Skip to main content

Why I'm Not in Favor of Nationalization of Utilities Mixed with Protectionism

ToonPool

There's the call of leftist fools to stop privatization. Many still believe that utilities should be run by nationalization rather than privatization. I've been reading on Facebook where some fools believe that allowing foreign telecommunications companies (telcos) to invest in the Philippines will "risk security". Any telco will risk security if there are no laws to regulate it like the Data Privacy Law. Just because I support private enterprises doesn't mean that I say the government is hands-off. On the other hand, the government has the duty to set rules such as fair compensation, proper employee treatment, safety measures, and the like to make sure that we remain in healthy competition. Some people who keep protesting against the privatization of industries I believe (1) want the government to provide for all the needs of the people (which leads to dictatorship, eventually), (2) have some agenda as to why they're doing it, or (3) these people are protesting without knowing what they're talking about.

I think this is the problem of having nationalized industries. I decided to take a look at the oligarchy problem. Two major storms in my life (Ruping and Odette) made me think of the slow restoration. I can't blame the power companies for their slow restoration. For instance, I can't blame VECO for taking "too long" for these reasons--(1) there are plenty of customers, and (2) there are safety procedures to follow. Clearing up the road was one daunting task after Odette. After that, there are so many places that need to be restored. In operations management, that would be a bottleneck. It's already a few private utility enterprises vs. a huge crowd's demand. The demand for electricity with so few power companies makes it expensive and performance can be easily compromised. There's the stress of biting more than one can chew.

We need to think about where the real problem is. I don't need a Ph. D. in economics from the Ateneo De Manila Univesity (ADMU) or the University of the Philippines (UP) to understand it (in part). The issue is supply and demand. Privatization isn't a bad idea unless there are too few private utility providers. Let's say that we start to nationalize all industries. Let's have the government seize all the utility providers. That means there will be no more Globe and PLDT for telcos. That means we will no longer have private water companies. Everything must now be government-owned. Some people still want the government to provide for their needs. Even "better", we will discourage foreign direct investors (FDIs) from establishing utility plants. It may sound good (at first) but we can expect performance to dwindle. It's because supply will eventually go down and the demand goes up. What happens is that when you've got a monopoly--you're going to have a sudden increase in prices. The law of supply and demand is something learned in middle school and high school. It's not something you need a degree in economics to understand at a certain level!

Instead, the idea of capitalism (while some socialists have adopted free-market policies such as China and Vietnam) is private enterprises fill in the supply and demand gap. There's still government intervention or regulation involved such as tax collection, labor laws, intellectual property rights, and the like. The government still intervenes when private enterprises break certain laws to protect the business environment. I think the problem with Odette's aftermath could've reached Venezuelan levels of catastrophe if the utilities were all government-owned instead of government-regulated private enterprises. However, privatization isn't enough because it would be dumb if too few businessmen are trying to fill the demand of an entire island or even 7,107 islands with an entire population.

That's why I felt Andrew James Masigan's sentiment that the Public Services Act of 2022 is long overdue. I feel that FDIs are needed to help the utility sector. More competition will not only make the local businesses shape up if they want to survive. It will also fill in the supply and demand gap. Just think if utility companies from ASEAN will invest in the Philippines. The Internet will eventually be faster through FDI and more affordable thanks to supply and demand. The Philippines will have better chances to restore power after a disaster when there are more power providers than just this and that. Though when salaries increase, we should expect an increase in prices too. It's because salaries are part of operating costs that will contribute to overall pricing. Companies would be crazy to give high salaries and low-priced products. Such a decision will lead them to eventual bankruptcy.

How will government-regulated competition of private enterprise work? Competitors will not engage in gladiatorial competitions. Instead, these competitors, whether they be local investors or foreign investors will have to follow rules such as paying taxes, labor laws, and intellectual property rights. That means any business guilty of breaking these rules will face appropriate penalties. What happens is that supply and demand are filled. FDIs will be part of the sphere. It would mean that some of them will start investing in the far-flung areas instead of where there's so little supply for the huge demand. It doesn't matter if the business was owned by a Filipino or a foreigner--they're all tax-mapped. Government agencies will buy from private institutions. A foreign telco may provide our government offices a badly-needed server upgrade. They'll buy their chairs and the other equipment from a private institution. They'll get a privately owned construction company to build government infrastructure programs. In the long run, a balance between government and private enterprises is what's needed. We need the government to regulate them through reasonable rules. Meanwhile, we need private enterprises to fill the supply and demand gap for the people. 

References

Websites


"Long overdue laws finally passed" by Andrew J. Masigan (April 06, 2022)
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...
Read more

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...
Read more

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...
Read more

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...
Read more