Skip to main content

How I Believe the Public Service Act of 2022 Will Benefit the Philippine Business and Economic Environment

One of the greatest news for the Philippines is the Public Service Act of 2022. The following can be read from the Philippine News Agency regarding President Rodrigo R. Duterte's signing of the new law into action:

President Rodrigo Roa Duterte on Monday signed into law a measure amending the Public Service Act (PSA), allowing up to 100 percent foreign ownership of public services in the country.

Republic Act (RA) No. 11659 or "An Act Amending Commonwealth Act No. 146 otherwise known as the Public Service Act” as amended was signed by Duterte in a ceremony at the Rizal Hall, Malacañan Palace in the presence of lawmakers and other officials.

Under the amended PSA, the telecommunications, railways, expressways, airports, and shipping industries will be considered public services, allowing up to 100 percent foreign ownership in these sectors.

Duterte also led the ceremonial presentation of newly enacted laws namely RA 11647 which amends the Foreign Investments Act; RA 11650, which ensures inclusive education for learners with disabilities; and RA 11648, which increases the age for determining statutory rape from 12 to 16-years-old.

I would like to stress that foreign ownership and land ownership are two different things. It's all about shares and not land ownership. The landowner doesn't have a share in the company's shares as a landowner unless he or she manages to legitimately get a share via agreement. The landowner collects rentals which is part of the expenses--not profits. A tenant will pay rent whether one is at a profit or at a loss. Failure to pay rent means eviction. In the case of taxes, failure to pay taxes can have hefty consequences too.  So, what's approved here is foreigners can have up to 100 percent shares ownership but not land ownership. The foreign investor can keep all their net profits--profits that come after all expenses such as rent (to Filipino landowners) and taxes (to the Filipino government) are kept. I mean, there's the term net income after taxes, right? They keep their profits but only net profits after taxes.

Besides, the late Benigno "Noynoy" Simeon C. Aquino also had these contributions before this administration showing the power of foreign investment:

By all accounts, the Aquino administration has had a strong economic record. The Philippines is an emerging economy, which has steadily grown under Mr. Aquino due to the inflow of foreign direct investment (FDI).

FDI has been rising steadily in recent years, and between January and November 2014, FDI flows reached USD 5.7 billion, which represents a more than 60% increase compared to 2013. Most of these investments went into manufacturing gas, steam, and air-conditioning supply, finance and insurance, transportation and storage, and professional, scientific and technical activities.

It's because of the filling of the supply and demand gap. The services that have been covered by the recent amendment are telecommunications, railways, expressways, airports, and shipping industries. This reminds me of what the late Lee Kuan Yew said in his book From Third World to First on page 315. 

We discussed their loss-incurring state-owned enterprises (SOEs). They wanted to privatize them or sell them off to the workers and others. I explained that this method would not provide them with what was critical efficient management. Singapore Airlines was 100 percent government owned, but it was efficient and profitable because it had to compete against international airlines. We did not subsidize it; if it was not profitable, it would have to close down. I recommended that they privatize their SOEs by bringing in foreign corporations to get an injection of management expertise and foreign capital for new technology. A change in the management system was essential. They needed to work with foreigners to learn on the job. Privatizing within the country by selling to their own people could not bring about this result.

Lee, after all, was the man who had established Singapore from a third-world country to a first-world country. This would change the business culture of the Philippines. It would mean filling in the supply and demand gap. Singapore Airlines has been one of my best experiences since the late 1990s. Until now, it remains to be competent. I believe the real reason why the Philippines' airlines have that problem is a lack of competition. Competition would force people to innovate. An investor's business lives or dies by how they run it. A foreign investor who does poorly will flunk as much as a local investor who does poorly. A local investor who does well will survive in competition as much as a foreign investor who does well. It's all about the survival of the fittest in the Philippine business environment.

What can be expected with more competition are as follows:

  1. Having more telecommunication companies means filling the Internet supply and demand gap. Filipinos will be able to enjoy cheaper and better Internet. The reason why Internet is expensive is slow is due to too much demand and too little supply.
  2. The transportation system will be better. I think one of the reasons why the MRT kept breaking down was because of the bottleneck. Railways, expressways, and shipping are in demand but there are too few of them to fill that gap. If there were more investors--the demand from Filipinos can be filled in slowly. Lee's statement on Singapore Airlines should be put to heart that it will force local railways, expressways, and shipping to change their game if they have to have competition.
  3. Lower prices of electricity. If there will be more electrical companies then the supply and demand will be filled. In turn, there will be more foreign investors who will be able to take advantage of lower costs of electricity. 
As Deng Xiaoping, the founder of Modern China, said, "It doesn't matter if the cat is black or white. What matters is that it catches mice." In other words, it doesn't matter if the business is locally owned or owned by foreigners. What matters is that the business delivers good results, income taxes, and produces jobs in the country where it's operating. 

References

Books

"From Third World to First--The Singapore Story: 1965-2000) by Lee Kuan Yew
Harpers Collins Publishers

Websites

"Duterte signs law amending Public Service Act" by Azer Parrocha (March 21, 2022)

"The legacy of Philippines President Benigno Aquino" by Laura Southgate (August 25, 2015)

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...
Read more

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...
Read more

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...
Read more

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...
Read more