Skip to main content

If You're Cowering from Competition from Foreign Investors, You Have NO RIGHT to Do Business


I remembered discussing about who ought to be the next president. I mentioned about the need for the removal of economic protectionism for better services. The next statement that I got was that, "Why would you let them invest here? Only they (foreign investors) will get rich!" It's a common lie and misunderstanding about foreign investment. Some might even be thinking that foreign investments equals foreign debt or foreign invasion. However, such isn't the case when you know about the subject of International Marketing. It was very last 2004 but there's one statement that can't be denied--the world is becoming a global village. Studying international marketing that year talked about the need to do international trading. Trading with other countries has always been part of economics.

Fear FDI, fear competition

I think the big fear of some anti-FDI sentiments is rooted upon one thing--fear of competition. It was said that Carlos P. Garcia made the"Filipino First" policy to protect the Philippines. However, such a policy may have caused failure. Discouraging foreign investments is discouraging competition. Late,r the Marcos Years can be attributed to inflation. Inflation is caused by the principle of supply and demand. High demand and low supply equals higher prices. Prices are raised when supply is low to protect the buyers and the sellers. Sellers would need some extra money to purchase extra supply or to recover from the losses. It made me think of why prices increase during a disaster like the recent Odette disaster--sellers themselves have accumulated losses along the way. 

The Foreign Investment Act of 1991 or the Republic Act 7042 talks about the 60-40 rule which is to be a "safeguard" for local businesses. 

a) the term “Philippine National” shall mean a citizen of the Philippines or a domestic partnership or association wholly owned by citizens of the Philippines; or a corporation organized under the laws of the Philippines of which at least sixty percent (60%) of the capital stock outstanding and entitled to vote is owned and held by citizens of the Philippines or a corporation organized abroad and registered as doing business in the Philippine under the Corporation Code of which one hundred percent (100%) of the capital stock outstanding and entitled to vote is wholly owned by Filipinos or a trustee of funds for pension or other employee retirement or separation benefits, where the trustee is a Philippine national and at least sixty percent (60%) of the fund will accrue to the benefit of Philippine nationals: Provided, That where a corporation and its non-Filipino stockholders own stocks in a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) registered enterprise, at least sixty percent (60%) of the capital stock outstanding and entitled to vote of each of both corporations must be owned and held by citizens of the Philippines and at least sixty percent (60%) of the members of the Board of Directors of each of both corporations must be citizens of the Philippines, in order that the corporation shall be considered a Philippine national; (as amended by R.A. 8179).

The rule in itself is just utterly ridiculous. Later, there were amendments made to allow certain sectors to invest as specified in the Negative List. Amendments were done over time with Fidel V. Ramos, Joseph Marcelo Ejercito, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, the late Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino, and incumbent Philippine President Rodrigo R. Duterte. Certain amendments were done which allowed Noynoy to give the Philippines an economic kickstart. However, certain sectors are still in the negative list. This, however, still limits the competition. Noynoy did some economic reforms but it would've been a wiser move if he practically got rid of the negative list. That would've probably allowed the Philippines to be at even better footing against Singapore and Malaysia.

Those who are saying that protectionism is to help "businesses" grow are really mistaken. Instead, it's all about fearing competition. I'm always amazed at how it's very easy to brag about Filipinos who are winning abroad. However, some of these same people are fearful of competition from foreign investments. They say that Filipinos must rely on their own capacity and not rely on foreigners. However, cutting through it, it's all about being scared of competition. What's the use of being into business if you're too scared of competition? Do they think that those Filipinos that big win abroad ran away from competition or just won easily? Please, Lydia De Vega was no overnight "fastest woman in the world" neither was Cecil Licad an overnight concert pianist!

One could take a look at how Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping. Deng, though a communist, saw what Mao didn't. Mao tried to create the Great Leap Forward by isolationism and protectionism. The results were disastrous--it was a great leap forward to oblivion. Instead, Deng decided to practically do a lot of new policies such as welcoming foreign investment. Deng went to the United States of America (USA) and told them that his state was open for business. The economic reform of Deng did wonders such as when he invited foreign direct investors. Even the late Lee Kuan Yew dared to call Deng a great man. Deng proved Maoism was a failure. Dengism became a new thing when capitalism was infused into a new program called Socialism with Chinese Characteristics. Vietnam also followed with the Doi Moi program making it more progressive than the democratic Philippines. In short, Deng knew that competition was what China needed to get a kickstart. Either you work or no pay was Deng's way.

The idea that the likes of Neri Colmenares and Teodoro Casino are saying is nothing but cowardice. Some cowards just use them as sources probably having nowhere else to to turn to. In reality, one must think of being too scared of competition. It's only normal to have fear but this is not healthy fear anymore when you are requesting for protection from competition.

A real entrepreneur doesn't run away from competition

There are various tools used in business case studies to get your alternative courses of action and the solution to it. There's the SWOT Analysis which talks about Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. Porter's Five Forces are all about(1) competition in the industry, (2) potential new entrants into the industry, (3) supplier power, (4) power of customers, and (5) threat of substitute products.  There's also the PESTLE analysis which stands for Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental. We need to take a look at the fact that entering into business means entering into competition. If you want to prove yourself great--you need to show that you can survive in the midst of competition. You prove yourself great by winning fair and square--not by cheating nor by asking for protection from competition. That's what I decided to remember when I was remembering all the case studies I did as a student at the University of San Carlos (USC). 

The analytical tools don't talk about hiding or destroying the competition. Instead, it's all about how to win or the strategy that may be formulated. There's the plan to win but what about the strategy? Neither plan nor strategy will be useful if there's no competition. A plan is an arrangement or pattern for a definite purpose A strategy is a blueprint, layout, or design to accomplish a specific goal with flexibility. In short, a strategy is all about changing when necessary to go with the plan. It's like the plan is to hit a big profit. However, the strategy talks about how to win a big profit such as taking advantage of economies of scale, checking out the emerging market, and how to make the best products worth the money of the customer. These can also be used by local businesses in the face of foreign investment.

In SWOT analysis, there's always the opportunity. A whiny local businessman only sees foreign investors as threats. However, a real local businessman will see the opportunities with foreign investors. A foreign investor is a rival. However, the rival of your customer or supplier can mean another customer (extra sales) or a new extra supplier to grow one's network. A local businessman may start selling basic goods (such as basic goods) to the foreign investor, which in turn, means extra money. A local businessman may also decide to get more utilities from both local and foreign such as extra transportation services, faster Internet, and many more. It's all about building up a network through the competitor of one's customers and one's service providers. True, they are a threat but every threat may open a new opportunity. 

This kind of mentality will tell you why free trade countries work better than protectionism. Do you think Sony will become a worldwide brand if Japan remained in the Tokugawa Era's protectionist policy? |You may be enjoying your Sony appliances such as the Playstation 5 or a Sony TV set. Samsung became a global brand because South Korea is a very friendly to foreign investors. Samsung was able to prove itself against the foreign electronic companies to the point that it beat Apple in terms of sales. Eventually, Xiaomi from China ended up becoming a new global player in the smartphone market by defeating Samsung and Apple. What about North Korea's Koryolink? I doubt it that people will be getting a Koryolink soon nor will it become a global brand because of their protectionist environment. Meanwhile, China's free market system did wonders to the country even when it still claims to be a Communist country.

If one must think about proving the Filipino great--we must welcome competition by foreign investors by all means. The recent Typhoon Odette tragedy has some slower restoration work. The reason is because there's too much demand and too little supply. Internet speed is slow in the Philippines because two-three telecommunication companies can't supply it to the whole Philippines. Add the competition and we get a fresh supply. Higher supply to meet the higher demand means we can get lower cost services for better quality. It's because too much workload can wear anyone or anything out. If a local business falls down--it should only be because they refuse to evolve. It's like how local Muslim restaurants fall down while those ran by Arabs manage to stand out for years. Just think about how survival is based on competency whether one is a local or a foreign entrepreneur.

In turn, the competition translates into revenues. A local business grows with the competitors in the form of suppliers, service providers, and additional customers. A real estate lessor will gain additional tenants whether they are foreigner or local. Extra income means more taxable income for the government. All who do business in the Philippines are still required to pay income taxes whether they be foreign investors or local investors. If there are more people employed then there will be more spending meaning there will be more taxable income. So again, doesn't that defeat the idea that only foreign investors will get rich if you let them invest here in the Philippines?

References 

"2021 Summary of Philippines Foreign Investment Negative List" 

"DENG XIAOPING'S EARLY ECONOMIC REFORMS"

"Lee Kuan Yew and China’s transformation"

"Porter's 5 Forces" by Gordon Scott (Updated: February 21, 2020)

"PEST Analysis"

"R.A. 7042 – “Foreign Investments Act of 1991.”

"Samsung beat Apple in 2012 PC, tablet and smartphone sales" by Michael Rougeau (February 22, 2013)

"Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, and Threat (SWOT) Analysis" by Will Kenton (Updated: March 29, 2021)

"What Was the Great Leap Forward?" Written by the Investopedia Team, Reviewed by Michael Boyle (Updated: September 22, 2021) 

"Xiaomi vs Samsung. Which one is better?" by Mauricio Hernaski (August 6, 2020, updated on November 14, 2021)

Popular posts from this blog

#SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics' Understanding of How Gasoline Prices Work

International State College of the Philippines Today is Flor Contempacion Day , and rallies are expected. However, whether it's Flor's death anniversary or not, rallies are expected for the wrongest of reasons. I would like to address this photo from the International State College of the Philippines' Facebook page. The demands here are rather clunky and stupid. We have the following demands that would naturally clash with each other, such as: No to the oil deregulation law while demanding lower oil prices. This is simply ignoring the basic fundamentals of economics, namely the law of supply and demand . They say that oil companies are greedy for gain. These rallyists probably don't really understand the difference between revenues and profits . Let's understand the Oil Deregulation Law  The Oil Deregulation Law, or the Republic Act No. 8479 , passed on February 10, 1998, under the late Fidel Valdez Ramos. Here's how the liberalization works: CHAPTER II  LIBERAL...

"Will #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics Lower Philippine Gas Prices?

Inquirer Gasoline prices have increased again, haven't they?  A few days ago, I wrote  why #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba's view of gas prices is questionable . Today, I feel like writing this after several complaints on Facebook. I would like to create a follow-up post. People are complaining too much without understanding the real reason why some countries have lower prices of gasoline. Real talk. We need to talk about economic policies,  and  of course, please do a study on supply-demand analysis  on supply chain management . Let's examine the complaints made by Bulatlat Bulatlat Here's a chart from Bulatlat that compares the increase in prices of gasoline between the Philippines, Thailand, and Malaysia. It's always problematic when people ignore simple economics. It's funny, but Bulatlat mentions this on their website: Note also how expensive our diesel and gasoline products are compared to those of our ASEAN neighbors. The estimated common price today of diesel in...

The Good Old Days when Gasoline was Cheaper Under the Late Noynoy Aquino

Millennials' Voice I would like to clarify first and foremost that this post isn't an attempt to say that the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III's legacy was all bad. Some good things happened. However, let me be clear that it's stupid to say, " We don't need economic cha-cha because of the late Noynoy. " However, let me clear that I decided to write this because of a Facebook post called Millennials' Voice , which wrote this: Did you know that during President Noynoy Aquino's time, the price of oil in the world market was high, between $100 and $110 per barrel. But even with those high prices, gasoline and diesel at local pumps in the country were still relatively affordable.  Under President Duterte, world oil prices went up and down, from a low of $41 to a high of $101 per barrel. The big jump to $101 in 2022 happened because of the war between Russia and Ukraine.   Now, under the current president, world oil prices have gone up again to around $...

The Tragic Windfall of the Late Flor Contemplacion's Family

PEH.ph Last year, I wrote an article talking about Flor Contemplacion crybabies spreading fake news for 30 years . I noticed that the movie could be watched for free on YouTube (which is one hour and 52 minutes long), and the one that you had to pay for via rent or personal soft copy ( which is two hours and two minutes long). I was looking into the film and realized the "for free" version lacks the exaggerated water dunking and electrocution torture scene, which I believe is available, which is a ten-minute difference. I remember seeing the old version where Flor was tortured by Singaporean police via water dunking and electrocution, to get an answer out of her. The famous line by the late Nora Aunor was, "I did not kill anybody!" It's 31 years, and I don't expect the fake news about Flor to stop just because  it's past 30. No, fake news is that hard to kill even in the digital age. It reminds me of the fate of Flor's sons , where one of them, Sandr...

Has Passing Down Hatred for Singapore (Because of Flor Contemplacion) Economically Helped the Philippines?

PEH.ph It was on March 17, 1995, when Flor Contemplacion was executed in Singapore. I've noticed that I've been addressing her as the late many times, even if the late is a statement that may be ony appropriate if the person has been recently deceased within 10 years. It's about to become 30 years since Flor was hanged in Singapore. However, generational hatred would've been passed down from 1995 up to 2025. Some people are still tagging #JusticeFor Flor. These traits may be passed down from the Batang 1990s to their children in this generation. It may also be passed down from parent to child, even if the child was born in the 2000s to 2010s. Somebody born in 2000s and beyond might even say, "Papa and mama told me about Flor Contemplacion! That's why I hate Singapore!" Talk about a child born in 2004 who's probably angry with Singapore, because his parents kept telling him about how Flor was supposedly "unjustly treated" over there.  Some tim...