Skip to main content

A Curious Look at China's Xiaomi Defeating Samsung and Apple in the Smartphone Market

Xiaomi Planet

Is China truly an even bigger awakened dragon? A bit of the history of Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms had transformed China from an impoverished communist state into a glorious one. Though, one can say China isn't really communist anymore as it has abandoned the traditional model of Karl Marx and Mao Zedong. Instead, Deng opted for what he called "socialism with Chinese characteristics". Who would have thought that Deng's economic reforms would create a raging dragon out of China in the world of economics? This would probably be true as new Chinese products are soaring in the world. There's Huawei and there's Xiaomi. You may now be wearing a Mi-Band and be using a POCO Phone--both products by Xiaomi. 

It's no secret that Samsung once defeated Apple. Apple is pretty much a high-end phone. Having an Apple means having a high-en phone which, like a Mercedes Benz or BMW, is more of a status symbol. However, Samsung managed to produce some cool phones over Apple last 2012. I may usually tend to spend a little more. However, I think about how I didn't spend much to fix my Samsung laptop (which I'm planning to replace soon with a newer model) last 2012 in contrast to what if I got an Apple MacPRO. It made me think of how I lost an iPod and never wanted another again due to how much it cost. Having two Samsung phones made me think of how much it was better than an iPhone. I didn't have to spend much. Though, my second Samsung phone finally got busted (fortunately, before Odette) and I got a POCO M4 Pro 5G phone in its place. 

So, it turns out that Xiaomi actually managed to defeat both Apple and Samsung. What's there to love about Xiaomi? I thought of a Rappler article in which Kyle Chua talks about the reasons to love the Xiaomi Redmi. The reasons are as follows-- (1) unbeatable price, (2) immersive display, (3) longer lasting battery, (4) functional and fashionable design, and (5) stellar camera performance. In the 4Ps analysis of business--we have (1) product, (2) price, (3) place, and (4) promotion. The product in itself has good specs and the price is a competitive advantage. Who wouldn't want to get more for less, right?  

I was thinking about reading why the iPhone sucks. I think about how it doesn't bother me when people have an iPhone while I had a Samsung. It's because I didn't spend much on my laptop repairs and I think I won't mind getting a higher Samsung or Xiaomi laptop to replace it soon. One of the biggest problems I have with Apple products is the high cost. One reason why I would never want a Mercedes, BMW, or Limousine is because of the high cost of maintenance. It's very much unlike having a Toyota to which I didn't spend much for the labor. Even better, I could get a fancy Toyota VIOS that looks rather expensive that a distance for less. I wonder how true it was that a brand new iPhone-X allegedly had bugs upon its new release. It ends up more like a status symbol. It reminds me of how a Mercedes Benz, once it gets a dent, it would be very expensive to fix it in contrast to a Toyota. I would have the same problem with the iPhone. So, why would I get an iPhone, right? That's why I chose Samsung. Besides, one may have an iPhone but have no ipon (Tagalog for savings) or a BMW but they're BWM (broke without money). 

It seems that Xiaomi has managed to have advantages over Samsung. I was thinking of buying a rather expensive Samsung which was the Galaxy S21 Ultra. The current costs range from PHP 40,000+ to PHP 70,000+ last I checked. Meanwhile, I purchased my POCO M4 Pro 5G for an estimate of PHP 12,490.00. Anybody who wants a cool phone for less. My dream phone would probably cost more and be so painful if ever it was damaged. Besides, good battery life is absolutely an advantage in the product. One reason why I wanted a new phone was that my second Samsung phone's battery was practically coming to an end. Then, that second hand Galaxy S7 phone reached its inevitable end. Why would I settle for pricy Samsung phones when the Xiaomi phones cost less and can give me a good performance? 

What makes Samsung phones more costly than Xiaomi? The reasons would be as follows--(1) billions are spent on Research & Development, (2) Samsung's manufacturing areas cost more than Xiaomi's which is in China, (3) it's said Samsung has better hardware, (4) Samsung spends more for advertising, (5) Samsung has more channels which increase the cost of selling, (6) Samsung has many overhead costs which add to the overall product cost, (7) Samsung reiterates its phone yearly causing even more expenses, (8) Samsung doesn't collect user data (no ads), and (9) Samsung has a lot of service centers which makes it even more costly. So, Xiaomi has the competitive advantage where people who belong to the working class to the middle class will prefer Xiaomi over Samsung. 

Pretty much, the advantage Xiaomi has managed to outdo the two major rivals--Samsung and Apple. Samsung did manage to beat Apple with an advantage over price. However, Samsung has one downside in spite of its good reputation--the cost. Sometimes, you need to be able to make more profit at a lower price to survive in the business world. Cost is a very huge advantage too. If you can offer a good product for less then you can certainly dominate the lower and middle class.

Besides, Porter's Five Forces would talk about these factors--(1) level of supplier power, (2) intensity of the competitive landscape, (3) threat of new entrants, (4) threat of substitute products, and (5) buyer's entry/exit costs. Xiaomi understood the competitive landscape with Apple and Samsung. Samsung defeated Apple in those areas. Now, it was time for Xiaomi to become a threat as a new entrant and a substitute product against Samsung. Samsung would have to deal that it has more expensive phones which might limit the coverage in contrast to Xiaomi. Xiaomi manages to have the level of supplier power which also helped in its being a new entrant and a substitute product. Samsung had the five forces to defeat Apple. Now, Xiaomi would have the five forces that helped it gain an advantage over Samsung.

References

"5 things we love about the Xiaomi Redmi 9A and Redmi 9C" by Kyle Chua (May 21, 2021)

"China’s Xiaomi overtook Samsung and Apple in June smartphones sales" by Saheli Roy Choudhury (August 5, 2021)

"Samsung beat Apple in 2012 PC, tablet and smartphone sales" by Michael Rougeau (February 22, 2013)

"Top 9 Reasons Why The iPhone Sucks" by Diekola Yusuf (November 6, 2020)

"Why are Samsung phones costly than Xiaomi?"

"Xiaomi vs Samsung. Which one is better?" by Mauricio Hernaski (August 6, 2020, updated on November 14, 2021)
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

The Idiocy of Typing Anti-FDI Rants Using IMPORTED Devices, IMPORTED Platforms, and IMPORTED Social Media

Bulatlat It's very easy to open Facebook (or any related platform) and find lots of stupidity , right? There have been idiotic comments I find on Facebook such as FDI is this and that. We can find "thought leader groups" such as Alliance of Concerned Teachers, Anakpawis, Anakbayan, Bayan Muna, IBON Foundation, Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, and Philippine Anti-Fascist League (PH Antifa) who keep ranting about FDI as this and that. I even remember somebody dared to say that FDI caused Egypt to dry up. Ironically, North Korea and Venezuela, two protectionist countries, have very bad pollution problems. I'd blame it that they don't have the money to do a clean-up drive. How can you clean up a polluted river without the right equipment? How can you expect better power efficiency with outdated equipment that keep coughing up, cough, cough, lots of black smoke?  All the talks on social media can be very funny. The big irony is that all calls for "...
Read more

Get Stuck with EDSA, End Up Like Nokia

  Yes, we should never forget what history teaches us. A classmate of mine, back in high school, wrote a simple and blunt essay called "History: A Teacher". I doubt he still has a soft copy, given it was already more than 20 years ago. I'd like to quote Duterte critic Andrew James Masigan wrote this in  Philippine Star --something that should remain relevant: I would never undervalue the 1987 Constitution. It dismantled the legal framework of a repressive regime and established the democratic institutions we enjoy today. For this, I am grateful. The 1987 Constitution was crafted with the best of intentions. It sought to put the Filipino first in all aspects of governance and to level the playing field amongst sectors and peoples.  But it is far from perfect. It failed to consider the importance of foreign capital and technologies and the stiff competition we would have to face to obtain them. In short, its economic provisions were short-sighted . So despite the Constitut...
Read more

[UNPOPULAR OPINION] Why People Power Anniversary Should Be a Special Working Day Instead

  As a blogger, I shouldn't turn on the PC in hopes of becoming popular . It should be to turn on the PC and blog to make a difference . Right now, I think about the controversy when President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. declared the 1986 EDSA Revolution's anniversary as a working holiday . The call for some of the "minority lawmakers" is that they want to return the People Power Anniversary to a regular holiday once more. There are times I feel like, "Should we let it be a regular holiday again, so as not to repeat the Marcos dictatorship?" Sadly, the real answer is that the Philippines has been relying too much on EDSA , so it's practically ending up like Nokia . I was thinking about the reality of February being the most hectic month. February only has 28 days (and February 25 is near the month's end ). I thought that the Philippines also has too many national holidays more often than not. In fact, the Inquirer article written by...
Read more

It's Incredibly Frustrating to Discuss Economics with an Overspender

Overspending is just bad economics, isn't it? Economics is defined as the following for the sake of a review of high school basics: Economics is a social science concerned with the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. It studies how individuals, businesses, governments, and nations make choices about how to allocate resources. Economics focuses on the actions of human beings, based on assumptions that humans act with rational behavior, seeking the most optimal level of benefit or utility. The building blocks of economics are the studies of labor and trade. Since there are many possible applications of human labor and many different ways to acquire resources, it is the task of economics to determine which methods yield the best results. Economics can generally be broken down into macroeconomics, which concentrates on the behavior of the economy as a whole, and microeconomics, which focuses on individual people and businesses. It had me thinking of 2016 wh...
Read more

Talking Economics with an Overeating Glutton

Two years ago, I wrote an entry about why discussing economics with an overspender is frustrating . Now, I was looking at certain fat people who say really dumb things about economics. Just recently, I was looking at a certain fat idiot (fortunately, he only has 1K+ followers) who posted on Facebook that not only will the parliamentary system cause the Philippines to become a dictatorship, but he also says that changing economic provisions will cause the Philippines to collapse and the country to fall into the hands of foreigners. I won't name the person out to avoid getting personal. However, the person is apparently very fat and he blames capitalism day in and day out. The person even says that businessmen do nothing and it's the employers that do everything. Has that fat slob ever heard that businesses are run by bosses and that if the bosses do screw up, they're the ones who are the most answerable? The employees are the cogs and the boss runs the cogs. I was looking at...
Read more