Skip to main content

How Removing of EXCESSIVE Restrictions Concerning Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Will Benefit the Philippines

The Philippines has had a history of protectionism. Back then, Carlos P. Garcia declared the Filipino First Policy in 1935. Later, Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. also carried out more or less the same policy in the 1973 Constitution. Eventually, the Foreign Direct Investment Act of 1991 (R.A. 7042) kicked in which limited certain sectors to only 40% for foreigners. On paper, it sounds good but the practice is rather excessive in reality. As said, the 60-40 policy isn't about land ownership. Instead, it's all about the limits that an FDI has concerning a foreign firm.

Why is 60-40 rather impractical in practice than in theory?

The practice of 60-40 or limiting foreign ownership in certain industries is pretty much excessive. Here's a bit of an illustration you want to think about. Just imagine yourself opening a commercial space or looking for one. Do you think tenants would want to rent a space if they had to give 60% of their net profits to their landlowners? Do you want to rent a space if your landowner demands you to give 60% of your net profits to him or her in that branch? Obviously, the answer would be no which is why 60-40 is actually impractical in practice.

A good illustration of 60-40 is like selling overpriced merchandise the value isn't worth it. Some people sell overpriced items hoping to make a quick profit. A person may open a rent-a-car business with fancy cars at a high cost. Another person may open a rent-a-car with non-fancy cars at a lower cost. However, the problem of the first rent-a-car business is that the luxury cars have the tendency to lose power in the middle of the road. The second rent-a-car business may not have fancy cars but those cars reach the destination on time because they don't have the tendency to lose power in the middle of the road. Obviously, the one with a lower cost with better service will reap better profits in the long run. 

Not having 60-40 restrictions would be much better in the long run

It may seem impractical (at first) not to demand 60% of net profits from FDIs. However, it would be more beneficial if you think about the tenant-landowner relationship. Think of it as a commercial building of any kind. Do you think the real estate empire of the late Henry Sy and the late John Gokongwei would expand by getting 60% of the profits of their lessons? Instead, it was all about setting an agreement on rentals. Tenants can continue to enrich themselves if they (1) pay reasonable rent, and (2) follow rules in the contract. The tenant can only be evicted if they fail to follow the contract. Otherwise, the tenant can sue for unlawful eviction if ever the landowner breached the contract.

Instead, it's best to view the FDI-Philippine government relationship as that of the tenant and the landowner. Just think of the FDI as the tenant and the Philippines as the commercial building such as a shopping mall. An FDI enters the Philippines and does business. However, like a tenant in a shopping mall, they will be subjected to rules. The rules can be as follows:
  1. FDIs are required to follow Filipino labor laws and practices in regard to employment. In short, the priority for employment is to provide jobs to Filipinos. Where you do business--it's best to hire the locals first.
  2. FDIs are required to pay their rentals to their Filipino lessors. True, the Filipino lessor won't get 60% of the net profits. However, the Filipino lessor gets a monthly rent which becomes the basis of the tenant is either worthy of another contract or getting evicted. A Filipino lessor may have the freedom not to renew any expired contract but the tenant must be put on notice beforehand.
  3. FDIs are subjected to pay their taxes even if they own more shares than the Filipino partner or don't even have a Filipino partner. True, their payment of rentals to Filipino lessors will be considered a deductible (since it falls under expense) but their net profits before taxation are subject to taxation. There's the computation of the gross income minus expenses (allowable deduction). What's left of the net income before taxation is subjected to the tax bracket. Failure to pay taxes can result in financial penalties, possible imprisonment, closure of business, and even deportation. Taxes are pretty much like rentals--except it's subjected to a bracket based on income. Tenants can get kicked out for not paying rent. FDIs can get kicked out if they don't pay taxes. After all, taxes are the source of government revenues for its expenses like rentals are the source of income for the lessors for their expenses.

This in turn will invite more FDIs which translates into more revenues meaning more taxes for the country. True, the money wouldn't come in fast. 60-40 should be treated like a Get Rich Quick Scheme--you want to earn a lot of money so fast but it will backfire badly if you implement it. Instead, earning the money at a reasonable pace (and learning to be frugal while at it) is what works. Sometimes, an FDI might be looking for a Filipino partner to own in a 50-50 agreement. We call that the joint venture agreement. Gong Cha, for example, was a joint venture between a an Korean and a Taiwanese. Currently, the Korean party owns more shares now than the Taiwanese partner. It still continues to give revenues in the Taiwanese branch and taxable income everywhere it operates.

More FDIs also equal more choices for local businesses. It would also mean filling in the supply and demand gap. The big reason why utilities cost more with lesser quality is all about high supply and low demand. Do you think two to three telecommunications company can provide better Internet? Do you think a few power companies can provide better electricity? They will eventually exhaust themselves if they have too many customers. FDIs will end up bridging the gap when customers who are either fed up with slow service or find a new provider can get a new provider. These FDIs in the utilities sector can bridge the supply-demand gap. At the same time, the local utility companies will have to innovate and upgrade if they want to compete. 

Just think that the inflow of FDIs from previous terms up to the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino (Noynoy) was because certain sectors were liberalized. Economic reforms for easing restrictions on certain sectors of R.A. 7042 had allowed it to happen. However, there are still sectors that need to be liberated. In fact, I believe we need to get rid of the 60-40 clause completely because it's really hindering any further development in the Philippines. After all, FDIs should be viewed as opportunities for the local investors to learn and grow instead of cowering in fear of competition.

References

"R.A. 7042 – “Foreign Investments Act of 1991.”

"SINK OR SWIM: CHANGING THE 60-40 RULE ON FOREIGN OWNERSHIP AS KEY TO SURVIVING GLOBALIZATION" by Glenndale Cornelio

"Joint Venture (JV)" written by Marshall Hargrave, reviewed by Somer Anderson

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

[UNPOPULAR OPINION] Why People Power Anniversary Should Be a Special Working Day Instead

  As a blogger, I shouldn't turn on the PC in hopes of becoming popular . It should be to turn on the PC and blog to make a difference . Right now, I think about the controversy when President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. declared the 1986 EDSA Revolution's anniversary as a working holiday . The call for some of the "minority lawmakers" is that they want to return the People Power Anniversary to a regular holiday once more. There are times I feel like, "Should we let it be a regular holiday again, so as not to repeat the Marcos dictatorship?" Sadly, the real answer is that the Philippines has been relying too much on EDSA , so it's practically ending up like Nokia . I was thinking about the reality of February being the most hectic month. February only has 28 days (and February 25 is near the month's end ). I thought that the Philippines also has too many national holidays more often than not. In fact, the Inquirer article written by...
Read more

Is Jollibee "Invading" South Korea Now as It's About to Acquire 70% of Shabu All Day?

I must confess that I find this new rather hilarious . It's because the word shabu is often associated with drugs. All the while, shabu shabu is a Korean delicacy! Well, I'm going to say that Jollibee Foods Corporation has now become a multinational buyer . Jollibee acquired 70% of Compost Coffee back in 2024 . This year, Jollibee as a multinational corporation is now acquiring Shabu All Day for PHP 5.1 billion pesos. Is Jollibee checkmating South Korea or is the Philippines conquering South Korea not just by OFWs but als through Jollibee? The answer is still no. From GMA News , we can read this article by Jon Viktor D. Cabuenas: Under the deal, Shabu All Day will be consolidated into Jollibee Foods Corp.’s (JFC) financial statements immediately upon completion of the acquisition for a total consideration equivalent to KRW127 billion. Completion of the transaction is subject to closing and financing conditions. The acquisition is expected to lead to a 2% jump in revenues, incre...
Read more

"Filipino First Policy" Has NO PLACE in the Rising Asian 21st Century

I guess nobody saw the Asian 21st Century coming, right? China was once a poor nation but look at it now. Vietnam was once a poor nation but look at it now. Singapore was once a poor nation but look at it now. The late great Lee Kuan Yew wrote his book From Third World to First . I'm afraid some people have been using it to go against the presidency of Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. while ignoring what else Lee Kuan Yew had to say. Lee Kuan Yew described the Filipino press to be rambunctious on pages 304-305 which I agree. I'm afraid that the Filipino press may have had a hand in getting rid of any economic or political reforms that could help the Philippines. Yet, one policy has been holding back the Philippines for decades and yes, it's the Filipino First Policy .  Reviewing the Filipino First Policy and why it has no place in the rising Asian 21st century I remembered how the values education subject taught Carlos P. Garcia's stupid Filipino First Policy as a Filipino value...
Read more

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more

The Prevalence of Fake Rich in the Philippines

Back in 2022, I wrote about why it's deadly to believe someone is rich based on their lifestyle . During my childhood to teenage years, I used to think someone was wealthier because of reasons like: Their parents spoil them with generous allowances.  They're driving a luxury car everywhere they go. They have expensive parties every year.  They have a lot of luxury brands. The children have so many toys.  The list can go on and on , and I believe I might type too many words from there. I grew up with people bragging about  how rich they are, even if the claims are preposterous. It's common among children to brag about what they don't have . Unfortunately, some never outgrow that dangerous habit and grow up with a fake rich lifestyle. This is the lifestyle where one wants others to think they're rich, even if they're not rich. The rule of fake rich reverses the advice above. Instead, the fake rich lifestyle says, "Buy a USD 500.00 bag never mind you have noth...
Read more