Skip to main content

Why I Don't See IBON Foundation as a Real Economic "Think TanK'

It's one thing to criticize presidents for their performance. It's another without analyzing the data. Sure, we need to study mathematics but the way it's presented can be a reason why it's hated. I felt that high school mathematics focused too much on numbers. Mathematics, in all its aspects, is part of life. Trigonometry is part of life. Calculus is part of life. Statistics is part of life. Speaking of statistics, I was thinking about how IBON Foundation has given its assessment of Duterte's administration. This isn't to say that outgoing President Rodrigo R. Duterte hasn't made mistakes. Rather, this is to point out how IBON Foundation has that tendency to be illogical.

IBON Foundation (click to enlarge)

This data by IBON Foundation was gathered. I'm not saying that the figures are lies or manipulated. My problem with how IBON Foundation works is their failure to account for the cause and effect more often than not. 

Malaya Business Insight

It's like how one of their late members, the late Neil Doloricon, even had the audacity to draw a caricature (above) that foreign investors will leave the Philippines with nothing. I think IBON Foundation needs to tell first-world countries that foreign investment is bad or will leave them bankrupt. In response, I decided to write that foreign investors only get rich after they've paid their taxes. Haven't they encountered cost accounting which says net profits is only after all expenses are paid for? For sure, the late Lee Kuan Yew's book From Third World to First had long proven them long. I wonder what their motives are behind when they say that there's this foreign investment "fetish" that keeps Filipinos poor. In response, I decided to write about a destructive obsession with ayudas (cash handouts) in regards to their obsession with cash handouts. They better explain with empirical data how cash handouts help the economy. Cash handouts are never meant to be a long-term solution except in extreme cases. Every amount of cash handout is from taxes paid by the people. 

We need to know the cause and effect. I'm not saying that the inflation rate hasn't gone up, the prices of gasoline haven't gone up, the debt hasn't gone down, and the other problems. However, these guys really fail to show the correlation between world events and how it affects the Philippines. It seems to be that they want to blame Duterte for problems beyond his control namely (1) factors that affect the prices of petroleum products, (2) the COVID-19 pandemic, and (3) times when we need to import. COVID-19 has forced the borrowing of money for COVID-19 expenses. Yet, they still want to oppose foreign investments which would help provide national income. The recent problems such as the War in Ukraine caused by Russia have helped significantly cause inflation due to the prices of gasoline worldwide. COVID-19 brought the world to a standstill especially when not enough gas was refined for some time. Those problems that hit during Duterte's time are beyond his control.

The big difference between Andrew J. Masigan and IBON Foundation

I could still give Masigan some praise for this reason. For instance, when Masigan criticized Duterte, he did a better analysis than what IBON gave. Masigan actually went as far as to point out the fundamental flaws such as how he cited this at Business World:
So why can’t the growth of exports keep up with the growth of our imports? Apart from the relative failure to nurture local industries to be competitive enough to export, the Philippines has also been hard-pressed to attract foreign direct investments (FDIs). As we all know, FDI’s have a direct correlation to our capacity to export. Following our peak in 2017 when we attracted $10.26 billion worth of FDIs, foreign investments declined to $9.95 billion in 2018, $8.70 billion in 2019 and $6.4 billion in 2020. Mind you, our FDIs are about half of what Vietnam realizes.

There are many reasons why we lag in FDIs. Among the principal reasons is the negative list of industries where foreign participation is prohibited by the constitution, (un)ease in doing business, gaps in our supply chain, corruption in government, policy instability, the weak rule of law, uncompetitive fiscal incentives and the dearth of outward investment missions to woo foreign investors. Worsening matters is President Duterte’s animosity towards the west which dissuaded many American, European, Japanese, and Australian investors from setting up shop in the country.

What even amazed me is when Masigan also wrote this one in the same article where he discussed why he felt Dutertenomics was flawed:

As usual, the dollar inflows from OFW remittances and service exports (IT-BPO industry) save us from financial ruin. Between 2016 and 2020, OFW remittances pumped-in an average of $32 billion a year while our service exports contributed an average of $36.5 billion a year.

Have OFW remittances and service exports been enough to cover our deficits? No. There is a still a gap and it is funded by debt. 

Which, later, Masigan even went as far as to say that laws concerning foreign investments were "long overdue". In short, I felt that Masigan was giving an objective criticism of Duterte. It's very different from how IBON Foundation does it by just mentioning digits without understanding some factors are beyond the country's control. That's why I still feel like recommend reading Masigan's articles and analysis. Masigan wrote this one also at Business World where he believes the need for economic charter change is really there:

The same is true for the economic provisions of the constitution. We all know that by reserving certain industries exclusively for Filipinos (or Filipino majorities), we deprived the nation of valuable forex investments, technology transfers, tax revenues, export earnings and employment opportunities. Yet, amendments to the economic provisions of the constitution (Eco Cha-cha) have never made it to law simply because certain families stand to lose their stronghold on industries and the lingering doubt that once the constitution is opened for amendment, dubious legislators would push for lifting term limits.

The good news is that Eco Cha-cha is presently being deliberated in the legislature, thanks to the leadership of Speaker Lord Allan Velasco. This is a rare but welcome development which we should all support. Not only will Eco Cha-cha accelerate our economic recovery, it will also increase our competitiveness relative to our regional neighbors.

The restrictive provisions of the constitution have held back the country’s development for more than 30 years. From the 1980s up to the close of the century, countries like Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand leapfrogged economically on the back of a deluge foreign direct investments (FDIs). During that period, the Philippines share of regional FDIs was a paltry 3% in good years and 2% in normal years. The flawed economic laws of the constitution are largely to blame for this. Lately, Vietnam has taken the lion’s share of FDIs, leaving the Philippines in the dust.

Meanwhile, I feel IBON should be disregarded. They're still presenting solutions that I call an insult to my degree. I feel like I could still have a bachelor's degree, not get my master's degree, and still disagree with what IBON Foundation says. A lot of stuff I'm writing right now is taken from a bachelor's degree education such as accounting and finance. IBON probably still wants to think in economic nationalism (which hasn't worked) accompanied by cash handouts will save the economy. Yet, basic economics proves that overprinting of money is bad for the economy and that isolationism isn't good as proven by Venezuela's really bad situation today. 

References

Books 

"From Third World to First--The Singapore Story: 1965-2000) by Lee Kuan Yew
Harpers Collins Publishers

Websites

"Eco ‘Cha-cha,’ now!" by Andrew J. Masigan (January 24, 2021)

"Long overdue laws finally passed" by Andrew J. Masigan (April 06, 2022)

"Our destructive foreign investment fetish" by IBON Foundation (March 28, 2022)

"Why Dutertenomics weakened the economy" by Andrew J. Masigan (July 18, 2021)
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...
Read more

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...
Read more

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...
Read more

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...
Read more