Skip to main content

Econ Cha-Cha Opponents Have No Choice Because Foreigners "Unfairly" Own the Means to Produce Equipment?

Bulatlat

In 2022, I wrote an article about anti-capitalists having no choice because the capitalists hold the means of production. Recently, I've been raising the issue, "Are you sure your gadgets are all imported?" Instead of falling into silence, they throw the mockery, "Oh no! Not the gadgets question again!" They would go as far as to say, "We have no choice but to use imported equipment because foreigners own the means to produce foreign equipment!" Oh, that's a very brutally honest answer!

They might say that buying imported equipment isn't exploitative. Then I say, "If you can have a MacPRO and an iPhone, why don't we let Apple do more than open Apple stores. Why not let Apple have a factory in the Philippines?" They might shout out, "You're letting foreigners do business here, run away with the profit, and leave us poor? Only they will get rich (read rebuttal here)!" They'd throw in as many childish insults, hoping I'd get mad, and when I lost my cool, they'd play the poor innocent victim. I could explain that if Apple produces its goods in the Philippines--buying an iPhone would be cheaper because of lower costs. They'll still argue that MNCs are invaders (read rebuttal here). They'd say they have no choice but to use the shiny new iPhone (as if there aren't other alternative brands and nobody is forcing them to buy it) to tell people that MNCs are exploitative, that they'd run off with the profit, enslave Filipinos, and that economic charter change means selling the Philippines to foreigners.  

The logic fails on many levels. Buying these imported equipment from MNCs empowers the people they hate. It's often allegedly said by Karl Marx or Vladimir Lenin (who ironically introduced the New Economic Policy) that the last capitalist they'd hang is the one who sells them the rope. However, Lenin introduced the New Economic Policy (NEP) which introduced a state-controlled free market, which may have been the basis for Doi Moi in Vietnam. Today, Vietnam uses Doi Moi where the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV) attracts FDIs. Why would they buy equipment from the one whom they intend to hang? Shouldn't they just steal their equipment or make their own equipment? This makes you wonder if opponents of FDI have their own agenda? Just think that Atty. Teodoro A. Casiño was last seen with an iPhone. Rosario Guzman uses a MacPRO laptop. If I were leading a revolution--why would I buy equipment from the same person I hate? I would rather steal the equipment or make my own equipment! 

One must ask, "Why did they purchase an iPhone and a MacPRO?" If they participate in capitalism simply to survive--they need to answer that. They have some choices between the more affordable models and the luxury brands from Apple. If I were them, I'd preferably purchase any non-luxury phone and laptop over Apple. I might purchase Huawei, Samsung, Sony, or Xiaomi laptops and phones instead of Apple. They must answer if Apple ever forced them to buy Apple products when there are more affordable brand choices. In capitalism, they have a choice between Apple and other non-luxury brands. 

This statement may have caused Nguyen Duy Cong aka Doi Muoi (who died in 2018) and Deng Xiaoping to turn things around. Maybe, one day Do Muoi and Deng found out, "Shoot! We can't keep up with this? Why not invite the manufacturers of imported equipment to manufacture in our country instead?" Deng went to the USA and said, "China is now open for business." Do Muoi introduced various reforms. It's because they've had enough of the contradiction. True, China and Vietnam still operate under a Communist form of government. However, their progress under the two great leaders was because of pragmatism. Doi Moi reforms and Socialism with Chinese Characteristics were clever economic plans, despite being set by Communist governments. They did the right thing by inviting those foreigners who made the equipment into the country. 

The results of letting foreigners who own the means to produce equipment, invest in one's country became better. It's because FDIs are still regulated by the state even if they don't need a local partner. For Vietnam, there's a more flexible joint venture in some areas such as agriculture where an investor can start with 30% and own more than 50% of the capital - as long as it teamed up with a state enterprise. Vietnam allows other FDIs to own 100% of their shares in most industries. That makes me ask the question of when will opponents of economic charter change see their own hypocrisy? Maybe not if all they care about is feeding their ego. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Wanting Wealth WITHOUT Financial Discipline

Many people want to be rich, but not so many people want the discipline on how to be rich. Isn't that the plain hard truth ? As I do this sideline blog , I contemplated whether I should write another post after writing several posts years back, or when I wrote about Venezuela as a cautionary tale . Back on topic, I thought about how financial discipline is something often overlooked. It's easy to talk about Christmas since that's probably the most wonderful time of the year to be spendthrift , only to find out that one's broke by the New Year . The cycle of reckless financial habits tends to restart in January, even when January becomes that time of reckoning between debtors and creditors! January 2026 will end, February 2026 comes, and then the cycle of financial recklessness continues. It's the same cycle over and over! Last Christmas, I remember how DTI Secretary Christina Roque spoke about the PHP 500.00 noche buena, for a family of four . I called it tactless b...
Read more

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...
Read more

The Philippines will NEVER Get Richer by Blaming Its Richer Asian Neighbors

Gemini AI Updated: September 27, 2025 It would be nice to talk about the typical blame game in the Philippines. I could remember that, as a child and a teenager, I had this habit of blaming people I disliked for my failing an exam. The reasons are mostly imagined. What I remembered in my later college years was when I met a couple of super irresponsible students. They had this attitude to say something like, "My parents don't care if it'll take me 20 years to finish my bachelor's degree." Some people even say something like, "It's the fault of the rich that we are poor." It was a backfire when I told such people, "Isn't it any wonder why your finances are down? It's because your parents don't even value the money when they don't care if it'll take up to 20 years to finish college!"  Understanding the blame game and why it feels so good Psychology Today presents this on why some people will always blame others . These fin...
Read more

Communist Vietnam's Great Leap Forward in Agricultural Production

I remember reading through Third World to First by the late Lee Kuan Yew. It's very easy to use the book to badmouth the Marcoses but not to learn from the rest of it. The book also talks about Vietnam and LKY's encounter with the late Nguyen Duy Cong aka Do Muoi. It's often said that Singapore only opened because of its lack of natural resources. On the contrary, Do Muoi decided to learn from Singapore how to turn the Communist Party of Vietnam into a powerhouse. Do Muoi, though a communist , was impressed by Singapore during his October 1993 state visit. Vietnam, unlike Singapore, is a country rich in natural resources. The third-world mentality said that MNCs are there to rape the resources .  A very huge misconception especially if you know Singapore's history Some Filipinos on social media even say that FDIs will destroy agriculture and nature. This is a meme by the Philippine Anti-Fascist League on Facebook. They say that FDIs equals environmental degradation. Yet...
Read more

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more