Skip to main content

How Mao's Last Dancer, Li Cunxin's Story, May Tell the Need for Economic Liberalization

The Epoch Times

As talks about the need for more economic freedom in the Philippines is on, some people are still saying that, "No, we need 60-40!" Well, one might need to view the film Mao's Last Dancer (or read the book written by the author himself, Li Cunxin) to understand a Chinese man's travel to the United States of America (USA). Li himself was the sixth son of a family of seven. Having been born in 1961, he would've passed through the harsh regime of Mao Zedong. Mao ruled China until his death in 1976 which soon paved for Deng Xiaoping's takeover. Before Deng took over, Mao was succeeded by Hua Guofeng who was soon replaced by Deng. Deng understood economics upon his trip to America.

The focus of the film (and the book) is Li, a dancer, who was selected at a very young age. Communism likes starting their cadets young, right? They were selected by the ruthless Madame Mao, Mao's final wife before he finally succumbed to death. Madame Mao's record wasn't so clean either since she had three previous failed marriages as well before becoming the First Lady of China. The arduous training of the Communist dancers. One teacher, referred to as Teacher Chan, was banished for promoting classical Russian ballet. I assume that maybe, just maybe, Joseph Stalin did ban Russian ballet too.

Things start to change after Mao died. The film included the use of footage from the news about Mao's death. Later on, the dancer Ben Stevenson arrived in China for a cultural visit. If I could be right, this was when Hua was still the leader before Deng managed to take over. Later on, Li was able to visit his family in China (and his parents visited him) thanks to Deng's open-door policy.

From ABC News, this can be read about Lis's journey:

Cunxin had a culture shock while in the USA. Everything that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) taught him was really wrong. ABC News also shares this insight regarding Cunxin's experience with the US:

"I didn't understand ballet, so definitely, to help my family was the driving force. [It was] my willingness to sacrifice the love my parents had for me," he said.

After Mao died and China began opening up under Deng Xiaoping's leadership, Li was exposed to increasing Western influences that were eye-opening.

"That's when we [see] in the movies, [foreigners] wear better clothes than us, they eat better food, they seemed happier," he said.

"At first we thought that was Western propaganda — eventually when I went to America when I saw it with my own eyes, I realised they [the movies] were not propaganda.

"We [had been] brainwashed under Mao's era.

The movie featured Li in his cluelessness. I would be in that clueless state too. It's not fiction like how five North Korean soldiers in Crash Landing on You marveled at South Korea's development. I heard how traditional communism continues to teach that, "It's just American imperialism." type of talk. Li beheld the US for the first time in his eyes. He saw a freer country. The Americans wore better clothes and ate better food. It's a good thing that Deng finally saw it and said, "Communist China is open for business." Later, Deng said, "Socialism isn't poverty. To be rich is glorious." I guess one can say socialism might be better defined as high-class communism. The environment was a total shocker when he felt American soil for the first time. 

Soon enough, Li desired to stay in the US because it was much better than Communist China. Li had his failed marriage with Elizabeth Mackey when they were too young to commit but old enough to marry. Li was 20 and she was 18 years old. The marriage did fail because Li got too focused on his career. Li later remarried an Australian woman named Mary McKendry. Both Li and McKendry are still married. It was in 1979 when Li and Mackey met below the age of consent. The marriage took place in 1981 and they divorced in 1982. Later, both McKendry and Li married in 1987 and they have children together. Li is currently a Chinese Australian by international status which is good. I doubt Li would want to be back in China under the regime of Xi Jinping.

It's because Li saw the power of free markets. The promises of Mao were nothing but moot. Li even admitted he was willing to jump off the roof for Mao. The Guardian gives this note on his once-blind admiration for Mao: 

“During my childhood,” he says, “we suffered a lot from Mao’s terrible, misguided policies. I can still see the desperation in my mother’s eyes because she had so little to cook for us. Often, there was nothing but dried yams. But we really believed we belonged to the most privileged nation on earth. We thought that if we followed Mao, we were all heading to paradise. I would have jumped off the roof for him, no question.”

Li insists that, even when he’d been desperately unhappy in Beijing, his faith in Mao never wavered. “It felt such an incredible privilege just to be in the city and near to him – it was like coming close to God.” He also dreamed that if he could somehow become a good enough dancer, he might not only serve Mao but help to lift his family out of poverty.

This just reminds me of how Mao's brainwashing propaganda is false hope. It's been the same pattern where Communists have their higher-ups with the power while the followers starve. Yet, commie admirers (such as the brats of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League, which is ironically on Facebook) still say stuff like, "Competition ruins everything! Government providing everything is the best!" Well, Li's own experience was all that. Not to mention, Mao made people believe that they had the best constitution in the world. As Li said, he thought that they belonged to the most privileged nation on Earth only because of propaganda. 

This was also part of Li's own ordeal according to The Guardian:

By the time he was 18, Li had become one of Beijing’s leading dance students. With a new thawing in Chinese-American relations, his diligence was rewarded with a year’s study in Houston. At first, the experience was too overwhelming: growing up, he’d been taught to believe that the west was a cesspit of poverty and corruption. Yet the Texas city contradicted everything he thought he knew. “It was all amazing – the swimming pools, the food, the fact that people could freely criticise their leaders. It was as if 18 years of my life were being erased. I didn’t know who I was or what I should think.

Even more terrifying, perhaps, was the dawning realisation that he didn’t want to leave. “I thought, ‘If I could live and work in America, my God, what could I do?’” And when he fell in love, with a young American dance student called Elizabeth Mackey, he began to consider defection. It was a terrifying risk and he nearly didn’t get away with it. Even though he and Mackey had hastily got married to secure his legal status in America, he was briefly incarcerated in the Chinese consulate in Houston, and threatened not only with deportation and punishment, but also with retribution on his family.

As the film continued, I couldn't help but contain emotions. I didn't know what to say. It was pretty much like starting to see stuff like how Filipino First Policy caused the Philippines to fail. Communist China and Communist Vietnam only progressed when they both embraced FDIs. Yet, some people still believe in the toxic lies of Communist propaganda in the Philippines. Propaganda like, "The Philippines is the best country in the world." has done nothing The belief China was the best country in the world in Mao's time didn't work either. Before one can say, "But the Philippines isn't China!" Well, no form of protectionist policy ever worked in the long run.

I recommend this film to be shown. I say Mao's Last Dancer, though it's more than ten years old as film, should still have its relevance in the call for economic reform. 

Popular posts from this blog

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...

Overspending as a Narcotic of the Filipino Masses

Harvard Health Publishing It's almost time for the New Year, right? However, there's the problem that so many Filipinos just refuse to do any financial New Year's resolutions . It's a continued series of broken New Year's resolutions year after year , such as not doing anything about one's financial and economic literacy . Then again, can Filipinos learn financial literacy when the school environment is  too theoretical ? As I observe the same cycle in the Philippines, from January to December, it has always been a financial mess for many Filipinos. The problem starts with mishandling money, such as how paychecks are often handled by people .  There's always some joy in spending, whether we want to admit it or not We can't deny that if we bought what we want (especially with one's own money), there's some feeling of satisfaction . For example, a person who stops begging from their parents and starts buying what they want, with  their money , can ...

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...

Is Christmas Toxic Positivity a Cause or an Effect of the Philippines' Lack of Progress?

Lessandra When it's Christmas, it's so easy to think of the song of the late Andy Williams, "It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year". The music itself reeks of toxic positivity,  whether one likes it or not. It's a shame, really, because December 20 was also the anniversary of Asia's Titanic, the sinking of the Doña Paz ! We live in a society that somehow never learns from its mistakes, like a person who's stuck in gambling debt, is still hoping to get rich gambling . Despite all that, Christmas toxic positivity still abounds in the Philippines. We still have a lot of ongoing bad habits, such as starting Christmas in September and then doing last-minute Christmas shopping during the week of Christmas. That's why every time I drive on the road on Christmas, I tend to shout, "Isn't it any wonder why the Philippines never improves?" The term Noche Buena has evolved over time . For some, it's simply the Christmas dinner. However, so...

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...