How Do Pinoy Pridists Propose to Pay Growing National Debt?!
![]() |
Bombo Radyo Cebu |
It doesn't take a doctorate in economics at (insert prestigious university) to understand that Makabayan Bloc is a bad joke. For example, Kabataan Partylist has a real lack of knowledge of economics. That's why I wrote that Kabataan Partylist will need to learn economics from the Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth Union. Just thinking about what Makabayan bloc wants irritates me to no end. Come on, Atty. Renee M. Co is a lawyer, and Raoul Daniel A. Manuel is a mathematics major. Raoul is a mathematics major but how could he promote the idea of increasing salaries while reducing prices at the same time?
This is a proposal made by Kabataan Partylist some time ago. I could just imagine what the Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth Union, aka the Vietnam Youth Union, would have to say about that. If Makabayan bloc members understood basic accounting and economics, they wouldn't be saying such stupid stuff (read here). It's because a wage increase is only beneficial when there's a high demand for jobs (read here). But how can there be high demands for jobs when not all Filipinos are wired to be businessmen? However, if they ever studied basic accounting and basic finance, profits aren't unpaid wages. In fact, net income after taxes is barely half of the revenues. Part of the process includes paying wages. If the wages increase, the end product must also increase the prices. But some people just insult the laws of economics. Newsflash! Insulting economics will not make the laws of economics go away (read here)!
Is their favorite source for economic solutions still the IBON Foundation?!
The solutions? I'm afraid that even when these are enforced, they may not be enough. One of the proposals is the wealth tax. Last 2023, the IBON Foundation (and I really refuse to take them seriously due to their outdated arguments) even proposed taxing the super-rich some more. That might be their way to pay the growing national debt.
Growing billionaire wealth amid increasing poverty, worsening joblessness, and stagnant wages shows that it’s high time for the Marcos Jr administration to heed calls for a wealth tax on the country’s billionaires. This can be a substantial source of revenues for urgently needed income support and health services which are both being cut in the proposed 2024 national government budget. Economic growth can also be spurred with greater support for small farms and businesses.
A billionaire wealth tax can substitute for many consumption taxes that disproportionately burden millions of Filipino families struggling with high prices and low incomes. It can also signal the reversal of government policy to make the tax system more regressive especially since the tax reforms started by the previous Duterte administration and being continued today.
The recently-released Forbes Philippines’ 50 Richest list shows how much more affordable a modest wealth tax is for the country’s super-rich. Converted at prevailing exchange rates, the Php3.95 trillion net worth of country’s 50 richest reported in 2022 increased by 12.5% to Php4.44 trillion in 2023. The billionaire wealth tax proposed in Congress would have raised Php259.4 billion on this wealth and still leave them with Php4.18 trillion which is still more than their net worth reported in 2022.
The proposed wealth tax on the super-rich levies a modest 1% on wealth over Php1 billion, 2% over Php2 billion and 3% over Php3 billion.
The IBON Foundation even has this mentality that defies common sense. Below is something that the IBON Foundation made, which makes me puke why some people even take them seriously:
Government policies and investment incentives
Vietnam’s government actively supports agricultural investments through favorable policies, tax incentives, and land use regulations. Key measures include:
- Corporate tax benefits: The standard corporate income tax rate is 20 percent, but preferential rates (10 percent, 15 percent, or 17 percent) are available for high-tech and sustainable agricultural projects.
- Land use and leasing rights: The Land Law 2024 allows foreign-invested companies to lease agricultural land, with annual rental price adjustments.
- Investment incentives: Special tax holidays, exemptions, and subsidies are available for projects in organic farming, high-tech agriculture, and sustainable practices.
- Special Economic Zones (SEZs): Investors in designated zones benefit from reduced land rental fees and enhanced infrastructure.
Vietnam may have eased the 70% maximum foreign investment ownership (of which 30% is owned by the government), in honor of these measures:
Investment strategies and market entry models
Foreign investors have several pathways to enter Vietnam’s agriculture market:
Joint ventures with local partners – Collaborations with Vietnamese agribusinesses can help navigate regulatory and market challenges.
Public-private partnerships (PPP) – The Partnership for Sustainable Agriculture in Vietnam (PSAV) has effectively mobilized resources for sustainable agricultural projects.
Direct foreign investment – With FDI in agriculture reaching US$1.2 billion in 2024, investors are entering the market independently, particularly in processing and agritech solutions.
Contract farming arrangements – Around 30 percent of Vietnam’s agricultural output** now comes from contract farming, offering stable supply chains and risk-sharing mechanisms.
The Communist Party of Vietnam under General Secretary Nguyen Vanh Linh, and Nguyen Duy Cong aka Do Muoi (both dead), created the Doi Moi policy (read here). It would be hilarious how IBON would either cherry-pick or couldn't see that Vietnam's liberalization of agriculture has helped its local manufacturing. No, Vietnam didn't enrich itself first before opening up. Instead, Doi Moi started inviting FDIs to invest, which in turn helped Vietnam emerge. Vietnam's VND is far weaker than the Philippines' PHP.
The more I look into IBON, the more I think, "Are these guys so outdated?" It's even more laughable that the Foreign Trade University has trustees who look like Enrique "Sonny" Africa and Rosario Guzman from IBON! Even funnier, how could the CPV even establish the FTU (read here)? Even funnier, the FTU's Facebook page is riddled with "Kabataan Partylist" members.
Instead, all IBON focuses are on Pinoy Pride Economics aka the Filipino First Policy... again. IBON's proposal, whether it'd be a wage hike (while demand for labor is low and supply for labor is high), is just a third-world way of thinking. The other is IBON's focus on the wealth tax might not be feasible in the long run. In fact, it doesn't take a PhD in economics to figure out that overly high tax rates can encourage (1) tax evasion, and (2) money under the table transactions, even more. That's why I advocate for lowering tax rates as a means to attract more FDI.
Whether we want to admit it or not, Pinoy Pride Economics fails to see how FDI could help pay the debt
SINCE REUNIFICATION IN 1975, the economy of Vietnam has been plagued by enormous difficulties in production, imbalances in supply and demand, inefficiencies in distribution and circulation, soaring inflation rates, and rising debt problems. Vietnam is one of the few countries in modern history to experience a sharp economic deterioration in a postwar reconstruction period. Its peacetime economy is one of the poorest in the world and has shown a negative to very slow growth in total national output as well as in agricultural and industrial production. Vietnam's gross domestic product ( GDP) in 1984 was valued at US$18.1 billion with a per capita income estimated to be between US$200 and US$300 per year. Reasons for this mediocre economic performance have included severe climatic conditions that afflicted agricultural crops, bureaucratic mismanagement, elimination of private ownership, extinction of entrepreneurial classes in the South, and military occupation of Cambodia (which resulted in a cutoff of much-needed international aid for reconstruction).
By then, the Vietnamese started to think about the losses. The "peacetime" economy was low. Have Pinoy Pridists even seen through that? In one way or another, Vietnam has become more and more open to FDI. There was a drop in Vietnamese pride, something that held back Vietnam economically. Do Muoi showed a more pragmatic approach, to the point he was actually worthy of sitting down as the CPV's General-Secretary!
Pages 316-317 of From Third World to First showed how Vietnam's economy actually got balanced, also through FDI:
When he (Do Muoi) asked how he could increase the flow of foreign investments, I suggested that they should abandon the habits they learned in guerilla warfare. Development projects for the south that had been approved by the Ho Chi Minh authority had to be approved again in the north by Hanoi officials how knew little about conditions there. It was time-wasting. Next, projects approved by the government in Hanoi were often blocked by local authorities because of the supremacy of the local commander in charge, a legacy from their guerilla days.
In fact, the Vietnamese had made progress. As a result of more contacts with foreigners and greater information on the market economy, ministers and officials had a better understanding of the workings of the free market. Greater street activity, more shops, foreign businesspeople, hotels--those were all signs of prosperity in Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi.
Did Do Muoi wait for Vietnam to become "first world"? Did LKY tell Do Muoi to, "Well, just wait for Vietnam to become a first-world country before opening up to more FDI." The answer is still no. The CPV opened up with more contacts with foreigners and greater information on the market economy. Vietnam may still be run with the CPV as a one-party state (which is why I believe their mayors are appointed). However, Vietnam understood how more free market, despite their stance as a Socialist state, had helped them solve problems like inflation and rising debt!
Are Pinoy Pridists now willing to open #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba stores to help solve the national debt crisis?
![]() |
Business & Plans |
A nonprofit organization (NPO) is one that is not driven by profit but by dedication to a given cause that is the target of all income beyond what it takes to run the organization.Because of this, NPOs receive tax-exempt status from the federal government, meaning they don't have to pay income tax.Nonprofit organizations are often used for trusts, cooperatives, advocacy, charity, environmental and religious groups. Many, but not all, NPOs have paid staff in management positions; almost all use volunteers.Unlike for-profit businesses, NPOs have no owners and any surplus profits after operating expenses are used to further its goals instead of being distributed between members or employees of the organization.
If you look into how an NPO works, the surplus profits after operating expenses are still necessary to further the organization's goals. NPOs may be paying their members salaries instead of profit sharing. In short, they may be paid administrative fees while profits are used to enhance the organization. This means that any business model that doesn't generate profit will collapse. Even NPOs will still need some profits to keep themselves running. Profit sharing may not be done but these profits are still needed to further its goals.
Given that #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba stores will lose more than they make in profits before taxes, these clowns may not even be able to pay taxes. Why would they be taxed if there's no income to be taxed? In taxation, there's such a thing as tax avoidance. For example, I would pass receipts that were relevant to my business expenses. I bought a brand new PC at PHP 32,000+. That would mean that I could get a deduction of PHP 32,000+. The same goes for any expenses incurred during operations. They may generate sales of PHP 2 million based on PHP 20.00 per kilo of rice. However, they would have a loss of PHP 4.4 million in the process, just from the "magnificent" PHP 20.00 per kilo Ganador. I wonder where they will get the money to pay PHP 1,200.00 per day for their employees. If they have employed another entire baranggay with a population of 50,000 people because they offer high salaries--they would be spending PHP 60 million for salaries. Their sales worth PHP 2 million will not cover their losses! In short, nothing will be taxable!
This is why I advocate for open FDI, no matter what the naysayers say. The question is, do they understand what FDI is all about? They can go ahead and keep quoting from Makabayan bloc as their "ever best source". They can go ahead and remain as Flor Contemplacion Crybabies. But face it, the laws of business and economics don't care about their feelings!
Comments
Post a Comment