Skip to main content

60-40 Foreign Direct Investment Ownership is Nothing More Than OVERPRICED Rent


I'm amazed that there are some people who still insist that the Philippines should retain the 60-40 investment scheme or even lesser shares ownership for foreign investments. The argument always goes such as (1) Filipinos must be the majority shareholder because it's their country, (2) only foreign investors will get rich if you let them invest in here 100%, and (3) you're basically selling land. This is the problem when people can't tell the difference between shares ownership and land ownership. Shares ownership means owning a percentage of the company. Land ownership is where the land is leased upon. This is where I would like to argue why easing certain foreign investment restrictions is necessary.

An illustration that will help see why 60-40 is nothing more than overpriced rent

I would like to give this picture. Let's imagine you're a businessman and you're looking for a space to rent. Not everyone is willing to sell their commercial space but there are those more than willing to rent it. Some just refuse to sell their commercial space because selling is a one-shot deal. Now, you found a good space. It's a very nice neighborhood, with clean fresh air, good peace and order, and then here comes the property holder. You're so excited to look at the place. The property holder gives you a tour around the commercial building. It's in a very nice location. You really feel you get a good place. 

It's now time to sign the contract. You feel you found the best place you could start a business. You decide to ask for the rental fee. You know you can't buy the place but you can rent it, right? The property holder then presents the contract of lease. You start reading the provisions. However, one provision starts to tick you off. What's this provision you may ask? It might go something like this, "The tenant, therefore, shall agree to pay 60% of his/her net income to the property holder on a monthly basis." That would definitely be a tick-off now, wouldn't it? The property owner is demanding all who lease the commercial property should give him at least 60% shares of ownership for that branch. Who in the right mind would ever want to rent that kind of space? 

For one, I definitely would refuse such a landlord. I would have probably said, "No thanks! The fees are too high!" I couldn't imagine how the business will be if I had to give up 60% of my net profits to the property holder. The whole thing is just unjust. Yet, that's what the Philippines has been doing for some time--giving overpriced rent to multinational corporations (MNCs). What happens during the 60-40 shares arrangement is this--foreign investors only get to keep 40% of their net income. Who in the right mind would want to invest if you can't keep 100% of your net profits after taxes?

Why removing the 60-40 arrangement in regards to net profits will be more profitable

Now, let's move to another scenario. You're so sick and tired of that property owner you met. However, another landlord in that area showed up and said, "Why don't you take a look at my space?" You get a tour around the next commercial area. It may not look as good as the previous one but it's still in good condition. This property owner then says, "You're looking for a space, right? I did some computations and maybe you might need to pay me at least PHP 20,000.00 for the first few years. We can negotiate the increase later if ever it's needed." 

This would be a completely different scenario. The property owner says, "You can continue to do business here but you have to pay me at least PHP 20,000.00 per month. Failure to pay in two consecutive months means you're out." This is really much better. It doesn't matter how much net profit you make--all the owner asks is the rightful amount of rent. The property owner reserves one's right ot kick the tenant out only if violations were committed. The tenant can keep 100% of his net profit after taxes. However, this net profit only comes after the payment of rentals, government fees (which include taxes), and compliance with law and order. This becomes the better arrangement.

This is what the 100% shares ownership would do. MNCs wouldn't need a Filipino partner to do business. However, land ownership is more or less out of the question to control the supply and demand. After all, MNCs are there to rent and the country they're renting in is like the shopping mall. No mall owner will ever sell their space. The MNC can do business all it wants in the Philippines without a Filipino partner. However, the restrictions imposed on them are (1) they can't buy land, (2) they have to pay rentals to the property holders, (3) they need to pay government fees which include taxes, and (4) following the laws of the Philippine government. If they won't pay rent then they're out. If they don't pay government fees then consider the possibility of imprisonment and deportation. If you commit a crime then you do the time. Follow all of them and you can continue getting rich but only from net income after taxes.

It's true that the money won't come so easily. However, because of the ease of doing business (with reasonable restrictions) then more money will come in. What happens next is that when there will be more MNCs--there will be more income eventually. I may not get rich fast without not having a 60-40 arrangement with tenants. However, having just rental fees will be one of the reasons why more tenants will move into my commercial space. It wouldn't flow in big (at first) but having the right price to earn a profit (not too high nor too low) will encourage more people to do business. It wouldn't be so fast but it will be more sustainable in the long run. After all, sacrifices need to be made to make a sustainable flow of money such as investing in environmentally friendly business practices, ethical treatment of workers, having a good supply chain, and the like. It might cost more money (now) but the returns will be much higher in the future. 

Besides, the more competition there will be, the better the Philippine business environment becomes. Filipino businessmen will have to get creative on how to face threats and opportunities. They will have a lot of competition to deal with. However, their customers' new competitors and their service providers' competitors are opportunities for growth. Sugar farmers in Negros Occidental may think of selling raw sugar to Taiwanese milk tea owners looking for fresh sugar. Local Filipino businessmen may want to avail themselves of better transportation services. Banks may want to make way for more clients. Meanwhile, local businessmen may consider investing in one local bank and another foreign bank. Local banks would still benefit from foreign investors who'd approach them first because they're the most readily available. In the end, it's all about delivering quality services regardless if the investor is local or foreign. 

References

"Duterte signs law amending Public Service Act" by Azer Parrocha (March 21, 2022)

"Glocalization" by Adam Hayes, reviewed by Gordon Scott (Updated: March 26, 2020)

"SINK OR SWIM: CHANGING THE 60-40 RULE ON FOREIGN OWNERSHIP AS KEY TO SURVIVING GLOBALIZATION" by Glenndale Cornelio

"The Philippines Readies Public Services for 100 Percent Foreign Ownership" by James Guild (December 29, 2021)
https://thediplomat.com/2021/12/the-philippines-readies-public-services-for-100-percent-foreign-ownership/
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

[UNPOPULAR OPINION] Why People Power Anniversary Should Be a Special Working Day Instead

  As a blogger, I shouldn't turn on the PC in hopes of becoming popular . It should be to turn on the PC and blog to make a difference . Right now, I think about the controversy when President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. declared the 1986 EDSA Revolution's anniversary as a working holiday . The call for some of the "minority lawmakers" is that they want to return the People Power Anniversary to a regular holiday once more. There are times I feel like, "Should we let it be a regular holiday again, so as not to repeat the Marcos dictatorship?" Sadly, the real answer is that the Philippines has been relying too much on EDSA , so it's practically ending up like Nokia . I was thinking about the reality of February being the most hectic month. February only has 28 days (and February 25 is near the month's end ). I thought that the Philippines also has too many national holidays more often than not. In fact, the Inquirer article written by...
Read more

Is Jollibee "Invading" South Korea Now as It's About to Acquire 70% of Shabu All Day?

I must confess that I find this new rather hilarious . It's because the word shabu is often associated with drugs. All the while, shabu shabu is a Korean delicacy! Well, I'm going to say that Jollibee Foods Corporation has now become a multinational buyer . Jollibee acquired 70% of Compost Coffee back in 2024 . This year, Jollibee as a multinational corporation is now acquiring Shabu All Day for PHP 5.1 billion pesos. Is Jollibee checkmating South Korea or is the Philippines conquering South Korea not just by OFWs but als through Jollibee? The answer is still no. From GMA News , we can read this article by Jon Viktor D. Cabuenas: Under the deal, Shabu All Day will be consolidated into Jollibee Foods Corp.’s (JFC) financial statements immediately upon completion of the acquisition for a total consideration equivalent to KRW127 billion. Completion of the transaction is subject to closing and financing conditions. The acquisition is expected to lead to a 2% jump in revenues, incre...
Read more

"Filipino First Policy" Has NO PLACE in the Rising Asian 21st Century

I guess nobody saw the Asian 21st Century coming, right? China was once a poor nation but look at it now. Vietnam was once a poor nation but look at it now. Singapore was once a poor nation but look at it now. The late great Lee Kuan Yew wrote his book From Third World to First . I'm afraid some people have been using it to go against the presidency of Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. while ignoring what else Lee Kuan Yew had to say. Lee Kuan Yew described the Filipino press to be rambunctious on pages 304-305 which I agree. I'm afraid that the Filipino press may have had a hand in getting rid of any economic or political reforms that could help the Philippines. Yet, one policy has been holding back the Philippines for decades and yes, it's the Filipino First Policy .  Reviewing the Filipino First Policy and why it has no place in the rising Asian 21st century I remembered how the values education subject taught Carlos P. Garcia's stupid Filipino First Policy as a Filipino value...
Read more

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more

The Prevalence of Fake Rich in the Philippines

Back in 2022, I wrote about why it's deadly to believe someone is rich based on their lifestyle . During my childhood to teenage years, I used to think someone was wealthier because of reasons like: Their parents spoil them with generous allowances.  They're driving a luxury car everywhere they go. They have expensive parties every year.  They have a lot of luxury brands. The children have so many toys.  The list can go on and on , and I believe I might type too many words from there. I grew up with people bragging about  how rich they are, even if the claims are preposterous. It's common among children to brag about what they don't have . Unfortunately, some never outgrow that dangerous habit and grow up with a fake rich lifestyle. This is the lifestyle where one wants others to think they're rich, even if they're not rich. The rule of fake rich reverses the advice above. Instead, the fake rich lifestyle says, "Buy a USD 500.00 bag never mind you have noth...
Read more