Skip to main content

The STUPIDITY of Insisting that Equity Restrictions in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines Exist for "National Security"

As the call for economic charter change goes on, I feel the need to educate some people with common sense. I'm reading comments on Facebook that 60-40 (or any similar ownership restrictions) is for the "security of the Philippines" or that certain sectors can't be allowed 100% ownership on the part of the MNC. Once again, do I need to remind people for the nth time that 100% FDI ownership is all about share ownership? Sadly, many Filipinos misunderstand what 100% FDI means (read here). What 100% FDI ownership means is that MNCs don't need to look for a Filipino partner, only to be burdened with having to give up 60% (or more) of the net profits after taxes and they only keep 40% (or less). That's why I called such an arrangement as overpriced rent (read here).

Some of these people I ran into on Facebook (of all places) are too beholden to Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. It was last 2018 when Davide Jr. also said that the Philippines may become a "colony of businessmen". One of Davide Jr.'s words was this:

Davide said the 60-40 foreign equity ratio should stay also because the Philippine population is growing annually and they should have food security.

"What will you feed the people afterwards if all our assets here, natural assets, would be [granted] to foreign investors?...Congress should stick to it [60-40] and fully implement the same," he said.

The Constitution restricts ownership of certain areas of investments to firms with at least 60-percent Filipino capital.

The restriction also covers exploration, development, and utilization of natural resources through co-production, joint venture, or production-sharing agreements with Filipino citizens, or corporations or associations.

However, as they keep mentioning Davide Jr., I fire shots at them with Singapore's very own Kishore Mahbubani, founder of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP) in the National Unversity of Singapore (NUS). I could imagine what if Mahbubani and his friends decided to vacation in Cebu City and ran into Davide Jr. Mahbubani might say, "Hilario is that you?" Davide Jr. may say, "Long time no see. I'm glad you remembered me. We met at the United Nations." Mahbubani may say, "Too bad you never joined the World Economic Forum. Unfortunately, I must disagree with your statements. So you say it's for security reasons? I'm sorry but I have to disagree."

Let's compare FDIs to tenants who invest in the space and the Philippines to any form of commercial space (hence why I'm still opposed to letting foreigners buy spaces). If we're going to make the comparison, let's say that I opened a shopping mall in a downtown area. However, before one can rent in my shopping mall, they must sign a waiver that says that the lessor must let me own 60% of their business for that branch, located in my shopping mall. Certainly, no sensible businessperson would agree to such a stupid deal. I'm pretty sure none of the shopping mall groups such as Ayala, Robinson's, and SM ever put such a ridiculous clause in their contracts! 

I bet a lot of the families who run the malls will laugh at me. Just think if I wouldn't allow a tenant to rent a space unless the person agreed to give me 60% ownership of that space. Tenants want to keep 100% of their profits. Unfortunately, most people operate with the idea that profits are what you own for the day. Never mind that simple mathematics says that the profit is computed by the selling price less the cost price. 

Image by Sabrina Jiang © Investopedia 2020

In accounting, we have to focus on this cost accounting statement. I'd like to tell people to notice that we have revenue less COGS equals gross income. Gross income is then deducted from all expenses which results in Earnings Before Tax. After that, Earnings Before Tax is deducted from taxes. All that's left is the net income, which the investor wants to keep at 100%. Expenses would include the monthly rental aside from utility expenses. If one wants sot reduce the prices of goods, it should be because some (or all) areas of related costs have been reduced. If utilities are cheaper, increasing the salaries of employees while having a certain reduction of the overall price of the goods or services is possible. However, simply increasing salaries without considering all other factors will be inflationary. 

Basically, as a lessor, I collect the rentals every month. If the tenant can't pay the rent in two consecutive months, it's a ground for lawful eviction. The rent is part of the list of expenses. If I say that I'm going to require 60-40 for "security purposes", it's a very flimsy excuse. It's not as if I can't add certain restrictions to the clause such as no subleasing without permission, no immoral activities, no damage to property, no consecutive two months of non-payment, no one is allowed to live in the commercial space, etc. These restrictions are reasonable compared to when I require the tenant to give 60% of their net income after taxes. Getting a profit isn't an easy thing. The businesses should be allowed to keep 100% of what's left of the net income after taxes.

It may sound nice to say that it's all about "security". However, any shrewd businessperson who will read my contract will not buy the garbage I just spewed at the person. They would see that my requiring them to give 60% of their net income is nothing more than my own selfish agenda. Requiring MNCs to split 60-40 (or even higher than 60%) of the net income is all about the Filipino partner trying to get rich fast. That's why the late Carlos P. Garcia's "Filipino First Policy" caused the Philippines to fail. True, the Philippines may not be a totalitarian or Communist state. However, more businesses have chosen Communist Vietnam instead as a place to invest. 

The idea that only Filipinos should hold the majority of the economic activity is obsolete. It's not that we disregard the locals. If Filipino businesses can do good then they will survive the influx of FDIs. If they see the FDIs as opportunities for better connections then they will grow. Jollibee is an example of how the Philippines can survive against foreign businesses (read here). Garcia's third-world mentality only kept the Philippines stuck. It's a shame Filipinos tend to quote the great Lee Kuan Yew on the Marcoses but refuse to accept his helpful advice on other things. Some would even say, "It's just LKY's opinion!" or "It's just Mahathir Mohamad's opinion!" All the while, they treat the constitutionalists of the Philippines as "overly beholden". 

The big question is what has being "overly beholden" to people like Davide Jr. done for the Philippines? Vietnam and China both learned from Singapore how to improve their economies, even if they remain as Communist countries. Why has the Philippines been so stuck with the Marcos narrative (even still blaming it for problems not caused by it) instead of fixing the effects of the Marcos Years? The idea that 60-40 exists for "security reasons" is nothing more than a flimsy excuse that may have some hidden agenda. 
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...
Read more

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...
Read more

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...
Read more

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...
Read more