Skip to main content

Warren Buffett's Principles NOT Taught in Business School?

I'm a graduate of a business school. I felt ashamed (to a certain extent) that I wasn't accepted into the Bachelor of Science in Information Technology (BSIT) course. I decided to pursue business school instead as planned after my first year in my Associate in Computer Science (ACS) course. I decided to take a master's degree to impress others or to convince them I'm not a fool. Later on, while taking my Masters in Business Administration (MBA) degree--I fell into a scam by a family friend and later didn't even know what Cash 2 Go in the Metrobank credit card was. After a heated argument with someone questioning my course, I was finally told the hard truth I needed to hear, "That proves the Filipino education system really sucks!" I finally had my MBA. Later, I discovered a lot of stuff that I was never taught. One of them was actually the best investment to put into even in the finance classes! Sure, finance classes are needed but shouldn't we teach business students not just how to compute the profit but to also properly invest the profit? 

Right now, I even forgot why it's not the ideal time to invest in bonds. When interest is up--the values of bonds will go lower. Bonds are rather restrictive and can't be pulled out anytime. Meanwhile, when interest rates are up--the stock market may go down. It's a very inverse effect. I didn't even know when was the best time to enter bonds except if the financial adviser said so. Isn't that really embarrassing that as a business graduate student I didn't know that? I ought to know that. 

We did have a financial seminar at the University of San Carlos (USC). We were taught some basics such as examining financial companies. The basic principle is, "If it's too good to be true then don't take it." However, I feel what was truly missing from the financial seminar was to teach the basics of stocks or other ways to invest in them. One reason why I avoided stocks (until 2018 with AXA Chinese Tychoon Fund which uses cost averaging) was because of the risks associated with them. What I never realized was that day trading was called a speculative orgy by Charlie Munger (read here). Using the word "orgy" might truly describe my feelings. I even tried to use a day-trading simulator (which had USD 10,000.00 virtual currency). The results were a real gamble. I made more losses than I had with my gains. 

What I never spotted five years ago was Buffett on college and graduate school. I've been to both. I almost expected stuff like learning to do proper stock investment. Instead, I ended up learning about cost averaging from Buffett himself. Buffett recommends cost-averaging into an index fund for a specified period of time. What was interesting was that Buffett didn't want to go to college and do business immediately. As Buffett says that success doesn't always require a college degree. Some people can have prestigious degrees from prestigious schools. All the while, such people can be supporting really stupid economic policies (read here).

Instead, I decided to think that my MBA degree is never going to be the end of it. I tend to believe that I'm "invincible" because of my MBA degree. There are times a degree is just a degree. That's unless of course if you're seeking to become an engineer, a doctor, a nurse, a pharmacist, an economist, an accountant, or any profession needing at least a basic college education. What I soon realized is that none of Buffett's children graduated college. Buffett even said college may not be for everyone. That's why I'm in favor of K+12 over K+10. 

Instead, Buffett said to invest in yourself. Buffett's advice is spelled out as, "Address whatever you feel your weaknesses are, and do it now." I think one of my weaknesses can be my attention deficit disorder (ADD) which causes me to be impulsive. I made a bad financial decision based on being impulsive. I nearly made a deal with a con service because of impulsivity. I invested in the AXA Chinese Tycoon Fund before I learned about cost averaging. During the crash, I did some Googling and found value cost averaging. I opened a GCash account to pay for food deliveries and found GInvest. I ended up finding out that investing in stock funds is long-term. I ask myself, "Why didn't I learn this in school?" I even bought the late Lee Kuan Yew's famous book From Third World to First. I even wonder why isn't it even a recommended reading? I feel so dumb that I only discovered some things later in life.

Right now, I think it's time to rethink how business schools do what they do. I think we need to learn more than just marketing techniques, business analysis using different types of math (and calculus happens to be my favorite approach), accounting, and finance. Sure, I did benefit from very strict teachers that kept my impulsive behavior in check during my undergraduate days. However, I feel like it's never enough for a business school to teach just how to run a company, be an executive, or be an accountant. It's sad how I even screwed up during my MBA days with practical applications. I really feel stupid (until now) as to why I allowed such a bad deal to happen. It's no use crying over spilled milk. Instead, I should continue to invest in myself instead of relying too much on school.

That's why I decided to write this blog sometime after Odette. I really felt the need to reinvest in myself. I did learn a few stuff such as cost averaging and why I should continue my AXA fund. Meanwhile, I could use GCash's GInvest feature for other stuff. I've invested in an index fund. I've invested in two feeder funds. Right now, my aim is truly to buy more during this bear market and sell during the bull market. I really ended up saying, "Why didn't I learn that in school?" This is a challenge to finally change the way business schools think. We can start by talking about Buffett's principles for a start. 

Popular posts from this blog

Should Noynoy Aquino be a Valid Excuse to Reject Econ Cha Cha?

Philippine Star   Updated January 25, 2025 This may be a touchy post. Politics is often a source of fights during parties. That's why we're told not to talk about politics during parties. Unfortunately, some people on Facebook are now using the late Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino Jr. as an excuse not to execute even economic charter change. Never mind that blatant supporter of Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo, Andrew James Masigan, supports economic charter change . The late Charles Edward P. Celdran was also an anti-Duterte critic. As I looked at some okay boomer posts, I'm not surprised at people who still use Noynoy as an excuse to shout with all their might, "No to economic charter change!" Somebody posted on Facebook the following. As always, I won't publicly shame anyone. If possible, I will only refer to them by codenames or use the name Anonymous. I want to remain as professional as possible. This person said that under N...

Honoring the Recently Deceased Jose de Venecia Jr. in a Business/Economics Perspective

That's right. Jose de Venecia  recently passed away yesterday. As an advocate for reform, it's sad but true that de Venecia didn't win because he was boring . It was easy to think of him as a boring guy. I remember the time when he was called in ISPUP as Yoda De Venecia (after the Star Wars character). I was just a clueless college student at that time when the ISPUP episode was shown. I was only 13 years old when de Venecia ran for president. It was also that era when Joseph Estrada (who's now 88 years old) ran for president, and it was that time when Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (who turned 90 last year) became the chief justice.  Just recently, I found this eulogy   for JDV. I will not post the whole eulogy, but only the one from the one that would "fit better" for a business-economics blog: He helped advance policies that enabled major infrastructure projects through public private partnerships, converted former military bases into thriving economic centers...

Social Media Gossipers' Ad Hominems Against Actor Robin Padilla Regarding His Proposal to Remove 60-40

Make no mistake that I didn't vote for Robin Padilla. I feel like I've had enough of voting for celebrities, athletes, and those who I felt are know-nothings in the legislative. However, Padilla recently had his proposal to remove the 60-40 restrictions regarding foreign direct investments (FDIs) . Former Philippine Vice President Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo was even in favor of that amendment. I guess that's why Philippine economist Andrew James Masigan endorsed Robredo. I may have not endorsed Robredo while Masigan remains to be one of my favorite local sources. The news from GMA News Online reveals these plans by Padilla himself: Senator Robin Padilla said he wanted to revise the Constitution to scrap the 60-40 rule on foreign ownership of businesses to accelerate job creation and competition among industries . In a Monday interview, Padilla said the move would attract more foreign investments to support the country’s economic recovery. “Para sa akin mas...

Opening #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Stores Nationwide Increases POGO-Related Risks (NOT FDI)

Alice Guo aka Guo Hua-Ping may be in jail now . However, I believe the saga is far from over . It reminds me that I actually wrote about how several idiots on Facebook go so far as to say, " Alice Guo should be a warning about open FDI! " Some have even gone as far as to say that POGO and Chinese spies should "justify" the Filipino First Policy . However, the harsher reality is that the Filipino First Policy may actually be encouraging dummy investors instead ! As the saga continues, I've decided to write what I might call my harshest entry yet. It's going to be Chinese New Year this year. This might be an entry that may need to be shared before the Lunar New Year! My grievances are  still ongoing because some people still demand #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, no matter how destructive it  will be . That's why I use Venezuela as an example, especially during Nicolas Maduro's downfall . Back to the topic, I remember writing a joke post where I said, "Wh...

An Interesting Mental Exercise for Chinese as Second Language Class

Back in my day, I remember we kept memorizing what was called bon toi (written as 问题, Wèntí in Mandarin) without understanding them. I hated memorizing those. I guess another reason was to parrot what one can't understand. We had the biak diam too which is Hokkien for oral recitation. Memorizing the question and answer (written as 问题和答案, Wèntí hé dá'àn in Mandarin) would actually not be so tedious if Chinese was taught as a second language. My bizarre idea is to think about having only one bon toi but there are five answers to memorize.  Memorizing (and understanding) why some don't want to learn Chinese These five reasons (above) have to be memorized in both Chinese and English. The teacher (老师, Lǎoshī) would say the question,  "不学中文的最大借口是什么?" (Bù xué zhōngwén de zuìdà jièkǒu shì shénme?). The question can't be answered  until  the student actually translated it as, "What are the top excuses not to learn Chinese?"  The student will eval...