Skip to main content

Filipino First Policy Linked with Crab Mentality


Having sea crab yesterday or just eating crab, I always think of that old commercial in the 1990s. It was called, "Iwasan ang crab mentality." or "Avoid crab mentality." This makes me recall a scene when I was a child. I saw a pail full of mud crabs (called alimango in Filipino) and if one crab got out, the others pulled it down. The TV commercial showed how if the crabs got together, they could all escape their grizzly fate of becoming eaten for human consumption. Chefs are just lucky crabs pull each other down. However, it also shows that the crabs would rather all be cooked together than let that crab escape. 

Unfortunately, crab mentality is one of the biggest problems in the Philippines. It's not all that unique among Filipinos. However, it doesn't Filipinos should ever take comfort in engaging in a crab mentality, just because other people do it. Here's an interesting excerpt from Inquirer by Jerry Peres de Tagle PhD:
Studies in human behavior show that one’s crab mentality comes from a personal insecurity or low self-esteem, which is usually unknown to the individual. It may be that the feeling of disdain, jealousy, and antagonism is justified. There is usually a sense of being self-righteous and virtuous. But, why is this behavior prevalent in particular societies? I have seen it across the various cultures and countries. It seems to be common with societies and groups that have experienced suppression, bullying, and oppression for a period of time, across generations and decades, if not centuries.

Crab mentality is learned as part of societal acculturation, adaptation, and survival.  It is learned by parents and elders to suppress the success-linked behaviors of their children and of newcomers in a tribe. This is the adaptive behavior of the family to survive and escape the wrath of the masters in the community. Intelligent and success behaviors in children were seen as dangerous for the people who held power. The masters who wielded power over the group knew that intelligent and self-determined children would grow up to question, rebel, and subvert the existing power structure of the community.
As I looked into the article from the Inquirer--it may explain the Filipino First Policy even further. One may read this in Carlos P. Garcia's statement:

THE “FILPINO FIRST” POLICY

The ”Filipino First” policy of this administration re­ceived a resounding popular indorsement in the last election. Politically we became independent since 1946, but econom­ically we are still semi-colonial. This is especially true in our foreign trade. This policy is therefore designed to regain economic independence. It is a national effort to the end that Filipinos obtain major and dominant participa­tion in their own national economy. This we will achieve with malice towards none and with fairness to all. We will accomplish this with full understanding of our inter­national obligations towards our friends of the Free World. We will carry this out within the framework of our special relations with the United States to whose citizens we granted until 1974, by Constitutional provision, equal rights as Filipinos in the exploitation of our natural resources and public utilities, and to whom we also granted trading parity rights under the Laurel-Langley Agreement. Under this policy we will welcome friendly and understanding foreign capital willing to collaborate with us in the exploitation of our vast natural resources preferably on joint venture basis.

It is my hope that legislations under this orientation will be enacted this year.

In Garcia's wish that Filipinos would obtain major and dominant participation in their national economy, he only wants to see more Filipinos succeed than foreigners, in the Philippines. Sure, it sounds good on paper but can you imagine a shopping mall where most of its establishments, are owned by the shopping mall itself? I've gone to SM and Ayala and that's not the case. If the shopping mall's establishments were majorly owned by the shopping mall, why even bother opening a mall? Most of the shopping mall's income is from tenants, not from the establishments owned by the mall.

I wrote an article where Filipino entrepreneurs say, "Only FDI will get rich!" equals "I hate competition." I wrote it because people saying, "Only FDIs will get rich." can easily translate into envy, instead of their so-called "concern" for the nation. If they did care about the nation, they would've had already known how FDIs have been used to uplift countries from massive unemployment. They have a poor understanding of the word profit. Such people may be confusing profits with revenues (read here). No, profits are what's left of revenues minus all expenses!

Instead, Filipino First Policy can be summed up as, "If Filipinos can't succeed, neither can foreigners." That's probably why the 60-40 policy was created. Sure, it doesn't discourage FDIs but it's discouraging. Who would want to invest in a business where you can only keep 40% of your profits? The profit is what's left from revenues minus all expenses. What's left after revenues less expenses is barely even half of revenues! Even non-profit organizations still need a profit to keep it going. The difference is non-profit organizations don't share the profit with their members!

These lawmakers who defend the Filipino First Policy are like crabs too. As mentioned earlier by Tagles, the problem is that intelligent and successful behavior among people--can be viewed as a threat. Rebeling for the right reasons could happen when people gain insight. That's why crab mentality is a powerful tool. Mao Zedong used it to curb rebellion through programs like the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution, and the Hundred Flowers Campaign. Mao may have known what he was doing--he knew how to keep people too hungry and weak to overthrow him! Hungry people make bad rebels. Mao's programs were probably meant to keep him in power, until his death. A similar motive may be true for lawmakers. Lawmakers who defend the Filipino First Policy like Atty. Neri Colmenares and Atty. Teodoro A. Casiño, are most likely after their own interests. Sometimes, I can feel that these people know they're lying.

If more Filipinos get job opportunities, they will soon learn stuff they should've learned years before. Filipinos who get good job opportunities, whether foreign or local, may learn to manage money properly or even have better ideas for starting a business. Filipinos might start building their own businesses with more technology and ideas from FDIs. How can one expect Filipinos to get creative if there's nothing to work with, thanks to Filipino First Policy? That's probably why the greedy oligarchs and protectionist lawmakers, choose to keep most Filipinos poor. They only want to succeed on their own. If they can't succeed then neither can their fellow Filipinos. They want to succeed only for themselves! 

This may also explain why some Filipinos blame richer countries for the Philippines' lack of development. Let's face it--the Philippines will never get richer by blaming its richer Asian neighbors (read here)! The Filipino First Policy may have encouraged Filipinos to blame foreigners for their plight, instead of learning from foreigners to succeed. Has years of blaming and crab mentality did any marvels for the economy? Instead, development has been short-term thanks to the Filipino First Policy, which actually promotes crab mentality

Popular posts from this blog

The Philippines will NEVER Get Richer by Blaming Its Richer Asian Neighbors

Gemini AI Updated: September 27, 2025 It would be nice to talk about the typical blame game in the Philippines. I could remember that, as a child and a teenager, I had this habit of blaming people I disliked for my failing an exam. The reasons are mostly imagined. What I remembered in my later college years was when I met a couple of super irresponsible students. They had this attitude to say something like, "My parents don't care if it'll take me 20 years to finish my bachelor's degree." Some people even say something like, "It's the fault of the rich that we are poor." It was a backfire when I told such people, "Isn't it any wonder why your finances are down? It's because your parents don't even value the money when they don't care if it'll take up to 20 years to finish college!"  Understanding the blame game and why it feels so good Psychology Today presents this on why some people will always blame others . These fin...

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

Would You Rather Die of Thirst and/or Heatstroke This Summer Than Accept Quality Water and Electricity Services from MNCs?

Looking at the IBON Foundation's page can be laughable . One may notice Atty. Neri Colmenares, someone who fortunately lost the senatorial race twice . I remember arguing about people who'd believe in the lies that Colmenares would propagate about FDIs. There's the call to stop water privatization (the call for the nationalization of the water industry) and the constant opposition to allowing foreigners to own 100%. Do they even get that 100% FDI ownership is all about share ownership and not land ownership ? As the summer heat intensifies due to the El Niño, I decided to write this entry. A good question to ask now is, "Would you rather die of thirst or a heatstroke than accept quality water and electricity services from MNCs?"  What organizations like the IBON Foundation and Migrante International insist is on national industrialization over the acceptance of FDIs. The question is how do they expect to industrialize the nation based on doing everything on their ...

How I Believe the Public Service Act of 2022 Will Benefit the Philippine Business and Economic Environment

One of the greatest news for the Philippines is the Public Service Act of 2022. The following can be read from the Philippine News Agency regarding President Rodrigo R. Duterte's signing of the new law into action: President Rodrigo Roa Duterte on Monday signed into law a measure amending the Public Service Act (PSA), allowing up to 100 percent foreign ownership of public services in the country. Republic Act (RA) No. 11659 or "An Act Amending Commonwealth Act No. 146 otherwise known as the Public Service Act” as amended was signed by Duterte in a ceremony at the Rizal Hall, Malacañan Palace in the presence of lawmakers and other officials. Under the amended PSA, the telecommunications, railways, expressways, airports, and shipping industries will be considered public services, allowing up to 100 percent foreign ownership in these sectors. Duterte also led the ceremonial presentation of newly enacted laws namely RA 11647 which amends the Foreign Investments Act; RA 11650, whic...

No Amount of INSULTS Would Repeal the Laws of Business and Economics

It's October 2024 and I had no topic to write about a few days ago. Today, I decided to write about how using personal attacks is a common tactic . The use of Ad Hominems or personal attacks is attacking the person instead of the argument. Such people don't care if they contradict themselves--as long as they can insult because they're losers . One of the things I noticed is how I discuss the laws of economics. However, I can get an answer like, "Muh supply and demand! Da conspiracy of supply and demand!" I purposely misspelled the words to show how the person's lack of knowledge and use of mockery. Such persons can repeatedly hurl insults like saying I'm stupid, room temperature IQ, fake IQ, traitor to my fellow Filipino, etc. The list can go on and it's both amusing and irritating to recall every bit of insult I've had. But as advised, I'm told to learn to ignore insults  or laugh at them. An anonymous quote, probably said by Socrates was, ...