Skip to main content

Why I Support Taiwanese Politician Yeh Yi Jin's Proposal for Taiwan to Drop Zhuyin Entirely (in Favor of Pinyin)

Taiwan News


It may be news from 2018 (meaning, five years ago) but as a person who sees the importance of Mandarin in the international market, I still want to react. Not surprisingly, Yeh Yi Jin lost the Tainan mayoral bid because of her controversial statement to abolish Zhuyin from Taiwan altogether. She may have lost the race but I'm still supporting her for this. It's not because I kept failing hard in Zhuyin back in my days. It's because I feel that as time goes on, some things need to be dropped like asking students to submit their reports written via typewriter or asking documents to be faxed when email (and modern standard mail) are more reliable. Like I argued with an investment before, I said, "You can't fax a book. Can I just mail it?" The bank kept arguing it had to be faxed. Unfortunately stubborn boomers, stubborn boomers, everywhere, right?

From The Free China Post, this is what's said about Yeh's argument:
Yeh argues that using zhuyin serves almost no purpose other than to learn zhuyin itself.  She purports that if students were to learn pinyin however, they would not only gain the benefit of learning how to pronounce Mandarin, but also how to use the Latin alphabet for later study of secondary languages.  Yeh thinks that if she could first introduce this system in Tainan, that other cities and counties would soon follow suit.

The politician also argues that with the world’s ever-increasing use of technology, using pinyin is easier.  This being due to the fact that most keyboards use the Latin system. She thinks that this will create faster and easier input.

She also argues that this will attract more foreigners to study Mandarin in Taiwan.  This is my main point of contention with Yeh.
I believe she's right. A historical fact was that Zhou Yougang (who died at 111 years old in 2017), the father of Hanyu Pinyin, was actually a critic of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). I really find it stupid how the drift between Zhuyin and Pinyin has been more political as if Zhou himself was a member of the CCP when he wasn't. The guy was a political prisoner. I even wonder did Mao Zedong himself lie to Joseph Stalin that the CCP invented Pinyin, therefore causing Taiwan to reject it? Bizarre speculation but it could be true. 

It's true some people did master the Zhuyin table. However, not everyone has the ability to be that good with multiple languages. Some languages in the world write in an entirely different alphabet such as Arabic and Indian languages. From the same article on The Free China Post--this can also be read which makes me think most of the instructors must be stubborn boomers:
A fair amount of Mandarin instructors argue that zhuyin is a more accurate way to learn pronunciation, and it is certainly the most classical way to learn. Pinyin came into fashion in the 1950s with simplified characters from the mainland  While I am no expert, the pronunciation of the letters used in Chinese pinyin, differ a lot from how we pronounce the sounds in English.  This should be expected as both languages have sounds that are unique to their respective languages.

I am certainly not enough of an expert to weigh in totally on this issue.  Though some Taiwanese netizens did.  They said they were happy that the mayoral hopeful had no real sway over the educational standards on the island.  They also questioned why they don’t just give up on Mandarin all together and learn English as their first language, almost certainly a tongue in cheek remark

Whether we want to admit it or not, language must evolve. Chinese education back in my day got rid of the subject we called Tzong Hap in Amoy. We were to focus on 華語 (Huáyǔ) though we were still stuck with Zhuyin. Yes, I remembered passing without really learning anything! I do have my regrets but I'm still going to criticize the Chinese education system, in hopes of making Chinese more accessible as a second language. Language evolves over time and the need to transliterate is there. True, we do still have countries that write in a very different alphabet like the Arabs and the Indians. However, Chinese uses calligraphy and the use of Zhuyin can complicate things in the long run. It's one thing that I have to learn to write Arabic and Hindi with the Arabic alphabet and the Hindi alphabet. It's another thing if I have to learn another alphabet just to learn how to read Chinese characters. 

Yeh's remarks are pretty much to get Taiwan ready for the Asian Century. With over one billion speakers of Mandarin worldwide, Taiwan can't miss this grand opportunity by being too traditional. If pinyin were focused on instead of Zhuyin, Taiwanese could also have an easier time getting into English, which is the universal language. How can Mandarin speakers teach Mandarin as a second language if they don't know anything else but Mandarin? English is still widely spoken. Can you even use Zhuyin to register your business in a non-Chinese country (read here)? That's what I believe she's trying to drive at!

Popular posts from this blog

The Idiocy of Typing Anti-FDI Rants Using IMPORTED Devices, IMPORTED Platforms, and IMPORTED Social Media

Bulatlat It's very easy to open Facebook (or any related platform) and find lots of stupidity , right? There have been idiotic comments I find on Facebook such as FDI is this and that. We can find "thought leader groups" such as Alliance of Concerned Teachers, Anakpawis, Anakbayan, Bayan Muna, IBON Foundation, Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, and Philippine Anti-Fascist League (PH Antifa) who keep ranting about FDI as this and that. I even remember somebody dared to say that FDI caused Egypt to dry up. Ironically, North Korea and Venezuela, two protectionist countries, have very bad pollution problems. I'd blame it that they don't have the money to do a clean-up drive. How can you clean up a polluted river without the right equipment? How can you expect better power efficiency with outdated equipment that keep coughing up, cough, cough, lots of black smoke?  All the talks on social media can be very funny. The big irony is that all calls for "...

Get Stuck with EDSA, End Up Like Nokia

  Yes, we should never forget what history teaches us. A classmate of mine, back in high school, wrote a simple and blunt essay called "History: A Teacher". I doubt he still has a soft copy, given it was already more than 20 years ago. I'd like to quote Duterte critic Andrew James Masigan wrote this in  Philippine Star --something that should remain relevant: I would never undervalue the 1987 Constitution. It dismantled the legal framework of a repressive regime and established the democratic institutions we enjoy today. For this, I am grateful. The 1987 Constitution was crafted with the best of intentions. It sought to put the Filipino first in all aspects of governance and to level the playing field amongst sectors and peoples.  But it is far from perfect. It failed to consider the importance of foreign capital and technologies and the stiff competition we would have to face to obtain them. In short, its economic provisions were short-sighted . So despite the Constitut...

It's Incredibly Frustrating to Discuss Economics with an Overspender

Overspending is just bad economics, isn't it? Economics is defined as the following for the sake of a review of high school basics: Economics is a social science concerned with the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. It studies how individuals, businesses, governments, and nations make choices about how to allocate resources. Economics focuses on the actions of human beings, based on assumptions that humans act with rational behavior, seeking the most optimal level of benefit or utility. The building blocks of economics are the studies of labor and trade. Since there are many possible applications of human labor and many different ways to acquire resources, it is the task of economics to determine which methods yield the best results. Economics can generally be broken down into macroeconomics, which concentrates on the behavior of the economy as a whole, and microeconomics, which focuses on individual people and businesses. It had me thinking of 2016 wh...

Talking Economics with an Overeating Glutton

Two years ago, I wrote an entry about why discussing economics with an overspender is frustrating . Now, I was looking at certain fat people who say really dumb things about economics. Just recently, I was looking at a certain fat idiot (fortunately, he only has 1K+ followers) who posted on Facebook that not only will the parliamentary system cause the Philippines to become a dictatorship, but he also says that changing economic provisions will cause the Philippines to collapse and the country to fall into the hands of foreigners. I won't name the person out to avoid getting personal. However, the person is apparently very fat and he blames capitalism day in and day out. The person even says that businessmen do nothing and it's the employers that do everything. Has that fat slob ever heard that businesses are run by bosses and that if the bosses do screw up, they're the ones who are the most answerable? The employees are the cogs and the boss runs the cogs. I was looking at...

Social Media Gossipers' Ad Hominems Against Actor Robin Padilla Regarding His Proposal to Remove 60-40

Make no mistake that I didn't vote for Robin Padilla. I feel like I've had enough of voting for celebrities, athletes, and those who I felt are know-nothings in the legislative. However, Padilla recently had his proposal to remove the 60-40 restrictions regarding foreign direct investments (FDIs) . Former Philippine Vice President Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo was even in favor of that amendment. I guess that's why Philippine economist Andrew James Masigan endorsed Robredo. I may have not endorsed Robredo while Masigan remains to be one of my favorite local sources. The news from GMA News Online reveals these plans by Padilla himself: Senator Robin Padilla said he wanted to revise the Constitution to scrap the 60-40 rule on foreign ownership of businesses to accelerate job creation and competition among industries . In a Monday interview, Padilla said the move would attract more foreign investments to support the country’s economic recovery. “Para sa akin mas...