A business blog by an MBA graduate who's currently no longer interested in getting a Ph.D. This blog aims to share insights into the business world such as investments, economic policies, and more. Feel free to poke around, and learn more about what I have and want to say.
How Removing of EXCESSIVE Restrictions Concerning Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Will Benefit the Philippines
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
-
The Philippines has had a history of protectionism. Back then, Carlos P. Garcia declared the Filipino First Policy in 1935. Later, Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. also carried out more or less the same policy in the 1973 Constitution. Eventually, the Foreign Direct Investment Act of 1991 (R.A. 7042) kicked in which limited certain sectors to only 40% for foreigners. On paper, it sounds good but the practice is rather excessive in reality. As said, the 60-40 policy isn't about land ownership. Instead, it's all about the limits that an FDI has concerning a foreign firm.
Why is 60-40 rather impractical in practice than in theory?
The practice of 60-40 or limiting foreign ownership in certain industries is pretty much excessive. Here's a bit of an illustration you want to think about. Just imagine yourself opening a commercial space or looking for one. Do you think tenants would want to rent a space if they had to give 60% of their net profits to their landlowners? Do you want to rent a space if your landowner demands you to give 60% of your net profits to him or her in that branch? Obviously, the answer would be no which is why 60-40 is actually impractical in practice.
A good illustration of 60-40 is like selling overpriced merchandise the value isn't worth it. Some people sell overpriced items hoping to make a quick profit. A person may open a rent-a-car business with fancy cars at a high cost. Another person may open a rent-a-car with non-fancy cars at a lower cost. However, the problem of the first rent-a-car business is that the luxury cars have the tendency to lose power in the middle of the road. The second rent-a-car business may not have fancy cars but those cars reach the destination on time because they don't have the tendency to lose power in the middle of the road. Obviously, the one with a lower cost with better service will reap better profits in the long run.
Not having 60-40 restrictions would be much better in the long run
It may seem impractical (at first) not to demand 60% of net profits from FDIs. However, it would be more beneficial if you think about the tenant-landowner relationship. Think of it as a commercial building of any kind. Do you think the real estate empire of the late Henry Sy and the late John Gokongwei would expand by getting 60% of the profits of their lessons? Instead, it was all about setting an agreement on rentals. Tenants can continue to enrich themselves if they (1) pay reasonable rent, and (2) follow rules in the contract. The tenant can only be evicted if they fail to follow the contract. Otherwise, the tenant can sue for unlawful eviction if ever the landowner breached the contract.
Instead, it's best to view the FDI-Philippine government relationship as that of the tenant and the landowner. Just think of the FDI as the tenant and the Philippines as the commercial building such as a shopping mall. An FDI enters the Philippines and does business. However, like a tenant in a shopping mall, they will be subjected to rules. The rules can be as follows:
FDIs are required to follow Filipino labor laws and practices in regard to employment. In short, the priority for employment is to provide jobs to Filipinos. Where you do business--it's best to hire the locals first.
FDIs are required to pay their rentals to their Filipino lessors. True, the Filipino lessor won't get 60% of the net profits. However, the Filipino lessor gets a monthly rent which becomes the basis of the tenant is either worthy of another contract or getting evicted. A Filipino lessor may have the freedom not to renew any expired contract but the tenant must be put on notice beforehand.
FDIs are subjected to pay their taxes even if they own more shares than the Filipino partner or don't even have a Filipino partner. True, their payment of rentals to Filipino lessors will be considered a deductible (since it falls under expense) but their net profits before taxation are subject to taxation. There's the computation of the gross income minus expenses (allowable deduction). What's left of the net income before taxation is subjected to the tax bracket. Failure to pay taxes can result in financial penalties, possible imprisonment, closure of business, and even deportation. Taxes are pretty much like rentals--except it's subjected to a bracket based on income. Tenants can get kicked out for not paying rent. FDIs can get kicked out if they don't pay taxes. After all, taxes are the source of government revenues for its expenses like rentals are the source of income for the lessors for their expenses.
This in turn will invite more FDIs which translates into more revenues meaning more taxes for the country. True, the money wouldn't come in fast. 60-40 should be treated like a Get Rich Quick Scheme--you want to earn a lot of money so fast but it will backfire badly if you implement it. Instead, earning the money at a reasonable pace (and learning to be frugal while at it) is what works. Sometimes, an FDI might be looking for a Filipino partner to own in a 50-50 agreement. We call that the joint venture agreement. Gong Cha, for example, was a joint venture between a an Korean and a Taiwanese. Currently, the Korean party owns more shares now than the Taiwanese partner. It still continues to give revenues in the Taiwanese branch and taxable income everywhere it operates.
More FDIs also equal more choices for local businesses. It would also mean filling in the supply and demand gap. The big reason why utilities cost more with lesser quality is all about high supply and low demand. Do you think two to three telecommunications company can provide better Internet? Do you think a few power companies can provide better electricity? They will eventually exhaust themselves if they have too many customers. FDIs will end up bridging the gap when customers who are either fed up with slow service or find a new provider can get a new provider. These FDIs in the utilities sector can bridge the supply-demand gap. At the same time, the local utility companies will have to innovate and upgrade if they want to compete.
Just think that the inflow of FDIs from previous terms up to the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino (Noynoy) was because certain sectors were liberalized. Economic reforms for easing restrictions on certain sectors of R.A. 7042 had allowed it to happen. However, there are still sectors that need to be liberated. In fact, I believe we need to get rid of the 60-40 clause completely because it's really hindering any further development in the Philippines. After all, FDIs should be viewed as opportunities for the local investors to learn and grow instead of cowering in fear of competition.
Happy Halloween, I guess? I decided to write this article just today to tackle scare tactics against economic liberalization. A scare tactic is defined as a strategy intended to manipulate public opinion about a particular issue by arousing fear or alarm. Economic liberalization is defined by Investopedia as: Trade liberalization is the removal or reduction of restrictions or barriers on the free exchange of goods between nations. These barriers include tariffs, such as duties and surcharges, and nontariff barriers, such as licensing rules and quotas. Economists often view the easing or eradication of these restrictions as steps to promote free trade. This is also where we have free trade . I've read protectionist scare tactics during the times of former Philippine presidents, the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino, and Rodrigo R. Duterte. I found a lot on Facebook and Twitter . It's not uncommon really that stupid people abound on social media and write the stupidest thin...
I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei? A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...
Gemini AI Art A few days ago, I wrote about how Hilario G. Davide Jr. contradicted himself as a UN Diplomat, who's against 100% FDI . Right now, I need to address the partly good/partly bad advice. Indeed, we should never believe everything on the Internet. Some people can even get a paid domain and be publishing nonsense (ex., Pinoy Ako Blog) while a blogger like myself, is trying to carefully craft posts. I thought about the sheer double standard that I had to deal with. It's the same anti-charter change people who tell me, "Don't listen to everything on the Internet!" are also the same people who say, "You should always listen to the framers of the inviolate 1987 Constitution!" Such advice is laughable because, for one, even the late Maria Corazon "Cory" Cojuangco-Aquino spoke these words : You must define and protect our individual freedoms and rights; you must decide how our different institutions of state will relate to each other. Do n...
ToonPool There's the call of leftist fools to stop privatization. Many still believe that utilities should be run by nationalization rather than privatization . I've been reading on Facebook where some fools believe that allowing foreign telecommunications companies (telcos) to invest in the Philippines will "risk security". Any telco will risk security if there are no laws to regulate it like the Data Privacy Law. Just because I support private enterprises doesn't mean that I say the government is hands-off. On the other hand, the government has the duty to set rules such as fair compensation, proper employee treatment, safety measures, and the like to make sure that we remain in healthy competition. Some people who keep protesting against the privatization of industries I believe (1) want the government to provide for all the needs of the people (which leads to dictatorship, eventually), (2) have some agenda as to why they're doing it, or (3) these people ar...
Today is Valentine's Day and also Ash Wednesday. Ash Wednesday doesn't have a fixed date since the Lenten season depends on the Jewish calendar's cycle. Back on topic, I wrote about Filipinas marrying foreigners to escape the hardships of life . Eventually, I followed it up by writing about how the IBON Foundation possibly views FDI followed up by how Migrante Internation possibly views FDI . With those two organizations in mind, I wonder if their statements state that the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. allegedly opened up the economy to foreign investments all the more (which is a lie ) may have also included Filipinas dating foreign males of different kinds. Sure, the correct word for the English is Filipino woman but I prefer to use Filipina because of my status as a Filipino citizen . I have nothing against Filipinas dating foreign men if it's done out of love. However, I can't help but notice the crude jokes that are written against FDI. Some economically ignor...
I was doing some news readings and I found out about the death of a certain Stephen Corilla. The incident happened in the Universal Robina Corporation's factory in Mandaue a few days ago. It really chilled my bones to read these details which I'll share from Sunstar : POLICE are set to investigate a food and beverage plant in Barangay Tabok, Mandaue City after one of its workers was killed on duty while cleaning a pulverizer machine Thursday afternoon, June 2, 2022. Cpl. Glenn Bordalba of the Mandaue City Police Office Station 3 in Barangay Basak who is leading the investigation told SunStar Cebu Monday, June 6, that they will visit the Universal Robina Corp. (URC) Mandaue City plant in Tabok on Tuesday, June 7, to investigate the matter. Bordalba added that they have not started the investigation yet as they were not allowed entry to the site by the URC management after the incident was reported to them. An approval from the corporation’s consultant is needed for the police to...
Tech Explorist I may be no top financial advisor or billionaire. However, it doesn't mean that I can't reject social media gossip such as how Facebook pages are filled with them. I was reading through some Facebook pages talking about the recent stock market crash (which may be nowhere near the 1929 Stock Market Crash). What truly amazed me is how illogical arguments can make. That's why I wrote why I'd listen to Warren Buffett (an investor) over social media naysayers . Buffett has the money, made proof with it, and one of the things I'm doing now is gathering indexes while the market is low . I don't think it'd recover any time soon either. Right now, my focus is to get more stocks through indexes and feeders. Some might boast that they have an Atenean or La Sallian education from Manila. However, does an education from Manila make one better than the rest of the Philippines? I frequently threw tantrums because I didn't do well in high school (under ...
Vietnam National University, Hanoi Kabataan Partylist, is that you? No, it's actually the Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth Union (Đoàn Thanh niên Cộng sản Hồ Chí Minh), or alternatively, it can be called the Vietnam Youth Union . The color blue may remind some of Kabataan Partylist. Both Kabataan Partylist and the Vietnam Youth Union are involved with recruiting youths into the organization. However, there's a crucial difference between Kabataan Partylist and the Youth Union in how they view economics. The Kabataan Partylist Laguna's blog even writes this: It believes that the Philippines, as a semi-colonial and semi-feudal country, is plagued by a system which allows foreign and big business interests to dominate, while the majority of our countrymen are left poor and hungry . We are living in a society where foreign subservience, peasant landlessness, and rampant corruption are the top three ills. To that end, Kabataan Party-list strives to galvanize the Filipino youth in u...
Art by Hugo Yunzon It's finally August or Buwan Ng Wika (Month of the Language), though it may be better to call it Buwan Ng Kultura (Month of the Culture). Buwan Ng Wika programs tend to focus more on the uniqueness of several types of Filipino people. What I recall back in my high school days (late 1990s) is how I was asked to play an "American" in a Buwan Ng Wika program. There were also other people asked to portray the Chinese traders, Arab traders, Indian traders, and the Japanese occupation. It would be good to do a review of the pre-colonial Philippines. The name Philippines was derived from the Spanish king, King Philip. Back then, the natives were called Indios which sounds very similar to Indonesia . Yes, most Filipinos are either Malay or Indo. A look at the Indonesians and Malaysians would have one mistake them for Filipinos. A note is that the Chinese population there usually speaks Hokkien. From Purdue Filpino --here's some basic information about Fili...
I wasn't always a fan of Indian food (at first). I remembered eating in an Indian restaurant before that didn't serve good quality food. However, I had made some friends with some Filipino-Indians during my stay in the University of San Carlos (USC) as a business administration student. I finally at the house of an Indian friend of mine. I tasted some of their food which more mostly meat dishes though I prefer the vegetarian food routine. Some Indian restaurants popped during the 2010s though I preferred halal restaurants. Indian restaurants usually don't serve beef because most of the owners are Hindus. Hindus don't eat beef because cows are considered sacred animals to them. I remembered that some Indians protested against McDonald's due to the beef problem in the international marketing class. As courtesy, please don't ask if there's beef in their restaurant. Mr. India, now Bollywood Tandoor I was soon an MBA student in USC in 2011. Soon enough, Mr. Indi...
Comments
Post a Comment