Skip to main content

Do Those Social Media Gossipers Complaining About Inflation Know ANYTHING About BASIC Supply Chain Management?

It's really funny (and frustrating) to see all the posts on Facebook concerning inflation. "Thought leader" page Silent No More Philippines is just one of them. I couldn't help but laugh (and cringe) when they started complaining about the prices of goods increasing. Unfortunately, that page is only known for complaining since the reign of former Philippine president, Rodrigo R. Duterte and the recent reign of Philippine President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. Once again, I'd like to state that I didn't vote for Marcos Jr. The problem with that page isn't their criticism. The problem is that the page hardly displays solutions. In fact, recent posts that they have complained about inflation and the increase in price of Jollibee fast food makes me ask, "Do they know a thing about supply chain management?" That's why I really refuse to take advice from social media gossipers, especially in matters about economics (read here).

ScienceDirect.com

I decided to revisit some old lessons way back in 2004-2007 during my business administration years. A simple analysis of the supply chain will tell you how pricing is done. People say that the government is just using the war in Ukraine (or any factor beyond the control of the Philippines) as an excuse to have expensive gasoline. Please, it's all about the law of supply and demand. A simple supply chain management will tell you that barrels of gasoline are still transported by gasoline. If the supply of gasoline in the world market is low then the demand in the world market is high--gasoline prices ought to rise up. Subsidizing gasoline or making gasoline companies sell at a lower price than their costs is just plain bad business and economics!

Yup, you can just expect it to backfire badly on your face.

This just reminds me of the classic demand by some protesters for higher salaries, lower prices of goods, and cash handouts for everyone. The three demands are very self-defeating (read why here). The supply chain will tell you that salaries are all parts of the means of production. If the company increases the salary rate of the workers--they ought to increase the prices for products and services. If farmers are going to get a raise then the cost of rice must increase to continue giving that rate. The prices can only drop when there's an economy of scale (which fills in the supply-demand gap). Otherwise, prices must normally increase if workers are to get a higher salary.

Image by Sabrina Jiang © Investopedia 2020

Once again, do I need to display basic accounting for why demanding higher salaries while lowering the prices of goods is stupid? The supply chain really has the cost of goods sold and other expenses. All these will end up adding up to how much must be sold in order to gain a profit. The revenue is deducted from the cost of goods sold  (COGS). Every direct expense such as materials purchased will affect the final price. 

Let's think about Jollibee's current increase in prices. There are many factors why the prices will increase. It all involves expenses. If the cost of gasoline is high then naturally the materials they need will have to be priced higher. Let's say gasoline prices increase due to the world market. Jollibee must have a shipment of supplies. Think about Jollibee having longer operating hours these days. If gasoline prices are high then the cost of electricity will be high as well. Longer operating hours equals higher operating costs. It might be a complex network but it doesn't take a genius to understand it. Jollibee is a very huge company. Therefore, operating expenses will be naturally expensive. If Jollibee is to sell their food at the same prices all the time--you can expect Jollibee to shut down soon!

The same can go for whipped cream which is a basic grocery item. If there's an increase in gasoline prices then do you think the costs of transportation and power will be lower? The cost of raw materials will be higher. The cost of production will be higher. If one part of the supply chain's cost increases then logic dictates that you need to sell higher to be able to survive. It makes sense for whipped cream to nearly double its price if one (or more) component of its supply chain has an increased its cost.

These people are just there to spread gossip. That's why I refuse to take pages like Silent No More PH seriously. Whoever the administrators are, I'd like to ask them if they even bothered to see the situation beyond blaming politicians they dislike. Besides, even if Atty. Maria Leonor Gerona-Robredo won as the 17th president--the Philippines will still feel the shock. Meanwhile, if they do demand for more "economics magic"--we can guarantee that the Philippines will go from simple inflation to hyper-inflation like Venezuela. 

Popular posts from this blog

The Idiocy of Typing Anti-FDI Rants Using IMPORTED Devices, IMPORTED Platforms, and IMPORTED Social Media

Bulatlat It's very easy to open Facebook (or any related platform) and find lots of stupidity , right? There have been idiotic comments I find on Facebook such as FDI is this and that. We can find "thought leader groups" such as Alliance of Concerned Teachers, Anakpawis, Anakbayan, Bayan Muna, IBON Foundation, Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, and Philippine Anti-Fascist League (PH Antifa) who keep ranting about FDI as this and that. I even remember somebody dared to say that FDI caused Egypt to dry up. Ironically, North Korea and Venezuela, two protectionist countries, have very bad pollution problems. I'd blame it that they don't have the money to do a clean-up drive. How can you clean up a polluted river without the right equipment? How can you expect better power efficiency with outdated equipment that keep coughing up, cough, cough, lots of black smoke?  All the talks on social media can be very funny. The big irony is that all calls for "...

Get Stuck with EDSA, End Up Like Nokia

  Yes, we should never forget what history teaches us. A classmate of mine, back in high school, wrote a simple and blunt essay called "History: A Teacher". I doubt he still has a soft copy, given it was already more than 20 years ago. I'd like to quote Duterte critic Andrew James Masigan wrote this in  Philippine Star --something that should remain relevant: I would never undervalue the 1987 Constitution. It dismantled the legal framework of a repressive regime and established the democratic institutions we enjoy today. For this, I am grateful. The 1987 Constitution was crafted with the best of intentions. It sought to put the Filipino first in all aspects of governance and to level the playing field amongst sectors and peoples.  But it is far from perfect. It failed to consider the importance of foreign capital and technologies and the stiff competition we would have to face to obtain them. In short, its economic provisions were short-sighted . So despite the Constitut...

It's Incredibly Frustrating to Discuss Economics with an Overspender

Overspending is just bad economics, isn't it? Economics is defined as the following for the sake of a review of high school basics: Economics is a social science concerned with the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. It studies how individuals, businesses, governments, and nations make choices about how to allocate resources. Economics focuses on the actions of human beings, based on assumptions that humans act with rational behavior, seeking the most optimal level of benefit or utility. The building blocks of economics are the studies of labor and trade. Since there are many possible applications of human labor and many different ways to acquire resources, it is the task of economics to determine which methods yield the best results. Economics can generally be broken down into macroeconomics, which concentrates on the behavior of the economy as a whole, and microeconomics, which focuses on individual people and businesses. It had me thinking of 2016 wh...

Talking Economics with an Overeating Glutton

Two years ago, I wrote an entry about why discussing economics with an overspender is frustrating . Now, I was looking at certain fat people who say really dumb things about economics. Just recently, I was looking at a certain fat idiot (fortunately, he only has 1K+ followers) who posted on Facebook that not only will the parliamentary system cause the Philippines to become a dictatorship, but he also says that changing economic provisions will cause the Philippines to collapse and the country to fall into the hands of foreigners. I won't name the person out to avoid getting personal. However, the person is apparently very fat and he blames capitalism day in and day out. The person even says that businessmen do nothing and it's the employers that do everything. Has that fat slob ever heard that businesses are run by bosses and that if the bosses do screw up, they're the ones who are the most answerable? The employees are the cogs and the boss runs the cogs. I was looking at...

Social Media Gossipers' Ad Hominems Against Actor Robin Padilla Regarding His Proposal to Remove 60-40

Make no mistake that I didn't vote for Robin Padilla. I feel like I've had enough of voting for celebrities, athletes, and those who I felt are know-nothings in the legislative. However, Padilla recently had his proposal to remove the 60-40 restrictions regarding foreign direct investments (FDIs) . Former Philippine Vice President Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo was even in favor of that amendment. I guess that's why Philippine economist Andrew James Masigan endorsed Robredo. I may have not endorsed Robredo while Masigan remains to be one of my favorite local sources. The news from GMA News Online reveals these plans by Padilla himself: Senator Robin Padilla said he wanted to revise the Constitution to scrap the 60-40 rule on foreign ownership of businesses to accelerate job creation and competition among industries . In a Monday interview, Padilla said the move would attract more foreign investments to support the country’s economic recovery. “Para sa akin mas...