Skip to main content

Accepting Foreign Investments Isn't About Relying Solely on Foreigners

 

One of the biggest common mistakes about foreign investments is that it's all about "relying solely on foreigners" or "it's not going to develop the national industry". I agree that relying solely on foreign investments is not good. It's because if there are no local suppliers of local raw materials--foreign investments may have to rely purely on importation which isn't a good thing. Meanwhile, a nation will develop its agriculture and the like to provide raw materials for all kinds of buyers. It's pretty much a two-way street when it comes to investment. The late Lee Kuan Yew also talked about greening up Singapore along the way before it progressed. Singapore accepted foreign investments while it was still a third-world. However, it didn't neglect its own local industries.

Reading through Chapter 4 of From Third World to First will tell us lessons about foreign investments. Lee saw them as the opportunity to bring in jobs, teach new skills, and bring in new technology. Kishore Mahbubani of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy stated that fact over and over again. It's the third-world mentality to just "learn and do everything on our own." Children need to learn to be independent one day from their parents. However, children can't learn the life skills to be independent unless they were trained at home and in school on how to do so. Yet, this independence isn't absolute as one must develop the value of interdependence. That is learning to rely on each other and doing one's share of the work. People who are now having their own income depend on their jobs or businesses to survive. People who have jobs have to learn to be interdependent with their co-workers to produce results. A good manager is interdependent with one's subordinates.

Instead, accepting foreign investment is all about developing a nation's capabilities. Sure, a nation may soon learn to make its own equipment. Lee mentioned that the great Communist leader, Deng Xiaoping, was a great man. Deng abandoned the old model and pursued the black cat and white cat model. Deng decided to buy some imported aircraft for China. Soon, China would learn to make its own aircrafts. It didn't matter to Deng if the aircraft was imported or local--all it mattered was that it would serve China. Deng's aim was to make China prosperous by any legitimate means. Deng opened up China to foreign investments when he told Americans, "China is open for business." Special economic zones were built and foreign investments began to produce jobs. Deng took Lee's advice on economics and realized that much had to be done. China had an outdated education system, people living with a third-world mentality, and now it was time to fix it. Deng dumped Mao Zedong's old model in favor of free markets in Communist China. The economic reformer Do Muoi did the same thing for Vietnam. Vietnam and China developed their countries following Lee's approach. 

It's observable how imported equipment and businesses can help Filipino businesses grow. It's like making binagol (taro cake in a coconut shell) in Samar with an imported grinder, stainless steel pots that are most likely imported, and getting imported vehicles to make sure the binagols arrive at the marketplace and groceries on time. Filipino restaurants have partnered with Grab and Foodpanda to increase their coverage. For them, it didn't matter if the businesses were local or foreign--they cared more about good results. It would be, as said, ridiculous if a Filipino business will just "do everything itself". A restaurant owner should focus on cooking delicious food--not making its own delivery service or motorcycles. A restaurant owner should care more about the quality of the equipment to give good service--not if it was local or imported.

The local businesses would be looking for opportunities. If they want to survive then they need to innovate and expand. It would mean getting new service providers, suppliers, and more importantly, new customers. It's because if your customers have competition then you have new customers. Somebody selling agricultural products wholesale may start to sell to both foreign or Filipino manufacturers. It wouldn't matter if the customer was a local or a foreigner if they pay well. It wouldn't matter if a service provider was a local or a foreigner if they pay well. Foreign investments increase opportunities for the growth or development of the national industry. A real national industry will do whatever it takes to make the Philippines' businesses globally competitive. 

References

Books

"From Third World to First--The Singapore Story: 1965-2000) by Lee Kuan Yew
Harpers Collins Publishers

Websites

"LEE KUAN YEW TALKS ABOUT THE FAILURE OF MAOISM AND DENG XIAOPING’S SHIFT TOWARDS CAPITALISM"

Popular posts from this blog

The Idiocy of Typing Anti-FDI Rants Using IMPORTED Devices, IMPORTED Platforms, and IMPORTED Social Media

Bulatlat It's very easy to open Facebook (or any related platform) and find lots of stupidity , right? There have been idiotic comments I find on Facebook such as FDI is this and that. We can find "thought leader groups" such as Alliance of Concerned Teachers, Anakpawis, Anakbayan, Bayan Muna, IBON Foundation, Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, and Philippine Anti-Fascist League (PH Antifa) who keep ranting about FDI as this and that. I even remember somebody dared to say that FDI caused Egypt to dry up. Ironically, North Korea and Venezuela, two protectionist countries, have very bad pollution problems. I'd blame it that they don't have the money to do a clean-up drive. How can you clean up a polluted river without the right equipment? How can you expect better power efficiency with outdated equipment that keep coughing up, cough, cough, lots of black smoke?  All the talks on social media can be very funny. The big irony is that all calls for "...

Get Stuck with EDSA, End Up Like Nokia

  Yes, we should never forget what history teaches us. A classmate of mine, back in high school, wrote a simple and blunt essay called "History: A Teacher". I doubt he still has a soft copy, given it was already more than 20 years ago. I'd like to quote Duterte critic Andrew James Masigan wrote this in  Philippine Star --something that should remain relevant: I would never undervalue the 1987 Constitution. It dismantled the legal framework of a repressive regime and established the democratic institutions we enjoy today. For this, I am grateful. The 1987 Constitution was crafted with the best of intentions. It sought to put the Filipino first in all aspects of governance and to level the playing field amongst sectors and peoples.  But it is far from perfect. It failed to consider the importance of foreign capital and technologies and the stiff competition we would have to face to obtain them. In short, its economic provisions were short-sighted . So despite the Constitut...

It's Incredibly Frustrating to Discuss Economics with an Overspender

Overspending is just bad economics, isn't it? Economics is defined as the following for the sake of a review of high school basics: Economics is a social science concerned with the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. It studies how individuals, businesses, governments, and nations make choices about how to allocate resources. Economics focuses on the actions of human beings, based on assumptions that humans act with rational behavior, seeking the most optimal level of benefit or utility. The building blocks of economics are the studies of labor and trade. Since there are many possible applications of human labor and many different ways to acquire resources, it is the task of economics to determine which methods yield the best results. Economics can generally be broken down into macroeconomics, which concentrates on the behavior of the economy as a whole, and microeconomics, which focuses on individual people and businesses. It had me thinking of 2016 wh...

Talking Economics with an Overeating Glutton

Two years ago, I wrote an entry about why discussing economics with an overspender is frustrating . Now, I was looking at certain fat people who say really dumb things about economics. Just recently, I was looking at a certain fat idiot (fortunately, he only has 1K+ followers) who posted on Facebook that not only will the parliamentary system cause the Philippines to become a dictatorship, but he also says that changing economic provisions will cause the Philippines to collapse and the country to fall into the hands of foreigners. I won't name the person out to avoid getting personal. However, the person is apparently very fat and he blames capitalism day in and day out. The person even says that businessmen do nothing and it's the employers that do everything. Has that fat slob ever heard that businesses are run by bosses and that if the bosses do screw up, they're the ones who are the most answerable? The employees are the cogs and the boss runs the cogs. I was looking at...

Social Media Gossipers' Ad Hominems Against Actor Robin Padilla Regarding His Proposal to Remove 60-40

Make no mistake that I didn't vote for Robin Padilla. I feel like I've had enough of voting for celebrities, athletes, and those who I felt are know-nothings in the legislative. However, Padilla recently had his proposal to remove the 60-40 restrictions regarding foreign direct investments (FDIs) . Former Philippine Vice President Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo was even in favor of that amendment. I guess that's why Philippine economist Andrew James Masigan endorsed Robredo. I may have not endorsed Robredo while Masigan remains to be one of my favorite local sources. The news from GMA News Online reveals these plans by Padilla himself: Senator Robin Padilla said he wanted to revise the Constitution to scrap the 60-40 rule on foreign ownership of businesses to accelerate job creation and competition among industries . In a Monday interview, Padilla said the move would attract more foreign investments to support the country’s economic recovery. “Para sa akin mas...