A business blog by an MBA graduate who's currently no longer interested in getting a Ph.D. This blog aims to share insights into the business world such as investments, economic policies, and more. Feel free to poke around, and learn more about what I have and want to say.
Search This Blog
Why Being a Miser Isn't the Right Way to Do Business or to Live Life
Sometimes, people can confuse frugality with being a miser. I think about a couple of times when I watched Spongebob Squarepants back some time ago and getting irritated at Mr. Krabs. Unfortunately, there are some people who are so obsessed with money (or money comes first) that they end up becoming misers. As I was watching Spongebob while studying to get my bachelor's degree in business administration--I felt that the Krusty Krab model won't work well in real life. I mean, I tend to eat at Jollibee almost daily since I was studying in the University of San Carlos-Main Campus (USC-Main). As I was eating there--I thought would have Tony Tancaktiong build Jollibee as an empire if he was a miser? Mr. Krabs ran his Krusty Krab on a miserly mindset--just one cook and one cashier. Mr. Krabs would even artificially inflate prices just to get more money. In real life, Mr. Krabs should go to jail.
Drawing the line between being thrifty and stingy
It's often easy to confuse both of them. So, we need to draw the difference between them. I was thinking about how it would be to have a stingy parent vs. a thrifty parent. For a stingy spouse, his or her thrifty spouse is extravagant. However, that's very far from it because there's a difference between a thrifty person from an extravagant person. Along the way, I felt going on the middle read of thriftiness though I tend to spend more than others.
Being thrifty means one spends money wisely. For a thrifty person, it would mean being willing to spend more if it will save more money in the long run. A thrifty person would buy a more expensive appliance if it gives good convenience, and service, and is power-efficient. A thrifty person may shun luxury brands because they're overpriced. However, a thrifty person may spend a little more for quality. It's like a person won't buy a luxury car but will spend more on a brand new Toyota car. A thrifty person may buy a brand new nice smartphone but will reject any overpriced smartphone. It's because the person seeks long-term savings even if it means spending more for the moment.
Meanwhile, being stingy is absolutely compromising on need and quality. You can think of a person who has so much money but like in some exaggerated stories--even deprive themselves of their needs. It's like in the children's story of The Miser and His Gold who hid his gold in his backyard than invest it in the bank. Another story has a miser who even doesn't buy new clothes. That would a very sad state because the person only thinks of raking in as much money as possible. It would also go as far as that such a person wants to always sell at a higher price while haggling with others for a lower price. In short, the person puts money above everything else.
The opportunity costs of the miserly lifestyle in contrast to being thrifty
I was thinking of certain fewer episodes of Spongebob that show the opportunity costs of being a miser. True, the cartoon may just be there to give you a laugh (though it's already worn out by now) but you might meet such people who can make some of the mistakes of Mr. Krabs. It had me thinking about how a miserly lifestyle can accumulate opportunity costs. In economics, an opportunity cost is something that you lost when you could've gotten it.
It reminds me of an incident when I decided to invest in AXA. For a miser, insurance is "worthless". For some, they don't even trust the banks so they might be hiding their money under the mattress. During my MBA days, one of the speakers in the financial symposium mentioned that her grandfather kept the money in a safe in the house. It was a truly sad thing since the value of money changes over time. Something considered of high value during the 1970s may no longer be of high value today. I had some toys that cost around PHP 200.00--PHP 300.00 during the 1990s were considered costly. Now, those values are considerably low.
Instead, one can think about a diversified portfolio is the thrifty way to go. The miser may scoff at it as a scam. However, a thrifty person carefully investigates financial companies. For example, a thrifty person dismisses all "too good to be true" promises. Meanwhile, a miser may either buy them in (because of greed) or shun them along with the good financial companies. A thrifty person may decide to put some money in stocks or a managed fund, get some insurance (such as health insurance), and insure as much stuff as possible. A thrifty person may think that stocks can be of higher risk so managed funds can be a good alternative. A thrifty person decides to put some money in this and that bank investment to let it grow.
What would be the big disadvantage of keeping all your money under the mattress or a private safe? Depositing your money in a legitimate bank means there's some form of insurance if ever the bank gets bankrupt. There's also the option to pull out of a bank you know is misusing clients' money for a trustworthy bank like Metrobank or Banco De Oro. Meanwhile, keeping all your money under the mattress or a private safe will mean it rots in there. Not to mention, new currency is printed every now and then. That means the coins and bills need to be changed for them and older currency becomes obsolete. Not to mention, there's no chance to grow at all since banks pay their clients interest since they're practically borrowing money from depositors. That's why banks need to be very wary about who gets loans or does mortgages--it's also to protect clients!
How being thrifty vs. being stingy affects businesses too
I was thinking about how some of the biggest businessmen are philanthropists. Maybe, it's because some of them know what it's like to be poor. For example, the late Henry Sy dealt with shoes before opening SM or how Tony Tancaktiong started small before establishing Jollibee. Some businessmen believe in the power of giving to charity. Some of them even give generous tips and founded their companies hoping to create a future for their employees. These people can easily build a good brand image which will have you coming back for more.
How would being thrifty be good for business? It would be good to live a life built on quality over luxury goods. What's wrong, really, if a wealthy man doesn't wear branded goods or uses an expensive mobile phone? What's wrong if a wealthy businessman chooses to celebrate his parties in private? It's wise to avoid lavish living as that could soon compromise the income. Some businessmen fall down because of lavish living. Living within one's means is advantageous as it generates wealth for the next generation. Teaching the children to do the same might create a future emergency fund for the next generations in contrast to raising spoiled children.
However, why is being a miser a bad way to do business? When a businessman only cares about money--he forgets about that raking in the profits is not a one-man job. Do you think Jollibee will be Jollibee without its entry-level service crew and restaurant managers? Do you think that a factory is a factory without factory workers? A miser would only care about how much money he can save even if the quality is compromised. It's like not spending even on necessities which, in turn, will eventually slow down work processes. It's like refusing to buy newer and better equipment and then complaining why work quality has been bad. It's like refusing to carry out repairs, waiting for the damage to become worse, then stupidly complaining about why the expenses suddenly piled up. In short, being a miser is all about compromising quality so one can save money. However, it means one ends up having opportunity losses out of being a miser. Besides, safety may also be compromised resulting in heavy lawsuits or even jail time in the long run.
This is an interesting drawing I found on Facebook. It's often used to portray people who look at the removal of the unnecessarily restrictive 60-40 shares ownership policy as, "The current president's gift to China." The same was done during former Philippine president Atty. Rodrigo R. Duterte. The same was also done with Philippine President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. It makes me think of stupid comments written by idiots on Facebook. It would be ironic if a lot of anti-FDI and anti-American rants were made not only on Facebook but also were typed using Apple gadgets of all things! They may be quick to use whatever irrational reasons. Some reasons can range from foreigners "unfairly" owning the means to produce equipment (read here ) and that they're simply forced to participate in the capitalist economy model to survive (read here ). However, I must ask if these guys were forced to use the luxury brands they're using (read here ). As the map shows, s
Yesterday was the birthday of former president Carlos P. Garcia, who died in 1971. Garcia is often associated with the Filipino First Policy. Back in the 1990s, I remember how Filipino First Policy was taught in values education classes --never mind the glaring contradictions. The contradictions are that imported equipment was used, or that we can literally never escape the use of imported equipment. I wrote an article discussing why Garcia's Filipino First Policy has no place in the rising Asian Century . I haven't done academic work right now, having been disgruntled by the Filipino education system. Sadly, not even graduate school taught me the basics of stock market investment (such as equity funds) or how Cash 2 Go works. That's why some people say, "It's just a degree!" I often said, "Well your doctor went to college, your lawyer went to college, etc." However, it looks like a college degree may not be for everyone, under K+12! Some people are
Happy Labor Day anyone? It's this time of the year when labor groups like Kilusang Mayo Uno (literally the May One Movement) would protest. They would raise banners demanding #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba. For those who don't speak Tagalog, it means raising salaries and lowering the prices of goods. However, basic cost accounting will tell you that salaries are part of the cost of production . People ignore facts and choose their feelings a lot . I tell them that salaries are part of the cost of production (no need for a Ph. D for that, which I no longer aim to get) but they just sneer at it . They think the government has absolute control over the economy like magic . Members of Filipino labor groups may even say that wage hikes aren't inflationary even when evidence shows otherwise. The Economics Help website presents why doing so can actually worsen inflation: Wage Push Inflation. If labour is able to push for higher wages, despite lower growth, then we could get a combi
Anti-Snowflake Squad Facebook Page I was checking across Facebook and noticed some idiots complaining about Jollibee acquiring companies. The same idiots turned out to be anti-FDI--the same group that converses with Porky Madugo and Mukhang Adik. As usual, I will not directly link the idiots (or even reveal them directly, they will reveal themselves) to avoid giving them clout. Here's a statement by Porky that may make anyone wonder if (1) he knows he's lying (which I think he is for some self-serving reason ), or (2) he doesn't know what he's talking about: The monopolization of business ruins the business. It degrades the quality of the business of a product. If you think monopolization is good, that's stupidity. It kills the competition and it kills the business. Well, as old saying goes: "capitalists are the only one will destroy themselves." Since when did capitalism mean killing competition? Isn't Porky supposedly a die-hard Communist? In the
La Salsa Facebook Page I've eaten at La Salsa Twice. I've tried eating at El Taquito (which is probably no longer operational in Cebu) and El Loco (which closed down years ago). I've eaten the Mexican American style of Red Lizard (read here ). La Salsa Filipino-Mexican Cantina offers a delicious blend of Mexican food for the Filipino customer. It's another experience for delicious Mexican-style cooking. I've tried their beef fajita and enchilada. These are some of my favorite Mexican foods. For my first two dine-ins--I felt the cozy atmosphere of a home . I expected the enchiladas to be thinner but they are thicker. Perhaps, it's a different enchilada than the one I ate years ago. Both are delicious in their own way. I enjoyed the huger serving of enchilada. Right now, it's still the soft opening. Some items won't be available at the moment. Based on my own personal review, I'd recommend this restaurant to anyone who enjoys fusion cooking. I love h
I was looking for a song in relation to the BoPoMoFo. In my case, I'm prone to calling Pinyin "BoPoMoFo" until today (read here ). It's because Pinyin basically serves the same purpose as Zhuyin--teaching one how to read Chinese. I'd like to say that I got too comfortable with this old sequence: I may hate memorizing Zhuyin but I like treating Pinyin in the same sequence. The new table which uses the 23 initials-24 finals method (read here ) can be confusing. Some old-timers may have an easier time transliterating the Zhuyin into Pinyin. However, I still find the new sequence confusing. I may no longer remember Zhuyin (and I kept failing at it and kept memorizing sentences without understanding) but I can remember Pinyin. Except my memorization of the Pinyin was in the BoPoMoFo sequence. With more than a billion Chinese speakers worldwide--can we keep using the old books to teach Mandarin? That's why I wrote about why the old Chinese textbooks can't be us
Atlas Institute for Internal Affairs Happy Double 10 to Taiwan! Chinese Filipino schools would take part in what's often called the Double 10 celebrations. October is the 10th month and it's the 10th day. I remember talking about how Taiwan succeeded by accepting FDIs and how the Filipino First Policy caused us to fail . The typical response I would get on American-made social media (of all places), such as Facebook, would be, "How many times do I need to stress that the Philippines isn't Taiwan. We are the Philippines! We are unique!" If those fools did a study, they may realize that there's a link between the Taiwanese aborigines and the Filipino aborigines (read here ). The Philippines should've learned from Taiwan during COVID-19 One of the best models for fighting COVID-19 was Taiwan. Sure, I'm more in favor of shifting to a parliamentary system and Taiwan is still a presidential country (with parliamentary features). Former Taiwanese president
Philippine Star Is it me or is the Christmas Season really that toxic in the Philippines? I wrote an article about the irony of early Christmas season with late Christmas shopping . I didn't think about writing this but is it me or do people like to ask for impunity during the Christmas season? Think about that toxic former friend or former romantic partner. You cut off that person because of the toxic behavior he or she shows. However, you meet at a public place during the -ber months. The person says, "Let's reconcile! It's Christmas!" I can be open to reconciliation with classmates with who I had a childish quarrel back in high school. So far, one of the people I had a childish grudge wasn't a toxic person. The reason why I feel I can reconcile with that person is because he's productive . The same can't be said for people who have a toxic attitude. What do several Filipinos look forward to during Christmas? Would it be just the spiritual signific