Skip to main content

The Problem with Grades Over Learning Education

I remember back when I attempted cheating, I had classmates who got suspended for cheating, and I felt stupid because my grades weren't good in high school. True, most of my college grades were above passing and I never had a single back subject. I eventually managed to get an MBA hence why I put the suffix MBA in my username. However, I'd like to revisit the problems I've had, the fights I've had with my parents during my student days, and how I really wanted to drop out of school too many times because it was "too hard and boring". I even remember throwing tantrums whenever I never liked the lesson. It was in fourth-year high school (under K+10) when those tantrums got so worse. It's because of the grading system that says, "Your grades will determine your future!" Even worse, they kept saying that with not getting good grades in mathematics and science, we're told, "Just take HRM!" Even our best teachers never knew that Hospitality Management is never an easy course. A relative of mine even said, "If it was so easy then try managing a hotel without being taught how to do so!"

I think the big problem is all about grades over learning. Teachers have very little to no choice. Schools have very little to no choice. It's because the Department of Education (DepEd) which was back then, known as DECS (meaning Department of Education, Culture, and Sports) had the bigger say about education. So schools had very little to no choice but to follow the curriculum. The vicious cycle of generations can be from parents to the child to the grandchild. Even worse, there's a focus on too much memorization rather than memorization with understanding. Memorization helps but again we know too much of a good thing is bad.

It didn't matter what subject was taught. Everything was practically summarized as, "As long as you pass!", "Get a high grade!", or "Stop asking questions." What happened to the values of a good scientist which include curiosity and open-mindedness? Can you imagine if great scientists (which includes mathematicians) from the distant past had the attitude of, "As long as you pass?" Can you imagine if the great mathematicians of the past said only cared more about grades than learning? Right now, the subjects that are deemed "useless" wouldn't even exist. Trigonometry, calculus, algebra, geometry, physics, chemistry, biology, and every related subject will not even be taught. Yet, it becomes the harsh reality that happens. So, everything from language to history to science to mathematics is simply said, "Stop asking questions! Just study!" Studying is part of life. However, how can one effectively study if they don't ask questions? 

I'd say that was probably the problem of every language teacher. It's a common complaint I hear year after year from Chinese language teachers. Students can randomly get a high grade on a quiz but never learn to read. Many times, Chinese language teachers were still forced to stick to zhuyin (because it allegedly made learning "better") instead of teaching the easier pinyin. I admit my grades in Chinese were bad. I never saw it as important until Taiwanese shows started airing on local Philippine TV. Students simply learned how to write characters down a bit not understand the meaning. I'd blame the big problem as all related to teaching how to memorize instead of how to speak. A classmate of mine in high school got suspended for cheating in a Chinese class. I also attempted cheating in a Chinese class. It's a very common problem to have cheating in a Chinese class. Yet, Chinese language teachers have no choice but to conform to it. Many even finished Chinese in high school but never learned to properly speak Mandarin. A lot of people who did menial jobs in Taiwan can speak better Mandarin than them! That's why I even felt I might want to do menial jobs in Taiwan and study Mandarin there!

I'd say life would be boring if I didn't know those "useless" subjects. However, I do feel stupid that I never knew how economics and calculus are used only in college. I only knew about how trigonometry was used in a two-year computer course which I barely passed. I only appreciated learning biology, chemistry, and physics later in life. Life would be boring if all I focused on was office work. The "useless" subjects did get me to understand why this and that are used in construction, in food preparation, I could appreciate a lot of maths as to why I could enjoy IT Park, and I'm not stuck to a monotonous routine. However, I'd still dare point out that emphasizing too much on the grades on the "useless" subjects made them feel useless. I mean, not everyone is meant to be taking elite courses (that is, science-intensive courses). Besides, I only wanted to take Information Technology (IT) back then only because it was the hype. Never mind that my mathematical ability wasn't suited for that kind of course. Eventually, so many got eliminated from the IT courses so fast! 

Later, I started to feel less insecure about me having problems with my grades. I even felt that "Why wasn't this taught in school?" It's especially true about investing in the stock market. Right now, I even feel embarrassed that I pursued an MBA degree but never knew about stuff like the Cash to Go program or even basic stock market investing. We had a symposium and yet we weren't taught how to really deal with stocks. Even more, there are now books and you can look online on how to do stock trading. Some people feel stock trading is just for professionals. However, Warren Buffett begs to differ when he recommends a low-cost index fund. When I started reading more about Buffett's investment, I felt like, "Did we just waste money in school?" That's why I even wrote about Buffett's investment methods that aren't taught in school (read here).

Even worse, parents have become accomplices in this and not just teachers. Oftentimes, a child asks, "How is this used?" The parent says, "Never mind that! Just focus on the lesson!" It reminds me of how tutorial time can be that stressful. Parents would even emphasize getting good grades over learning. On extremes, they will force their child towards getting the first place. With that in mind, some schools do practice "grade buying" to a certain extent, as long as it's not that obvious. It's like how the salutatorian became the valedictorian because of money. If the child's natural curiosity in learning is squashed, parents really are accomplices in why their children are becoming fools. They have the nerve to call their children "Stupid!" and "Idiot!" when they themselves are participants in the whole faulty system that values grades over learning. Some of them even get touchy when they're asked about their grades. Did they really do better than their children? Even so, the academic curriculum decades ago was easier than it is today! In my case, I'm more than ready to admit I almost didn't graduate high school, I hated school back then, and even if I did get better in college, I'm still more than willing to admit that I wasn't a good student in high school. Meanwhile, some people will still lie that they were brilliant scholars even while they refuse to have their happy birthday grades revealed to protect their facade. In my case, I never shied away from admitting I nearly didn't graduate high school when people think I'm a genius. 

This post isn't meant to glorify cheating. Cheating is still a severe offense in any shape or form. However, I feel the school system may be suffering from a bad case of double standards. The education system has cheated us of real education. How many times are lessons taught but there's no real application? Lessons are getting harder because new information is generated daily. However, students are cheated of the opportunity to learn the hard lessons without compromising learning with obsolete methods. If the education system still insists on not making any changes at all--we might as well make cheating legal. It's because if the school system cheats on students of a real education then cheating should be legalized. If we want to dramatically reduce cheating, we need to really (and seriously) change the way education is done. This is all about giving people fewer reasons to cheat. 

All this can be summarized as an outdated education system (read here). I believe we still need to have hard work and performance ratings. However, we need to focus on cooperation instead of competition to get the top spot in the class. Class rankings for me are getting overrated. Singapore has done away with it choosing to focus with cooperation. Sure, we do need brilliant students to help those lagging behind. However, I think classroom ranking can be more detrimental as some people will still say, "I'm just dumb as a post!" type of talk. I'd say the Philippines can learn from Singapore's education system to produce better citizens.

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...