A business blog by an MBA graduate who's currently no longer interested in getting a Ph.D. This blog aims to share insights into the business world such as investments, economic policies, and more. Feel free to poke around, and learn more about what I have and want to say.
Why Being a Miser Isn't the Right Way to Do Business or to Live Life
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
-
Sometimes, people can confuse frugality with being a miser. I think about a couple of times when I watched Spongebob Squarepants back some time ago and getting irritated at Mr. Krabs. Unfortunately, there are some people who are so obsessed with money (or money comes first) that they end up becoming misers. As I was watching Spongebob while studying to get my bachelor's degree in business administration--I felt that the Krusty Krab model won't work well in real life. I mean, I tend to eat at Jollibee almost daily since I was studying in the University of San Carlos-Main Campus (USC-Main). As I was eating there--I thought would have Tony Tancaktiong build Jollibee as an empire if he was a miser? Mr. Krabs ran his Krusty Krab on a miserly mindset--just one cook and one cashier. Mr. Krabs would even artificially inflate prices just to get more money. In real life, Mr. Krabs should go to jail.
Drawing the line between being thrifty and stingy
It's often easy to confuse both of them. So, we need to draw the difference between them. I was thinking about how it would be to have a stingy parent vs. a thrifty parent. For a stingy spouse, his or her thrifty spouse is extravagant. However, that's very far from it because there's a difference between a thrifty person from an extravagant person. Along the way, I felt going on the middle read of thriftiness though I tend to spend more than others.
Being thrifty means one spends money wisely. For a thrifty person, it would mean being willing to spend more if it will save more money in the long run. A thrifty person would buy a more expensive appliance if it gives good convenience, and service, and is power-efficient. A thrifty person may shun luxury brands because they're overpriced. However, a thrifty person may spend a little more for quality. It's like a person won't buy a luxury car but will spend more on a brand new Toyota car. A thrifty person may buy a brand new nice smartphone but will reject any overpriced smartphone. It's because the person seeks long-term savings even if it means spending more for the moment.
Meanwhile, being stingy is absolutely compromising on need and quality. You can think of a person who has so much money but like in some exaggerated stories--even deprive themselves of their needs. It's like in the children's story of The Miser and His Gold who hid his gold in his backyard than invest it in the bank. Another story has a miser who even doesn't buy new clothes. That would a very sad state because the person only thinks of raking in as much money as possible. It would also go as far as that such a person wants to always sell at a higher price while haggling with others for a lower price. In short, the person puts money above everything else.
The opportunity costs of the miserly lifestyle in contrast to being thrifty
I was thinking of certain fewer episodes of Spongebob that show the opportunity costs of being a miser. True, the cartoon may just be there to give you a laugh (though it's already worn out by now) but you might meet such people who can make some of the mistakes of Mr. Krabs. It had me thinking about how a miserly lifestyle can accumulate opportunity costs. In economics, an opportunity cost is something that you lost when you could've gotten it.
It reminds me of an incident when I decided to invest in AXA. For a miser, insurance is "worthless". For some, they don't even trust the banks so they might be hiding their money under the mattress. During my MBA days, one of the speakers in the financial symposium mentioned that her grandfather kept the money in a safe in the house. It was a truly sad thing since the value of money changes over time. Something considered of high value during the 1970s may no longer be of high value today. I had some toys that cost around PHP 200.00--PHP 300.00 during the 1990s were considered costly. Now, those values are considerably low.
Instead, one can think about a diversified portfolio is the thrifty way to go. The miser may scoff at it as a scam. However, a thrifty person carefully investigates financial companies. For example, a thrifty person dismisses all "too good to be true" promises. Meanwhile, a miser may either buy them in (because of greed) or shun them along with the good financial companies. A thrifty person may decide to put some money in stocks or a managed fund, get some insurance (such as health insurance), and insure as much stuff as possible. A thrifty person may think that stocks can be of higher risk so managed funds can be a good alternative. A thrifty person decides to put some money in this and that bank investment to let it grow.
What would be the big disadvantage of keeping all your money under the mattress or a private safe? Depositing your money in a legitimate bank means there's some form of insurance if ever the bank gets bankrupt. There's also the option to pull out of a bank you know is misusing clients' money for a trustworthy bank like Metrobank or Banco De Oro. Meanwhile, keeping all your money under the mattress or a private safe will mean it rots in there. Not to mention, new currency is printed every now and then. That means the coins and bills need to be changed for them and older currency becomes obsolete. Not to mention, there's no chance to grow at all since banks pay their clients interest since they're practically borrowing money from depositors. That's why banks need to be very wary about who gets loans or does mortgages--it's also to protect clients!
How being thrifty vs. being stingy affects businesses too
I was thinking about how some of the biggest businessmen are philanthropists. Maybe, it's because some of them know what it's like to be poor. For example, the late Henry Sy dealt with shoes before opening SM or how Tony Tancaktiong started small before establishing Jollibee. Some businessmen believe in the power of giving to charity. Some of them even give generous tips and founded their companies hoping to create a future for their employees. These people can easily build a good brand image which will have you coming back for more.
How would being thrifty be good for business? It would be good to live a life built on quality over luxury goods. What's wrong, really, if a wealthy man doesn't wear branded goods or uses an expensive mobile phone? What's wrong if a wealthy businessman chooses to celebrate his parties in private? It's wise to avoid lavish living as that could soon compromise the income. Some businessmen fall down because of lavish living. Living within one's means is advantageous as it generates wealth for the next generation. Teaching the children to do the same might create a future emergency fund for the next generations in contrast to raising spoiled children.
However, why is being a miser a bad way to do business? When a businessman only cares about money--he forgets about that raking in the profits is not a one-man job. Do you think Jollibee will be Jollibee without its entry-level service crew and restaurant managers? Do you think that a factory is a factory without factory workers? A miser would only care about how much money he can save even if the quality is compromised. It's like not spending even on necessities which, in turn, will eventually slow down work processes. It's like refusing to buy newer and better equipment and then complaining why work quality has been bad. It's like refusing to carry out repairs, waiting for the damage to become worse, then stupidly complaining about why the expenses suddenly piled up. In short, being a miser is all about compromising quality so one can save money. However, it means one ends up having opportunity losses out of being a miser. Besides, safety may also be compromised resulting in heavy lawsuits or even jail time in the long run.
Financially Fat I was partly inspired by Odette to write this blog. It was during Odette that I realized (at a whole new level) that complacency is deadly . The picture above on the Financially Fat Facebook page may seem funny. However, this is also written on the Facebook page: We’ve romanticized resilience for far too long. . In the Philippines, or even in international media, “Filipino resilience” is often praised after every typhoon, flood, or crisis. Smiling through hardship. Laughing amidst loss. It sounds inspiring—until you realize it’s also become an excuse . . An excuse for poor disaster response. An excuse for subpar infrastructure. An excuse to stop holding leaders accountable. . We shouldn’t glorify the ability to endure what no one should be enduring in the first place . . Resilience should not replace responsibility. Hope should not replace action. And smiles should not replace solutions. . It’s time we stop clapping for survival—and start demanding systems that pre...
I remember Cebu City had severe flood warning going on . I saw some stores at Carbon in Cebu City, getting severely flooded . It was a real nightmare as Typhoon Crising also passed by Cebu. The sight was a disaster. Flooding in Carbon doesn't surprise me. There are a lot of unsavory people in Cebu City's downtown. It's a disgusting thing when I think about stepping on whatever disgusting stuff, that was improperly disposed of. I would talk stuff like, "It's because of people like you that the Philippines doesn't improve!" It's not surprising to find the news that garbage has been a leading culprit. The government may have some responsibility. However, citizens who love to throw their garbage just anywhere also form part of the problem. Social responsibility falls on both the government and the citizens. Sure, the government has to play its part (ex., making clear policies). However, the citizens should also play their part by not throwing garbage in i...
Yawn! Annoyed! These fake game ads need to stop . These deceptive ads should be deemed illegal. The most recent super annoying ad that I've been saying lately is Gossip Harbor . If it's too good to be true, don't believe it! The ad promised that it was free, with no ads, and that those who downloaded it would receive a free gift of USD 100.00. Doesn't that sound too good to be true? I decided not to download it, since I was fearful that Gossip Harbor may contain some dangerous malware . The ad, featuring a Caucasian man saying the stuff I just mentioned earlier, was too good to be true . What might be driving companies to make these super annoying fake game ads? Yes, they get super annoying . Come on, it's just plain common sense . Why are these game ads always showing someone playing a basic game, and screwing up ? When you download, you get something completely different . The Udonis blog gives this possible reason behind the fake ads: Frustration Bait (a.k.a. ...
Make no mistake that I didn't vote for Robin Padilla. I feel like I've had enough of voting for celebrities, athletes, and those who I felt are know-nothings in the legislative. However, Padilla recently had his proposal to remove the 60-40 restrictions regarding foreign direct investments (FDIs) . Former Philippine Vice President Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo was even in favor of that amendment. I guess that's why Philippine economist Andrew James Masigan endorsed Robredo. I may have not endorsed Robredo while Masigan remains to be one of my favorite local sources. The news from GMA News Online reveals these plans by Padilla himself: Senator Robin Padilla said he wanted to revise the Constitution to scrap the 60-40 rule on foreign ownership of businesses to accelerate job creation and competition among industries . In a Monday interview, Padilla said the move would attract more foreign investments to support the country’s economic recovery. “Para sa akin mas...
Vietnam is now enjoying the benefits of open FDI Source: Quan Doi Nhan Dan Some fools on Facebook are using Vietnam as a reason why the Philippines shouldn't open to FDI. The Philippine Anti-Fascist League (whose original Facebook page has been deleted) spread the misinformation that Vietnam progressed through protectionism. According to PAFL--Vietnam's real "FDI" is in distributing its products worldwide and not by accepting FDI. The idea is absurd on so many levels. Why would countries around the world want to buy Vietnamese products if Vietnam wouldn't even allow their MNCs to do business in Vietnam?! Instead of listening to what fools say that Vietnam is a protectionist country, let's dig into an important part of its history. This important part of its history is called Doi Moi--which literally translates to restoration . Before that, I encourage you to read my article on why using Vietnam as an excuse against economic charter change for the Philippines, ...
It's one thing to criticize presidents for their performance. It's another without analyzing the data. Sure, we need to study mathematics but the way it's presented can be a reason why it's hated. I felt that high school mathematics focused too much on numbers. Mathematics, in all its aspects, is part of life. Trigonometry is part of life. Calculus is part of life. Statistics is part of life. Speaking of statistics, I was thinking about how IBON Foundation has given its assessment of Duterte's administration. This isn't to say that outgoing President Rodrigo R. Duterte hasn't made mistakes. Rather, this is to point out how IBON Foundation has that tendency to be illogical. IBON Foundation (click to enlarge) This data by IBON Foundation was gathered. I'm not saying that the figures are lies or manipulated. My problem with how IBON Foundation works is their failure to account for the cause and effect more often than not. Malaya Business Insight It's ...
This has to be one of the most annoying scams ever. I may be in favor of SIM registration but you must realize it only reduces the chances of scams. Some people may still undergo the black part, buy multiple SIM cards, and not register them. Some of them may be hacked. However, without a SIM registration, I believe these SIMs can easily be blocked and marked as scams. Though, it might take more technology to trace them back. Right now, this is what's called the One Ring Phone Scam reported last June 2023. How One Ring Phone Scam works Scammers will typically use an auto-dialer to make mass international calls to numerous people at once . Spoofed phone numbers will be used to seem legitimate in the caller ID display. They will only allow the phone to ring once then hang up, prompting a missed call notification on your end . If you call back, you risk being connected to an automated machine that will either ask you to stay on the line or connect you to a premium-rate number without ...
It's funny how I look at Facebook and find several ironic things. A few years back, there was a Facebook page that I think was called Heneral Luna (General Luna) . It had a meme that mentioned that the first world countries didn't become industrialized by accepting FDIs but through a land reform where the small businesses were protected from foreigners. It was claimed that's where the first-world countries reformed. My answer to that is baloney . The meme above this paragraph was from the 1987 Philippine Consh*tution page. Note that I decided to do some censoring because a bad word is being used. Yet, I can't help but use the page to illustrate a point. This "Heneral Luna" page on Facebook (now even called Heneral Lunatic since the ideas spelled are lunacy at their finest ) can be easily debunked with proper research. We also have the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (PAFL) with its idiotic leftist memes and support for the late terrorist Jose Maria Sison. I cou...
There's no denying that we're in the Asian century. We have the rise of Mandarin as one of the major languages of the world. In fact, it's the second most spoken language. However, I feel Chinese schools in the Philippines weren't exactly prepared to teach Chinese--only how to memorize without understanding. That's exactly why I didn't like the Chinese language subject. If there was one thing I hated about the Chinese language subject--it was the use of zhuyin. The use of Romanizing wasn't allowed. I could agree to learn to read the characters. However, Zhuyin may not be the best course of action in regard to the international community . I even feel that Zhuyin (a subject I hated) may be as obsolete as the Filipino ancient alphabet. It wasn't until college that I got into pinyin. People had been checking out Taiwanese entertainment. I remembered Googling and found Romanized lyrics. Those who were college students in the 2000s (under the K+10) may remem...
This just in, Kabataan Partylist member Atty. Renee Louise M. Co says what the late Lee Kuan Yew would call third-world mentality . I'd like ot translate what Louise here is saying, because not everyone who reads my blog speaks Tagalog: Don't use the West Philippine Sea issue to deceive the public into supporting Cha-Cha (charterchange) This this clout chasing at its worse. We don't want foreign control of our seas. However, when charter change is passed, it will give way to 100% ownership to key industries, like utilities, land, schools, media, and other parts of the economy. Economic cha-cha backstabs our national sovereignty. Kabataan Partylist is committing a false dilemma. A false dilemma is defined as: Description: When only two choices are presented yet more exist, or a spectrum of possible choices exists between two extremes . False dilemmas are usually characterized by “either this or that” language, but can also be characterized by omi...
Comments
Post a Comment