flor's death anniversary or not, rallies are expected for the wrongest of reasons. I would like to address this photo from the International State College of the Philippines' Facebook page. The demands here are rather clunky and stupid. We have the following demands that would naturally clash with each other, such as: No to the oil deregulation law while demanding lower oil prices. This is simply ignoring the basic fundamentals of economics, namely the law of supply and demand . They say that oil companies are greedy for gain. These rallyists probably don't really understand the difference between revenues and profits . Let's understand the Oil Deregulation Law  The Oil Deregulation Law, or the Republic Act No. 8479 , passed on February 10, 1998, under the late Fidel Valdez Ramos. Here's how the liberalization works: CHAPTER II  LIBERAL...
Read more

The Myth of "Invading" Other Countries Through Foreign Investors and Overseas Filipino Workers

BoardGameGeek Years ago, I could remember how "Filipino pride" seems to be required by the DECS. Some songs in the Filipino subject (or called Tagalog) tend to glorify it. One of the songs was called "Ako'y Isang Pinoy" (or "I'm Pinoy") feels ironic since it was played on an imported music player. We had discussions for years about how Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) are often the unsung heroes or the new heroes. The mentality kept going on with how people desired to take a particular course not because they wanted to--it's because they wanted to go abroad. Why I wanted to take Bachelor of Science in Information Technology (BSIT) was not just to impress people but also to go abroad . However, more people shifted away from BSIT either because they were eliminated (common cause) or because it was too hard for them. Some of them flat out admitted that they took BSIT in hopes of going abroad. Some were taking nursing in hopes of again-- going abro...
Read more

Learning from the Late Lee Kuan Yew's Proving Protectionist-Driven Economists Wrong About Multinational Corporations

Reading the book From Third World to First is really a must. The late Lee Kuan Yew was faced with the mentality of the development economists of his day. Here's an excerpt from "Chapter 4--Surviving Without a Hinterland" which I'd like to share from Pages 57-58: After several years of disheartening trial and error, we concluded that Singapore's best hope lay with the American multinational corporations (MNCs). When the Taiwanese and Hong Kong entrepreneurs came in the 1960s, they brought low technology such as textile and toy manufacturing, labor-intensive but not large-scale. American MNCs brought higher technology in large-scale operations, creating many jobs. They had weight and confidence. They believed that their government was going to stay in Southeast Asia and their businesses were safe from confiscation or war loss. I gradually crystallized my thoughts and settled on a two-pronged strategy to overcome our disadvantages. The first was to leapfrog the reg...
Read more