Skip to main content

Filipino First Policy Linked with Crab Mentality


Having sea crab yesterday or just eating crab, I always think of that old commercial in the 1990s. It was called, "Iwasan ang crab mentality." or "Avoid crab mentality." This makes me recall a scene when I was a child. I saw a pail full of mud crabs (called alimango in Filipino) and if one crab got out, the others pulled it down. The TV commercial showed how if the crabs got together, they could all escape their grizzly fate of becoming eaten for human consumption. Chefs are just lucky crabs pull each other down. However, it also shows that the crabs would rather all be cooked together than let that crab escape. 

Unfortunately, crab mentality is one of the biggest problems in the Philippines. It's not all that unique among Filipinos. However, it doesn't Filipinos should ever take comfort in engaging in a crab mentality, just because other people do it. Here's an interesting excerpt from Inquirer by Jerry Peres de Tagle PhD:
Studies in human behavior show that one’s crab mentality comes from a personal insecurity or low self-esteem, which is usually unknown to the individual. It may be that the feeling of disdain, jealousy, and antagonism is justified. There is usually a sense of being self-righteous and virtuous. But, why is this behavior prevalent in particular societies? I have seen it across the various cultures and countries. It seems to be common with societies and groups that have experienced suppression, bullying, and oppression for a period of time, across generations and decades, if not centuries.

Crab mentality is learned as part of societal acculturation, adaptation, and survival.  It is learned by parents and elders to suppress the success-linked behaviors of their children and of newcomers in a tribe. This is the adaptive behavior of the family to survive and escape the wrath of the masters in the community. Intelligent and success behaviors in children were seen as dangerous for the people who held power. The masters who wielded power over the group knew that intelligent and self-determined children would grow up to question, rebel, and subvert the existing power structure of the community.
As I looked into the article from the Inquirer--it may explain the Filipino First Policy even further. One may read this in Carlos P. Garcia's statement:

THE “FILPINO FIRST” POLICY

The ”Filipino First” policy of this administration re­ceived a resounding popular indorsement in the last election. Politically we became independent since 1946, but econom­ically we are still semi-colonial. This is especially true in our foreign trade. This policy is therefore designed to regain economic independence. It is a national effort to the end that Filipinos obtain major and dominant participa­tion in their own national economy. This we will achieve with malice towards none and with fairness to all. We will accomplish this with full understanding of our inter­national obligations towards our friends of the Free World. We will carry this out within the framework of our special relations with the United States to whose citizens we granted until 1974, by Constitutional provision, equal rights as Filipinos in the exploitation of our natural resources and public utilities, and to whom we also granted trading parity rights under the Laurel-Langley Agreement. Under this policy we will welcome friendly and understanding foreign capital willing to collaborate with us in the exploitation of our vast natural resources preferably on joint venture basis.

It is my hope that legislations under this orientation will be enacted this year.

In Garcia's wish that Filipinos would obtain major and dominant participation in their national economy, he only wants to see more Filipinos succeed than foreigners, in the Philippines. Sure, it sounds good on paper but can you imagine a shopping mall where most of its establishments, are owned by the shopping mall itself? I've gone to SM and Ayala and that's not the case. If the shopping mall's establishments were majorly owned by the shopping mall, why even bother opening a mall? Most of the shopping mall's income is from tenants, not from the establishments owned by the mall.

I wrote an article where Filipino entrepreneurs say, "Only FDI will get rich!" equals "I hate competition." I wrote it because people saying, "Only FDIs will get rich." can easily translate into envy, instead of their so-called "concern" for the nation. If they did care about the nation, they would've had already known how FDIs have been used to uplift countries from massive unemployment. They have a poor understanding of the word profit. Such people may be confusing profits with revenues (read here). No, profits are what's left of revenues minus all expenses!

Instead, Filipino First Policy can be summed up as, "If Filipinos can't succeed, neither can foreigners." That's probably why the 60-40 policy was created. Sure, it doesn't discourage FDIs but it's discouraging. Who would want to invest in a business where you can only keep 40% of your profits? The profit is what's left from revenues minus all expenses. What's left after revenues less expenses is barely even half of revenues! Even non-profit organizations still need a profit to keep it going. The difference is non-profit organizations don't share the profit with their members!

These lawmakers who defend the Filipino First Policy are like crabs too. As mentioned earlier by Tagles, the problem is that intelligent and successful behavior among people--can be viewed as a threat. Rebeling for the right reasons could happen when people gain insight. That's why crab mentality is a powerful tool. Mao Zedong used it to curb rebellion through programs like the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution, and the Hundred Flowers Campaign. Mao may have known what he was doing--he knew how to keep people too hungry and weak to overthrow him! Hungry people make bad rebels. Mao's programs were probably meant to keep him in power, until his death. A similar motive may be true for lawmakers. Lawmakers who defend the Filipino First Policy like Atty. Neri Colmenares and Atty. Teodoro A. Casiño, are most likely after their own interests. Sometimes, I can feel that these people know they're lying.

If more Filipinos get job opportunities, they will soon learn stuff they should've learned years before. Filipinos who get good job opportunities, whether foreign or local, may learn to manage money properly or even have better ideas for starting a business. Filipinos might start building their own businesses with more technology and ideas from FDIs. How can one expect Filipinos to get creative if there's nothing to work with, thanks to Filipino First Policy? That's probably why the greedy oligarchs and protectionist lawmakers, choose to keep most Filipinos poor. They only want to succeed on their own. If they can't succeed then neither can their fellow Filipinos. They want to succeed only for themselves! 

This may also explain why some Filipinos blame richer countries for the Philippines' lack of development. Let's face it--the Philippines will never get richer by blaming its richer Asian neighbors (read here)! The Filipino First Policy may have encouraged Filipinos to blame foreigners for their plight, instead of learning from foreigners to succeed. Has years of blaming and crab mentality did any marvels for the economy? Instead, development has been short-term thanks to the Filipino First Policy, which actually promotes crab mentality

Popular posts from this blog

Opening #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Stores Nationwide Increases POGO-Related Risks (NOT FDI)

Alice Guo aka Guo Hua-Ping may be in jail now . However, I believe the saga is far from over . It reminds me that I actually wrote about how several idiots on Facebook go so far as to say, " Alice Guo should be a warning about open FDI! " Some have even gone as far as to say that POGO and Chinese spies should "justify" the Filipino First Policy . However, the harsher reality is that the Filipino First Policy may actually be encouraging dummy investors instead ! As the saga continues, I've decided to write what I might call my harshest entry yet. It's going to be Chinese New Year this year. This might be an entry that may need to be shared before the Lunar New Year! My grievances are  still ongoing because some people still demand #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, no matter how destructive it  will be . That's why I use Venezuela as an example, especially during Nicolas Maduro's downfall . Back to the topic, I remember writing a joke post where I said, "Wh...

Social Media Gossipers' Ad Hominems Against Actor Robin Padilla Regarding His Proposal to Remove 60-40

Make no mistake that I didn't vote for Robin Padilla. I feel like I've had enough of voting for celebrities, athletes, and those who I felt are know-nothings in the legislative. However, Padilla recently had his proposal to remove the 60-40 restrictions regarding foreign direct investments (FDIs) . Former Philippine Vice President Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo was even in favor of that amendment. I guess that's why Philippine economist Andrew James Masigan endorsed Robredo. I may have not endorsed Robredo while Masigan remains to be one of my favorite local sources. The news from GMA News Online reveals these plans by Padilla himself: Senator Robin Padilla said he wanted to revise the Constitution to scrap the 60-40 rule on foreign ownership of businesses to accelerate job creation and competition among industries . In a Monday interview, Padilla said the move would attract more foreign investments to support the country’s economic recovery. “Para sa akin mas...

Should Noynoy Aquino be a Valid Excuse to Reject Econ Cha Cha?

Philippine Star   Updated January 25, 2025 This may be a touchy post. Politics is often a source of fights during parties. That's why we're told not to talk about politics during parties. Unfortunately, some people on Facebook are now using the late Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino Jr. as an excuse not to execute even economic charter change. Never mind that blatant supporter of Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo, Andrew James Masigan, supports economic charter change . The late Charles Edward P. Celdran was also an anti-Duterte critic. As I looked at some okay boomer posts, I'm not surprised at people who still use Noynoy as an excuse to shout with all their might, "No to economic charter change!" Somebody posted on Facebook the following. As always, I won't publicly shame anyone. If possible, I will only refer to them by codenames or use the name Anonymous. I want to remain as professional as possible. This person said that under N...

The Great Reversal: Democratic Philippines Became MORE Dependent on COMMUNIST Vietnam for Rice

Bao Thanh Nien On January 24, 2026, I read from the Philippine Star Facebook page  that a vendor from Baseco, Tondo, is selling Vietnamese rice at PHP 20.00 per kilo. Honestly, it made me laugh over President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr.'s promise. Was this rice from Vietnam a rice surplus if it wasn't premium rice? My experience with rice selling was with wholesale,  and it was a very different time. What I learned in the late 2000s to 2012 may no longer be applicable today.  Taking a look back at the history of Vietnam and the Philippines before Doi Moi This time, I decided to go with history because a certain someone on Facebook (as always, I will not mention names as much as possible) has actually called it that the Philippines' dependency on Vietnam for rice, despite the International Rice Research Institute being actually located in Pili Drive, Los Baños, Laguna 4031, Philippines. This guy (whom I nickname Porky due to his obesity) I just mentioned, sp...

An Interesting Mental Exercise for Chinese as Second Language Class

Back in my day, I remember we kept memorizing what was called bon toi (written as 问题, Wèntí in Mandarin) without understanding them. I hated memorizing those. I guess another reason was to parrot what one can't understand. We had the biak diam too which is Hokkien for oral recitation. Memorizing the question and answer (written as 问题和答案, Wèntí hé dá'àn in Mandarin) would actually not be so tedious if Chinese was taught as a second language. My bizarre idea is to think about having only one bon toi but there are five answers to memorize.  Memorizing (and understanding) why some don't want to learn Chinese These five reasons (above) have to be memorized in both Chinese and English. The teacher (老师, Lǎoshī) would say the question,  "不学中文的最大借口是什么?" (Bù xué zhōngwén de zuìdà jièkǒu shì shénme?). The question can't be answered  until  the student actually translated it as, "What are the top excuses not to learn Chinese?"  The student will eval...