Skip to main content

Common Sense: Foreign Investment Isn't Foreign Debt

Listen to him and those who think alike, not the naysayers!

Amazingly, some people confuse foreign direct investment (FDI) with foreign debt. They think letting foreigners invest in the country will increase the national debt. These are two totally different terms. I really have to laugh when somebody tells me that FDI will increase debt. I would say it's laughable because debts and investments may be related but they're two totally different words. A person may get into debt to invest in something. A person may get into some debt to build a commercial building or buy the land. However, a person invests when the commercial building is open for rent to pay back the debt. Debt is basically an expense because you need to pay back the money. An investment is an inflow of money. 

What is foreign debt? 

The Investopedia defines foreign debt as:
Foreign debt is money borrowed by a government, corporation or private household from another country's government or private lenders. Foreign debt also includes obligations to international organizations such as the World Bank, Asian Development Bank (ADB), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Total foreign debt can be a combination of short-term and long-term liabilities.

Foreign debt, also known as external debt, has been rising steadily in recent decades, with unwelcome side-effects in some borrowing countries. These include slower economic growth, particularly in low-income countries, as well as crippling debt crises, financial market turmoil, and even secondary effects such as a rise in human-rights abuses.

In effect, foreign debt is when a country borrows money from another country. For example, the Philippines will borrow money from Singapore to finance the COVID-19. It didn't ask for investments but a loan from Singapore. It might also borrow money to finance some infrastructure projects that taxes may not be able to cover. Even developed countries may borrow form each other every now and then depending on the situation.

Per see, foreign debt isn't always bad unless one's paying power is in shambles. To achieve this, we would need a combination of local and foreign investment to generate income for the government.

What is foreign investment? 

Meanwhile, foreign investment is what it is--an investment. The Investopedia defines foreign investment as:
Foreign investment involves capital flows from one country to another, granting the foreign investors extensive ownership stakes in domestic companies and assets. Foreign investment denotes that foreigners have an active role in management as a part of their investment or an equity stake large enough to enable the foreign investor to influence business strategy. A modern trend leans toward globalization, where multinational firms have investments in a variety of countries.

This is how foreign investment works, according to Investopedia:

How Foreign Investment Works

Foreign investment is largely seen as a catalyst for economic growth in the future. Foreign investments can be made by individuals, but are most often endeavors pursued by companies and corporations with substantial assets looking to expand their reach.

As globalization increases, more and more companies have branches in countries around the world. For some multinational corporations, opening new manufacturing and production plants in a different country is attractive because of the opportunities for cheaper production and labor costs.

Additionally, these large corporations frequently look to do business with those countries where they will pay the least amount of taxes. They may do this by relocating their home office or parts of their business to a country that is a tax haven or has favorable tax laws aimed at attracting foreign investors.

Foreign investment would mean that companies would invest in other countries. Obviously, there the cheaper production and labor costs to take advantage of. Sometimes, a business may want to do business where taxes aren't so heavy. That's why I'm in favor of having tax cuts when needed. The foreign investor opens a business in the said country. 

However, foreign investors are required to follow rules even if they don't need a local partner. There's still the need to be registered, follow labor laws, and pay taxes. If they're going to get rich in the Philippines, then they'll enter the taxable bracket. What happens is that the government starts collecting applicable taxes. Multinational companies (MNCs) would be paying corporate taxes. These people will be under the tax mapping of the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR). What happens is that the foreign investor is essentially owing to the Philippine government its taxes whenever payable. Both foreign investors and local investors are debtors in the sense that taxes are always due as long as the business is generating net profits before taxes. 

Foreign investors will not only create jobs, bring capital, and introduce markets, but also provide taxes. It's because taxes don't create jobs. It's the job providers that create taxes. A trip to the BIR office will show a list of registered companies. The BIR didn't create the jobs. Instead, job creators gave the BIR its purpose to collect taxes. The revenue office will be rendered inoperative unless there are job providers. The BIR collects these taxes which is allocated to the government treasury. The taxes collected would also mean having the money to pay back foreign debts accumulated. 

References

Popular posts from this blog

The Idiocy of Typing Anti-FDI Rants Using IMPORTED Devices, IMPORTED Platforms, and IMPORTED Social Media

Bulatlat It's very easy to open Facebook (or any related platform) and find lots of stupidity , right? There have been idiotic comments I find on Facebook such as FDI is this and that. We can find "thought leader groups" such as Alliance of Concerned Teachers, Anakpawis, Anakbayan, Bayan Muna, IBON Foundation, Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, and Philippine Anti-Fascist League (PH Antifa) who keep ranting about FDI as this and that. I even remember somebody dared to say that FDI caused Egypt to dry up. Ironically, North Korea and Venezuela, two protectionist countries, have very bad pollution problems. I'd blame it that they don't have the money to do a clean-up drive. How can you clean up a polluted river without the right equipment? How can you expect better power efficiency with outdated equipment that keep coughing up, cough, cough, lots of black smoke?  All the talks on social media can be very funny. The big irony is that all calls for "...

Get Stuck with EDSA, End Up Like Nokia

  Yes, we should never forget what history teaches us. A classmate of mine, back in high school, wrote a simple and blunt essay called "History: A Teacher". I doubt he still has a soft copy, given it was already more than 20 years ago. I'd like to quote Duterte critic Andrew James Masigan wrote this in  Philippine Star --something that should remain relevant: I would never undervalue the 1987 Constitution. It dismantled the legal framework of a repressive regime and established the democratic institutions we enjoy today. For this, I am grateful. The 1987 Constitution was crafted with the best of intentions. It sought to put the Filipino first in all aspects of governance and to level the playing field amongst sectors and peoples.  But it is far from perfect. It failed to consider the importance of foreign capital and technologies and the stiff competition we would have to face to obtain them. In short, its economic provisions were short-sighted . So despite the Constitut...

It's Incredibly Frustrating to Discuss Economics with an Overspender

Overspending is just bad economics, isn't it? Economics is defined as the following for the sake of a review of high school basics: Economics is a social science concerned with the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. It studies how individuals, businesses, governments, and nations make choices about how to allocate resources. Economics focuses on the actions of human beings, based on assumptions that humans act with rational behavior, seeking the most optimal level of benefit or utility. The building blocks of economics are the studies of labor and trade. Since there are many possible applications of human labor and many different ways to acquire resources, it is the task of economics to determine which methods yield the best results. Economics can generally be broken down into macroeconomics, which concentrates on the behavior of the economy as a whole, and microeconomics, which focuses on individual people and businesses. It had me thinking of 2016 wh...

[UNPOPULAR OPINION] Why People Power Anniversary Should Be a Special Working Day Instead

  As a blogger, I shouldn't turn on the PC in hopes of becoming popular . It should be to turn on the PC and blog to make a difference . Right now, I think about the controversy when President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. declared the 1986 EDSA Revolution's anniversary as a working holiday . The call for some of the "minority lawmakers" is that they want to return the People Power Anniversary to a regular holiday once more. There are times I feel like, "Should we let it be a regular holiday again, so as not to repeat the Marcos dictatorship?" Sadly, the real answer is that the Philippines has been relying too much on EDSA , so it's practically ending up like Nokia . I was thinking about the reality of February being the most hectic month. February only has 28 days (and February 25 is near the month's end ). I thought that the Philippines also has too many national holidays more often than not. In fact, the Inquirer article written by...

Talking Economics with an Overeating Glutton

Two years ago, I wrote an entry about why discussing economics with an overspender is frustrating . Now, I was looking at certain fat people who say really dumb things about economics. Just recently, I was looking at a certain fat idiot (fortunately, he only has 1K+ followers) who posted on Facebook that not only will the parliamentary system cause the Philippines to become a dictatorship, but he also says that changing economic provisions will cause the Philippines to collapse and the country to fall into the hands of foreigners. I won't name the person out to avoid getting personal. However, the person is apparently very fat and he blames capitalism day in and day out. The person even says that businessmen do nothing and it's the employers that do everything. Has that fat slob ever heard that businesses are run by bosses and that if the bosses do screw up, they're the ones who are the most answerable? The employees are the cogs and the boss runs the cogs. I was looking at...