Skip to main content

The STUPIDITY of Insisting that Equity Restrictions in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines Exist for "National Security"

As the call for economic charter change goes on, I feel the need to educate some people with common sense. I'm reading comments on Facebook that 60-40 (or any similar ownership restrictions) is for the "security of the Philippines" or that certain sectors can't be allowed 100% ownership on the part of the MNC. Once again, do I need to remind people for the nth time that 100% FDI ownership is all about share ownership? Sadly, many Filipinos misunderstand what 100% FDI means (read here). What 100% FDI ownership means is that MNCs don't need to look for a Filipino partner, only to be burdened with having to give up 60% (or more) of the net profits after taxes and they only keep 40% (or less). That's why I called such an arrangement as overpriced rent (read here).

Some of these people I ran into on Facebook (of all places) are too beholden to Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. It was last 2018 when Davide Jr. also said that the Philippines may become a "colony of businessmen". One of Davide Jr.'s words was this:

Davide said the 60-40 foreign equity ratio should stay also because the Philippine population is growing annually and they should have food security.

"What will you feed the people afterwards if all our assets here, natural assets, would be [granted] to foreign investors?...Congress should stick to it [60-40] and fully implement the same," he said.

The Constitution restricts ownership of certain areas of investments to firms with at least 60-percent Filipino capital.

The restriction also covers exploration, development, and utilization of natural resources through co-production, joint venture, or production-sharing agreements with Filipino citizens, or corporations or associations.

However, as they keep mentioning Davide Jr., I fire shots at them with Singapore's very own Kishore Mahbubani, founder of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP) in the National Unversity of Singapore (NUS). I could imagine what if Mahbubani and his friends decided to vacation in Cebu City and ran into Davide Jr. Mahbubani might say, "Hilario is that you?" Davide Jr. may say, "Long time no see. I'm glad you remembered me. We met at the United Nations." Mahbubani may say, "Too bad you never joined the World Economic Forum. Unfortunately, I must disagree with your statements. So you say it's for security reasons? I'm sorry but I have to disagree."

Let's compare FDIs to tenants who invest in the space and the Philippines to any form of commercial space (hence why I'm still opposed to letting foreigners buy spaces). If we're going to make the comparison, let's say that I opened a shopping mall in a downtown area. However, before one can rent in my shopping mall, they must sign a waiver that says that the lessor must let me own 60% of their business for that branch, located in my shopping mall. Certainly, no sensible businessperson would agree to such a stupid deal. I'm pretty sure none of the shopping mall groups such as Ayala, Robinson's, and SM ever put such a ridiculous clause in their contracts! 

I bet a lot of the families who run the malls will laugh at me. Just think if I wouldn't allow a tenant to rent a space unless the person agreed to give me 60% ownership of that space. Tenants want to keep 100% of their profits. Unfortunately, most people operate with the idea that profits are what you own for the day. Never mind that simple mathematics says that the profit is computed by the selling price less the cost price. 

Image by Sabrina Jiang © Investopedia 2020

In accounting, we have to focus on this cost accounting statement. I'd like to tell people to notice that we have revenue less COGS equals gross income. Gross income is then deducted from all expenses which results in Earnings Before Tax. After that, Earnings Before Tax is deducted from taxes. All that's left is the net income, which the investor wants to keep at 100%. Expenses would include the monthly rental aside from utility expenses. If one wants sot reduce the prices of goods, it should be because some (or all) areas of related costs have been reduced. If utilities are cheaper, increasing the salaries of employees while having a certain reduction of the overall price of the goods or services is possible. However, simply increasing salaries without considering all other factors will be inflationary. 

Basically, as a lessor, I collect the rentals every month. If the tenant can't pay the rent in two consecutive months, it's a ground for lawful eviction. The rent is part of the list of expenses. If I say that I'm going to require 60-40 for "security purposes", it's a very flimsy excuse. It's not as if I can't add certain restrictions to the clause such as no subleasing without permission, no immoral activities, no damage to property, no consecutive two months of non-payment, no one is allowed to live in the commercial space, etc. These restrictions are reasonable compared to when I require the tenant to give 60% of their net income after taxes. Getting a profit isn't an easy thing. The businesses should be allowed to keep 100% of what's left of the net income after taxes.

It may sound nice to say that it's all about "security". However, any shrewd businessperson who will read my contract will not buy the garbage I just spewed at the person. They would see that my requiring them to give 60% of their net income is nothing more than my own selfish agenda. Requiring MNCs to split 60-40 (or even higher than 60%) of the net income is all about the Filipino partner trying to get rich fast. That's why the late Carlos P. Garcia's "Filipino First Policy" caused the Philippines to fail. True, the Philippines may not be a totalitarian or Communist state. However, more businesses have chosen Communist Vietnam instead as a place to invest. 

The idea that only Filipinos should hold the majority of the economic activity is obsolete. It's not that we disregard the locals. If Filipino businesses can do good then they will survive the influx of FDIs. If they see the FDIs as opportunities for better connections then they will grow. Jollibee is an example of how the Philippines can survive against foreign businesses (read here). Garcia's third-world mentality only kept the Philippines stuck. It's a shame Filipinos tend to quote the great Lee Kuan Yew on the Marcoses but refuse to accept his helpful advice on other things. Some would even say, "It's just LKY's opinion!" or "It's just Mahathir Mohamad's opinion!" All the while, they treat the constitutionalists of the Philippines as "overly beholden". 

The big question is what has being "overly beholden" to people like Davide Jr. done for the Philippines? Vietnam and China both learned from Singapore how to improve their economies, even if they remain as Communist countries. Why has the Philippines been so stuck with the Marcos narrative (even still blaming it for problems not caused by it) instead of fixing the effects of the Marcos Years? The idea that 60-40 exists for "security reasons" is nothing more than a flimsy excuse that may have some hidden agenda. 
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

[UNPOPULAR OPINION] Why People Power Anniversary Should Be a Special Working Day Instead

  As a blogger, I shouldn't turn on the PC in hopes of becoming popular . It should be to turn on the PC and blog to make a difference . Right now, I think about the controversy when President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. declared the 1986 EDSA Revolution's anniversary as a working holiday . The call for some of the "minority lawmakers" is that they want to return the People Power Anniversary to a regular holiday once more. There are times I feel like, "Should we let it be a regular holiday again, so as not to repeat the Marcos dictatorship?" Sadly, the real answer is that the Philippines has been relying too much on EDSA , so it's practically ending up like Nokia . I was thinking about the reality of February being the most hectic month. February only has 28 days (and February 25 is near the month's end ). I thought that the Philippines also has too many national holidays more often than not. In fact, the Inquirer article written by...
Read more

Is Jollibee "Invading" South Korea Now as It's About to Acquire 70% of Shabu All Day?

I must confess that I find this new rather hilarious . It's because the word shabu is often associated with drugs. All the while, shabu shabu is a Korean delicacy! Well, I'm going to say that Jollibee Foods Corporation has now become a multinational buyer . Jollibee acquired 70% of Compost Coffee back in 2024 . This year, Jollibee as a multinational corporation is now acquiring Shabu All Day for PHP 5.1 billion pesos. Is Jollibee checkmating South Korea or is the Philippines conquering South Korea not just by OFWs but als through Jollibee? The answer is still no. From GMA News , we can read this article by Jon Viktor D. Cabuenas: Under the deal, Shabu All Day will be consolidated into Jollibee Foods Corp.’s (JFC) financial statements immediately upon completion of the acquisition for a total consideration equivalent to KRW127 billion. Completion of the transaction is subject to closing and financing conditions. The acquisition is expected to lead to a 2% jump in revenues, incre...
Read more

"Filipino First Policy" Has NO PLACE in the Rising Asian 21st Century

I guess nobody saw the Asian 21st Century coming, right? China was once a poor nation but look at it now. Vietnam was once a poor nation but look at it now. Singapore was once a poor nation but look at it now. The late great Lee Kuan Yew wrote his book From Third World to First . I'm afraid some people have been using it to go against the presidency of Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. while ignoring what else Lee Kuan Yew had to say. Lee Kuan Yew described the Filipino press to be rambunctious on pages 304-305 which I agree. I'm afraid that the Filipino press may have had a hand in getting rid of any economic or political reforms that could help the Philippines. Yet, one policy has been holding back the Philippines for decades and yes, it's the Filipino First Policy .  Reviewing the Filipino First Policy and why it has no place in the rising Asian 21st century I remembered how the values education subject taught Carlos P. Garcia's stupid Filipino First Policy as a Filipino value...
Read more

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more

The Prevalence of Fake Rich in the Philippines

Back in 2022, I wrote about why it's deadly to believe someone is rich based on their lifestyle . During my childhood to teenage years, I used to think someone was wealthier because of reasons like: Their parents spoil them with generous allowances.  They're driving a luxury car everywhere they go. They have expensive parties every year.  They have a lot of luxury brands. The children have so many toys.  The list can go on and on , and I believe I might type too many words from there. I grew up with people bragging about  how rich they are, even if the claims are preposterous. It's common among children to brag about what they don't have . Unfortunately, some never outgrow that dangerous habit and grow up with a fake rich lifestyle. This is the lifestyle where one wants others to think they're rich, even if they're not rich. The rule of fake rich reverses the advice above. Instead, the fake rich lifestyle says, "Buy a USD 500.00 bag never mind you have noth...
Read more