Skip to main content

Why I Don't See IBON Foundation as a Real Economic "Think TanK'

It's one thing to criticize presidents for their performance. It's another without analyzing the data. Sure, we need to study mathematics but the way it's presented can be a reason why it's hated. I felt that high school mathematics focused too much on numbers. Mathematics, in all its aspects, is part of life. Trigonometry is part of life. Calculus is part of life. Statistics is part of life. Speaking of statistics, I was thinking about how IBON Foundation has given its assessment of Duterte's administration. This isn't to say that outgoing President Rodrigo R. Duterte hasn't made mistakes. Rather, this is to point out how IBON Foundation has that tendency to be illogical.

IBON Foundation (click to enlarge)

This data by IBON Foundation was gathered. I'm not saying that the figures are lies or manipulated. My problem with how IBON Foundation works is their failure to account for the cause and effect more often than not. 

Malaya Business Insight

It's like how one of their late members, the late Neil Doloricon, even had the audacity to draw a caricature (above) that foreign investors will leave the Philippines with nothing. I think IBON Foundation needs to tell first-world countries that foreign investment is bad or will leave them bankrupt. In response, I decided to write that foreign investors only get rich after they've paid their taxes. Haven't they encountered cost accounting which says net profits is only after all expenses are paid for? For sure, the late Lee Kuan Yew's book From Third World to First had long proven them long. I wonder what their motives are behind when they say that there's this foreign investment "fetish" that keeps Filipinos poor. In response, I decided to write about a destructive obsession with ayudas (cash handouts) in regards to their obsession with cash handouts. They better explain with empirical data how cash handouts help the economy. Cash handouts are never meant to be a long-term solution except in extreme cases. Every amount of cash handout is from taxes paid by the people. 

We need to know the cause and effect. I'm not saying that the inflation rate hasn't gone up, the prices of gasoline haven't gone up, the debt hasn't gone down, and the other problems. However, these guys really fail to show the correlation between world events and how it affects the Philippines. It seems to be that they want to blame Duterte for problems beyond his control namely (1) factors that affect the prices of petroleum products, (2) the COVID-19 pandemic, and (3) times when we need to import. COVID-19 has forced the borrowing of money for COVID-19 expenses. Yet, they still want to oppose foreign investments which would help provide national income. The recent problems such as the War in Ukraine caused by Russia have helped significantly cause inflation due to the prices of gasoline worldwide. COVID-19 brought the world to a standstill especially when not enough gas was refined for some time. Those problems that hit during Duterte's time are beyond his control.

The big difference between Andrew J. Masigan and IBON Foundation

I could still give Masigan some praise for this reason. For instance, when Masigan criticized Duterte, he did a better analysis than what IBON gave. Masigan actually went as far as to point out the fundamental flaws such as how he cited this at Business World:
So why can’t the growth of exports keep up with the growth of our imports? Apart from the relative failure to nurture local industries to be competitive enough to export, the Philippines has also been hard-pressed to attract foreign direct investments (FDIs). As we all know, FDI’s have a direct correlation to our capacity to export. Following our peak in 2017 when we attracted $10.26 billion worth of FDIs, foreign investments declined to $9.95 billion in 2018, $8.70 billion in 2019 and $6.4 billion in 2020. Mind you, our FDIs are about half of what Vietnam realizes.

There are many reasons why we lag in FDIs. Among the principal reasons is the negative list of industries where foreign participation is prohibited by the constitution, (un)ease in doing business, gaps in our supply chain, corruption in government, policy instability, the weak rule of law, uncompetitive fiscal incentives and the dearth of outward investment missions to woo foreign investors. Worsening matters is President Duterte’s animosity towards the west which dissuaded many American, European, Japanese, and Australian investors from setting up shop in the country.

What even amazed me is when Masigan also wrote this one in the same article where he discussed why he felt Dutertenomics was flawed:

As usual, the dollar inflows from OFW remittances and service exports (IT-BPO industry) save us from financial ruin. Between 2016 and 2020, OFW remittances pumped-in an average of $32 billion a year while our service exports contributed an average of $36.5 billion a year.

Have OFW remittances and service exports been enough to cover our deficits? No. There is a still a gap and it is funded by debt. 

Which, later, Masigan even went as far as to say that laws concerning foreign investments were "long overdue". In short, I felt that Masigan was giving an objective criticism of Duterte. It's very different from how IBON Foundation does it by just mentioning digits without understanding some factors are beyond the country's control. That's why I still feel like recommend reading Masigan's articles and analysis. Masigan wrote this one also at Business World where he believes the need for economic charter change is really there:

The same is true for the economic provisions of the constitution. We all know that by reserving certain industries exclusively for Filipinos (or Filipino majorities), we deprived the nation of valuable forex investments, technology transfers, tax revenues, export earnings and employment opportunities. Yet, amendments to the economic provisions of the constitution (Eco Cha-cha) have never made it to law simply because certain families stand to lose their stronghold on industries and the lingering doubt that once the constitution is opened for amendment, dubious legislators would push for lifting term limits.

The good news is that Eco Cha-cha is presently being deliberated in the legislature, thanks to the leadership of Speaker Lord Allan Velasco. This is a rare but welcome development which we should all support. Not only will Eco Cha-cha accelerate our economic recovery, it will also increase our competitiveness relative to our regional neighbors.

The restrictive provisions of the constitution have held back the country’s development for more than 30 years. From the 1980s up to the close of the century, countries like Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand leapfrogged economically on the back of a deluge foreign direct investments (FDIs). During that period, the Philippines share of regional FDIs was a paltry 3% in good years and 2% in normal years. The flawed economic laws of the constitution are largely to blame for this. Lately, Vietnam has taken the lion’s share of FDIs, leaving the Philippines in the dust.

Meanwhile, I feel IBON should be disregarded. They're still presenting solutions that I call an insult to my degree. I feel like I could still have a bachelor's degree, not get my master's degree, and still disagree with what IBON Foundation says. A lot of stuff I'm writing right now is taken from a bachelor's degree education such as accounting and finance. IBON probably still wants to think in economic nationalism (which hasn't worked) accompanied by cash handouts will save the economy. Yet, basic economics proves that overprinting of money is bad for the economy and that isolationism isn't good as proven by Venezuela's really bad situation today. 

References

Books 

"From Third World to First--The Singapore Story: 1965-2000) by Lee Kuan Yew
Harpers Collins Publishers

Websites

"Eco ‘Cha-cha,’ now!" by Andrew J. Masigan (January 24, 2021)

"Long overdue laws finally passed" by Andrew J. Masigan (April 06, 2022)

"Our destructive foreign investment fetish" by IBON Foundation (March 28, 2022)

"Why Dutertenomics weakened the economy" by Andrew J. Masigan (July 18, 2021)
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Honoring the Recently Deceased Jose de Venecia Jr. in a Business/Economics Perspective

That's right. Jose de Venecia  recently passed away yesterday. As an advocate for reform, it's sad but true that de Venecia didn't win because he was boring . It was easy to think of him as a boring guy. I remember the time when he was called in ISPUP as Yoda De Venecia (after the Star Wars character). I was just a clueless college student at that time when the ISPUP episode was shown. I was only 13 years old when de Venecia ran for president. It was also that era when Joseph Estrada (who's now 88 years old) ran for president, and it was that time when Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (who turned 90 last year) became the chief justice.  Just recently, I found this eulogy   for JDV. I will not post the whole eulogy, but only the one from the one that would "fit better" for a business-economics blog: He helped advance policies that enabled major infrastructure projects through public private partnerships, converted former military bases into thriving economic centers...
Read more

Yes to Filipinas Marrying Foreign Men, No to 100% FDI Shares Ownership?!

Today is Valentine's Day. I feel Valentine's Day is plain overrated. Some people just get a date for the sake of it--even if it means enduring that materialistic girlfriend or abusive boyfriend! Isn't romance a year-round thing? A few Valentine's Day ago, I wrote about Filipinas marrying foreigners and that FDI doesn't include Filipinas dating foreigners . This time to add some comedy, I wrote this post. It's something to say, "Yes! Somebody is married to a foreigner!" It's the hype to get job opportunities abroad or to marry a foreigner. Blossoms Why do Filipinos want to marry foreigners? The Blossoms blog writes down the following: Love and Affection: Love is often the primary reason for marriage, and Filipinas who marry foreigners may do so because they have fallen in love with someone from another country.  Financial Stability: Some Filipinas may marry foreigners because they believe a foreign husband can provide financial stability and secur...
Read more

China's Real Great Leap Forward and Economic Cultural Revolution Under Deng Xiaoping

Nobody can dare deny that China has become a big superpower. I remembered I went to China last 2007 (which would be more than 10 years ago). China had become such a huge metropolis of power that I'm amazed at it. I was thinking about how Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Beijing were truly magnificent cities before the pollution problem (which should call for eco-capitalist measures). I was thinking about how I never realized China was once dirt poor.  Did you know China used to be so dirt-poor? The "economic legacy" of Mao Zedong was a disaster with the so-called "Great Leap Forward". It was a great leap forward all right--a great leap forward to ruin. Mao seeking to avoid the use of foreign resources to launch China proved disastrous. The 1970s would see a dramatic change when Deng Xiaoping finally took over the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The beginning of the rise of Communist China under Deng's new political policy would pave the way to China becoming a great s...
Read more

Should Noynoy Aquino be a Valid Excuse to Reject Econ Cha Cha?

Philippine Star   Updated January 25, 2025 This may be a touchy post. Politics is often a source of fights during parties. That's why we're told not to talk about politics during parties. Unfortunately, some people on Facebook are now using the late Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino Jr. as an excuse not to execute even economic charter change. Never mind that blatant supporter of Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo, Andrew James Masigan, supports economic charter change . The late Charles Edward P. Celdran was also an anti-Duterte critic. As I looked at some okay boomer posts, I'm not surprised at people who still use Noynoy as an excuse to shout with all their might, "No to economic charter change!" Somebody posted on Facebook the following. As always, I won't publicly shame anyone. If possible, I will only refer to them by codenames or use the name Anonymous. I want to remain as professional as possible. This person said that under N...
Read more

Teaching Mandarin by Recalling How Much Chinoy School Students Complained, "Hay, Chinese!"

It's time for a bit of Chinese language Throwback Thursday. I remember how the Chinese school can be summarized as students  memorizing without understanding . The problem wasn't the Lǎoshīs (老師) but the system that ran them as persons . I decided to write this article to " bring up a trauma " associated with the Chinese education system. From Kiko Chinese, this picture shows the common complaints from children. Standard Chinese is so hard! The Chinese schools tend to lose students because they keep failing in Grade 2 or Grade 2 in Chinese. In fact, I remember someone failing Chinese four times back in the 1990s. Another one was three years in Grade 3 Chinese, where the Chinese teacher was even stricter than the Grade 2 Chinese teacher. The real issue was that there wasn't any real learning because the old traditional Chinese system wasn't doing anything right . People were treated as if Hokkien were their first language. However, we realize that people can...
Read more