Skip to main content

Nobody Gets Rich Owning Plenty of Nice Stuff


I could remember growing up having thrifty parents while surrounded by people who had extravagant parents. It was when I studied in a rather pricey school that I felt so out of place. There were the "cool kids" who were spoiled brats. One person I knew was easily given what he wanted. Another I knew felt he was cool because his parents gave him what he wanted. I remembered an idle talk that we had, such as how I was bullied for not having the nice stuff other people had. Another said that so and so was richer because they had this and that. It was common to say so-and-so is the rich kid because he or she had the latest video game console or a luxury car. It made me so green with envy that I wanted a Limousine or a Mercedes-Benz just to impress those spoiled brats. My thrifty parents said no to such requests--telling me one day I'd understand.

A conversation I had with my mother was based on the people I envied. I gave reasons that so and so was rich because:
  1. They have very thick wallets, while I have a thin wallet. My parents gave me a very limited allowance, and I had the tendency to overspend.
  2. They are brought to school in a luxury car, while I was driven in a Mazda.
  3. They have rather luxurious houses to live in.
  4. The dumbest reason was that they keep talking about how rich they are. Someone even said he had a million pesos last Christmas--something I dismiss as childish bragging these days.
However, my parents would only shoot down such claims and say such people may be rich now, but lose it later. Then, I thought of what they would say (or what my late paternal grandmother who was also rather thrifty) said the following rebuttals:
  1. Parents who give very generous allowances to their children may have very thin bank accounts. They may have more debt than money to pay the debt. The bank may no longer be their friend.
  2. It's possible to be driving a BMW or a Mercedes-Benz, but one's broke as a joke. It so happens that someone who had a Pajero later ended up borrowing tons of money to repair it.
  3. It's possible to live in such a big house, which will only be mortgaged by the bank if you fail to pay it.
  4. A prudent rich person keeps silent about how much money they have. Some who brag about their so-called wealth don't have it.

Savings opportunities vs. branded goods

I once owned an Apple product and never wanted another one due to the cost of repairs. I had it junked, and I no longer wanted another one. I don't plan to get a Mercedes-Benz is due to the cost of labor is much higher. Having rubber shoes that cost PHP 7,000.00 is a real rip-off compared to if you bought regular rubber shoes. Someone I knew bought rubber shoes that were expensive to brag about, even if he wasn't wealthy. These products aren't necessarily better. In fact, I remembered my Apple product was gone with the wind during a lightning storm. Meanwhile, I had very little cost to repair my Samsung laptop (which I might replace soon), which I used during my MBA days.

However, we've got such people with the wrong perception of quality based on price. It's often said that the best is the most expensive. It's like the best school is the most expensive school. However, the same person who once said it ended up transferring to a high-standard public school instead. This is one thing Investopedia says about the problem of branded goods psychology:

Are Higher-Priced Goods Really of Higher Quality?
One possible explanation for this is the human tendency to overemphasize the positive elements of a product and ignore its disadvantages. For example, in the case of Apple Inc. (AAPL), consumers wait overnight for new releases of iPhones, iPads, and Mac computers. This despite the fact that Apple products are not technologically unique or superior.

In fact, Samsung makes phones with better features (compared to most models of the iPhone), and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Xiaomi make phones that typically have a cheaper price point. Nevertheless, Apple experiences a high degree of brand loyalty and seems to break sales records year after year.

Because some people perceive non-luxury goods as inferior simply by virtue of them being non-luxury (and not on the basis of their characteristics or qualities), they also come to the irrational conclusion that higher priced goods are of better quality. Contrary to the evidence, they may believe that you get what you pay for, regardless of whether the goods are actually better than their more affordable counterparts.

I personally am willing to pay more for better quality. For example, I was actually willing to spend PHP 40,000+ for a new Samsung until I realized that the Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro phone had better battery life at a lower cost. If I spent money on a new iPhone XS, which came out a few years ago, worth PHP 69,999.00 up to PHP 86,990.00. Let's just say that I decided to purchase that phone over the Xiaomi, which I purchased just now. Pretty much, I spent PHP 12,490.00 for my new POCO M4 Pr,o which gives me a savings of PHP 74,500.00. I could afford to buy the expensive phone, but I feel saving it for a rainy day is better. Having PHP 74,500.00 for a rainy day is better than having a nice phone but not having an extra for a rainy day. In the end, if I dropped that iPhone, it would be more painful than if I dropped my POCO. I wouldn't have so much pain buying another phone worth PHP 12,490.00 over buying another super expensive phone. The same goes for I wouldn't mind paying the fees at a Toyota repair shop for a luxurious-looking car rather than paying extremely high fees for a branded car.

Avoiding luxury goods when you can is a good thing. Instead, the best thing to do is to have a balance. Be willing to spend more for quality instead of perceived quality. It's like I decided to get a slightly more expensive POCO phone so I can have better, cooler features. Somebody might be cool with the new stuff, but the new stuff isn't branded. Sometimes, a nice bag that's sturdy isn't a branded good. Sure, that bag may cost less, but it may contain plenty of money's worth. Doing so can be the start of having higher savings.

The real meaning of financial wealth is never about the stuff you own or having an expensive lifestyle. Rather, it's all about having plenty of legitimate money. Though this isn't always about being wealthy, but making sure one has the money to meet one's needs and enjoy life. People with lots of money (whether they are wealthy or not) usually shut up about their wealth. More often than not, those who hardly have money are trying to impress others with money they probably just borrowed from others to make themselves look rich. 

References

"The Psychology Behind Why People Buy Luxury Goods" by Vanessa Page, Reviewed by Ebony Howard (Updated: February 13, 2021)
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more

External Validations, like Masters and Doctorate, Mean NOTHING with a LOUSY Education System

I have the tendency to use my MBA as a license to avoid criticism. It's a real problem that some people use their credentials and/or academic achievements to try and win an argument. One incident I wrote about was Rep. Raoul Abellar Manuel flexing his "smarts" by using his cum laude degree to win the argument . It was all about how I would often say, "You're the moron because I have the MBA and you don't." There are times I felt like taking an MBA would make up for my "moral shortcomings" during high school when I was barely passing (and the passing rate was 80% , which is rather high), that I wasn't having honors, and that there was this saying, " Thou grades shalt determine thy future! " That, of course, has led to the reality where cheating is prevalent .  I wanted to make a review. I took my MBA in 2011 and graduated in 2014. I always felt that the MBA program was what I needed to become "invincible". It was also at ...
Read more

No Hard-to-Earn Economics Degree is Required to Know That a Welfare, Anti-FDI Philippines is Destined to FAIL

GMA News When it comes to constitutional reform, I'm afraid one of the worst sources quoted would come from the Makabayan Bloc. Some people I face who are so against FDI also want to end the OFW program. The solution comes out rather absurd, as the Philippines must have its own state where it's all beg and beg . It would be like: "Free education for all! No to FDI for schools!"  "Free lunch in school!" "No to open FDI! The government must fund our local production!"  " Increase the salaries, lower the prices of goods! " (which is just plain bad accounting ) That's just a few of the crazy demands that have been given! My favorite question has always been, "Where will you get the funding?" The usual answers can be: " Print more money! " "The government should just make it a law!" "Tax the rich all the more!" which can often be accompanied by, " After all, it's the fault of the rich that p...
Read more

Why I'm Not in Favor of Nationalization of Utilities Mixed with Protectionism

ToonPool There's the call of leftist fools to stop privatization. Many still believe that utilities should be run by nationalization rather than privatization . I've been reading on Facebook where some fools believe that allowing foreign telecommunications companies (telcos) to invest in the Philippines will "risk security". Any telco will risk security if there are no laws to regulate it like the Data Privacy Law. Just because I support private enterprises doesn't mean that I say the government is hands-off. On the other hand, the government has the duty to set rules such as fair compensation, proper employee treatment, safety measures, and the like to make sure that we remain in healthy competition. Some people who keep protesting against the privatization of industries I believe (1) want the government to provide for all the needs of the people (which leads to dictatorship, eventually), (2) have some agenda as to why they're doing it, or (3) these people ar...
Read more

COMMUNIST Vietnam Has Defeated DEMOCRATIC Philippines Again This 2025

Cổng thông tin Trung ương Đoàn TNCS Hồ Chí Minh A few days ago, I wrote about warning Filipinos that they shouldn't wait for more unmitigated typhoon disasters, before realizing that the Filipino First Policy isn't working ! There's a statement that says, "Just because being tanga (inattentive) is libre (free), doesn't mean you should be tanga!"  Analyzing the different policies: why policies  matter I found a Business World article, written by Cesar Polvorosa, Jr., on my Facebook news feed discussing the Vietnamese economy . In fact, it would be better to share some hard truths that the article offers about what really went wrong with the  democratic Philippines compared to Communist Vietnam : DIVERGENT ECONOMIC MODELS  Vietnam pursued an export-oriented manufacturing strategy which has proven significantly more successful over the past half century than the Philippines’ service-heavy, remittances-dependent model . Export performance alone tells a compe...
Read more