Skip to main content

A Curious Look at China's Xiaomi Defeating Samsung and Apple in the Smartphone Market

Xiaomi Planet

Is China truly an even bigger awakened dragon? A bit of the history of Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms had transformed China from an impoverished communist state into a glorious one. Though, one can say China isn't really communist anymore as it has abandoned the traditional model of Karl Marx and Mao Zedong. Instead, Deng opted for what he called "socialism with Chinese characteristics". Who would have thought that Deng's economic reforms would create a raging dragon out of China in the world of economics? This would probably be true as new Chinese products are soaring in the world. There's Huawei and there's Xiaomi. You may now be wearing a Mi-Band and be using a POCO Phone--both products by Xiaomi. 

It's no secret that Samsung once defeated Apple. Apple is pretty much a high-end phone. Having an Apple means having a high-en phone which, like a Mercedes Benz or BMW, is more of a status symbol. However, Samsung managed to produce some cool phones over Apple last 2012. I may usually tend to spend a little more. However, I think about how I didn't spend much to fix my Samsung laptop (which I'm planning to replace soon with a newer model) last 2012 in contrast to what if I got an Apple MacPRO. It made me think of how I lost an iPod and never wanted another again due to how much it cost. Having two Samsung phones made me think of how much it was better than an iPhone. I didn't have to spend much. Though, my second Samsung phone finally got busted (fortunately, before Odette) and I got a POCO M4 Pro 5G phone in its place. 

So, it turns out that Xiaomi actually managed to defeat both Apple and Samsung. What's there to love about Xiaomi? I thought of a Rappler article in which Kyle Chua talks about the reasons to love the Xiaomi Redmi. The reasons are as follows-- (1) unbeatable price, (2) immersive display, (3) longer lasting battery, (4) functional and fashionable design, and (5) stellar camera performance. In the 4Ps analysis of business--we have (1) product, (2) price, (3) place, and (4) promotion. The product in itself has good specs and the price is a competitive advantage. Who wouldn't want to get more for less, right?  

I was thinking about reading why the iPhone sucks. I think about how it doesn't bother me when people have an iPhone while I had a Samsung. It's because I didn't spend much on my laptop repairs and I think I won't mind getting a higher Samsung or Xiaomi laptop to replace it soon. One of the biggest problems I have with Apple products is the high cost. One reason why I would never want a Mercedes, BMW, or Limousine is because of the high cost of maintenance. It's very much unlike having a Toyota to which I didn't spend much for the labor. Even better, I could get a fancy Toyota VIOS that looks rather expensive that a distance for less. I wonder how true it was that a brand new iPhone-X allegedly had bugs upon its new release. It ends up more like a status symbol. It reminds me of how a Mercedes Benz, once it gets a dent, it would be very expensive to fix it in contrast to a Toyota. I would have the same problem with the iPhone. So, why would I get an iPhone, right? That's why I chose Samsung. Besides, one may have an iPhone but have no ipon (Tagalog for savings) or a BMW but they're BWM (broke without money). 

It seems that Xiaomi has managed to have advantages over Samsung. I was thinking of buying a rather expensive Samsung which was the Galaxy S21 Ultra. The current costs range from PHP 40,000+ to PHP 70,000+ last I checked. Meanwhile, I purchased my POCO M4 Pro 5G for an estimate of PHP 12,490.00. Anybody who wants a cool phone for less. My dream phone would probably cost more and be so painful if ever it was damaged. Besides, good battery life is absolutely an advantage in the product. One reason why I wanted a new phone was that my second Samsung phone's battery was practically coming to an end. Then, that second hand Galaxy S7 phone reached its inevitable end. Why would I settle for pricy Samsung phones when the Xiaomi phones cost less and can give me a good performance? 

What makes Samsung phones more costly than Xiaomi? The reasons would be as follows--(1) billions are spent on Research & Development, (2) Samsung's manufacturing areas cost more than Xiaomi's which is in China, (3) it's said Samsung has better hardware, (4) Samsung spends more for advertising, (5) Samsung has more channels which increase the cost of selling, (6) Samsung has many overhead costs which add to the overall product cost, (7) Samsung reiterates its phone yearly causing even more expenses, (8) Samsung doesn't collect user data (no ads), and (9) Samsung has a lot of service centers which makes it even more costly. So, Xiaomi has the competitive advantage where people who belong to the working class to the middle class will prefer Xiaomi over Samsung. 

Pretty much, the advantage Xiaomi has managed to outdo the two major rivals--Samsung and Apple. Samsung did manage to beat Apple with an advantage over price. However, Samsung has one downside in spite of its good reputation--the cost. Sometimes, you need to be able to make more profit at a lower price to survive in the business world. Cost is a very huge advantage too. If you can offer a good product for less then you can certainly dominate the lower and middle class.

Besides, Porter's Five Forces would talk about these factors--(1) level of supplier power, (2) intensity of the competitive landscape, (3) threat of new entrants, (4) threat of substitute products, and (5) buyer's entry/exit costs. Xiaomi understood the competitive landscape with Apple and Samsung. Samsung defeated Apple in those areas. Now, it was time for Xiaomi to become a threat as a new entrant and a substitute product against Samsung. Samsung would have to deal that it has more expensive phones which might limit the coverage in contrast to Xiaomi. Xiaomi manages to have the level of supplier power which also helped in its being a new entrant and a substitute product. Samsung had the five forces to defeat Apple. Now, Xiaomi would have the five forces that helped it gain an advantage over Samsung.

References

"5 things we love about the Xiaomi Redmi 9A and Redmi 9C" by Kyle Chua (May 21, 2021)

"China’s Xiaomi overtook Samsung and Apple in June smartphones sales" by Saheli Roy Choudhury (August 5, 2021)

"Samsung beat Apple in 2012 PC, tablet and smartphone sales" by Michael Rougeau (February 22, 2013)

"Top 9 Reasons Why The iPhone Sucks" by Diekola Yusuf (November 6, 2020)

"Why are Samsung phones costly than Xiaomi?"

"Xiaomi vs Samsung. Which one is better?" by Mauricio Hernaski (August 6, 2020, updated on November 14, 2021)

Popular posts from this blog

Going from Tet Offensive in 1968 to Doi Moi in 1986

Foreign Trade University The Lunar New Year isn't just celebrated by the Chinese. Chinese New Year is one form of the Chinese New Year. Other forms of Lunar New Year follow   the Chinese New Year cycle, such as the Tết Nguyên Đán of Vietnam, the Japanese Lunar New Year, and the Seollal in South Korea. There's also the Tibetan New Year and the Mongolian New Year. I remember when talking about Vietnam celebrating the Lunar New Year together with the Chinese, my fellow Chinoy made the squity-eyed gesture to talk about most Vietnamese looking like Chinese. Should we even be surprised that there's a Vietnamese student who looks like the deposed Alice Guo, aka Guo Hua Ping?  What was the Tet Offensive about? Right now, I want to talk about the infamous Tet Offensive , which was a Lunar New Year attack of January 31, 1968. The Western concept would prefer to talk about it on January 31 instead of the Lunar New Year. A Filipino would probably say, "So what if it was Lunar Ne...

Facts vs. Gossip: Did Vietnam (According to Filipino MARITESes) Develop from Its Own Treasury Before Opening Up to FDI?

Vietnam Youth Union It's been 80 years since Vietnam achieved its independence in 1945. Some time ago, I wrote about how Vietnam's Doi Moi actually disproves the Trust Me Bro School of Economics . I wasn't too accustomed to researching Vietnam's ironic economic miracle . Vietnam is a one-party state ruled by the Communist Party of Vietnam. The word Communism would evoke fear and terror. What I find funny is that some people are using Vietnam as an excuse not to open up the Philippine economy (read here ). Such misinformed  people think that Vietnam "won this revolution," supposedly self-industrialized from its own treasury before opening up to FDI. In short, some people either believe that (1) Vietnam is an example of how a highly protectionist economy works, or (2) that Vietnam made itself rich before opening to FDI. Both of them are lies. I'll focus on the second point for this new blog post!  Right now, some people say that I'm just another marites...

China's Real Great Leap Forward and Economic Cultural Revolution Under Deng Xiaoping

Nobody can dare deny that China has become a big superpower. I remembered I went to China last 2007 (which would be more than 10 years ago). China had become such a huge metropolis of power that I'm amazed at it. I was thinking about how Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Beijing were truly magnificent cities before the pollution problem (which should call for eco-capitalist measures). I was thinking about how I never realized China was once dirt poor.  Did you know China used to be so dirt-poor? The "economic legacy" of Mao Zedong was a disaster with the so-called "Great Leap Forward". It was a great leap forward all right--a great leap forward to ruin. Mao seeking to avoid the use of foreign resources to launch China proved disastrous. The 1970s would see a dramatic change when Deng Xiaoping finally took over the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The beginning of the rise of Communist China under Deng's new political policy would pave the way to China becoming a great s...

Social Media Gossipers' Ad Hominems Against Actor Robin Padilla Regarding His Proposal to Remove 60-40

Make no mistake that I didn't vote for Robin Padilla. I feel like I've had enough of voting for celebrities, athletes, and those who I felt are know-nothings in the legislative. However, Padilla recently had his proposal to remove the 60-40 restrictions regarding foreign direct investments (FDIs) . Former Philippine Vice President Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo was even in favor of that amendment. I guess that's why Philippine economist Andrew James Masigan endorsed Robredo. I may have not endorsed Robredo while Masigan remains to be one of my favorite local sources. The news from GMA News Online reveals these plans by Padilla himself: Senator Robin Padilla said he wanted to revise the Constitution to scrap the 60-40 rule on foreign ownership of businesses to accelerate job creation and competition among industries . In a Monday interview, Padilla said the move would attract more foreign investments to support the country’s economic recovery. “Para sa akin mas...

Ironically, COMMUNIST Vietnam Continues Improving FDI Conditions, Compared to DEMOCRATIC Philippines

Vietnam National University It's crazy how people don't realize the bigger picture between Communist Vietnam and the democratic Philippines (read here ). It's really crazy how Senator Joseph Victor Gomez Ejercito apparently thinks that delayed proceedings to Vice President Sara Duterte-Carpio's impeachment trial could scare away FDIs. Meanwhile, Atty. Renee Louise Co of Kabataan Partylist could talk about economics, all the while Kabataan Partylist is still against open FDI. It's amazing how Raoul Abellar Manuel, a cumlaude in applied mathematics, still believes in #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba economics! Meanwhile, the biggest picture is that Communist Vietnam , while it's under a One-Party State of the Communist Party of Vietnam, is has the better picture of how to invite FDIs. In fact, the Constitution of Vietnam  is rather silent on economic restrictions . The CPV chooses to impose economic restrictions through legislation rather than enshrining them in its Constit...