Skip to main content

My Analysis on the Indian Restaurant Boom in Cebu City

I wasn't always a fan of Indian food (at first). I remembered eating in an Indian restaurant before that didn't serve good quality food. However, I had made some friends with some Filipino-Indians during my stay in the University of San Carlos (USC) as a business administration student. I finally at the house of an Indian friend of mine. I tasted some of their food which more mostly meat dishes though I prefer the vegetarian food routine. Some Indian restaurants popped during the 2010s though I preferred halal restaurants. Indian restaurants usually don't serve beef because most of the owners are Hindus. Hindus don't eat beef because cows are considered sacred animals to them. I remembered that some Indians protested against McDonald's due to the beef problem in the international marketing class. As courtesy, please don't ask if there's beef in their restaurant. 

Mr. India, now Bollywood Tandoor

I was soon an MBA student in USC in 2011. Soon enough, Mr. India opened in 2012 in Gaisano Country Mall. The place is owned by Soni Vasnani whose children are rather fluent in Bisaya. The restaurant was a peak of curiosity. I admit, I almost didn't want to try it because of my bad experience in an Indian restaurant I don't want to mention its name. I did try the food there eventually and enjoyed it. 

Later, the Gaisano Country Mall branch shut down some time after I got my MBA degree. Vasnani closed down the branch when he opened Bollywood Tandoor. Speaking of which, the very place where Bollywood Tandoor stands is where Dakimong used to stand. I wonder what led to Dakimong's closure as a foreign investor? Instead, Bollywood Tandoor took over that spot ever since then. I usually ate vegetarian food in Mr. India. Later, I tend to eat vegetarian food in Bollywood Tandoor such as their delicious bindhi masala (Indian pinakbet) and chole batura (a dish made of chickpeas and puffed bread).

I think the reason why Bollywood Tandoor got established was because Mr. India was having too many customers. If there are more customers then it's time to build a bigger place or another branch, right? However, rather than build a branch, they chose to build a bigger venue to accommodate more people. I could remember taking out stuff from Bollywood Tandoor and there were some unused packages of Mr. India used to wrap the goods. I could even remember seeing the Mr. India signboard in an earlier visit set aside. 

The South Indian restaurants popped in

Though, there was the competition of Cherry's the Spice in Banilad too when Bollywood opened. I tried Cherry's the Spice which is Hyderabadi-style cooking. It won several awards in Sun Star. Also, there's Hyderabad Dine-In too. Its owner Reddy Katkuri Prakash serves a different variety--South Indian food. South Indian food has been known to be rather strong. True, customers could have their orders modified for the Filipino taste. The differences can be startling though. South Indian cooking tends to use coconut milk. If I'm not wrong, coconut milk is usually added to South Indian seafood. Personally, I don't really find myself looking for Indian seafood. However, I think a lot of Filipino customers are fond of it based on my observation. It seems that seafood biryani and seafood kebabs are popular choices among Filipinos. I didn't immediately take a liking for South Indian food especially with it being spicier than usual.

At that time, I didn't bother to understand the differences between North Indian and South Indian cooking. It's pretty much like how the lechon in Manila and the lechon in Cebu are prepared differently. Both regions had their differences. So, I ended up realizing that South Indian restaurants may actually prepare meat dishes better. For one, I enjoy South Indian mutton and chicken dishes. The same happened to me when I ate in Bharat Spice in I.T. Park. Bharat Spice is owned by Vijay Vasandani. Bharat Spice's best dishes for me are the mutton and the chicken. I observed that like the previous places--Filipino customers tend to order seafood dishes along with chicken.

I would think there's a feeling of familiarity as to why the South Indian restaurants that serve even more intense food survive. For example, samosa can be called as empanada. Ordering chicken samosa would provide a different twist to the traditional chicken empanada. Couple it along with some fish or shrimp biryani. If I'm not wrong, South Indian lentil masala tends to use coconut milk which some Filipinos cook their mongo (which is also called mung dal, dal is bean in Indian) with coconut milk. The tandoor chicken would be an alternative way to prepare lechon manok with an Indian twist. I guess that these dishes manage to keep Indian restaurants alive--by providing some dishes that are popular among Filipinos. Some of the desserts might feel familiar to Filipinos like payasam is benignit or falooda is halo-halo. Though, the only Indian restaurant I know that serves falooda is Bollywood Tandoor which isn't Hyderabad-style cooking. 

The arrival of the vegetarian restaurant, Little India Healthy Cuisine may also be because of this Indian restaurant boom


Little India Healthy Cuisine is founded by Raj Prasad and his Filipino wife, Mona Prasad. Unlike the other Indian restaurants--they serve sattvic vegetarian meals. Sattvik is the philosophy of eating like a Brahmin or a Yogi. It's also pretty much the diet of the Buddhist monks. That's why the branch in Diliman may also get a visit from Buddhist priests and nuns (who usually prepare Chinese vegetarian food) from time to time. Sattvic also means the complete absence of pungent spices and alcohol. That's why, unlike other Indian restaurants, they also don't serve alcohol.


Pretty much, to understand the concept of sattvic--you may want to listen to this video by the late Ven. Master Sheng Yen. The video discusses why onion and garlic are also not eaten in Buddhist temples. You may want to watch the video first before reading through the next paragraph. If not, then you can go ahead and read. 

The restaurant did manage to click and establish two branches--one in One Pavilion Mall (OPM) and the other in SSY Lahug. Both places are considerably smaller in size than Bollywood Tandoor and Bharat Spice. Like Hyderabad Dine-In (which also opened a branch in Banawa after having a branch in Talamban), the space isn't so huge per branch. I wonder if the owners themselves were aware of the boom in Indian restaurants in Cebu City. I was wondering if the absence of garlic and onion in Little India Healthy Cuisine may have made the taste more tolerable to the Filipino palate. That's just my assumption though that the absence of both spices may have made it milder. Garlic and onion together with garam masala could make an intense combination. 

So, this also provided an alternative path to trying Indian food. For some, Hyderabad-style cooking might be too intense (though you can request for less spicy) so Little India offers a milder option. Not too spicy yet one can enjoy its spice. I think I tend to enjoy the soya meat biryani over the use of real meat for biryani in Indian cuisine. I tend to prefer meatless samosas dipped in tamarind sauce even when I also enjoyed mutton samosa from South Indian restaurants. As of late, I think Indian vegetarian tends to be my favorite as of late. I guess it's because I seek to eat less meat and more vegetables too though I still eat more meat whenever I'm stuck with heavy tasks. As of right now, I personally recommend eating at Little India Healthy Cuisine though I also enjoyed the others too. 
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Real Talk: No MNCs In Their Right Mind, Would Ever AGREE to That Ridiculous 60-40 Proposal

Here's another art I found on Facebook. Some time ago, I wrote about how the 60-40 policy may not prohibit, while still discouraging FDIs from entering . It's plain common sense, really, that nobody would want to rent a space if they had to part with 60% of their net profits to the lessor (read here ).  It annoys me to think that certain Netizens on Facebook are still blaming government corruption over the 60-40 policy. That can get annoying. I can link the 60-40 policy to government corruption . After all, corrupt officials want to perpetuate their stay in power through an ignorant and impoverished population. However, blaming corruption alone is really downright stupid. Some say investors are going to Communist Vietnam because the Communist Party of Vietnam-Vietnam People's Army is serious about cracking corruption. However, the reality is that, ironically, Communist Vietnam has more reasonable economic restrictions compared to the Philippines (read here ). Only a few sec...
Read more

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...
Read more

Kabataan Partylist Seriously Needs to Learn ECONOMICS from the Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth Union

Vietnam National University, Hanoi Kabataan Partylist, is that you? No, it's actually the Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth Union (Đoàn Thanh niên Cộng sản Hồ Chí Minh), or alternatively, it can be called the Vietnam Youth Union . The color blue may remind some of Kabataan Partylist. Both Kabataan Partylist and the Vietnam Youth Union are involved with recruiting youths into the organization. However, there's a crucial difference between Kabataan Partylist and the Youth Union in how they view economics. The  Kabataan Partylist Laguna's blog  even writes this: It believes that the Philippines, as a semi-colonial and semi-feudal country, is plagued by a system which allows foreign and big business interests to dominate, while the majority of our countrymen are left poor and hungry . We are living in a society where foreign subservience, peasant landlessness, and rampant corruption are the top three ills. To that end, Kabataan Party-list strives to galvanize the Filipino youth in u...
Read more

Communist Vietnam's Great Leap Forward in Agricultural Production

I remember reading through Third World to First by the late Lee Kuan Yew. It's very easy to use the book to badmouth the Marcoses but not to learn from the rest of it. The book also talks about Vietnam and LKY's encounter with the late Nguyen Duy Cong aka Do Muoi. It's often said that Singapore only opened because of its lack of natural resources. On the contrary, Do Muoi decided to learn from Singapore how to turn the Communist Party of Vietnam into a powerhouse. Do Muoi, though a communist , was impressed by Singapore during his October 1993 state visit. Vietnam, unlike Singapore, is a country rich in natural resources. The third-world mentality said that MNCs are there to rape the resources .  A very huge misconception especially if you know Singapore's history Some Filipinos on social media even say that FDIs will destroy agriculture and nature. This is a meme by the Philippine Anti-Fascist League on Facebook. They say that FDIs equals environmental degradation. Yet...
Read more

60-40 Foreign Direct Investment Ownership is Nothing More Than OVERPRICED Rent

I'm amazed that there are some people who still insist that the Philippines should retain the 60-40 investment scheme or even lesser shares  ownership for foreign investments. The argument always goes such as (1) Filipinos must be the majority shareholder because it's their country, (2) only foreign investors will get rich if you let them invest in here 100%, and (3) you're basically selling land. This is the problem when people can't tell the difference between shares ownership and land ownership . Shares ownership means owning a percentage of the company. Land ownership is where the land is leased upon. This is where I would like to argue why easing certain foreign investment restrictions is necessary. An illustration that will help see why 60-40 is nothing more than overpriced rent I would like to give this picture. Let's imagine you're a businessman and you're looking for a space to rent. Not everyone is willing to sell their commercial space but there ...
Read more