Skip to main content

Refuting the BOGUS Claim That Wage Increase Alone, Not FDI, is the Key to Long-Term National Development

This is yet another stupid claim from Kabataan (Youth) Partylist. I wonder if the organization is linked to that joke of a Facebook page called the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (PH Antifa). You have had other similar organizations such as Anakbayan (Children of the Nation), Bayan Muna (Nation First), IBON Foundation, Kilusang Mayo Uno (May 1 Movement), and the League of Filipino Students that insist on the unsustainable demand for higher salaries, lowering the prices of commodities, and handouts for everyone. The idea itself is already not feasible (read here) yet they keep demanding it. One must wonder are they a group of economic idiots or do they have ulterior motives?

Do these groups understand what FDI really means?

I noticed that people coming from like-minded groups (such as Teodoro Casiño of Bayan Muna) have their own bizarre ideas. I could still remember his Rappler article which he also wrote about FDI. If the likes of Casiño are linked with the likes of Kabataan Partylist and the League of Filipino Students then think of what he also wrote in his Rappler article:

Without definite limits on foreign ownership and with no preference for Filipino citizens and corporations, the Constitutional provisions on the national economy and patrimony would become a tabula rasa. It would now be up to the Federal Assembly to determine policies on foreign equity sharing and just about anything there is about the economy and our natural resources. This, of course, creates an entirely new window for corporate lobbying, putting small, underfunded Filipino citizens and corporations at a great disadvantage.

Worse, by totally removing the State’s role in developing an industrialized, self-reliant economy, in implementing agrarian reform, in promoting and protecting Filipino enterprises and producers, and in reserving our natural resources for Filipinos, Duterte’s Cha-Cha will leave small enterprises, workers and farmers having to fend for themselves from the onslaught of even more globalization.

These amendments are the culmination of 3 decades of “economic reforms” toward a totally free market, neoliberal economy. Combined with the existing policies of economic liberalization, deregulation and privatization, the amendments remove the last impediments to the total domination, control and plunder of our economy and natural resources by foreign corporations and banks.

This is a very primitive idea endorsed by Casiño. According to him, giving more room for FDI would mean that the national economy will become a tabula rasa. Tabula rasa means that the Philippines becomes a blank slate. I refuse to take Casiño's ideas seriously, not especially after reading From Third World to First by the late Lee Kuan Yew. This has something to do with the idea that FDIs equal foreign invaders (read here). I guess they're all subscribed to what I call the myth of invasion through FDIs and OFWs (read here). 

When I ask such like-minded people why the Philippines is still left behind, they can give ridiculous answers. One of their ridiculous answers would say it's just about corrupt politicians, Filipino voters, etc. They will continue to insist on stuff like, "There's absolutely no need to amend the 1987 Constitution because it's the best in the world." When asked, "If it's the best in the world, why are we left behind?" They will say that it's because of the politicians, the voters, etc., never mind that faulty provisions have had to be fixed before any improvement can even take place! 

When I start pointing out Singapore's success through FDI, there can be various stupid (and disproven reasons once you read Lee's book) such as:

  1. Singapore only opened up to FDI because of its lack of natural resources. 
  2. Singapore only opened up to FDI after it became a first-world country via protectionism.
  3. The dumbest reason can always link to the "martyrdom" of Flor Contemplacion.
If they still believe that FDIs are invaders, Lee would be calling their mentality a third-world mentality such as stated in the book From Third World to First from page 58:
The accepted wisdom of development economists at the time was that MNCs were exploiters of cheap land, labor, and raw materials. This "dependency school" of economists argued that MNCs continued the colonial pattern of exploitation that left the developing countries selling raw materials to and buying consumer goods from the advanced countries. MNCs controlled technology and consumer preferences and formed alliances with their host governments to exploit the people and keep them down. Third World leaders believed this theory of neocolonialist exploitation, but Keng Swee and I were not impressed. We had a real-life problem to solve and could not afford to be conscribed by any theory or dogma. Anyway, Singapore had no natural resources for MNCs to exploit. All it had were hard-working people, good basic infrastructure, and a government that was determined to be honest and competent. Our duty was to create a livelihood for 2 million Singaporeans. If MNCs could give our workers employment and teach them technical and engineering skills and management know-how, we should bring in the MNCs.

People who promote the idea that FDIs are invaders are living in a third-world mentality. That's what the likes of IBON Foundation want to promote. Ironically, Sonny Africa of IBON is a graduate of the London School of Economics. It was what people taught back then when Lee inherited a battered Singapore. Lee also stated on page 68 of From Third World to First this truth about "waiting to be industrialized before opening":

Our job was to plan the broad economic objectives and the target periods within which to achieve them. We reviewed these plans regularly and adjusted them as new realities changed the outlook. Infrastructure and the training and education of workers to meet the needs of employers had to be planned years in advance. We did not have a group of readymade entrepreneurs such as Hong Kong gained in the Chinese industrialists and bankers who came fleeing from Shanghai, Canton, and other cities when the communists took over. Had we waited for our traders to learn to be industrialists we would have starved. It is absurd for critics to suggest in the 1990s that had we grown our own entrepreneurs, we would have been less at the mercy of the rootless MNCs. Even with the experienced talent Hong Kong received in Chinese refugees, its manufacturing technology level is not in the same class as that of the MNCs in Singapore. 

The growth of Singapore became so impressive that even Communist nations like China and Vietnam learned from it. The late Nguyen Duy Cong aka Do Muoi and the late Deng Xiaoping both learned from Lee's success. Though both were Communists, they saw the power of Singapore's economic success.  

How then can FDI be the key to increasing the minimum wage?

Do you think it's a coincidence that most countries with higher wages are also open to FDI? Apparently, it seems that these clowns demanding wage increases and protectionism don't know the cause and effect. Why do so many Filipinos still dream of going abroad for greener pastures? It's not just because there are more employment opportunities in several other countries. It's because those countries can afford better pay. 

Let's take a look at countries where OFWs usually go to "conquer". I'd like to list their minimum wages from World Population Review in order to get a better understanding per hour based on past data:
Top 20 Countries with the highest minimum wage in 2020 (US$):
  1. Australia - $14.54
  2. Luxembourg - $13.67
  3. New Zealand - $13.18
  4. Monaco - $11.88
  5. Ireland - $11.54
  6. France - $11.46
  7. United Kingdom $11.37
  8. Netherlands - $11.21
  9. Belgium - $11.06
  10. Germany - $10.68
  11. San Marino - $10.55
  12. Canada - $10.33
  13. South Korea - $8.99
  14. Israel - $8.17
  15. Japan - $7.52
  16. Spain - $7.30
  17. United States $7.25
  18. Andorra - $6.72
  19. Slovenia - $5.84
  20. Taiwan - $5.26

If they think these countries progressed by increasing wages, think again. Instead, it was because these countries are more FDI-friendly than the Philippines. The Filipino First Policy has only caused the Philippines to fail (read here). Trying to protect businesses from competition only worsened the Philippine economic atmosphere. However, countries that are more FDI-friendly can afford to pay higher wages because the economy is better.

What's needed to be emphasized is that increasing wages in a protectionist country can worsen inflation according to Economics Help:

Wage Push Inflation. If labour is able to push for higher wages, despite lower growth, then we could get a combination of rising inflation, but slow growth. This is especially a problem if a country is part of the single currency. If wages rise, they become uncompetitive leading to lower demand. Therefore there is an unwelcome combination of rising prices, but lower growth. If countries were not in a single currency, the uncompetitiveness would lead to a depreciation in the exchange rate to restore competitiveness and increase demand.

Growth must come first before a wage increase. The Philippines should focus more on growing its national income first before increasing its wage rates. That can be done by easing unreasonable FDI restrictions. One of the biggest hurdles is the 60-40 FDI shares ownership policy. Who in their right mind, anyway, will want to rent a space if they had to give up 60% of their net income to the landowner (read here)? With more investors, whether they be Filipino or foreign-owned, the national economy will have more taxable income. I've gone to several foreign-owned establishments and there's the BIR registration and a notice to please ask for receipts. The BIR will collect taxes in the form of monthly value taxes, quarterly taxes, and annual taxes. The more a business gets income then the higher the income tax will be. What's left after taxes is the basis on which an investor gets rich. 

The Philippines' removal of protectionist policies can provide a badly-needed wage increase. When there's growth then wage increase can be done safely. Of course, this will result in more expensive prices of goods. Prices of goods in Singapore are more expensive than in the Philippines for that reason. However, having higher wages when there's significant growth will make any inflation, well, manageable because supply and demand gaps have been fulfilled through a more FDI-friendly market. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Is Jollibee "Invading" South Korea Now as It's About to Acquire 70% of Shabu All Day?

I must confess that I find this new rather hilarious . It's because the word shabu is often associated with drugs. All the while, shabu shabu is a Korean delicacy! Well, I'm going to say that Jollibee Foods Corporation has now become a multinational buyer . Jollibee acquired 70% of Compost Coffee back in 2024 . This year, Jollibee as a multinational corporation is now acquiring Shabu All Day for PHP 5.1 billion pesos. Is Jollibee checkmating South Korea or is the Philippines conquering South Korea not just by OFWs but als through Jollibee? The answer is still no. From GMA News , we can read this article by Jon Viktor D. Cabuenas: Under the deal, Shabu All Day will be consolidated into Jollibee Foods Corp.’s (JFC) financial statements immediately upon completion of the acquisition for a total consideration equivalent to KRW127 billion. Completion of the transaction is subject to closing and financing conditions. The acquisition is expected to lead to a 2% jump in revenues, incre...
Read more

[UNPOPULAR OPINION] Why People Power Anniversary Should Be a Special Working Day Instead

  As a blogger, I shouldn't turn on the PC in hopes of becoming popular . It should be to turn on the PC and blog to make a difference . Right now, I think about the controversy when President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. declared the 1986 EDSA Revolution's anniversary as a working holiday . The call for some of the "minority lawmakers" is that they want to return the People Power Anniversary to a regular holiday once more. There are times I feel like, "Should we let it be a regular holiday again, so as not to repeat the Marcos dictatorship?" Sadly, the real answer is that the Philippines has been relying too much on EDSA , so it's practically ending up like Nokia . I was thinking about the reality of February being the most hectic month. February only has 28 days (and February 25 is near the month's end ). I thought that the Philippines also has too many national holidays more often than not. In fact, the Inquirer article written by...
Read more

Why I Believe Economic Cha-Cha is Needed to Curb Exodus of Filipino Nurses

I was looking at the Facebook feeds and I found an interesting feed. It's from the Inquirer's Facebook page and I'm finding some interesting comments here . I'm really thinking about the economic ignorance of some of the comments. I won't be naming them out specifically. If I did, I'd probably have too much to mention. The level of ignorance can go with subsidies, wage increases, and better healthcare systems, but for some, when I mention  open economies-- it seems that somet of them are more than willing to say, "But foreign investors will invade us!" type of talk. I'm getting fed up with such kind of talk. I would like to explain how economic charter change is badly needed if we expect more Filipino workers to stay in the country. One article I wrote some time ago was the myth of invading other countries through labor export and foreign investment . The proof that it's a myth is that the Philippines has been sending nurses abroad. If my estim...
Read more

Helping Others is Good But Not to One's Own Expense

I advocate for helping others. I believe in helping others but there were times I overdid it. One time, I gave up so much that I had to be stopped. I was told, "If you gave everything now, how can you help others later?" I would donate some sums here and there, without thinking much. I'm not going to write them all. Some of them left me good while others left a bad taste (and a bad record) for me to endure. Sure, I want to help people but I tend to overlook the consequences. Some of the bad habits I had in the name of helping others are like: Being too generous with buying with credit. Eventually, I lost a lot of money which was never recovered . Some seasoned entrepreneurs may admit their own falls including the credit trap pitfall. Being too willing to give a discount without thinking about how it'd affect profits. Sure, a cheap price can draw people near. However, there are times when the prices of goods and services need to be raised to keep a business running. I ...
Read more

The Socio-Economic Cost of Pinoy Pride Economics

Tomorrow is what's commonly referred to as Philippine Independence Day (although the Philippines really became independent on July 4, 1948 ) which falls on a Sunday. Granted, some people will either be in church (or at least online church) so I decided to write this article a day before tomorrow. I feel like writing this article because some people want to achieve "economic independence". I feel this article is badly needed. I may no longer be taking my MBA classes (since I graduated last October 2014) but I feel like writing these essays after recovering (in part) from the disaster known as Typhoon Odette).  I read some stupid people on Facebook have said that the Philippines may become richer without foreign investments. I read the posts of protectionist thought leaders of people from Bayan Muna, IBON Foundation (which claims itself to be an economic think-tank), Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, and the like. It even made me laugh to see how one of the L...
Read more