A business blog by an MBA graduate who's currently no longer interested in getting a Ph.D. This blog aims to share insights into the business world such as investments, economic policies, and more. Feel free to poke around, and learn more about what I have and want to say.
Search This Blog
Why Being a Miser Isn't the Right Way to Do Business or to Live Life
Sometimes, people can confuse frugality with being a miser. I think about a couple of times when I watched Spongebob Squarepants back some time ago and getting irritated at Mr. Krabs. Unfortunately, there are some people who are so obsessed with money (or money comes first) that they end up becoming misers. As I was watching Spongebob while studying to get my bachelor's degree in business administration--I felt that the Krusty Krab model won't work well in real life. I mean, I tend to eat at Jollibee almost daily since I was studying in the University of San Carlos-Main Campus (USC-Main). As I was eating there--I thought would have Tony Tancaktiong build Jollibee as an empire if he was a miser? Mr. Krabs ran his Krusty Krab on a miserly mindset--just one cook and one cashier. Mr. Krabs would even artificially inflate prices just to get more money. In real life, Mr. Krabs should go to jail.
Drawing the line between being thrifty and stingy
It's often easy to confuse both of them. So, we need to draw the difference between them. I was thinking about how it would be to have a stingy parent vs. a thrifty parent. For a stingy spouse, his or her thrifty spouse is extravagant. However, that's very far from it because there's a difference between a thrifty person from an extravagant person. Along the way, I felt going on the middle read of thriftiness though I tend to spend more than others.
Being thrifty means one spends money wisely. For a thrifty person, it would mean being willing to spend more if it will save more money in the long run. A thrifty person would buy a more expensive appliance if it gives good convenience, and service, and is power-efficient. A thrifty person may shun luxury brands because they're overpriced. However, a thrifty person may spend a little more for quality. It's like a person won't buy a luxury car but will spend more on a brand new Toyota car. A thrifty person may buy a brand new nice smartphone but will reject any overpriced smartphone. It's because the person seeks long-term savings even if it means spending more for the moment.
Meanwhile, being stingy is absolutely compromising on need and quality. You can think of a person who has so much money but like in some exaggerated stories--even deprive themselves of their needs. It's like in the children's story of The Miser and His Gold who hid his gold in his backyard than invest it in the bank. Another story has a miser who even doesn't buy new clothes. That would a very sad state because the person only thinks of raking in as much money as possible. It would also go as far as that such a person wants to always sell at a higher price while haggling with others for a lower price. In short, the person puts money above everything else.
The opportunity costs of the miserly lifestyle in contrast to being thrifty
I was thinking of certain fewer episodes of Spongebob that show the opportunity costs of being a miser. True, the cartoon may just be there to give you a laugh (though it's already worn out by now) but you might meet such people who can make some of the mistakes of Mr. Krabs. It had me thinking about how a miserly lifestyle can accumulate opportunity costs. In economics, an opportunity cost is something that you lost when you could've gotten it.
It reminds me of an incident when I decided to invest in AXA. For a miser, insurance is "worthless". For some, they don't even trust the banks so they might be hiding their money under the mattress. During my MBA days, one of the speakers in the financial symposium mentioned that her grandfather kept the money in a safe in the house. It was a truly sad thing since the value of money changes over time. Something considered of high value during the 1970s may no longer be of high value today. I had some toys that cost around PHP 200.00--PHP 300.00 during the 1990s were considered costly. Now, those values are considerably low.
Instead, one can think about a diversified portfolio is the thrifty way to go. The miser may scoff at it as a scam. However, a thrifty person carefully investigates financial companies. For example, a thrifty person dismisses all "too good to be true" promises. Meanwhile, a miser may either buy them in (because of greed) or shun them along with the good financial companies. A thrifty person may decide to put some money in stocks or a managed fund, get some insurance (such as health insurance), and insure as much stuff as possible. A thrifty person may think that stocks can be of higher risk so managed funds can be a good alternative. A thrifty person decides to put some money in this and that bank investment to let it grow.
What would be the big disadvantage of keeping all your money under the mattress or a private safe? Depositing your money in a legitimate bank means there's some form of insurance if ever the bank gets bankrupt. There's also the option to pull out of a bank you know is misusing clients' money for a trustworthy bank like Metrobank or Banco De Oro. Meanwhile, keeping all your money under the mattress or a private safe will mean it rots in there. Not to mention, new currency is printed every now and then. That means the coins and bills need to be changed for them and older currency becomes obsolete. Not to mention, there's no chance to grow at all since banks pay their clients interest since they're practically borrowing money from depositors. That's why banks need to be very wary about who gets loans or does mortgages--it's also to protect clients!
How being thrifty vs. being stingy affects businesses too
I was thinking about how some of the biggest businessmen are philanthropists. Maybe, it's because some of them know what it's like to be poor. For example, the late Henry Sy dealt with shoes before opening SM or how Tony Tancaktiong started small before establishing Jollibee. Some businessmen believe in the power of giving to charity. Some of them even give generous tips and founded their companies hoping to create a future for their employees. These people can easily build a good brand image which will have you coming back for more.
How would being thrifty be good for business? It would be good to live a life built on quality over luxury goods. What's wrong, really, if a wealthy man doesn't wear branded goods or uses an expensive mobile phone? What's wrong if a wealthy businessman chooses to celebrate his parties in private? It's wise to avoid lavish living as that could soon compromise the income. Some businessmen fall down because of lavish living. Living within one's means is advantageous as it generates wealth for the next generation. Teaching the children to do the same might create a future emergency fund for the next generations in contrast to raising spoiled children.
However, why is being a miser a bad way to do business? When a businessman only cares about money--he forgets about that raking in the profits is not a one-man job. Do you think Jollibee will be Jollibee without its entry-level service crew and restaurant managers? Do you think that a factory is a factory without factory workers? A miser would only care about how much money he can save even if the quality is compromised. It's like not spending even on necessities which, in turn, will eventually slow down work processes. It's like refusing to buy newer and better equipment and then complaining why work quality has been bad. It's like refusing to carry out repairs, waiting for the damage to become worse, then stupidly complaining about why the expenses suddenly piled up. In short, being a miser is all about compromising quality so one can save money. However, it means one ends up having opportunity losses out of being a miser. Besides, safety may also be compromised resulting in heavy lawsuits or even jail time in the long run.
I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei? A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...
Yes, it's been a day since Typhoon Tino. It was a stormy, scary time, and I thought about how expenses were piling up after I was hit by Typhoon Odette . Thankfully, I had contingency savings at that time. However, with Uswan moving upwards and entering another area of the Philippine Area of Responsibility, I considered the issue of emergency savings. I thought about how Christmas can be the most stressful time of the year, with issues such as traffic caused by last-minute Christmas shopping . This time, I thought about some not-so-surprising statistics on Filipinos. It turns out that only 2/10 Filipinos have enough emergency savings . This should be considered disturbing, and this is another thing I failed to consider in my younger, more foolish years, according to the Philippine Star : Commissioned by insurance firm EastWest Ageas, the PURPLE Report conducted by consumer intelligence company NielsenIQ showed that most Filipinos only have P50,000 in emerg...
Philippine Star Updated January 25, 2025 This may be a touchy post. Politics is often a source of fights during parties. That's why we're told not to talk about politics during parties. Unfortunately, some people on Facebook are now using the late Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino Jr. as an excuse not to execute even economic charter change. Never mind that blatant supporter of Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo, Andrew James Masigan, supports economic charter change . The late Charles Edward P. Celdran was also an anti-Duterte critic. As I looked at some okay boomer posts, I'm not surprised at people who still use Noynoy as an excuse to shout with all their might, "No to economic charter change!" Somebody posted on Facebook the following. As always, I won't publicly shame anyone. If possible, I will only refer to them by codenames or use the name Anonymous. I want to remain as professional as possible. This person said that under N...
Happy Halloween, I guess? I decided to write this article just today to tackle scare tactics against economic liberalization. A scare tactic is defined as a strategy intended to manipulate public opinion about a particular issue by arousing fear or alarm. Economic liberalization is defined by Investopedia as: Trade liberalization is the removal or reduction of restrictions or barriers on the free exchange of goods between nations. These barriers include tariffs, such as duties and surcharges, and nontariff barriers, such as licensing rules and quotas. Economists often view the easing or eradication of these restrictions as steps to promote free trade. This is also where we have free trade . I've read protectionist scare tactics during the times of former Philippine presidents, the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino, and Rodrigo R. Duterte. I found a lot on Facebook and Twitter . It's not uncommon really that stupid people abound on social media and write the stupidest thin...
I advocate for helping others. I believe in helping others but there were times I overdid it. One time, I gave up so much that I had to be stopped. I was told, "If you gave everything now, how can you help others later?" I would donate some sums here and there, without thinking much. I'm not going to write them all. Some of them left me good while others left a bad taste (and a bad record) for me to endure. Sure, I want to help people but I tend to overlook the consequences. Some of the bad habits I had in the name of helping others are like: Being too generous with buying with credit. Eventually, I lost a lot of money which was never recovered . Some seasoned entrepreneurs may admit their own falls including the credit trap pitfall. Being too willing to give a discount without thinking about how it'd affect profits. Sure, a cheap price can draw people near. However, there are times when the prices of goods and services need to be raised to keep a business running. I ...
I think one of the things I want to write about education right now is the problem of too much homework . It almost didn't matter which school you went to in the Philippines or in some area--there's hardly a policy that discourages the regulation of homework. I'm not saying that homework should be abolished altogether compared to class ranking. I still think that regulated homework is the key. The benefits of homework are told by the Global Indian International School from Singapore: What is the Purpose of Homework? Homework is an essential part of every student's education. The purpose of homework for students is to practice what they have learned in class . It also gives students an opportunity to practice time management skills . Homework can also help build character by teaching children how to cope with frustration and how to manage their stress levels when they encounter difficulties or setbacks . Homework is a part of the school day, but it's also a huge p...
DSWD Field Office 7 - Central Visayas It's disheartening to know that after the Bogo earthquake in Cebu last September 30, 2025. Today, an earthquake Davao Oriental this day on October 10, 2025. It's sad to think that today is October 10, which is the Double 10 celebration for Taiwan . Right now, it's effortless for fools on Facebook (which is ironic) giving anti-capitalist, anti-business rants, never mind that even Vietnam is no longer solely dependent on State-Owned Enterprises! Instead, it made me think of the COVID-19 incident all over again, such as how Foodpanda and Grab, both foreign delivery services , have been helpful to Filipino businesses . Some idiots said on Facebook (and as always, I will not mention their names, they're public figures ) that it is the workers who did the work, not the owners, and that the government should provide everything. One crazy comment I got from someone on Facebook was, "Why should there be private enterprises? The DSWD is ...
Business World Online I was looking at the election results where Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. and Sara Duterte-Carpio are in the lead. Right now, the Philippine Stock Exchange Index (PSEi) is open but mostly in red . It's very common to see panic such as when the war in Ukraine started (and no, Vladimir Putin isn't investing in Ukraine, he's invading it). It's very easy to get carried by hearsay. However, we need to listen to the experts about stock market crashes and how to maneuver the recent crisis. We need to talk with the experts rather than the gossipmongers on social media such as Twitter and Facebook to get answers. Learning from Warren Buffett over social media naysayers One such experienced businessman is Warren Buffett. Buffett himself is a stock market legend. If I keep listening to the naysayers then I get nothing profitable. The Buffalo News reveals Buffett's three reasons not to worry about something like the current PSEi being mostly in red: 1. Investing...
Moneymax I could remember the pandemic when ordering from GrabFood and Foodpanda became the thing. The COVID-19 pandemic would've totally stifled the restaurant and food businesses, especially before the vaccinations. Right now, I've had my three Pfizer shots in total. As restaurants began to re-open, dine-in was still strictly not allowed until a certain percentage of Cebu City was vaccinated. I began to order some food whenever I need to (or want to) even with such limited choices. This had me thinking about how imported services can help local businesses. Whether those "nationalists" want to admit it or not--neither GrabFood nor Foodpanda are founded by Filipinos. Instead, GrabFood is founded in Singapore and Foodpanda is founded in Berlin, Germany. If it wasn't for the fall of the Berlin Wall--there would be no Foopanda. Back then, I remembered dining in my favorite local restaurants. However, the delivery service came and there were times I felt too lazy to ...
A very huge misconception especially if you know Singapore's history Some time ago, I decided to write about how foreign direct investments (FDIs) doesn't always mean environmental destruction . I would like to write this post about FDIs and multinational corporations (MNCs). I don't deny that some businesses just fail to uphold environmentally-friendly practices. That's why I also wrote about the importance of going green in doing businesses . Money is only worth it if there are forests to supply trees, there's delicious fish to eat because of clean streams, there's clean drinking water to buy, and the environment is well-taken care of. My money will have its value if I can go to a beach resort that uses its earnings to preserve the cleanliness of the place. Money becomes worthless when there's nothing of value to exchange it with. Poisoned rivers, massive deforestation, etc. will definitely make money worthless . That's why the late Lee Kuan Yew also d...
Comments
Post a Comment