Skip to main content

60-40 Foreign Direct Investment Ownership is Nothing More Than OVERPRICED Rent


I'm amazed that there are some people who still insist that the Philippines should retain the 60-40 investment scheme or even lesser shares ownership for foreign investments. The argument always goes such as (1) Filipinos must be the majority shareholder because it's their country, (2) only foreign investors will get rich if you let them invest in here 100%, and (3) you're basically selling land. This is the problem when people can't tell the difference between shares ownership and land ownership. Shares ownership means owning a percentage of the company. Land ownership is where the land is leased upon. This is where I would like to argue why easing certain foreign investment restrictions is necessary.

An illustration that will help see why 60-40 is nothing more than overpriced rent

I would like to give this picture. Let's imagine you're a businessman and you're looking for a space to rent. Not everyone is willing to sell their commercial space but there are those more than willing to rent it. Some just refuse to sell their commercial space because selling is a one-shot deal. Now, you found a good space. It's a very nice neighborhood, with clean fresh air, good peace and order, and then here comes the property holder. You're so excited to look at the place. The property holder gives you a tour around the commercial building. It's in a very nice location. You really feel you get a good place. 

It's now time to sign the contract. You feel you found the best place you could start a business. You decide to ask for the rental fee. You know you can't buy the place but you can rent it, right? The property holder then presents the contract of lease. You start reading the provisions. However, one provision starts to tick you off. What's this provision you may ask? It might go something like this, "The tenant, therefore, shall agree to pay 60% of his/her net income to the property holder on a monthly basis." That would definitely be a tick-off now, wouldn't it? The property owner is demanding all who lease the commercial property should give him at least 60% shares of ownership for that branch. Who in the right mind would ever want to rent that kind of space? 

For one, I definitely would refuse such a landlord. I would have probably said, "No thanks! The fees are too high!" I couldn't imagine how the business will be if I had to give up 60% of my net profits to the property holder. The whole thing is just unjust. Yet, that's what the Philippines has been doing for some time--giving overpriced rent to multinational corporations (MNCs). What happens during the 60-40 shares arrangement is this--foreign investors only get to keep 40% of their net income. Who in the right mind would want to invest if you can't keep 100% of your net profits after taxes?

Why removing the 60-40 arrangement in regards to net profits will be more profitable

Now, let's move to another scenario. You're so sick and tired of that property owner you met. However, another landlord in that area showed up and said, "Why don't you take a look at my space?" You get a tour around the next commercial area. It may not look as good as the previous one but it's still in good condition. This property owner then says, "You're looking for a space, right? I did some computations and maybe you might need to pay me at least PHP 20,000.00 for the first few years. We can negotiate the increase later if ever it's needed." 

This would be a completely different scenario. The property owner says, "You can continue to do business here but you have to pay me at least PHP 20,000.00 per month. Failure to pay in two consecutive months means you're out." This is really much better. It doesn't matter how much net profit you make--all the owner asks is the rightful amount of rent. The property owner reserves one's right ot kick the tenant out only if violations were committed. The tenant can keep 100% of his net profit after taxes. However, this net profit only comes after the payment of rentals, government fees (which include taxes), and compliance with law and order. This becomes the better arrangement.

This is what the 100% shares ownership would do. MNCs wouldn't need a Filipino partner to do business. However, land ownership is more or less out of the question to control the supply and demand. After all, MNCs are there to rent and the country they're renting in is like the shopping mall. No mall owner will ever sell their space. The MNC can do business all it wants in the Philippines without a Filipino partner. However, the restrictions imposed on them are (1) they can't buy land, (2) they have to pay rentals to the property holders, (3) they need to pay government fees which include taxes, and (4) following the laws of the Philippine government. If they won't pay rent then they're out. If they don't pay government fees then consider the possibility of imprisonment and deportation. If you commit a crime then you do the time. Follow all of them and you can continue getting rich but only from net income after taxes.

It's true that the money won't come so easily. However, because of the ease of doing business (with reasonable restrictions) then more money will come in. What happens next is that when there will be more MNCs--there will be more income eventually. I may not get rich fast without not having a 60-40 arrangement with tenants. However, having just rental fees will be one of the reasons why more tenants will move into my commercial space. It wouldn't flow in big (at first) but having the right price to earn a profit (not too high nor too low) will encourage more people to do business. It wouldn't be so fast but it will be more sustainable in the long run. After all, sacrifices need to be made to make a sustainable flow of money such as investing in environmentally friendly business practices, ethical treatment of workers, having a good supply chain, and the like. It might cost more money (now) but the returns will be much higher in the future. 

Besides, the more competition there will be, the better the Philippine business environment becomes. Filipino businessmen will have to get creative on how to face threats and opportunities. They will have a lot of competition to deal with. However, their customers' new competitors and their service providers' competitors are opportunities for growth. Sugar farmers in Negros Occidental may think of selling raw sugar to Taiwanese milk tea owners looking for fresh sugar. Local Filipino businessmen may want to avail themselves of better transportation services. Banks may want to make way for more clients. Meanwhile, local businessmen may consider investing in one local bank and another foreign bank. Local banks would still benefit from foreign investors who'd approach them first because they're the most readily available. In the end, it's all about delivering quality services regardless if the investor is local or foreign. 

References

"Duterte signs law amending Public Service Act" by Azer Parrocha (March 21, 2022)

"Glocalization" by Adam Hayes, reviewed by Gordon Scott (Updated: March 26, 2020)

"SINK OR SWIM: CHANGING THE 60-40 RULE ON FOREIGN OWNERSHIP AS KEY TO SURVIVING GLOBALIZATION" by Glenndale Cornelio

"The Philippines Readies Public Services for 100 Percent Foreign Ownership" by James Guild (December 29, 2021)
https://thediplomat.com/2021/12/the-philippines-readies-public-services-for-100-percent-foreign-ownership/
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...
Read more

Overspending as a Narcotic of the Filipino Masses

Harvard Health Publishing It's almost time for the New Year, right? However, there's the problem that so many Filipinos just refuse to do any financial New Year's resolutions . It's a continued series of broken New Year's resolutions year after year , such as not doing anything about one's financial and economic literacy . Then again, can Filipinos learn financial literacy when the school environment is  too theoretical ? As I observe the same cycle in the Philippines, from January to December, it has always been a financial mess for many Filipinos. The problem starts with mishandling money, such as how paychecks are often handled by people .  There's always some joy in spending, whether we want to admit it or not We can't deny that if we bought what we want (especially with one's own money), there's some feeling of satisfaction . For example, a person who stops begging from their parents and starts buying what they want, with  their money , can ...
Read more

Is Christmas Toxic Positivity a Cause or an Effect of the Philippines' Lack of Progress?

Lessandra When it's Christmas, it's so easy to think of the song of the late Andy Williams, "It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year". The music itself reeks of toxic positivity,  whether one likes it or not. It's a shame, really, because December 20 was also the anniversary of Asia's Titanic, the sinking of the Doña Paz ! We live in a society that somehow never learns from its mistakes, like a person who's stuck in gambling debt, is still hoping to get rich gambling . Despite all that, Christmas toxic positivity still abounds in the Philippines. We still have a lot of ongoing bad habits, such as starting Christmas in September and then doing last-minute Christmas shopping during the week of Christmas. That's why every time I drive on the road on Christmas, I tend to shout, "Isn't it any wonder why the Philippines never improves?" The term Noche Buena has evolved over time . For some, it's simply the Christmas dinner. However, so...
Read more

Why the Old Chinese Education System in the Philippines Can't Pass the HSK Standard Today

Bahay Tsinoy, museum of Chinese life in the Philippines There are a lot of cavemen-minded people out there. Some would argue that Pinyin is making things too easy, never mind that Mainland China was the first to  move to abolish Zhuyin. I was looking at the comments on the Bahay Tsinoy Facebook page, and I was not surprised by them. I try to talk about Pinyin and even ask, "Can you get your business permit with Zhuyin?" I guess I was being too blunt in what I did or not. Those old books above were useless . It's because they required people to learn Chinese first and an overdose of memorization . Memorization helps but without understanding, it doesn't help. Besides, you can't even use those textbooks above to teach Mandarin in the language centers (read why here ). People who graduated from Chinese schools talk about their experiences. Some of them even said, "We just memorized so we don't get whacked at the ruler by the siansi (Hokkien for teacher). Fo...
Read more

Why I Don't Intend (or Even Recommend to Anyone) to Invest in Cryptocurrencies

I remembered the time when I started to do some monetary investments (bonds, mutual funds), got scammed by a bad customer who hasn't paid me back until now, and how the journey of personal finance is no easy task. I feel like it's time to talk about another Ponzi scheme called cryptocurrency. First, we need to define it before I will state why I don't even intend to invest in it.   Cryptocurrency is defined by Investopedia as follows: A cryptocurrency is a digital or virtual currency that is secured by cryptography, which makes it nearly impossible to counterfeit or double-spend. Many cryptocurrencies are decentralized networks based on blockchain technology—a distributed ledger enforced by a disparate network of computers. A defining feature of cryptocurrencies is that they are generally not issued by any central authority, rendering them theoretically immune to government interference or manipulation . A clear lack of regulation and extreme volatility make it very dangero...
Read more