Skip to main content

60-40 Foreign Direct Investment Ownership is Nothing More Than OVERPRICED Rent


I'm amazed that there are some people who still insist that the Philippines should retain the 60-40 investment scheme or even lesser shares ownership for foreign investments. The argument always goes such as (1) Filipinos must be the majority shareholder because it's their country, (2) only foreign investors will get rich if you let them invest in here 100%, and (3) you're basically selling land. This is the problem when people can't tell the difference between shares ownership and land ownership. Shares ownership means owning a percentage of the company. Land ownership is where the land is leased upon. This is where I would like to argue why easing certain foreign investment restrictions is necessary.

An illustration that will help see why 60-40 is nothing more than overpriced rent

I would like to give this picture. Let's imagine you're a businessman and you're looking for a space to rent. Not everyone is willing to sell their commercial space but there are those more than willing to rent it. Some just refuse to sell their commercial space because selling is a one-shot deal. Now, you found a good space. It's a very nice neighborhood, with clean fresh air, good peace and order, and then here comes the property holder. You're so excited to look at the place. The property holder gives you a tour around the commercial building. It's in a very nice location. You really feel you get a good place. 

It's now time to sign the contract. You feel you found the best place you could start a business. You decide to ask for the rental fee. You know you can't buy the place but you can rent it, right? The property holder then presents the contract of lease. You start reading the provisions. However, one provision starts to tick you off. What's this provision you may ask? It might go something like this, "The tenant, therefore, shall agree to pay 60% of his/her net income to the property holder on a monthly basis." That would definitely be a tick-off now, wouldn't it? The property owner is demanding all who lease the commercial property should give him at least 60% shares of ownership for that branch. Who in the right mind would ever want to rent that kind of space? 

For one, I definitely would refuse such a landlord. I would have probably said, "No thanks! The fees are too high!" I couldn't imagine how the business will be if I had to give up 60% of my net profits to the property holder. The whole thing is just unjust. Yet, that's what the Philippines has been doing for some time--giving overpriced rent to multinational corporations (MNCs). What happens during the 60-40 shares arrangement is this--foreign investors only get to keep 40% of their net income. Who in the right mind would want to invest if you can't keep 100% of your net profits after taxes?

Why removing the 60-40 arrangement in regards to net profits will be more profitable

Now, let's move to another scenario. You're so sick and tired of that property owner you met. However, another landlord in that area showed up and said, "Why don't you take a look at my space?" You get a tour around the next commercial area. It may not look as good as the previous one but it's still in good condition. This property owner then says, "You're looking for a space, right? I did some computations and maybe you might need to pay me at least PHP 20,000.00 for the first few years. We can negotiate the increase later if ever it's needed." 

This would be a completely different scenario. The property owner says, "You can continue to do business here but you have to pay me at least PHP 20,000.00 per month. Failure to pay in two consecutive months means you're out." This is really much better. It doesn't matter how much net profit you make--all the owner asks is the rightful amount of rent. The property owner reserves one's right ot kick the tenant out only if violations were committed. The tenant can keep 100% of his net profit after taxes. However, this net profit only comes after the payment of rentals, government fees (which include taxes), and compliance with law and order. This becomes the better arrangement.

This is what the 100% shares ownership would do. MNCs wouldn't need a Filipino partner to do business. However, land ownership is more or less out of the question to control the supply and demand. After all, MNCs are there to rent and the country they're renting in is like the shopping mall. No mall owner will ever sell their space. The MNC can do business all it wants in the Philippines without a Filipino partner. However, the restrictions imposed on them are (1) they can't buy land, (2) they have to pay rentals to the property holders, (3) they need to pay government fees which include taxes, and (4) following the laws of the Philippine government. If they won't pay rent then they're out. If they don't pay government fees then consider the possibility of imprisonment and deportation. If you commit a crime then you do the time. Follow all of them and you can continue getting rich but only from net income after taxes.

It's true that the money won't come so easily. However, because of the ease of doing business (with reasonable restrictions) then more money will come in. What happens next is that when there will be more MNCs--there will be more income eventually. I may not get rich fast without not having a 60-40 arrangement with tenants. However, having just rental fees will be one of the reasons why more tenants will move into my commercial space. It wouldn't flow in big (at first) but having the right price to earn a profit (not too high nor too low) will encourage more people to do business. It wouldn't be so fast but it will be more sustainable in the long run. After all, sacrifices need to be made to make a sustainable flow of money such as investing in environmentally friendly business practices, ethical treatment of workers, having a good supply chain, and the like. It might cost more money (now) but the returns will be much higher in the future. 

Besides, the more competition there will be, the better the Philippine business environment becomes. Filipino businessmen will have to get creative on how to face threats and opportunities. They will have a lot of competition to deal with. However, their customers' new competitors and their service providers' competitors are opportunities for growth. Sugar farmers in Negros Occidental may think of selling raw sugar to Taiwanese milk tea owners looking for fresh sugar. Local Filipino businessmen may want to avail themselves of better transportation services. Banks may want to make way for more clients. Meanwhile, local businessmen may consider investing in one local bank and another foreign bank. Local banks would still benefit from foreign investors who'd approach them first because they're the most readily available. In the end, it's all about delivering quality services regardless if the investor is local or foreign. 

References

"Duterte signs law amending Public Service Act" by Azer Parrocha (March 21, 2022)

"Glocalization" by Adam Hayes, reviewed by Gordon Scott (Updated: March 26, 2020)

"SINK OR SWIM: CHANGING THE 60-40 RULE ON FOREIGN OWNERSHIP AS KEY TO SURVIVING GLOBALIZATION" by Glenndale Cornelio

"The Philippines Readies Public Services for 100 Percent Foreign Ownership" by James Guild (December 29, 2021)
https://thediplomat.com/2021/12/the-philippines-readies-public-services-for-100-percent-foreign-ownership/
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

It's More Fun In The Philippines Thanks to the Filipino First Policy

I guess it can be called a day, right? This April 1, 2023 , I'm finally calling it quits with fighting for economic liberalization! Yes, that's right! All the advocacy for economic liberalization is just garbage. Why did I even spend so much time writing this blog only to find out that I've been duped? I hereby renounce everything I wrote here. I finally saw how brilliant the Filipino First Policy is. Man, what have I done? How much damage have I caused in advocating for economic liberalization?  The greatest president we ever had was... High School Philippine History Movement It's time to listen to the economic genius known as the late Carlos P. Garcia. Yes, he has to be one of the greatest presidents that ever existed.  I took this note from the Bohol Provincial Library and found this about CPG's Filipino First Policy ; CPG adopted the “Filipino First” Policy to promote greater Filipino participation in business, and to put the Filipinos in control of the economy...
Read more

Pinoy Pride Economics Helps in Drug Mule Recruitment

Al Jazeera Who can remember the execution of three drug mules in China on March 30, 2011 ? These were three separate cases where the three convicts were  Sally Villanueva , Ramon Credo (who was cremated before his remains were brought home, and Elizabeth Batain (whose face was never shown). Sally had an episode in the GMA-7 TV show Magpakailanman,  where her husband was personally interviewed by Mel Tiangco. We never got Sally on the big screen. The husband's side of the story said that his wife was guilty of a frame-up, while Mel herself said, "If the offer is too good to be true, don't take it, or you could end up in the same pickle." Take note that I'm just paraphrasing Mel's words, not saying the words she said.  Reviewing the three drug mules who got arrested, based only on what's available for public viewing on the Internet If we read through the circumstances , this is how they were arrested, proving they weren't a trio: China has brushed aside...
Read more

The Good Old Days when Gasoline was Cheaper Under the Late Noynoy Aquino

Millennials' Voice I would like to clarify first and foremost that this post isn't an attempt to say that the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III's legacy was all bad. Some good things happened. However, let me be clear that it's stupid to say, " We don't need economic cha-cha because of the late Noynoy. " However, let me clear that I decided to write this because of a Facebook post called Millennials' Voice , which wrote this: Did you know that during President Noynoy Aquino's time, the price of oil in the world market was high, between $100 and $110 per barrel. But even with those high prices, gasoline and diesel at local pumps in the country were still relatively affordable.  Under President Duterte, world oil prices went up and down, from a low of $41 to a high of $101 per barrel. The big jump to $101 in 2022 happened because of the war between Russia and Ukraine.   Now, under the current president, world oil prices have gone up again to around $...
Read more

Yes, the Philippines Can Self-Industrialize Because Filipinos Are the Most Powerful Race in the World (NO JOKE)

Yes, you got that right! This meme is a fact that Filipinos are the most powerful race in the world. That has been proven by the Trust Me Bro Factcheckers of the Philippines. It's the case of Filipino Exceptionalism. One can read on Facebook something like, "How many times do I have to tell you that the Philippines isn't Vietnam/Singapore/China/Taiwan/Japan, etc.?" Ever read that? If you haven't then you must be exceptionally stupid. That's why the Philippines should never learn from other countries, especially from Singapore. Why are you always listening to foreigners? Why listen to the advice of a stinky Indian when you can have the advice of the best constitutionalist in the world, Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr.? You say that nations of the world go to Kishore Mabhubani in Singapore instead. Forget them because the Philippines is so unique that it can do everything on its own. It was proven by the greatest president that the Philippines always had, namely Carl...
Read more

The Filipino First Policy Caused the Philippines to Succeed!

High School Philippine History Movement Yes, you read it right! I found a hidden gem that I should've read years ago! It's the book Nationalist Economics by the late Alejandro Lichauco, who is part of the magnificent IBON Foundation. It's a shame I refused to read it. I should've read Lichauco's book instead of the late Lee Kuan Yew's book From Third World to First . What a shame that I didn't look into the details that LKY was a dictator, that Flor Contemplacion was indeed innocent, and that Singapore is a state comparable to Nazi Germany. As I bought my copy of Nationalist Economics from the Trust Me Bro School of Economics--I'm now convinced that the Filipino First Policy caused us to succeed! LKY ruled Singapore for 31 years, meaning it's a frightening thing indeed! Six years is the magic number ot establish a benevolent rule!  Who should we all listen to? Should we listen to foreigners or should we listen to our fellow Filipino? We must think st...
Read more