Skip to main content

Alice Guo's Conviction Should NEVER be a Call to Shut Down Constitutional Reform

The Alice Guo saga seems to have come to an end, right? That's, unless of course something happens and she escapes again. This always made me laugh when I realized that, as I was writing my articles, I came across a Vietnamese girl named Ha Thi Thu Trang, aka Ha Trang, who resembles Alice. Right now, Ha Trang could come to the Philippines for a vacation and not get mistaken for the same person. Back on the topic, I would like to point out that I actually wrote a post on whether or not using Alice's controversy should be a call to shut down constitutional reform.

Alice's now in jail, what's next?!

I would like to let people know in advance, I'm not here to demolish Senator Maria Theresa "Risa" Baraquel-Hontiveros' efforts in getting Alice arrested. In fact, I feel grateful (in part) that Risa managed to expose Alice's lies, along with Senator Sherwin "Win" Ting Gatchalian in exposing Alice's dubious records. However, I'm going to express my disappointment that Risa, for whatever intelligence she has, is still pretty much against charter change. Instead of focusing on structural reforms, Risa's now focused on the anti-dynasty bill. If anything, while Risa did something terrific with the Alice Guo case, I have to point her as a stubborn Gen X, after the stubborn Generation Boomer era. After all, 1964 to 1966 isn't a lot of time, compared to the 1970s vs. the 2000s vs the 2010s vs the 2020s!

This would also be something from Risa herself, from her Facebook page, which I translated into English for people for non-Tagalog speakers:

If we only want foreign investments, it would be better if we first strengthen the confidence of investors here. We need to build confidence in governance by eliminating corruption and improving our business environment, not by creating more instability through ChaCha.

Besides, amending the Constitution to open more of our most crucial industries — like public utilities, education, and advertising — to 100 percent foreign ownership will only expose us to security risks and weaken our national interests in a time of global unrest.

The proposal’s ultimate objective of stimulating and attracting more foreign investment is already addressed by present laws because the major part of our nation’s economy is already available for foreign participation, such as through the Retail Trade Liberalization Act, Foreign Investments Act, and Public Service Act.

And yet, even now, China’s 40 percent ownership of the state grid operator, the National Grid Corporation of the Philippines (NGCP), has brought many headaches — from security risks to poor service. That is a giant red flag we should not ignore. It is very obvious that this ChaCha will not put an end to this, and other economic woes.

This is just crazy because, for one, how in the world can China have a 40% ownership in the NGCP even solve the problem? That doesn't address the bigger issue. Seriously, how can Risa miss the crucial issue that the lack of power plants is really the problem? Even if the NGCP were 100% Filipino-owned, the same problems may persist more or less. The NGCP is a transmission highway, not a power plant! The real cause of the rotating brownouts is that there's too much demand for electricity and too little supply. It's a basic economics lesson! 

Addressing people who may want to say #NotoCharterChange because of Alice's conviction

I made a post where I discussed how the Filipino First Policy may be encouraging dummies. For some added humor where I christened Ha Thi Thu Trang as "Alice", due to the uncanny resemblance to Alice Guo in that same post. I would like ot address the fact that Alice is but the symptom of a bigger problem. 

What's the real problem or problems? Perhaps, it would be good for me to evaluate the common problems often overlooked, either on purpose or just plain inattentiveness:
  1. Whether you want to admit it or not, the 60-40is a huge discouragement factor. After all, people who think it's not a "big deal" need to try renting a space where they can only own 40% of the business!
  2. Corruption is indeed a problem. What's often overlooked is how the 60-40 policy actually benefits the corrupt (and the oligarchy, too) more than it benefits the people. One of the best ways corrupt people stay in power is by keeping people poor.
  3. The Filipino First Policy has ignored the fact that not all Filipinos are business-oriented. 
  4. Red tape in the Philippines actually encourages criminal activity, which is a conflicting algorithm with the call to combat crime.
  5. Do we even bother to realize that 100% FDI isn't about takeover but the ownership of shares? With this one in mind, foreigners who want to invest will simply take dummy identities more and more, which means removing one dummy (like Alice) may only have more dummies replacing Alice right now. That means any "healing" the nation has right now is temporary at best.
In short, these points bring up the high cost of Pinoy Pride economics. It should be funny because they're typing all their nonsense using imported equipment. I can expect their usual mockeries, where I should just stop them from giving an answer. If they give an answer, I can expect them to say, "We have no choice but to use imported equipment, because the foreigners unfairly own the means of production." Well, all I can say is, "Whatever! I've heard the same excused and the Filipino First Policy proponents, citing Davide, Monsod, whoever, are broken records. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...
Read more

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...
Read more

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...
Read more

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more

Filipino Businesses Need More Competition Than Democracy

Enterprise League Oftentimes, I remembered the number of complaints I get such as the Internet being so slow, the recent Typhoon Odette restoration being rather slow, high-cost but low-quality services, and that there's just not enough supply. However, the same people who are complaining about what I just mentioned earlier also said that I'm crazy when I told them to invite foreign direct investments (FDI) such as multinational corporations to invest here. Their line of reasoning goes from every weird direct line such as saying that multinational corporations (MNCs) are the form of the new "imperialism", that only the MNCs will get rich if we let them do business in the Philippines, that MNCs will exploit the people, that it will be overly relying on foreigners, and I don't know where they get such thinking. When I ask them for the solution--they just say that "Let's just do everything ourselves and rely on ourselves." Such logic is really stupid one...
Read more