Skip to main content

Would You Support an Environmentally-Destructive Local Business in the Name of Filipino First?

A very huge misconception especially if you know Singapore's history

Some time ago, I decided to write about how foreign direct investments (FDIs) doesn't always mean environmental destruction. I would like to write this post about FDIs and multinational corporations (MNCs). I don't deny that some businesses just fail to uphold environmentally-friendly practices. That's why I also wrote about the importance of going green in doing businesses. Money is only worth it if there are forests to supply trees, there's delicious fish to eat because of clean streams, there's clean drinking water to buy, and the environment is well-taken care of. My money will have its value if I can go to a beach resort that uses its earnings to preserve the cleanliness of the place. Money becomes worthless when there's nothing of value to exchange it with. Poisoned rivers, massive deforestation, etc. will definitely make money worthless. That's why the late Lee Kuan Yew also discussed about greening up Singapore in his book From Third World to First

Now, let's imagine this new scenario. We have a local business that's environmentally destructive. It ignores even the simplest guidelines such as no littering and no dumping of waste into the waters. All it cares about is making a profit at the cost of the environment. That person only wants the money as soon as possible. The person may be a miser who hates to spend or a spendthrift who wants instant money. Either way, we know that both kinds will refuse to spend on proper waste disposal. However, the law of the land says, "We must support Filipino businesses as much as possible and support them first." What happens is that these local businesses end up getting protected because they can just bribe their way through the various offices. That local business may bribe the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) to get their permit even if they've violated it many times. So, people have no choice but to support that environmentally destructive business at all costs.

We will have our new entrant--an environmentally friendly foreign direct investor (FDI). This FDI is already known to operate with much environmental friendliness that it gets cleanliness awards without bribing officials. It would've probably gotten cleanliness awards from Taiwan, South Korea, Malaysia, and Singapore. We know how Singapore is a very fine city. You get fined for littering, picking flowers in the park, bird feeding in inappropriate places, vandalism, removal of body waste in the most inappropriate places, and even chewing gum is banned there for a reason. Now, this firm enters the Philippines with all its environmentally-friendly credentials. However, because of Filipino First, this business will either have to share ownership with an environmentally destructive local partner or be on the negative list. Even worse, the Filipino First Policy may require us to shun FDIs because they're foreign. Ironically, those who promote protectionism use foreign media like Facebook, Google, WordPress, etc. Teodoro Casino uses WordPress. Apparently, IBON Foundation is using WordPress or some other website-making platform that I'm not aware of. 

However, if one's to be truly environmentally friendly then give no room for ultranationalism. Instead, do what Deng Xiaoping did. Deng didn't care if the cat is black or white as long as it caught mice. In my case, I don't care if the investor is local or foreign--what matters is they serve the country well. One of the criteria of a good business is being environmentally friendly. I want to make sure that when there's profit--the money can buy something valuable. Who would want to swim in the ocean if the beach is dirty and the air is polluted? Who would want to eat fish with garbage all over it? We're to focus on Lee's green policy. We should pursue environmentally-friendly businesses even if it means rejecting local businesses that don't follow it. If an FDI is respectful of the Philippines' natural resources, pays taxes, etc. then it's welcome to invest for as long as it likes. 

References

Books 

"From Third World to First--The Singapore Story: 1965-2000) by Lee Kuan Yew
Harpers Collins Publishers

Popular posts from this blog

The Idiocy of Typing Anti-FDI Rants Using IMPORTED Devices, IMPORTED Platforms, and IMPORTED Social Media

Bulatlat It's very easy to open Facebook (or any related platform) and find lots of stupidity , right? There have been idiotic comments I find on Facebook such as FDI is this and that. We can find "thought leader groups" such as Alliance of Concerned Teachers, Anakpawis, Anakbayan, Bayan Muna, IBON Foundation, Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, and Philippine Anti-Fascist League (PH Antifa) who keep ranting about FDI as this and that. I even remember somebody dared to say that FDI caused Egypt to dry up. Ironically, North Korea and Venezuela, two protectionist countries, have very bad pollution problems. I'd blame it that they don't have the money to do a clean-up drive. How can you clean up a polluted river without the right equipment? How can you expect better power efficiency with outdated equipment that keep coughing up, cough, cough, lots of black smoke?  All the talks on social media can be very funny. The big irony is that all calls for "...

Get Stuck with EDSA, End Up Like Nokia

  Yes, we should never forget what history teaches us. A classmate of mine, back in high school, wrote a simple and blunt essay called "History: A Teacher". I doubt he still has a soft copy, given it was already more than 20 years ago. I'd like to quote Duterte critic Andrew James Masigan wrote this in  Philippine Star --something that should remain relevant: I would never undervalue the 1987 Constitution. It dismantled the legal framework of a repressive regime and established the democratic institutions we enjoy today. For this, I am grateful. The 1987 Constitution was crafted with the best of intentions. It sought to put the Filipino first in all aspects of governance and to level the playing field amongst sectors and peoples.  But it is far from perfect. It failed to consider the importance of foreign capital and technologies and the stiff competition we would have to face to obtain them. In short, its economic provisions were short-sighted . So despite the Constitut...

Going from Tet Offensive in 1968 to Doi Moi in 1986

Foreign Trade University The Lunar New Year isn't just celebrated by the Chinese. Chinese New Year is one form of the Chinese New Year. Other forms of Lunar New Year follow   the Chinese New Year cycle, such as the Tết Nguyên Đán of Vietnam, the Japanese Lunar New Year, and the Seollal in South Korea. There's also the Tibetan New Year and the Mongolian New Year. I remember when talking about Vietnam celebrating the Lunar New Year together with the Chinese, my fellow Chinoy made the squity-eyed gesture to talk about most Vietnamese looking like Chinese. Should we even be surprised that there's a Vietnamese student who looks like the deposed Alice Guo, aka Guo Hua Ping?  What was the Tet Offensive about? Right now, I want to talk about the infamous Tet Offensive , which was a Lunar New Year attack of January 31, 1968. The Western concept would prefer to talk about it on January 31 instead of the Lunar New Year. A Filipino would probably say, "So what if it was Lunar Ne...

Facts vs. Gossip: Did Vietnam (According to Filipino MARITESes) Develop from Its Own Treasury Before Opening Up to FDI?

Vietnam Youth Union It's been 80 years since Vietnam achieved its independence in 1945. Some time ago, I wrote about how Vietnam's Doi Moi actually disproves the Trust Me Bro School of Economics . I wasn't too accustomed to researching Vietnam's ironic economic miracle . Vietnam is a one-party state ruled by the Communist Party of Vietnam. The word Communism would evoke fear and terror. What I find funny is that some people are using Vietnam as an excuse not to open up the Philippine economy (read here ). Such misinformed  people think that Vietnam "won this revolution," supposedly self-industrialized from its own treasury before opening up to FDI. In short, some people either believe that (1) Vietnam is an example of how a highly protectionist economy works, or (2) that Vietnam made itself rich before opening to FDI. Both of them are lies. I'll focus on the second point for this new blog post!  Right now, some people say that I'm just another marites...

It's Incredibly Frustrating to Discuss Economics with an Overspender

Overspending is just bad economics, isn't it? Economics is defined as the following for the sake of a review of high school basics: Economics is a social science concerned with the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. It studies how individuals, businesses, governments, and nations make choices about how to allocate resources. Economics focuses on the actions of human beings, based on assumptions that humans act with rational behavior, seeking the most optimal level of benefit or utility. The building blocks of economics are the studies of labor and trade. Since there are many possible applications of human labor and many different ways to acquire resources, it is the task of economics to determine which methods yield the best results. Economics can generally be broken down into macroeconomics, which concentrates on the behavior of the economy as a whole, and microeconomics, which focuses on individual people and businesses. It had me thinking of 2016 wh...