Skip to main content

You Can Work Hard WITHOUT Working Smart But NEVER the Other Way Around

We often hear we need to work hard. It reminds me of what I heard back when I was in late elementary, when I hated high school with a passion, and when I actually ended up telling people, "Do you ever wonder why the Philippines doesn't improve?" Of course, if hard work were all there was to it, why are some people stuck in financial difficulty? 

Teaching people how not to be too busy to accept improvements

I wrote an article that one should never be too "busy" to accept improvements. We can see that one can work hard without working smart. The two people are introduced to the better round wheel. However, the two aren't thinking that if they had the round wheel, their hard work would pay off better. Changing the wheels from the square tire to the round tire would allow more hard work to be done. How much hard work (that is, delivering rocks) can be accomplished at a faster, more effective rate if they went for the round wheel? Sadly, some people think that hard work will be enough, without thinking about ways to do their hard work smartly.

Improvement of quality of life is not just about working hard. Sure, it's still hard work, even if I've got all the necessary equipment. It's still hard work even if I can accept payments online, or more new technology arrives. However, this hard work can now be made manageable. In working smart, you would think of how to make one's hard work, not just working hard for the sake of working hard.

I prefer to caption this as "Do your hard work, intelligently." I didn't like the illustration of turning the cube into a ball. If a cube is what's required, bring in the cube! What we see here is that other people are still pushing the cube to the destination. These people pushing the cube may only deliver one cube in a day, or the delivery may even be late. However, the person using a forklift to deliver the cubes may deliver several cubes on time. The person may not even have to wake up ridiculously early to deliver the cubes.

What we need to realize is that people need a reasonable business environment. I would be so stupid if I were still having people use typewriters and fax machines, when PCs are going to be more convenient. Typewriters will just eat up more paper compared to if one could edit before one could print. It would be best to buy a UPS for each and every PC. I remember having irritations whenever my PC would reset because I used a regular AVR. The moment I used a UPS, I've had much less worry working. Come fluctuations, I can still save my work before I have to turn the PC off!

This means accepting changes in the market, whether domestic or international. My favorite example is Nokia. I used to have a Nokia phone. However, I soon discovered that smartphones were becoming the norm. It meant even grandpa or grandma (the new generation) can now use a smartphone, with some limited knowledge. Nokia worked hard but failed to work smart. Other companies worked smart by working hard to accept changes. The other companies that worked smart didn't do hard work for the sake of hard work. The other companies that beat Nokia worked hard with their smarts. They worked hard to make sure that their designs would be competitive. 

We need to teach financial literacy in middle school and high school

It's possible to have a good teacher while your system suffers from a breakdown. I used to have an economics teacher who was like the late Miriam Defensor-Santiago. I'm still thankful for the fact that she made sure I would graduate from high school. However, she became defective not because of her but because of the system. As I was thinking about it, most people just study high school economics to avoid the teacher's ire. That's what I felt when facing my MDS-style teacher. She was kind enough to help me out when I flunked. I may have learned concepts like the Law of Supply and Demand, Marginal Propensities (and I'm having a hard time recalling them, so I visit economics websites), and the world market. She was a good teacher, but honestly, the system failed me and her big time.

As it's July and honestly, the countdown ot Christmas is getting closer. It's easy for me to think of bad habits people have all year round. Ironically, most Filipinos start Christmas early (September), but they do last-minute Christmas shopping. I even wonder if the Christmas comedy film Jingle All the Way was also meant ot discourage last-minute Christmas shopping! If people are waiting for the last minute to do Christmas shopping, I blame it on the poor management of their paychecks (read here). I tend to get mad thinking about how people's paychecks barely last. Not everyone who does so is necessarily not working hard. You can have menial workers who don't have absences, show up on time, and still don't know how to manage money. 

I could blame it on schools. Warren Buffett teaches practical life lessons that I never learned, even in my MBA days! I had to learn stock market investing myself. That's why I have no more interest in getting a PhD. I might not even get the chance to teach students basic investing, like cost averaging on an index fund, using GINvest to invest in the international market, opening an ATRAM account, etc. It's possible to get a college diploma and never learn how to manage one's paycheck. The Christmas rush may just be a symptom of a much bigger problem. That's why I tend to hate the Christmas season. However, it's not Christmas per se that I'm angry about, but the foolishness of people during the Christmas season. 

It's typical to get a paycheck, and people do the payday blowout. Honestly, it's irritating whenever there are those "pa-libre" people. These are people who always ask you to pay for their meals. Nothing is wrong with having a blowout every once in a while. However, doing it every payday means ignoring that you need to have income less expenses to think about. For example, people would need to think of paying stuff like rentals (and your lessor will have the right to kick you out for delinquency), utility bills, and tuition fees. Not only that, one may even think that investing can start with simple small steps. For example, one could use GCash to invest at least PHP 1,000.00 in any investment option of their choice. They could slowly drop by PHP 1,000.00 per month, then they can invest more during the lower periods of the stock market, either in the Philippines or worldwide.

If people were taught financial literacy, they would learn basic stuff like:
  1. Teaching about basic accounting principles. This will help people understand basic concepts like the cost of production.
  2. How to slowly invest in the stock market, or invest in bonds for starters. 
  3. The difference between revenues and profits. This is taught in basic accounting and basic finance.
This would be basic personal finance that anyone can learn. This would be vital, especially if a menial worker or a group of workers all plan to establish their business someday. Some people might've been potential entrepreneurs, but a lousy system is holding them back. If one is incapable of becoming an entrepreneur, then one can at least retire comfortably. They might climb up the ladder, but never become an entrepreneur. The important thing is that they can afford proper housing (either rent or buy) and not have to worry about meeting basic needs

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...