Skip to main content

Common Sense: Foreign Investment Isn't Foreign Debt

Listen to him and those who think alike, not the naysayers!

Amazingly, some people confuse foreign direct investment (FDI) with foreign debt. They think letting foreigners invest in the country will increase the national debt. These are two totally different terms. I really have to laugh when somebody tells me that FDI will increase debt. I would say it's laughable because debts and investments may be related but they're two totally different words. A person may get into debt to invest in something. A person may get into some debt to build a commercial building or buy the land. However, a person invests when the commercial building is open for rent to pay back the debt. Debt is basically an expense because you need to pay back the money. An investment is an inflow of money. 

What is foreign debt? 

The Investopedia defines foreign debt as:
Foreign debt is money borrowed by a government, corporation or private household from another country's government or private lenders. Foreign debt also includes obligations to international organizations such as the World Bank, Asian Development Bank (ADB), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Total foreign debt can be a combination of short-term and long-term liabilities.

Foreign debt, also known as external debt, has been rising steadily in recent decades, with unwelcome side-effects in some borrowing countries. These include slower economic growth, particularly in low-income countries, as well as crippling debt crises, financial market turmoil, and even secondary effects such as a rise in human-rights abuses.

In effect, foreign debt is when a country borrows money from another country. For example, the Philippines will borrow money from Singapore to finance the COVID-19. It didn't ask for investments but a loan from Singapore. It might also borrow money to finance some infrastructure projects that taxes may not be able to cover. Even developed countries may borrow form each other every now and then depending on the situation.

Per see, foreign debt isn't always bad unless one's paying power is in shambles. To achieve this, we would need a combination of local and foreign investment to generate income for the government.

What is foreign investment? 

Meanwhile, foreign investment is what it is--an investment. The Investopedia defines foreign investment as:
Foreign investment involves capital flows from one country to another, granting the foreign investors extensive ownership stakes in domestic companies and assets. Foreign investment denotes that foreigners have an active role in management as a part of their investment or an equity stake large enough to enable the foreign investor to influence business strategy. A modern trend leans toward globalization, where multinational firms have investments in a variety of countries.

This is how foreign investment works according to Investopedia:

How Foreign Investment Works

Foreign investment is largely seen as a catalyst for economic growth in the future. Foreign investments can be made by individuals, but are most often endeavors pursued by companies and corporations with substantial assets looking to expand their reach.

As globalization increases, more and more companies have branches in countries around the world. For some multinational corporations, opening new manufacturing and production plants in a different country is attractive because of the opportunities for cheaper production and labor costs.

Additionally, these large corporations frequently look to do business with those countries where they will pay the least amount of taxes. They may do this by relocating their home office or parts of their business to a country that is a tax haven or has favorable tax laws aimed at attracting foreign investors.

Foreign investment would mean that companies would invest in other countries. Obviously, there the cheaper production and labor costs to take advantage of. Sometimes, a business may want to do business where taxes aren't so heavy. That's why I'm in favor of having tax cuts when needed. The foreign investor opens a business in the said country. 

However, foreign investors are required to follow rules even if they don't need a local partner. There's still the need to be registered, follow labor laws, and pay taxes. If they're going to get rich in the Philippines, then they'll enter the taxable bracket. What happens is that the government starts collecting applicable taxes. Multinational companies (MNCs) would be paying corporate taxes. These people will be under the tax mapping of the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR). What happens is that the foreign investor is essentially owing to the Philippine government its taxes whenever payable. Both foreign investors and local investors are debtors in the sense that taxes are always due as long as the business is generating net profits before taxes. 

Foreign investors will not only create jobs, bring capital, and introduce markets, but also provide taxes. It's because taxes don't create jobs. It's the job providers that create taxes. A trip to the BIR office will show a list of registered companies. The BIR didn't create the jobs. Instead, job creators gave the BIR its purpose to collect taxes. The revenue office will be rendered inoperative unless there are job providers. The BIR collects these taxes which is allocated to the government treasury. The taxes collected would also mean having the money to pay back foreign debts accumulated. 

References

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...
Read more

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...
Read more

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...
Read more

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...
Read more