Skip to main content

The SCARY Truth About Trying to Get Rich Quick Gambling

Freepik

Two years ago, last October 2023, I wrote an article where I described that the pera-normal settings are resultss of mismanagement. I was running out of ideas, but thankfully, Gemini AI, with its combination of right and wrong answers (that's why double-checking is important), has helped me out of writer's block. I would like to state that because October means Halloween for some, I decided to write this post where I address the scary truth about gambling. This reminds me of the irony of turning down investing in favor of gambling, such as the irony of "investing" in Axie Infinity after pulling out of AXA, or the stupidity of buying lottery tickets in hopes of getting rich.

Back in 2012, I remember losing a huge sum of money to a family friend, who was a habitual gamber. Some people even play mahjong until the crack of dawn, hoping to get rich fast. In another situation, I remember hearing of people who keep playing the lottery, hoping to get rich. This reminds me of the sob story of some crazy female working student, who mentioned how her family keeps buying lottery tickets after work, and she contributes via her silly song and dance. I got mad at her sob story back then. However, after realizing that trying to discipline every single Filipino isn't a sound economic plan, I realized that the crazy girl and her family were but symptoms of a much higher problem. They were the effect and not the cause of bad economic policies, such as the Filipino First Policy. But let's not dwell on that. Instead, I would like to focus on gambling for now.

The mathematics of probability shows the scary truth about gambling

A gamble means to bet on an uncertain outcome. This is the problem with gambling. When you're going gambling, it means that anything you gamble is based on an uncertain outcome. In the study of statistics, we have the mathematics of probability. This time, I'll cite from Investopedia, which is again, another material that my socialist hippie critics hate. This is the sad truth about gambling probabilities of winning:
Math is the universal language, and it rarely ever lies. Each game you play at a casino has a statistical probability against you winning—every single time. While this house advantage varies for each game, it ultimately helps to ensure that over time, the casino won’t lose money to gamblers.

For people who are really good at blackjack, the advantage for the casino might be only 0.5%, but certain types of slot machines might have a 35% edge over a player—and other games fall somewhere in between. The slot machine odds are often some of the worst, ranging from a one-in-5,000 to one-in-about-34-million chance of winning the top prize when using the maximum coin play. 
The house advantage obviously isn’t insurmountable—people do win, sometimes substantially. However, it does mean that the more you play, the more the math works against you, and the better the chances are of you walking out of the casino with less money in your wallet than when you came in.

In fact, playing the lottery is gambling. I tend to laugh (and cringe) whenever that incorrigible female working student, who kept talking about her family woes, and how they've been buying some lottery tickets, hoping to get rich. In fact, Investopedia reveals this sad data about lottery tickets:

Independent Probability

Of course, someone has to win the jackpot. But don't let that certainty cloud your judgment. The rules of probability dictate you do not increase your lottery odds by playing more frequently, nor by betting larger amounts on each drawing. Each lottery ticket has the same odds of winning no matter how many you buy. Each one has independent probability not altered by the frequency of play or how many other tickets you bought for the same drawing.

Buying more tickets certainly increases the overall likelihood of claiming a prize of some sort, even if it's extremely likely to end up below what you spent on the tickets. Spending $1,000 on Mega Millions tickets carries a nearly 50% probability of getting back $64 or less, a nearly 90% chance the prizes won won't total more than $92, and a 99% likelihood they won't top $554.

When the jackpots carry over and grow in size, those who buy tickets to the latest drawing can hope to claim some of the money spent by the luckless players on the prior ones. That may initially improve the expected return on a ticket, but as the higher jackpots and attendant publicity draw other players, the increased likelihood of having to share a jackpot, if you win, can lower expected returns below those on much lower jackpots.

Keep in mind that lottery game prizes account for only 50% of ticket receipts, like the Powerball.

This is scary information, mind you. Investopedia's blunt approach to addressing financial illiteracy, such as people who think supply and demand is just capitalist propaganda, aligns with my style of rhetoric. If we must look into the scary truth that you can never laugh away basic economic laws. Just think of the fact that a good example of a country that tried to ignore the laws of economics is Venezuela.

There's a statement, "Nobody gets rich from gambling but the casino!" Back to Investopedia, this is also one dangerous fact that we need to consider:

How Do Casinos Make Their Money?

Although casinos may earn some money from food, entertainment, and other venues, the breadwinner for the industry is the games. A significant portion of casino profits are the result of the accrual of all of the losses from casino patrons each year.

Does Playing More Increase the Odds of Winning?

The odds for each game are stacked in favor of the casino. This means that, the more you play, the more the math works against you, and the better the chances are of you walking out of the casino with less money in your wallet than when you came in.

Why doesn't the jackpot guarantee that you'll become rich?

This reminds me of a hypothetical scenario with my incident with that, what if the crazy female working student won the jackpot in between the time we met (2006) and up to this present day (2025). It would soon be 20 years since the incident. I heard that winning the jackpot doesn't guarantee a stop of gambling. It's like, for example, I look at my current investments at ATRAM (I will not disclose the amount, and neither should you disclose your investments in public), the more I think, "Rise some more!" However, given the amount of time equities (stocks) rise or fall, their volatility is nothing compared to gambling. In fact, one must always think that stocks aren't lottery tickets! I have the feeling of a high whenever the NAVPU goes up.

If there's something to think about, gambling is indeed addictive. What's even more tragic is when you realize that gamblers get a high even when they lose. It's an interesting piece of information that has become a clue as to why the jackpot couldn't guarantee you'll become rich. Now, time for a bit of truly scary information from the Gateway Foundation:
Compulsive gambling shows signs of measurable changes in your brain chemistry. As a behavioral addiction, gambling addiction is closely connected with how the brain’s reward system functions. Specifically, the effect that gambling has on your brain’s levels of dopamine — a chemical messenger that causes feelings of pleasure — is what makes gambling so addicting.

Hitting the jackpot releases dopamine, generating exceptionally good feelings each time a gambler wins. Once you’ve experienced the rush of dopamine brought on by a gambling win, you’ll do almost anything to experience that same amount of pleasure again.

The dopamine release from gambling makes it easy to gamble repetitively without a second thought. Before you know it, gambling can become a habit and an addiction. Those with a severe gambling addiction can even get caught up in the “dark flow” — a trance-like state in which players get absorbed into a gambling game for hours.

However, as someone gambles more and more, their brain begins to build up a tolerance for the dopamine released by gambling. Over time, the brain’s reward system gets overused, and betting the exact amounts does not produce the rush of good feelings that it once did. When the brain’s reward system is blunted, those craving more dopamine must take bigger and bigger risks to achieve the same high.

Once a gambling addiction reaches this point, people will struggle to stop placing bets. Since gambling triggers the same dopamine release as using a drug, compulsive gamblers can also experience withdrawal symptoms when they stop. In these cases, people need professional help and support to recover from their addiction.

Let's just say I hit the jackpot. What happens next is that because of a gambling win, the dopamine surge may be a lot higher than when somebody had stock market gains from 5-10 years of boring investment. The same could be true for the day trader who might get a 20% increase of the money within the day. However, that's all by chance, not financial discipline. In short, a day trader who gets a 20% increase would now hope to get more than 20% increase also within the day. If I invest my coupons from a bond to GInvest is reinvesting, the jackpot money is regambled all over again.

Given the chances of losing vs. winning, hitting the jackpot means, "Okay, I got the jackpot but it's not enough." It might result in more than just overspending the jackpot money. The dopamine surge would mean that instead of stopping after winning the jackpot, the dopamine surge from winning the jacpot, will encourage the gambler, to well, regamble the money

Popular posts from this blog

Toxic Positivity: Shielding Our ECONOMICALLY OUTDATED Constitution

ABS-CBN News I thought about what life was like in the late 1990s. It was a boomer vs. millennial clash . I remember how often I kept complaining about high school during the K+10 era. Even worse, the real problem why I hated school was that school cared more about grades for the sake of grades , instead of teaching students how to get good grades based on learning first. What may have compounded it is that we've had boomer parents who thought that fatigue is a badge of honor .  What I realized is the common problem of toxic positivity . We have the "good vibes only" or "everything will turn out right in the end". Sadly, life doesn't always turn out that way. You can tell a terminally ill cancer patient that, and the cancer patient would die anyway. No amount of toxic positivity ever fixes the problem. This time, I'd like to rant once more about how toxic positivity has been used to defend the outdated 1987 Constitutio of the Philippines.  The classic r...

The 2026 Iran War Audit vs. OFW-Reliant Pinoy Pride Economists

It's a shame, really, that I didn't think about writing this article on OFWs again. I got somewhat fixated on the  gas prices , and my mind was exhausted. I thought about how I even asked, " Will #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba economics even lower down the prices of gasoline? " It's one thing that the Philippines has been overly reliant  on the Middle East for gasoline. What I overlooked was the OFW phenomenon again . It was so easy to hype on the OFW phenomenon, like what happened with the Filipino nurse, Ello Ed Mundsel Bello, way back in 2015. The OFW hype would've compounded the Philippine economy's "reliance model" to a whole new level of bottleneck!  Analyzing the bottleneck of relying on the Middle East It's already a known fact that several OFWs are sent to the Middle East. I even remember running across a presumably retired dancer who would be 64 today, on Facebook. The guy actually bragged about how he was a dancer at the Excelsior Hotel in...

How is IBON Foundation Viewing and/or Representing FDI in Their Articles?

Some time ago, I wrote about why I can't take IBON Foundation seriously . As the battle for economic charter change is on, I believe it's time to tackle them again. They're tweeting here and there. Okay, I'm no researcher or organization. However, it doesn't mean that I can't do some basic research, share the research of others, and read other books. Even an intellectually stupid person can actually make sense if they gather the best materials. I even recall someone I know who's not intelligent but he actually spoke well about career opportunities, in the very school where he wasn't performing well! Trying to understand IBON's data presentation  I would like to address how IBON Foundation presents FDI growth. They would say stuff such as the claim job creation weakened despite FDI growth .  I was looking at IBON Foundation's claim (above) where it says that job creation allegedly weakened despite FDI inflows. Sure, they named sources but do they ...

A Destructive Obsession with Ayuda (Cash Handouts)

IBON Foundation Yesterday, I decided to write about how Pinoy Pride won't help pay that enormous PHP 13.42 Trillion debt . I thought I'd probably take a bit of a break to do some more research. However, I feel the need to write this post today since one of IBON Foundation's articles says that there's a destructive fetish for foreign investment . Then, another of IBON Foundation's articles says that there's money for Ayuda . I really feel insulted reading these since I'm a Masters Degree graduate in the School of Business and Economics. This really shows the destructive obsession with ayuda (cash handouts) and protectionism. IBON Foundation Above is one of IBON Foundation's charts. Some people on Facebook have gone as far as to call them Birdbrain Foundation. So what if there's money for ayuda or cash handouts? The problem here is that "think tanks" like IBON Foundation want to make it look like ayuda is more important. If asked to account ...

Why I Don't See IBON Foundation as a Real Economic "Think TanK'

It's one thing to criticize presidents for their performance. It's another without analyzing the data. Sure, we need to study mathematics but the way it's presented can be a reason why it's hated. I felt that high school mathematics focused too much on numbers. Mathematics, in all its aspects, is part of life. Trigonometry is part of life. Calculus is part of life. Statistics is part of life. Speaking of statistics, I was thinking about how IBON Foundation has given its assessment of Duterte's administration. This isn't to say that outgoing President Rodrigo R. Duterte hasn't made mistakes. Rather, this is to point out how IBON Foundation has that tendency to be illogical. IBON Foundation (click to enlarge) This data by IBON Foundation was gathered. I'm not saying that the figures are lies or manipulated. My problem with how IBON Foundation works is their failure to account for the cause and effect  more often than not.  Malaya Business Insight It's ...