Skip to main content

#SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics Will Ultimately Hurt the WORKING CLASS

Cartoonist Zach

Some people claim to fight for the working class--while refusing to work themselves. Some people claim to fight for the working class--while supporting policies that will prove detrimental to the working class. One of these policies is #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba--meaning to raise salaries and lower prices. I wrote some time ago about why #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba doesn't work. However, I'lm still attacked by Ad Homimens and Nom Sequiturs. How's that even possible anyway? Economics isn't magic! If President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr.'s promise of PHP 20.00 kilo rice is absurd--so is the promise of #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba economics! 

Image by Sabrina Jiang © Investopedia 2020

I don't need a PhD in economics to understand cost accounting. The income statement would include salaries as part of the cost. The cost of goods sold includes salaries. Marketing and promotions include salaries. General and administrative would include salaries. Payment for manual labor and administrative labor are salaries. The question is, "Where will people get the money to pay higher salaries?" It would be from the sales and profits. Profits are needed to keep the company going. Profits are needed for the company's growth--which includes raising up salaries of employees (to keep them loyal) or hiring a bigger workforce to meet demands.

#SahodItaasPresyoIbaba will require owners to raise salaries while selling at a loss. It's because the final product is affected by not just the supply chain but also by the production chain. If the cost of utilities increases then, naturally, a product and service will increase as well. The same goes for salaries. It's because the workforce's salary also affects the cost of a product or service. Do people think that a company would want to operate at a loss? Nobody would want to operate at a loss. If a company operates at a loss--it would also mean being unable to pay employees. Unpaid employees create unhappy employees. In turn, a company would need to lay off workers because it can't afford to pay all workers a higher salary. 

#SahodItaasPresyoIbaba economics may be confusing revenues for profits (read here). As always, people tend to think that their sales for the day make up the profit. Do they even realize that employees don't get a profit sharing because salaries are part of expenses? Revenues get deducted from the cost of goods sold along with other expenses, which include salaries. The revenues don't make profits. If employers pay an abnormally low salary--employees will be demotivated. If employers pay an abnormally high salary--they have a high risk of losses. Losses would either force companies to lay off workers or even close down businesses. If all businesses follow #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba--you can expect them to either lay off more workers or even close down. If all businesses close down, where will the working class go? Not everyone is capable of being an entrepreneur! 

More importantly, how can proponents of #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba claim to help the workers, when they're against FDI? They say FDI is "exploitative" but come on, it's not like as if labor laws aren't around to discourage exploitation. Don't tell me local Filipino businessmen are incapable of exploitation and environmental destruction. They say FDI is "destructive" because they will take the profits with them. Again, that's what they think because they confuse revenues with profits. FDI will increase the demand for labor, which in turn, will cause salaries to rise (read here). If they insist that people should rely solely on Filipino businesses--are they even willing to open employment for the people? That's the question I've repeatedly asked, only to get insults as an answer. In short, those who reply with insults are caught in the corner and are fighting like cornered cats

Those who claim that #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba will help the working class, aren't using their sensido common, or common sense. They want people to defy even basic economics. How can one truly claim to help the working class, if one supports policies that will ultimately result in businesses shutting down? If they do want to form their own communes (where the workers own the means of production)--can they really make it sustainable without profits? 

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...

From Lying About the Marcos Years Parliamentary System to Marcos Years Economic Liberalization?

Manuel L. Quezon III"s Twitter Account The first issue I've had is people saying on social media, "No to the parliamentary system because the first Marcos Administration was parliamentary!" It's really something because such people never bothered to do any further research. Please, knowledge isn't that expensive! Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" A. Aquino Jr. even stated, "We had a parliamentary form of government without a parliament." Later on, even Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s own words showed that the Philippines was still presidential . Why would people still insist that it was a parliamentary form of government? Even more, I'm not surprised that some people are saying on Facebook, "Economic charter change is all about term extension." Even worse, it can be from the Philippine mass media. Sadly, the late Lee Kuan Yew was right to fall the Philippine press rambunctious in his book From Third World to First . I can refer the book t...

Ironically, COMMUNIST Vietnam Continues Improving FDI Conditions, Compared to DEMOCRATIC Philippines

Vietnam National University It's crazy how people don't realize the bigger picture between Communist Vietnam and the democratic Philippines (read here ). It's really crazy how Senator Joseph Victor Gomez Ejercito apparently thinks that delayed proceedings to Vice President Sara Duterte-Carpio's impeachment trial could scare away FDIs. Meanwhile, Atty. Renee Louise Co of Kabataan Partylist could talk about economics, all the while Kabataan Partylist is still against open FDI. It's amazing how Raoul Abellar Manuel, a cumlaude in applied mathematics, still believes in #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba economics! Meanwhile, the biggest picture is that Communist Vietnam , while it's under a One-Party State of the Communist Party of Vietnam, is has the better picture of how to invite FDIs. In fact, the Constitution of Vietnam  is rather silent on economic restrictions . The CPV chooses to impose economic restrictions through legislation rather than enshrining them in its Constit...