Skip to main content

Why I Support Revenue Regulations No. 6-2022


The picture above is from the official Facebook page of the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR). I would be thinking about myself not questioning it. But as said, any democracy requires a critical mind to correct any flaws from the authorities. One of the issues I had in the past was the need to renew the Authority to Print (ATP) every five years. It's not like expired canned goods that wouldn't be validated. I have no problem with cash registers that need to be registered with the BIR. Cash registers, after all, produce the receipts which is the basis for the taxable income. Bookkeepers will need to take a look at the receipts, and write down the income for the month, businesses will end up paying value-added tax (VAT) if they reach a certain amount, and there are times that income taxes have to be increased or decreased depending on the situation.

I think I could pose a number of problems with the five-years expiry date after the pandemic had struck. It's time to name the following:

  1. People will print plenty of receipts because nobody knows when it will run out. However, time will come when people end up having to surrender bulks of receipt that were unused after the five-year ATP has ended. You can imagine the hassle that will create.
  2. Tenant profiling can be a lot more tedious than it has to be. Lessors will have to keep asking for the new ATP of tenants every five years. Renewing of contracts is one thing. I think making lessors have to collect new ATPs every five years from their tenants can be an unnecessary step. 
  3. I think having so many unused receipts will cause more trees to be cut down. We need to work for environmentally sustainable business environments. Penalizing or even shutting down businesses that don't obey environmental rules is one thing. I think having to keep printing new receipts every five years and leaving a lot of unused receipts, unused, will make tree-cutting more necessary than it should. 
Meanwhile, here is a few stuff that I believe will make it beneficial to get rid of the expiration of ATPS for good:
  1. Having the same ATP for a lifetime is the same as having the same driver's license for a lifetime. The difference is the driver's license expires after ten years. If a receipt is still legible, clear, and registered then why have the ATP expire after five years? It's not like a business permit that must be renewed yearly. The only time receipts should be surrendered is when a business closes or when a new receipt format is issued. Other than that, ATPs should remain as long as possible to avoid overcomplicating things. 
  2. If there are fewer unused receipts surrendered then there will be fewer trees that need to be cut. As said, the only receipts that need to be surrendered are of businesses that are closing down for a reason. We need to focus on environmental conservation.
  3. There would be smoother work processes. The only thing entrepreneurs need to be concerned more about is our sales and if they have enough receipts to declare to the BIR. I think renewing ATPs would complicate the process. I believe this new revenue regulation will allow the BIR to focus on taxable income as well.  
  4. I think the only time that the BIR has to be informed is when the business runs out of receipts. This isn't about issuing a new ATP but registering a new batch of freshly printed receipts to the BIR. I believe that only new batches of receipts need to be registered and not unused receipts getting surrendered because the ATP expired.
Pretty much, I hope we can find more hurdles to make business in the Philippines better. I salute the BIR for actually making this new revenue regulation. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

The 2026 Iran War Audit vs. OFW-Reliant Pinoy Pride Economists

It's a shame, really, that I didn't think about writing this article on OFWs again. I got somewhat fixated on the  gas prices , and my mind was exhausted. I thought about how I even asked, " Will #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba economics even lower down the prices of gasoline? " It's one thing that the Philippines has been overly reliant  on the Middle East for gasoline. What I overlooked was the OFW phenomenon again . It was so easy to hype on the OFW phenomenon, like what happened with the Filipino nurse, Ello Ed Mundsel Bello, way back in 2015. The OFW hype would've compounded the Philippine economy's "reliance model" to a whole new level of bottleneck!  Analyzing the bottleneck of relying on the Middle East It's already a known fact that several OFWs are sent to the Middle East. I even remember running across a presumably retired dancer who would be 64 today, on Facebook. The guy actually bragged about how he was a dancer at the Excelsior Hotel in...
Read more

IBON Foundation: Yes to Wealth Taxing the Rich, No to Economic Reforms?

Some time ago, I wrote about why I don't trust the IBON Foundation as an "economic think-tank" . I remember getting a lot of insults (and I've decided to block such people), telling me stuff like, "What have you done for the Philippines compared to IBON?" or "What about your mass base?" There's also that 88% survey result from Pulse Asia, which I heard has a very biased sampling size. Regardless, it's important to speak out facts and figures even if only one percent believes it and 99% doesn't! As I was looking to challenge myself in writing, I thought of challenging IBON's ongoing stance on the wealth tax. They had an article written in 2023. It's all about taxing the super wealthy . Is it good or bad? It's time to think about it.  Differentiating income from net worth Here's a sample of what IBON had written: A billionaire wealth tax can substitute for many consumption taxes that disproportionately burden millions of F...
Read more

Basic Economic Knowledge Tells Us Why Ayuda Will Not Help Filipinos Survive Inflation for Long

IBON Foundation I'm getting amazed at how IBON Foundation still has their ever-destructive obsession with ayuda (read here ). Lately, they have written another article where they say that high inflation "confirms" the need for real ayuda which means cash handouts (read here ). That's totally one thing whenever IBON Foundation decries the need for foreign direct investment (FDI) but they keep saying that cash handouts are good for the economy. That statement is purely stupid because handouts equals expenses and there's really no long-term  Return on Investment (ROI) on that one!  However, for the Philippine government to be able to give more cash handouts without FDIs (and rely too much on local businesses)--it can mean doing the following: Start raising taxes for the rich in order to provide more money for cash handouts. If taxes from the rich aren't enough--why not print more money, right?  The demand for ayuda worth PHP 10,000.00 is utterly stupid. The two ...
Read more