A business blog by an MBA graduate who's currently no longer interested in getting a Ph.D. This blog aims to share insights into the business world such as investments, economic policies, and more. Feel free to poke around, and learn more about what I have and want to say.
Why Being a Miser Isn't the Right Way to Do Business or to Live Life
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
-
Sometimes, people can confuse frugality with being a miser. I think about a couple of times when I watched Spongebob Squarepants back some time ago and getting irritated at Mr. Krabs. Unfortunately, there are some people who are so obsessed with money (or money comes first) that they end up becoming misers. As I was watching Spongebob while studying to get my bachelor's degree in business administration--I felt that the Krusty Krab model won't work well in real life. I mean, I tend to eat at Jollibee almost daily since I was studying in the University of San Carlos-Main Campus (USC-Main). As I was eating there--I thought would have Tony Tancaktiong build Jollibee as an empire if he was a miser? Mr. Krabs ran his Krusty Krab on a miserly mindset--just one cook and one cashier. Mr. Krabs would even artificially inflate prices just to get more money. In real life, Mr. Krabs should go to jail.
Drawing the line between being thrifty and stingy
It's often easy to confuse both of them. So, we need to draw the difference between them. I was thinking about how it would be to have a stingy parent vs. a thrifty parent. For a stingy spouse, his or her thrifty spouse is extravagant. However, that's very far from it because there's a difference between a thrifty person from an extravagant person. Along the way, I felt going on the middle read of thriftiness though I tend to spend more than others.
Being thrifty means one spends money wisely. For a thrifty person, it would mean being willing to spend more if it will save more money in the long run. A thrifty person would buy a more expensive appliance if it gives good convenience, and service, and is power-efficient. A thrifty person may shun luxury brands because they're overpriced. However, a thrifty person may spend a little more for quality. It's like a person won't buy a luxury car but will spend more on a brand new Toyota car. A thrifty person may buy a brand new nice smartphone but will reject any overpriced smartphone. It's because the person seeks long-term savings even if it means spending more for the moment.
Meanwhile, being stingy is absolutely compromising on need and quality. You can think of a person who has so much money but like in some exaggerated stories--even deprive themselves of their needs. It's like in the children's story of The Miser and His Gold who hid his gold in his backyard than invest it in the bank. Another story has a miser who even doesn't buy new clothes. That would a very sad state because the person only thinks of raking in as much money as possible. It would also go as far as that such a person wants to always sell at a higher price while haggling with others for a lower price. In short, the person puts money above everything else.
The opportunity costs of the miserly lifestyle in contrast to being thrifty
I was thinking of certain fewer episodes of Spongebob that show the opportunity costs of being a miser. True, the cartoon may just be there to give you a laugh (though it's already worn out by now) but you might meet such people who can make some of the mistakes of Mr. Krabs. It had me thinking about how a miserly lifestyle can accumulate opportunity costs. In economics, an opportunity cost is something that you lost when you could've gotten it.
It reminds me of an incident when I decided to invest in AXA. For a miser, insurance is "worthless". For some, they don't even trust the banks so they might be hiding their money under the mattress. During my MBA days, one of the speakers in the financial symposium mentioned that her grandfather kept the money in a safe in the house. It was a truly sad thing since the value of money changes over time. Something considered of high value during the 1970s may no longer be of high value today. I had some toys that cost around PHP 200.00--PHP 300.00 during the 1990s were considered costly. Now, those values are considerably low.
Instead, one can think about a diversified portfolio is the thrifty way to go. The miser may scoff at it as a scam. However, a thrifty person carefully investigates financial companies. For example, a thrifty person dismisses all "too good to be true" promises. Meanwhile, a miser may either buy them in (because of greed) or shun them along with the good financial companies. A thrifty person may decide to put some money in stocks or a managed fund, get some insurance (such as health insurance), and insure as much stuff as possible. A thrifty person may think that stocks can be of higher risk so managed funds can be a good alternative. A thrifty person decides to put some money in this and that bank investment to let it grow.
What would be the big disadvantage of keeping all your money under the mattress or a private safe? Depositing your money in a legitimate bank means there's some form of insurance if ever the bank gets bankrupt. There's also the option to pull out of a bank you know is misusing clients' money for a trustworthy bank like Metrobank or Banco De Oro. Meanwhile, keeping all your money under the mattress or a private safe will mean it rots in there. Not to mention, new currency is printed every now and then. That means the coins and bills need to be changed for them and older currency becomes obsolete. Not to mention, there's no chance to grow at all since banks pay their clients interest since they're practically borrowing money from depositors. That's why banks need to be very wary about who gets loans or does mortgages--it's also to protect clients!
How being thrifty vs. being stingy affects businesses too
I was thinking about how some of the biggest businessmen are philanthropists. Maybe, it's because some of them know what it's like to be poor. For example, the late Henry Sy dealt with shoes before opening SM or how Tony Tancaktiong started small before establishing Jollibee. Some businessmen believe in the power of giving to charity. Some of them even give generous tips and founded their companies hoping to create a future for their employees. These people can easily build a good brand image which will have you coming back for more.
How would being thrifty be good for business? It would be good to live a life built on quality over luxury goods. What's wrong, really, if a wealthy man doesn't wear branded goods or uses an expensive mobile phone? What's wrong if a wealthy businessman chooses to celebrate his parties in private? It's wise to avoid lavish living as that could soon compromise the income. Some businessmen fall down because of lavish living. Living within one's means is advantageous as it generates wealth for the next generation. Teaching the children to do the same might create a future emergency fund for the next generations in contrast to raising spoiled children.
However, why is being a miser a bad way to do business? When a businessman only cares about money--he forgets about that raking in the profits is not a one-man job. Do you think Jollibee will be Jollibee without its entry-level service crew and restaurant managers? Do you think that a factory is a factory without factory workers? A miser would only care about how much money he can save even if the quality is compromised. It's like not spending even on necessities which, in turn, will eventually slow down work processes. It's like refusing to buy newer and better equipment and then complaining why work quality has been bad. It's like refusing to carry out repairs, waiting for the damage to become worse, then stupidly complaining about why the expenses suddenly piled up. In short, being a miser is all about compromising quality so one can save money. However, it means one ends up having opportunity losses out of being a miser. Besides, safety may also be compromised resulting in heavy lawsuits or even jail time in the long run.
Bombo Radyo Cebu Today is National Heroes Day 2025. Why do I feel that Buwan ng Wika (National Language Month), alternatively called Buwan ng Kasaysayan (National History Month), has been used to justify the Filipino First Policy, which caused the Philippines to fail? Some time ago, and it wasn't Buwan ng Wika, I actually wrote an entry begging Filipinos to abandon the thought that foreign investors are foreign invaders . Whether we want to admit it or not, even the meaning of the words investor and invader are too different. A simple dictionary definition would show that investor and invader are two different words . An investor is "a person or group of people that puts its money into a business or other organization in order to make a profit:", according to the Cambridge Dictionary . Meanwhile, the Cambridge Dictionary defines invader as "an army or country that uses force to enter and take control of another country:". Big difference! Get more dictionaries ...
I wrote a post where I discussed whether or not Alice Guo (and I heard her real name is supposedly Guo Hua Ping) should be a reason to say "No to economic charter change." A certain idiot I've dubbed Porky Madugo even wrote this on his Facebook account: Back on topic, I would like to emphasize that the Filipino First Policy may actually be encouraging dummy investors instead of discouraging them. Some people may use Alice to say, "See, I told you so, you (insert demeaning name)! If Alice can enter so easily, what about we allow 100% FDI and China buy us all!" That's the logic of that certain Porky Madugo, whose name and picture I blocked, despite my immense dislike for his stupidity. If Alice has been faking it by lying she's a Filipino citizen (and sadly, this incident has been used to justify hatred against Chinese Filipinos), then the real root cause is this. The Filipino First Policy makes it too difficult for foreigners to do business in the Phili...
Philippine Anti-Fascist League Above is a meme found on Facebook that I'd dare say reflect epic levels of ignorance. The picture above represents the Spanish conquest of the Philippines. The Philippines was under the Spanish Empire for nearly 300 years. The Philippines gained independence from Spain on June 12, 1898, and from the United States of America (USA) on July 12, 1948. Basic Philippine history has proven that the natives of the Philippines (before being called Filipinos) have been trading with various foreigners before colonization. The Chinese traded with Filipino natives before they were dubbed Filipinos. Did the Chinese Emperor or the Chinese Empire ever have control over the Philippines because of trading? There is no history in China where the Philippines was once a colony of China before Spain took it over. The Chinese merchants were only interested in trading, not conquering, the 7,107 islands that were later collectively named the Philippines after King Philip of...
Art by Hugo Yunzon It's finally August or Buwan Ng Wika (Month of the Language), though it may be better to call it Buwan Ng Kultura (Month of the Culture). Buwan Ng Wika programs tend to focus more on the uniqueness of several types of Filipino people. What I recall back in my high school days (late 1990s) is how I was asked to play an "American" in a Buwan Ng Wika program. There were also other people asked to portray the Chinese traders, Arab traders, Indian traders, and the Japanese occupation. It would be good to do a review of the pre-colonial Philippines. The name Philippines was derived from the Spanish king, King Philip. Back then, the natives were called Indios which sounds very similar to Indonesia . Yes, most Filipinos are either Malay or Indo. A look at the Indonesians and Malaysians would have one mistake them for Filipinos. A note is that the Chinese population there usually speaks Hokkien. From Purdue Filpino --here's some basic information about Fili...
Washington Times It's really entertaining (while it can also be frustrating ) dealing with economic neanderthals from my own country. Such people operate on what I call "Pinoy Pride Economics", never mind its high socio-economic post (read here ). I ended up remembering the now-defunct Philippine Anti-Fascist League old page (and the new page is barely getting any views), which I believe is run by a group of Gen-Z brats blaming the USA for Venezuela's plight. I went Googling and found out that six years ago, President Nicolas Maduro showed he might be the champion of blaming other countries for his own country's poverty. This incident was a massive blackout that hit Venezuela in 2019 . The news from CNN gives this detail why Maduro might win any blame contest if there was one: As the March outages left the country in the dark, Caracas saw dueling protests by supporters of Maduro and of opposition leader Juan Guaidó, who has been recognized as Venezuela’s interi...
I advocate for helping others. I believe in helping others but there were times I overdid it. One time, I gave up so much that I had to be stopped. I was told, "If you gave everything now, how can you help others later?" I would donate some sums here and there, without thinking much. I'm not going to write them all. Some of them left me good while others left a bad taste (and a bad record) for me to endure. Sure, I want to help people but I tend to overlook the consequences. Some of the bad habits I had in the name of helping others are like: Being too generous with buying with credit. Eventually, I lost a lot of money which was never recovered . Some seasoned entrepreneurs may admit their own falls including the credit trap pitfall. Being too willing to give a discount without thinking about how it'd affect profits. Sure, a cheap price can draw people near. However, there are times when the prices of goods and services need to be raised to keep a business running. I ...
Make no mistake that I didn't vote for Robin Padilla. I feel like I've had enough of voting for celebrities, athletes, and those who I felt are know-nothings in the legislative. However, Padilla recently had his proposal to remove the 60-40 restrictions regarding foreign direct investments (FDIs) . Former Philippine Vice President Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo was even in favor of that amendment. I guess that's why Philippine economist Andrew James Masigan endorsed Robredo. I may have not endorsed Robredo while Masigan remains to be one of my favorite local sources. The news from GMA News Online reveals these plans by Padilla himself: Senator Robin Padilla said he wanted to revise the Constitution to scrap the 60-40 rule on foreign ownership of businesses to accelerate job creation and competition among industries . In a Monday interview, Padilla said the move would attract more foreign investments to support the country’s economic recovery. “Para sa akin mas...
I remembered Chatime became my first favorite tea franchise. Sure, there was Moonleaf near the University of San Carlos-Main Campus (USC-Main) which I wonder if it's still open now. Though, Chatime quickly became my personal favorite for a reason. The one I'm most familiar with is the branch in I.T Park which quickly became my after-meal beverage at times. Chatime is a worldwide franchise' in the Philippine business environment Chatime's history is described as follows by U-Franchise which I'll give an excerpt: Since 2005, Chatime franchise has been serving millions of customers with their favorite cup of tea, making it part of every occasion, celebration or simply cupping a busy day at work. Chatime was founded in Taiwan in 2005 and in 2011 opened its doors in the Philippines. With a commitment to a quality of ingredients and mix-ins and a flare for innovative flavor combinations, we set out to brew nothing but the very best bubble teas. Chatime has now opened mor...
One of the greatest news for the Philippines is the Public Service Act of 2022. The following can be read from the Philippine News Agency regarding President Rodrigo R. Duterte's signing of the new law into action: President Rodrigo Roa Duterte on Monday signed into law a measure amending the Public Service Act (PSA), allowing up to 100 percent foreign ownership of public services in the country. Republic Act (RA) No. 11659 or "An Act Amending Commonwealth Act No. 146 otherwise known as the Public Service Act” as amended was signed by Duterte in a ceremony at the Rizal Hall, Malacañan Palace in the presence of lawmakers and other officials. Under the amended PSA, the telecommunications, railways, expressways, airports, and shipping industries will be considered public services, allowing up to 100 percent foreign ownership in these sectors. Duterte also led the ceremonial presentation of newly enacted laws namely RA 11647 which amends the Foreign Investments Act; RA 11650, whic...
The decades of Filipino First Policy really need a clean-up, right? It's really amazing how some people keep blaming the US for Venezuela's current situation. What's next? Will they blame China and South Korea for North Korea being poor? I wrote an article where I discussed Venezuela's pride and protectionism . One of the many sources I cited discussed how frequent blackouts caused Venezuelans to eat rotten meat last 2018 . Are they going to well, blame the USA again , for the frequent blackouts? If Venezuela's basic utilities are all monopolized by the government--how can they blame the US for the crisis that Venezuela caused itself? Did the US tell Venezuela to do its really bad economic policies? I would read the comments made by SJWs on Facebook. They would write all forms of anti-capitalist rants without understanding what capitalism is. They say that competition ruins quality and that things will be better under a welfare state. The video above shows a sample ...
Comments
Post a Comment