Skip to main content

The Philippines 60-40 Equity Scheme Doesn't Prohibit FDIs But It's Still VERY DISCOURAGING for International Business


First and foremost, I'd like to tell people that I don't believe that the Marcos Years were the "golden years". I still agree with economist Cielo Magno that land ownership isn't a factor, since some countries without equity restrictions, don't allow foreigners to buy land. In contrast, inflation and the like were rampant during that time. However, we need to realize that any gains after EDSA 1986 weren't realized. As I was looking at Facebook, a page called Punch the Lies by Atty. Mike Navallo stated this: 
FACT: The 1987 Constitution does not prohibit entry of global investors into PH. What it regulates is foreign investment in areas deemed critical such as public utilities; exploration, devt and use of natural resources; and certain investments as determined by Congress. (Art XII) 
Public utilities (water, electricity, petroleum distribution, seaports, PUVs) are considered vital to socio-economic devt that's why they're subject to foreign ownership limits. 
There's also a question on national security. Remember concerns over Chinese involvement in NGCP? 
The Public Services Act was amended in 2022 excluding from the definition of "public utility" services such as telecomms and transportation, therefore allowing foreign ownership. 
It would be easy to look down on me because I'm not a lawyer. However, in this digital age, I don't need to be a lawyer to understand the basics. I'd like to address the elephant in the room here. However, I'd like to address the common sense issue of public services. It's said by Punch the Lies that the reason why they're subject to foreign ownership limits is because they're vital to socio-economic development. However, what can we do if the costs of water, electricity, petroleum distribution, seaports, and PUVs are too expensive due to the simple rule of supply and demand?

Earlier, I wrote an article about the stupidity of having equity restrictions--in the name of security. Of course, I expect these people to keep quoting mostly Filipino economists and lawyers. Their favorite people are the likes of Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr., Atty. Christian Monsod, and Professor Solita "Winnie" Collas-Monsod, to name a few. They also love to quote from the IBON Foundation. I find the idea of subjecting businesses to 60-40 in the name of security, to be utterly stupid. It's not like as if certain laws such as taxation laws, labor laws, data privacy act, etc. don't provide necessary restrictions.

The 60-40 arrangement is nothing more than overpriced rent (read here). Who in their right mind would want to rent a space if they have to give 60% ownership to the lessor? Let's say I prepare a shopping mall. However, I require all my tenants to give me 60% of their ownership, which in turn entitles me to 60% of their profits. Even worse, I'd be stingy to give them a good place. It's definitely not paying for the value. In turn, even when I don't prohibit tenants from entering, my conditions would still discourage them from entering.

If people are wondering why Communist Vietnam has been more viable for business--please check their policies on foreign investment. In fact, the Vietnam Briefing reveals that most industries (except a few) allow up to 100% foreign ownership of shares. Vietnam doesn't allow land ownership. Please stop confusing land ownership with share ownership! The Vietnam Embassy states that for certain sectors, the ownership limit granted to investors is 70%, not 40%. A 30% difference really makes a difference in why more go to Vietnam. Please, Vietnam isn't that protectionist paradise as some fools want to paint it out to be. It may still be under the Communist Party of Vietnam but Doi Moi changed its economic policy significantly (read here).

Image by Sabrina Jiang © Investopedia 2020

I'm afraid most people who support the 60-40 policy confuse profits with revenues (read here). If they're worried about FDIs and will run away with their profits, then listen. FDIs get rich based on their net income after taxes (read here). Please, a sample income statement will show you that net income is what's left after all expenses have been paid. For some, it's just some "capitalist conspiracy used as an excuse". However, basic economics is no "capitalist conspiracy". Common sense will tell you that supply and demand drive the market price. Common sense will tell you that businesses don't just earn, they must also spend. FDIs will still be required to pay all types of taxes required. These taxes can be the value tax, income tax, and withholding taxes. Just because they own 100% of their business, doesn't mean they don't pay taxes. 

To explain it in simple terms--an FDI may get a monthly revenue of PHP 277,700.00. However, all the expenses paid such as salaries, utility bills, depreciation, interest due to debt, etc. will be deducted from the revenues. Eventually, the taxable amount is PHP 111,000.00. Now, let's say that the taxes would be subjected to 12% VAT. The remaining net income after tax (for the month) would be PHP 97,680.00. That means the corporate income for the month is only 35% of their revenues for the month. An increase in sales doesn't always translate to an increase in income. Would the company really want to part 60% of what's left after all expenses, with a Filipino oligarch? 
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Yes to Filipinas Marrying Foreign Men, No to 100% FDI Shares Ownership?!

Today is Valentine's Day. I feel Valentine's Day is plain overrated. Some people just get a date for the sake of it--even if it means enduring that materialistic girlfriend or abusive boyfriend! Isn't romance a year-round thing? A few Valentine's Day ago, I wrote about Filipinas marrying foreigners and that FDI doesn't include Filipinas dating foreigners . This time to add some comedy, I wrote this post. It's something to say, "Yes! Somebody is married to a foreigner!" It's the hype to get job opportunities abroad or to marry a foreigner. Blossoms Why do Filipinos want to marry foreigners? The Blossoms blog writes down the following: Love and Affection: Love is often the primary reason for marriage, and Filipinas who marry foreigners may do so because they have fallen in love with someone from another country.  Financial Stability: Some Filipinas may marry foreigners because they believe a foreign husband can provide financial stability and secur...
Read more

Honoring the Recently Deceased Jose de Venecia Jr. in a Business/Economics Perspective

That's right. Jose de Venecia  recently passed away yesterday. As an advocate for reform, it's sad but true that de Venecia didn't win because he was boring . It was easy to think of him as a boring guy. I remember the time when he was called in ISPUP as Yoda De Venecia (after the Star Wars character). I was just a clueless college student at that time when the ISPUP episode was shown. I was only 13 years old when de Venecia ran for president. It was also that era when Joseph Estrada (who's now 88 years old) ran for president, and it was that time when Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (who turned 90 last year) became the chief justice.  Just recently, I found this eulogy   for JDV. I will not post the whole eulogy, but only the one from the one that would "fit better" for a business-economics blog: He helped advance policies that enabled major infrastructure projects through public private partnerships, converted former military bases into thriving economic centers...
Read more

Should Noynoy Aquino be a Valid Excuse to Reject Econ Cha Cha?

Philippine Star   Updated January 25, 2025 This may be a touchy post. Politics is often a source of fights during parties. That's why we're told not to talk about politics during parties. Unfortunately, some people on Facebook are now using the late Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino Jr. as an excuse not to execute even economic charter change. Never mind that blatant supporter of Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo, Andrew James Masigan, supports economic charter change . The late Charles Edward P. Celdran was also an anti-Duterte critic. As I looked at some okay boomer posts, I'm not surprised at people who still use Noynoy as an excuse to shout with all their might, "No to economic charter change!" Somebody posted on Facebook the following. As always, I won't publicly shame anyone. If possible, I will only refer to them by codenames or use the name Anonymous. I want to remain as professional as possible. This person said that under N...
Read more

Opening #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Stores Nationwide Increases POGO-Related Risks (NOT FDI)

Alice Guo aka Guo Hua-Ping may be in jail now . However, I believe the saga is far from over . It reminds me that I actually wrote about how several idiots on Facebook go so far as to say, " Alice Guo should be a warning about open FDI! " Some have even gone as far as to say that POGO and Chinese spies should "justify" the Filipino First Policy . However, the harsher reality is that the Filipino First Policy may actually be encouraging dummy investors instead ! As the saga continues, I've decided to write what I might call my harshest entry yet. It's going to be Chinese New Year this year. This might be an entry that may need to be shared before the Lunar New Year! My grievances are  still ongoing because some people still demand #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, no matter how destructive it  will be . That's why I use Venezuela as an example, especially during Nicolas Maduro's downfall . Back to the topic, I remember writing a joke post where I said, "Wh...
Read more

Teaching Mandarin by Recalling How Much Chinoy School Students Complained, "Hay, Chinese!"

It's time for a bit of Chinese language Throwback Thursday. I remember how the Chinese school can be summarized as students  memorizing without understanding . The problem wasn't the Lǎoshīs (老師) but the system that ran them as persons . I decided to write this article to " bring up a trauma " associated with the Chinese education system. From Kiko Chinese, this picture shows the common complaints from children. Standard Chinese is so hard! The Chinese schools tend to lose students because they keep failing in Grade 2 or Grade 2 in Chinese. In fact, I remember someone failing Chinese four times back in the 1990s. Another one was three years in Grade 3 Chinese, where the Chinese teacher was even stricter than the Grade 2 Chinese teacher. The real issue was that there wasn't any real learning because the old traditional Chinese system wasn't doing anything right . People were treated as if Hokkien were their first language. However, we realize that people can...
Read more