Skip to main content

Common Sense: Foreign Investment Isn't Foreign Debt

Listen to him and those who think alike, not the naysayers!

Amazingly, some people confuse foreign direct investment (FDI) with foreign debt. They think letting foreigners invest in the country will increase the national debt. These are two totally different terms. I really have to laugh when somebody tells me that FDI will increase debt. I would say it's laughable because debts and investments may be related but they're two totally different words. A person may get into debt to invest in something. A person may get into some debt to build a commercial building or buy the land. However, a person invests when the commercial building is open for rent to pay back the debt. Debt is basically an expense because you need to pay back the money. An investment is an inflow of money. 

What is foreign debt? 

The Investopedia defines foreign debt as:
Foreign debt is money borrowed by a government, corporation or private household from another country's government or private lenders. Foreign debt also includes obligations to international organizations such as the World Bank, Asian Development Bank (ADB), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Total foreign debt can be a combination of short-term and long-term liabilities.

Foreign debt, also known as external debt, has been rising steadily in recent decades, with unwelcome side-effects in some borrowing countries. These include slower economic growth, particularly in low-income countries, as well as crippling debt crises, financial market turmoil, and even secondary effects such as a rise in human-rights abuses.

In effect, foreign debt is when a country borrows money from another country. For example, the Philippines will borrow money from Singapore to finance the COVID-19. It didn't ask for investments but a loan from Singapore. It might also borrow money to finance some infrastructure projects that taxes may not be able to cover. Even developed countries may borrow form each other every now and then depending on the situation.

Per see, foreign debt isn't always bad unless one's paying power is in shambles. To achieve this, we would need a combination of local and foreign investment to generate income for the government.

What is foreign investment? 

Meanwhile, foreign investment is what it is--an investment. The Investopedia defines foreign investment as:
Foreign investment involves capital flows from one country to another, granting the foreign investors extensive ownership stakes in domestic companies and assets. Foreign investment denotes that foreigners have an active role in management as a part of their investment or an equity stake large enough to enable the foreign investor to influence business strategy. A modern trend leans toward globalization, where multinational firms have investments in a variety of countries.

This is how foreign investment works according to Investopedia:

How Foreign Investment Works

Foreign investment is largely seen as a catalyst for economic growth in the future. Foreign investments can be made by individuals, but are most often endeavors pursued by companies and corporations with substantial assets looking to expand their reach.

As globalization increases, more and more companies have branches in countries around the world. For some multinational corporations, opening new manufacturing and production plants in a different country is attractive because of the opportunities for cheaper production and labor costs.

Additionally, these large corporations frequently look to do business with those countries where they will pay the least amount of taxes. They may do this by relocating their home office or parts of their business to a country that is a tax haven or has favorable tax laws aimed at attracting foreign investors.

Foreign investment would mean that companies would invest in other countries. Obviously, there the cheaper production and labor costs to take advantage of. Sometimes, a business may want to do business where taxes aren't so heavy. That's why I'm in favor of having tax cuts when needed. The foreign investor opens a business in the said country. 

However, foreign investors are required to follow rules even if they don't need a local partner. There's still the need to be registered, follow labor laws, and pay taxes. If they're going to get rich in the Philippines, then they'll enter the taxable bracket. What happens is that the government starts collecting applicable taxes. Multinational companies (MNCs) would be paying corporate taxes. These people will be under the tax mapping of the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR). What happens is that the foreign investor is essentially owing to the Philippine government its taxes whenever payable. Both foreign investors and local investors are debtors in the sense that taxes are always due as long as the business is generating net profits before taxes. 

Foreign investors will not only create jobs, bring capital, and introduce markets, but also provide taxes. It's because taxes don't create jobs. It's the job providers that create taxes. A trip to the BIR office will show a list of registered companies. The BIR didn't create the jobs. Instead, job creators gave the BIR its purpose to collect taxes. The revenue office will be rendered inoperative unless there are job providers. The BIR collects these taxes which is allocated to the government treasury. The taxes collected would also mean having the money to pay back foreign debts accumulated. 

References

Popular posts from this blog

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...

External Validations, like Masters and Doctorate, Mean NOTHING with a LOUSY Education System

I have the tendency to use my MBA as a license to avoid criticism. It's a real problem that some people use their credentials and/or academic achievements to try and win an argument. One incident I wrote about was Rep. Raoul Abellar Manuel flexing his "smarts" by using his cum laude degree to win the argument . It was all about how I would often say, "You're the moron because I have the MBA and you don't." There are times I felt like taking an MBA would make up for my "moral shortcomings" during high school when I was barely passing (and the passing rate was 80% , which is rather high), that I wasn't having honors, and that there was this saying, " Thou grades shalt determine thy future! " That, of course, has led to the reality where cheating is prevalent .  I wanted to make a review. I took my MBA in 2011 and graduated in 2014. I always felt that the MBA program was what I needed to become "invincible". It was also at ...

No Hard-to-Earn Economics Degree is Required to Know That a Welfare, Anti-FDI Philippines is Destined to FAIL

GMA News When it comes to constitutional reform, I'm afraid one of the worst sources quoted would come from the Makabayan Bloc. Some people I face who are so against FDI also want to end the OFW program. The solution comes out rather absurd, as the Philippines must have its own state where it's all beg and beg . It would be like: "Free education for all! No to FDI for schools!"  "Free lunch in school!" "No to open FDI! The government must fund our local production!"  " Increase the salaries, lower the prices of goods! " (which is just plain bad accounting ) That's just a few of the crazy demands that have been given! My favorite question has always been, "Where will you get the funding?" The usual answers can be: " Print more money! " "The government should just make it a law!" "Tax the rich all the more!" which can often be accompanied by, " After all, it's the fault of the rich that p...

Why I'm Not in Favor of Nationalization of Utilities Mixed with Protectionism

ToonPool There's the call of leftist fools to stop privatization. Many still believe that utilities should be run by nationalization rather than privatization . I've been reading on Facebook where some fools believe that allowing foreign telecommunications companies (telcos) to invest in the Philippines will "risk security". Any telco will risk security if there are no laws to regulate it like the Data Privacy Law. Just because I support private enterprises doesn't mean that I say the government is hands-off. On the other hand, the government has the duty to set rules such as fair compensation, proper employee treatment, safety measures, and the like to make sure that we remain in healthy competition. Some people who keep protesting against the privatization of industries I believe (1) want the government to provide for all the needs of the people (which leads to dictatorship, eventually), (2) have some agenda as to why they're doing it, or (3) these people ar...

COMMUNIST Vietnam Has Defeated DEMOCRATIC Philippines Again This 2025

Cổng thông tin Trung ương Đoàn TNCS Hồ Chí Minh A few days ago, I wrote about warning Filipinos that they shouldn't wait for more unmitigated typhoon disasters, before realizing that the Filipino First Policy isn't working ! There's a statement that says, "Just because being tanga (inattentive) is libre (free), doesn't mean you should be tanga!"  Analyzing the different policies: why policies  matter I found a Business World article, written by Cesar Polvorosa, Jr., on my Facebook news feed discussing the Vietnamese economy . In fact, it would be better to share some hard truths that the article offers about what really went wrong with the  democratic Philippines compared to Communist Vietnam : DIVERGENT ECONOMIC MODELS  Vietnam pursued an export-oriented manufacturing strategy which has proven significantly more successful over the past half century than the Philippines’ service-heavy, remittances-dependent model . Export performance alone tells a compe...