Skip to main content

It's Incredibly Frustrating to Discuss Economics with an Overspender


Overspending is just bad economics, isn't it? Economics is defined as the following for the sake of a review of high school basics:

Economics is a social science concerned with the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. It studies how individuals, businesses, governments, and nations make choices about how to allocate resources. Economics focuses on the actions of human beings, based on assumptions that humans act with rational behavior, seeking the most optimal level of benefit or utility. The building blocks of economics are the studies of labor and trade. Since there are many possible applications of human labor and many different ways to acquire resources, it is the task of economics to determine which methods yield the best results.

Economics can generally be broken down into macroeconomics, which concentrates on the behavior of the economy as a whole, and microeconomics, which focuses on individual people and businesses.

It had me thinking of 2016 when I discussed who to vote for. I remembered I talked about the need to actually invite foreign direct investors (FDIs) to the country. The response was rather stupid. One of the people I talked to was an overspender. He said, "Why are you inviting them over? Only they will get rich!" I argued this and that but the person is just bullheaded. The incident made me think about people who don't know how to value money are going to ignore economics. Sure, such people can pass high school economics and college economics (in my case, I had a total of 12 units in my entire academic life). However, they are simply ignoring the basics of economics when all they do is study it for a grade.  

An overspender doesn't know how to economize, right? To economize means to spend less and reduce one's expenses. Economics is also concerned with spending less and reducing one's expenses. However, this doesn't mean being a miser too. To economize would mean to analyze all alternatives possible not just to save in the present but also to make sure one gets a good Return On Investment (ROI). That is to avoid any unnecessary expense that could've been avoided if certain actions were met. It's like spending money on proper waste disposal will cost less than having to pay for much bigger costs related to environmental damage in the future. For the overspender, they tend to live like money is free which results in them spending without thinking of the consequences. 

For the overspender, all they care about is easy money or acting like money doesn't run out. It's pretty much like spoiled children of overly rich parents or some Overseas Filipino Worker (OFW) families. I remembered a symposium at the University of San Carlos-Main Campus (USC-Main) during my MBA days. One of the undergraduate accounting students mentioned about spending habits of OFWs. The family that's left behind in the Philippines tend to live on remittances. The OFW is abroad, sweating, working, and the family thinks that money is so easy. For spoiled children, they don't know about the sacrifice their parents made. It can e worsened when rich people want to spare their children from their struggles--a really bad mistake that will cause the family wealth to disappear eventually. 

For those in business, I think why the overspending businessman may oppose economic reforms may also be linked for easy money. It's much easier to earn money by offering bad services for a high price. You don't need much effort to make a good product if you're protected from competition. All a greedy businessman who overspends may care about that customers give him money, he's the only one among the few offering the service, then get money even if his products and services are bad. He would object to foreign competition because he fears his comfort zone will be gone. I guess it's all about lying that only FDIs will get rich. It's more of protecting one's selfish interests to gain more money for overspending.  

The overspender then starts to panic when the money runs out. What happens next can be a very bad decision. There are plenty of bad people out there who will take advantage of their plight. Too much spending can lead to the You Live Only Once attitude (YOLO), the necessity to give a blowout, envy of what others have, splurging during paydays, and lifestyle inflation. This will eventually lead to them falling for bad loan schemes (such as Five-Six Lending) and Get Rich Quick schemes such as Ponzi schemes. Charles Ponzi was notorious for his financial schemes hence it was called a Ponzi scheme. Many fall for Ponzi schemes because they want to get a lot of money quickly so they can overspend. Think about convincing your friend not to invest in the Get Rich Quick scheme or the Five-Six scheme? He or she will just ignore it because all he or she cares about is the huge promise--never mind that simple mathematics will prove that the scheme is a sham. I bet Ponzi loved the economic illiteracy of his day and he got rich cast. Ponzi got rich fast but he eventually died penniless in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, on January 18, 1949. 

Another economic term to think of is the Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC). It's defined as a proportion of an aggregate raise in pay where a consumer spends rather than saves. It would be interesting to know that a key takeaway is that MPC is typically lower among people of higher incomes. That would mean that people of lower-income overall tend to spend more money than those of higher income. The MPC might even be defined as follows:

Given data on household income and household spending, economists can calculate households’ MPC by income level. This calculation is important because MPC is not constant; it varies by income level. Typically, the higher the income, the lower the MPC because as income increases more of a person's wants and needs become satisfied; as a result, they save more instead. At low-income levels, MPC tends to be much higher as most or all of the person's income must be devoted to subsistence consumption.

So, pretty much, the overspender ends up devoted to subsistence consumption. The person with the higher income ends up focusing on savings. It might be best seen as that when a person doesn't have savings--it's because they might not be focused too much on their needs but the wants. That means when stuff like basic needs is needed--they tend not to have it. Meanwhile, those who slowly try to grow their money may discover their MPC starts to decrease. It may be because by spending on what they needed during the time they had a higher MPC--they end up securing more money in the future by also learning to save.

For the overspender, none of these matter already, right? For them, all that matters to them is that spending makes the world go round. Never mind that overspending has been one of the major causes of governments falling down. A lot of dictatorships are also attributed to overspending to satisfy the wants of those in power. Meanwhile, any good ruler knows not to overspend and to spend only what's necessary.  

References 

"10 Reasons Why Filipinos Have No Savings"

"Charles Ponzi" 

"Guide to Economics" Written by Adam Hayes, Reviewed by Charles Potters, Fact-Checked by Katrina Munchichiello (Updated: December 29, 2020)

"In Ponzi We Trust" by Mary Darby (December 1998)

"Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC)" Written by the Investopedia Team, Reviewed by Somer Anderson (Updated: January 22, 2022) 

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...