Skip to main content

Phishing Can Be Done By the LEGALLY EMPLOYED in LEGITIMATE Financial Institutions


It might be easy for some to ignore the obvious phishing emails such as a complete stranger asking for money, a too-good-to-be-true employment offer, a Ponzi scheme offering huge returns in such a short time, a pyramid scam that promises to pay you every time you recruit, etc. when you've guilt some experience. I was once hit by a pyramid scam and lost a small amount of money. I decided not to pursue recruiting because I was too busy trying to get my bachelor's degree in business administration. However, what's so often ignored is the world of employee fraud. Besides, some phishing activities can be done by legally employed financial institution employees. Don't believe me? Well, I believe that's what happened to me today when I lost some money in a GCash "verification" process since it looked so legitimate. Apparently, the GCash scam was done were legally employed staff and not some programmer. Some people are so greedy that they want money fast regardless of the consequences. 

There's really the world of internal banking fraud. The Net Guardians website gives this introduction in "A-Z of Internal Banking Fraud" (I suggest taking time to read it) which is often ignored and I tend to do so:

IT IS NO EXAGGERATION TO SAY THAT THE GREATEST FRAUD RISK THAT BANKS FACE WALKS THROUGH THEIR DOORS EVERY MORNING AND SITS DOWN TO WORK
Frauds carried out by bank employees are a huge global problem. In its 2020 Report to the Nations, the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) assessed 2,504 cases of internal fraud from 125 countries, which led to estimated losses of $3.6bn. Banking and Financial Services accounted for the largest share of internal fraud cases examined by the ACFE, with 15.4% of the total.

The A-Z of Internal Banking Fraud highlights the scale of this problem and the different vulnerabilities that internal fraudsters exploit, and explains how advanced anti-fraud technologies can combat it. Bank employees are uniquely well placed to discover and take advantage of weaknesses in their organization’s internal controls – perhaps by abusing their level of access to the bank’s IT systems or by targeting dormant accounts.

But FinTech anti-fraud solutions are improving all the time – their ability to identify and block suspicious activity in real time is becoming the first line of defense against the biggest fraud risk in banking.

So, what I'm thinking is that if some people lost their money in AXA (where I currently invest some of my money)--it could be a result of fraudulent employees. AXA is a worldwide deposit company and of a good reputation. However, there will always be Judas Iscariot employees every now and then. These inside-jobbers. It could be from a good bank like Metrobank or Banco De Oro. It could be in a reliable form of digital banking like GCash. Robbery in broad daylight can happen because of employee fraud. 

This 2022, another report from The Vibes.com: Malaysia from Every Side has it that a bank employee cheated millions of customers in Malaysia. It would be very interesting to read that a certain Klang MP Charles Santiago filed a case against the employee. Here's an excerpt of that scam incident:

However, after some of these clients met each other, they suspected that they may have been victims of a scam upon seeing no sign of profits deposited in their bank accounts.

“Realising that there may have been a scam involved, a number of police reports were filed by the victims on March 23 and 24,” Santiago said in the letter.

When asked by The Vibes during a brief WhatsApp conversation, the Klang MP explained that he is unsure if the authorities have initiated investigations.

Attempts to contact South Klang OCPD Cha Hoong Fong for comment drew no response.

Meanwhile, Santiago has urged the manager of the bank branch to conduct an investigation into the matter soon and meet with the victims to provide an explanation as well as compensation.

It could be seen that not all scammers run an obvious shady operation. Not all scammers will invite you to some dark alley or obscure location like those I get from the so-called lottery wins or forex scams. These scams can come from those who are legally employed in registered financial institutions. Some of them may even go as far as to lie that they're the bank manager (when they aren't), could be a very corrupt bank manager, or just anybody who works in a financial institution just for the profits. These people want the money as soon as possible rather than having to work hard for it. Some of them may be paid well and are just pretending to be mistreated by their bosses. 

These employees are clearly breaking employment rules. No financial institution employee is ever allowed to ask for stuff like the personal passwords of the customers. They're the customers' privacy. Yet, some may try to either sweet talk like saying, "Your account could be deactivated." since the use of obvious force isn't going to work. They could also send emails that look legitimate like they could copy the template from where they work. If you know any, better screenshot that email or report that employee over to management. Such people legally employed in legitimate financial institutions might as well work for cryptocurrency companies if they want a fast buck. Though, I believe they're using their legitimate employment as a cover for their illegal activities since it's one of the best ways criminals can do their business--having a legal front to hide the illegal behind. 

References

"A-Z of Internal Banking Fraud" (July 07. 2021)
https://netguardians.ch/internal-banking-fraud/

"Customers cheated of millions in scam by bank employee: Santiago"
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...
Read more

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...
Read more

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...
Read more

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...
Read more