Skip to main content

Helping Others is Good But Not to One's Own Expense

I advocate for helping others. I believe in helping others but there were times I overdid it. One time, I gave up so much that I had to be stopped. I was told, "If you gave everything now, how can you help others later?" I would donate some sums here and there, without thinking much. I'm not going to write them all. Some of them left me good while others left a bad taste (and a bad record) for me to endure. Sure, I want to help people but I tend to overlook the consequences.

Some of the bad habits I had in the name of helping others are like:

  1. Being too generous with buying with credit. Eventually, I lost a lot of money which was never recovered. Some seasoned entrepreneurs may admit their own falls including the credit trap pitfall.
  2. Being too willing to give a discount without thinking about how it'd affect profits. Sure, a cheap price can draw people near. However, there are times when the prices of goods and services need to be raised to keep a business running. I can't afford to sell at a lower price if the costs of operations (such as production costs) have exceeded.
  3. I tend to give too much in the short term. Shouldn't I think about multiplying the money as well so I could also help others long term
That's why I felt it was dumb for people to demand free stuff from groceries during the COVID-19 pandemic. It's because the pantries did release their money so they could buy the stuff. If the groceries kept giving away free stuff then the pantries would have nowhere to buy their good. For every free stuff given, someone had to shoulder the cost. The community pantry was only reserved for the least fortunate. A grocery has its discretion on how much of its inventory will it give for free vs. how much will it sell. A grocery can afford to give some free but to give everything free is very short-term.

If a person knows how to save and invest, the person must also help others but not at one's own expense. More often than not, doing so is all about trying to look good at one's own expense. If we've got people who got poor trying to look rich--some people got broke helping others to look good. A budget for charity can be made. 

There are ways to think about how to be able to do charity work either directly or indirectly:
  1. Give whatever you can give while having money for your needs, not wants. It's like I chose to donate a certain amount for health workers during COVID-19 via Grab.
  2. Give money that's not too small or too big if you have plenty of money. This is essential because there are many others who can be helped. 
  3. Don't allow one's self to become leeched on by parasites. There are times to say no to people who have a long list of reasons why their finances always suffer. These people can be those who love to gamble, people who splurge their paychecks, and the like.
  4. For a person who needs desperate help, a community campaign would be way better than just one person paying the expenses. It may invite a big-time philanthropist who might be able to pay it in full without costing himself or herself her finances. Meanwhile, ordinary people shouldn't feel guilty giving less because helping others shouldn't be at their own expense. 
  5. If you know the company is charitable, why not invest in their stocks if they're a stock corporation or lend them a bond if available? One could invest in lending money to businesses via bonds. Another is to buy stocks either through direct picking or through a Unit Investment Trust Fund (UITF). Investing money in stocks and bonds for companies known for charity work can provide indirect but really good help in the long run. 
In my own case, I need to remember that there's a difference between charity and mendicancy. Cash assistance can be good as long as it doesn't promote mendicancy. It can be good to have conditional cash transfers. The conditional cash transfer is only meant to help people if they comply with the requirements. For example, 4Ps in the Philippines require children to be always at school and the aide stops at a certain age. However, giving cash handouts to lazy people who have an obsession with ayudas (read here) will be detrimental to the country. Some people removed from 4Ps have been caught guilty of gambling their handouts, therefore violating the terms and conditions. It's because it's a conditional not unconditional cash transfer.

Hopefully, this helps!

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...