Skip to main content

The Philippines 60-40 Equity Scheme Doesn't Prohibit FDIs But It's Still VERY DISCOURAGING for International Business


First and foremost, I'd like to tell people that I don't believe that the Marcos Years were the "golden years". I still agree with economist Cielo Magno that land ownership isn't a factor, since some countries without equity restrictions, don't allow foreigners to buy land. In contrast, inflation and the like were rampant during that time. However, we need to realize that any gains after EDSA 1986 weren't realized. As I was looking at Facebook, a page called Punch the Lies by Atty. Mike Navallo stated this: 
FACT: The 1987 Constitution does not prohibit entry of global investors into PH. What it regulates is foreign investment in areas deemed critical such as public utilities; exploration, devt and use of natural resources; and certain investments as determined by Congress. (Art XII) 
Public utilities (water, electricity, petroleum distribution, seaports, PUVs) are considered vital to socio-economic devt that's why they're subject to foreign ownership limits. 
There's also a question on national security. Remember concerns over Chinese involvement in NGCP? 
The Public Services Act was amended in 2022 excluding from the definition of "public utility" services such as telecomms and transportation, therefore allowing foreign ownership. 
It would be easy to look down on me because I'm not a lawyer. However, in this digital age, I don't need to be a lawyer to understand the basics. I'd like to address the elephant in the room here. However, I'd like to address the common sense issue of public services. It's said by Punch the Lies that the reason why they're subject to foreign ownership limits is because they're vital to socio-economic development. However, what can we do if the costs of water, electricity, petroleum distribution, seaports, and PUVs are too expensive due to the simple rule of supply and demand?

Earlier, I wrote an article about the stupidity of having equity restrictions--in the name of security. Of course, I expect these people to keep quoting mostly Filipino economists and lawyers. Their favorite people are the likes of Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr., Atty. Christian Monsod, and Professor Solita "Winnie" Collas-Monsod, to name a few. They also love to quote from the IBON Foundation. I find the idea of subjecting businesses to 60-40 in the name of security, to be utterly stupid. It's not like as if certain laws such as taxation laws, labor laws, data privacy act, etc. don't provide necessary restrictions.

The 60-40 arrangement is nothing more than overpriced rent (read here). Who in their right mind would want to rent a space if they have to give 60% ownership to the lessor? Let's say I prepare a shopping mall. However, I require all my tenants to give me 60% of their ownership, which in turn entitles me to 60% of their profits. Even worse, I'd be stingy to give them a good place. It's definitely not paying for the value. In turn, even when I don't prohibit tenants from entering, my conditions would still discourage them from entering.

If people are wondering why Communist Vietnam has been more viable for business--please check their policies on foreign investment. In fact, the Vietnam Briefing reveals that most industries (except a few) allow up to 100% foreign ownership of shares. Vietnam doesn't allow land ownership. Please stop confusing land ownership with share ownership! The Vietnam Embassy states that for certain sectors, the ownership limit granted to investors is 70%, not 40%. A 30% difference really makes a difference in why more go to Vietnam. Please, Vietnam isn't that protectionist paradise as some fools want to paint it out to be. It may still be under the Communist Party of Vietnam but Doi Moi changed its economic policy significantly (read here).

Image by Sabrina Jiang © Investopedia 2020

I'm afraid most people who support the 60-40 policy confuse profits with revenues (read here). If they're worried about FDIs and will run away with their profits, then listen. FDIs get rich based on their net income after taxes (read here). Please, a sample income statement will show you that net income is what's left after all expenses have been paid. For some, it's just some "capitalist conspiracy used as an excuse". However, basic economics is no "capitalist conspiracy". Common sense will tell you that supply and demand drive the market price. Common sense will tell you that businesses don't just earn, they must also spend. FDIs will still be required to pay all types of taxes required. These taxes can be the value tax, income tax, and withholding taxes. Just because they own 100% of their business, doesn't mean they don't pay taxes. 

To explain it in simple terms--an FDI may get a monthly revenue of PHP 277,700.00. However, all the expenses paid such as salaries, utility bills, depreciation, interest due to debt, etc. will be deducted from the revenues. Eventually, the taxable amount is PHP 111,000.00. Now, let's say that the taxes would be subjected to 12% VAT. The remaining net income after tax (for the month) would be PHP 97,680.00. That means the corporate income for the month is only 35% of their revenues for the month. An increase in sales doesn't always translate to an increase in income. Would the company really want to part 60% of what's left after all expenses, with a Filipino oligarch? 
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

The Irony the Philippines Starts the Christmas Season in September BUT Many Filipinos Love Last-Minute Christmas Shopping

  Uproxx As Christmas is just around the corner--I feel more stress coming in! It doesn't help when people try to use the late Andy Williams' "It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year" to try and skip the problem. It's already known that most Filipinos love to start Christmas in September . However, the irony is that Filipinos start Christmas early but do their Christmas shopping late. If they began the Christmas Season early, shouldn't they think about what to do before December strikes?  Two years ago, I wrote a post discussing last-minute Christmas shopping . Many Filipinos tend to do last-minute Christmas shopping. They had all of November (when the Christmas sale usually begins) but why do the Christmas shopping in December ? One of the things I blame is the one-day paycheck lifestyle (see here ). It can be observed that many Filipinos never learn to prioritize more important things . One can get their stars when they see their paychecks. However, the...
Read more

Is Christmas Toxic Positivity a Cause or an Effect of the Philippines' Lack of Progress?

Lessandra When it's Christmas, it's so easy to think of the song of the late Andy Williams, "It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year". The music itself reeks of toxic positivity,  whether one likes it or not. It's a shame, really, because December 20 was also the anniversary of Asia's Titanic, the sinking of the Doña Paz ! We live in a society that somehow never learns from its mistakes, like a person who's stuck in gambling debt, is still hoping to get rich gambling . Despite all that, Christmas toxic positivity still abounds in the Philippines. We still have a lot of ongoing bad habits, such as starting Christmas in September and then doing last-minute Christmas shopping during the week of Christmas. That's why every time I drive on the road on Christmas, I tend to shout, "Isn't it any wonder why the Philippines never improves?" The term Noche Buena has evolved over time . For some, it's simply the Christmas dinner. However, so...
Read more

Christmas Toxic Positivity May Be Your Biggest Holiday Financial Killer

Christmas is just around the corner, isn't it? It's easy to tell me, "Stop being a Scrooge! Lighten up! It's Christmas!" Some people can't tell the difference between positivity and when positivity becomes toxic . If you think about it, toxic positivity is defined as: ...the belief that people should maintain a positive mindset no matter how dire or difficult a situation is. While there are benefits to being optimistic and engaging in positive thinking, toxic positivity rejects all difficult emotions in favor of a cheerful and often falsely positive façade . Every time I talk about Christmas foolishness (read here ), it's always pointed out that I love being negative. Honestly, there are times I'd rather be negative than to be overly positive. I always talk about mentioning the silly notions that my countrymen have like, "If the situation is bitter, just add sugar (read here )." In Cebuano, it's said, "Kung pait, butangi lang ug asu...
Read more

Can Anti-FDI Proponents Prove Their Claim That Economic Liberalization Will Just Benefit the Filipino Oligarchs?

The same old narration has been made over and over again . I'd dare say that the narration out the Facebook pages of the likes of Atty. Teddy Casiño, Atty. Neri Colmenares, Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, Migrante International, IBON Foundation, etc. are more or less the same. It's already a broken record based on the facts that they've been refuted. I've read the book From Third World to First . I guess Migrante International hates that book because Singapore is often associated with the execution of Flor Contemplacion, at least on their watch. What they're doing is nothing more than still hating Japan, Germany, and Italy because of the Second World War. I'm not surprised at another lie that's often repeated--economic liberalization (or 100% FDI shares ownership) will only  benefit the oligarchs . I guess it'll be easy to nail on me because I'm not a summa cum laude and Rep. Raoul Abellar Manuel is and he's a graduate of the Uni...
Read more

It's UTTER IGNORANCE to Say that the Philippines Needs to Self-Industrialize First Before Allowing FDIs to Own 100% Equity

It's often said by idiots on Facebook that allowing FDIs to own 100% of their shares is just going to leave the Philippines with nothing. I don't know how long I can keep my patience with such fools. To explain it, FDIs get rich based on net profits after taxes (read here ). FDIs will still end up paying VAT and income taxes if they want to continue investing in the Philippines. It's like if you want to continue doing business in the commercial space--you need to pay the rental fee to your lessor. The idea of 100% FDI ownership should be spelled out as, "Allowing FDIs to own 100% of their shares." They wouldn't need to find a Filipino partner before they can do business in the Philippines. They may not be allowed to own land  but they can operate without a Filipino partner. The even bigger stupidity is when FDIs are required to split 60-40 of the partnership. Meaning, that they must split 60% of the net income after taxes with the local Filipino partner. That...
Read more