Skip to main content

Simple Logic: Prices of Basic Goods Will COST HIGHER in the Shopping Mall Groceries

I really must laugh and cringe at the stupidity of so-called thought leaders on Facebook. I did name some of them such as Silent No More PH. From a photo of whipped cream to red onions (above). The photos were taken at a mall grocery. I even wonder if the people of Silent No More PH (and since when were they ever silent) ever bother to do a simple supply chain analysis. That's why I wrote an article where I addressed if social media gossipers even know anything about supply chain analysis (read here). It would be idiotic to go to a shopping mall and expect public market (palengke in Tagalog) price levels. 

It's because we have this simple supply chain analysis to think about public markets vs. malls 

ScienceDirect.com


Just think about how the supply chain goes. So, let's think about the suppliers of raw materials. Let's think about one of the unavoidable problems of the gasoline price increase. How many times do I need to tell people that the prices of gasoline are a world market problem? Should the government mandate for subsidy or sell at a loss--gasoline stations will have to shut down because they will become unprofitable. Some social media gossipers say that the war in Ukraine is "just an excuse". Please, if the supply of gasoline from the world market has lowered due to previous low demand--do you think that they can easily process gasoline? Gasoline is transported by well... gasoline. Is it that hard to understand? 

Now, we start to look at the suppliers to manufacturers. Let's start with whipped cream. The ingredients for whipped cream are transported by gasoline. If the prices of gasoline are high then shouldn't the supplier add a markup to make sure they can afford gasoline? Not to mention that the suppliers have other expenses such as salaries, maintenance, and the like. Gasoline will be used in transportation. Higher cost of gasoline means a higher cost of electricity. It's not rocket science to understand that even if one component has a cost increase--the entire supply chain follows. I even wonder if the people behind those pages even bother to examine that?

Why are the prices of goods in the malls higher than in the public market? It's common sense (really) that a public market has lower operating costs. A good example is that an open public market is well, open. That means they spend very little on electricity compared to the shopping mall. Small-scale vendors don't have as many employees as a shopping mall. Meanwhile, a shopping mall has higher maintenance. The rent will be considerably higher than renting a public space. Expenses such as electricity for refrigerators, air-conditioning, lights, longer working hours, more employees, etc. would tell you why prices will be more expensive. If groceries in malls are sold at market prices--can they really pay for their expenses? Did the point-missing social media gossipers even think of that? Then again I wonder how much they even know about business and economics with their posts? Malls are high maintenance so the cost of rent is higher than a public space. The prices are justifiably high because the bills they have to pay are considerably higher.

That's why there are times I prefer to shop for vegetable downtown instead of at the mall. Are these point-missing trolls wanting everything to be handed over to them for free? If that's so then they can expect a deterioration of quality. A fruit and vegetable stand in a public market can sell cheaper due to lower maintenance costs. Meanwhile, to sell fruits and vegetables at a lower cost when you have higher rent due to a higher maintenance commercial space is just foolish. Sure, sales can be high but can the sales produce the money to pay the rent? Do these point-missing trolls ignore some people who are willing to pay a higher cost for convenience? It's like a person who is having heat rashes may prefer to buy vegetables at the mall than the public market even if it's more expensive. 

Then again what do you expect from people who miss the point? I guess they don't even know things. Just think about the old proverb that empty containers make the most noise. I simply must laugh at what could be ignorance. If they just did a supply chain analysis or look at events carefully--they'd been complaining and not looking at the problem. If they're also against importation in the name of nationalism--they can be part of the problem. Importation can be helpful in times of scarcity. If they're against the importation (for now) of agricultural goods then why even bother posting it on American-made social media like Twitter and Facebook? The irony is there with how these people talk and talk. Arguing with them might be point useless but their arguments still need to be refuted, righyt? 


Popular posts from this blog

The Irony the Philippines Starts the Christmas Season in September BUT Many Filipinos Love Last-Minute Christmas Shopping

  Uproxx As Christmas is just around the corner--I feel more stress coming in! It doesn't help when people try to use the late Andy Williams' "It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year" to try and skip the problem. It's already known that most Filipinos love to start Christmas in September . However, the irony is that Filipinos start Christmas early but do their Christmas shopping late. If they began the Christmas Season early, shouldn't they think about what to do before December strikes?  Two years ago, I wrote a post discussing last-minute Christmas shopping . Many Filipinos tend to do last-minute Christmas shopping. They had all of November (when the Christmas sale usually begins) but why do the Christmas shopping in December ? One of the things I blame is the one-day paycheck lifestyle (see here ). It can be observed that many Filipinos never learn to prioritize more important things . One can get their stars when they see their paychecks. However, the...

Is Christmas Toxic Positivity a Cause or an Effect of the Philippines' Lack of Progress?

Lessandra When it's Christmas, it's so easy to think of the song of the late Andy Williams, "It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year". The music itself reeks of toxic positivity,  whether one likes it or not. It's a shame, really, because December 20 was also the anniversary of Asia's Titanic, the sinking of the Doña Paz ! We live in a society that somehow never learns from its mistakes, like a person who's stuck in gambling debt, is still hoping to get rich gambling . Despite all that, Christmas toxic positivity still abounds in the Philippines. We still have a lot of ongoing bad habits, such as starting Christmas in September and then doing last-minute Christmas shopping during the week of Christmas. That's why every time I drive on the road on Christmas, I tend to shout, "Isn't it any wonder why the Philippines never improves?" The term Noche Buena has evolved over time . For some, it's simply the Christmas dinner. However, so...

Christmas Toxic Positivity May Be Your Biggest Holiday Financial Killer

Christmas is just around the corner, isn't it? It's easy to tell me, "Stop being a Scrooge! Lighten up! It's Christmas!" Some people can't tell the difference between positivity and when positivity becomes toxic . If you think about it, toxic positivity is defined as: ...the belief that people should maintain a positive mindset no matter how dire or difficult a situation is. While there are benefits to being optimistic and engaging in positive thinking, toxic positivity rejects all difficult emotions in favor of a cheerful and often falsely positive façade . Every time I talk about Christmas foolishness (read here ), it's always pointed out that I love being negative. Honestly, there are times I'd rather be negative than to be overly positive. I always talk about mentioning the silly notions that my countrymen have like, "If the situation is bitter, just add sugar (read here )." In Cebuano, it's said, "Kung pait, butangi lang ug asu...

Can Anti-FDI Proponents Prove Their Claim That Economic Liberalization Will Just Benefit the Filipino Oligarchs?

The same old narration has been made over and over again . I'd dare say that the narration out the Facebook pages of the likes of Atty. Teddy Casiño, Atty. Neri Colmenares, Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, Migrante International, IBON Foundation, etc. are more or less the same. It's already a broken record based on the facts that they've been refuted. I've read the book From Third World to First . I guess Migrante International hates that book because Singapore is often associated with the execution of Flor Contemplacion, at least on their watch. What they're doing is nothing more than still hating Japan, Germany, and Italy because of the Second World War. I'm not surprised at another lie that's often repeated--economic liberalization (or 100% FDI shares ownership) will only  benefit the oligarchs . I guess it'll be easy to nail on me because I'm not a summa cum laude and Rep. Raoul Abellar Manuel is and he's a graduate of the Uni...

It's UTTER IGNORANCE to Say that the Philippines Needs to Self-Industrialize First Before Allowing FDIs to Own 100% Equity

It's often said by idiots on Facebook that allowing FDIs to own 100% of their shares is just going to leave the Philippines with nothing. I don't know how long I can keep my patience with such fools. To explain it, FDIs get rich based on net profits after taxes (read here ). FDIs will still end up paying VAT and income taxes if they want to continue investing in the Philippines. It's like if you want to continue doing business in the commercial space--you need to pay the rental fee to your lessor. The idea of 100% FDI ownership should be spelled out as, "Allowing FDIs to own 100% of their shares." They wouldn't need to find a Filipino partner before they can do business in the Philippines. They may not be allowed to own land  but they can operate without a Filipino partner. The even bigger stupidity is when FDIs are required to split 60-40 of the partnership. Meaning, that they must split 60% of the net income after taxes with the local Filipino partner. That...