Skip to main content

Phishing Can Be Done By the LEGALLY EMPLOYED in LEGITIMATE Financial Institutions


It might be easy for some to ignore the obvious phishing emails such as a complete stranger asking for money, a too-good-to-be-true employment offer, a Ponzi scheme offering huge returns in such a short time, a pyramid scam that promises to pay you every time you recruit, etc. when you've guilt some experience. I was once hit by a pyramid scam and lost a small amount of money. I decided not to pursue recruiting because I was too busy trying to get my bachelor's degree in business administration. However, what's so often ignored is the world of employee fraud. Besides, some phishing activities can be done by legally employed financial institution employees. Don't believe me? Well, I believe that's what happened to me today when I lost some money in a GCash "verification" process since it looked so legitimate. Apparently, the GCash scam was done were legally employed staff and not some programmer. Some people are so greedy that they want money fast regardless of the consequences. 

There's really the world of internal banking fraud. The Net Guardians website gives this introduction in "A-Z of Internal Banking Fraud" (I suggest taking time to read it) which is often ignored and I tend to do so:

IT IS NO EXAGGERATION TO SAY THAT THE GREATEST FRAUD RISK THAT BANKS FACE WALKS THROUGH THEIR DOORS EVERY MORNING AND SITS DOWN TO WORK
Frauds carried out by bank employees are a huge global problem. In its 2020 Report to the Nations, the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) assessed 2,504 cases of internal fraud from 125 countries, which led to estimated losses of $3.6bn. Banking and Financial Services accounted for the largest share of internal fraud cases examined by the ACFE, with 15.4% of the total.

The A-Z of Internal Banking Fraud highlights the scale of this problem and the different vulnerabilities that internal fraudsters exploit, and explains how advanced anti-fraud technologies can combat it. Bank employees are uniquely well placed to discover and take advantage of weaknesses in their organization’s internal controls – perhaps by abusing their level of access to the bank’s IT systems or by targeting dormant accounts.

But FinTech anti-fraud solutions are improving all the time – their ability to identify and block suspicious activity in real time is becoming the first line of defense against the biggest fraud risk in banking.

So, what I'm thinking is that if some people lost their money in AXA (where I currently invest some of my money)--it could be a result of fraudulent employees. AXA is a worldwide deposit company and of a good reputation. However, there will always be Judas Iscariot employees every now and then. These inside-jobbers. It could be from a good bank like Metrobank or Banco De Oro. It could be in a reliable form of digital banking like GCash. Robbery in broad daylight can happen because of employee fraud. 

This 2022, another report from The Vibes.com: Malaysia from Every Side has it that a bank employee cheated millions of customers in Malaysia. It would be very interesting to read that a certain Klang MP Charles Santiago filed a case against the employee. Here's an excerpt of that scam incident:

However, after some of these clients met each other, they suspected that they may have been victims of a scam upon seeing no sign of profits deposited in their bank accounts.

“Realising that there may have been a scam involved, a number of police reports were filed by the victims on March 23 and 24,” Santiago said in the letter.

When asked by The Vibes during a brief WhatsApp conversation, the Klang MP explained that he is unsure if the authorities have initiated investigations.

Attempts to contact South Klang OCPD Cha Hoong Fong for comment drew no response.

Meanwhile, Santiago has urged the manager of the bank branch to conduct an investigation into the matter soon and meet with the victims to provide an explanation as well as compensation.

It could be seen that not all scammers run an obvious shady operation. Not all scammers will invite you to some dark alley or obscure location like those I get from the so-called lottery wins or forex scams. These scams can come from those who are legally employed in registered financial institutions. Some of them may even go as far as to lie that they're the bank manager (when they aren't), could be a very corrupt bank manager, or just anybody who works in a financial institution just for the profits. These people want the money as soon as possible rather than having to work hard for it. Some of them may be paid well and are just pretending to be mistreated by their bosses. 

These employees are clearly breaking employment rules. No financial institution employee is ever allowed to ask for stuff like the personal passwords of the customers. They're the customers' privacy. Yet, some may try to either sweet talk like saying, "Your account could be deactivated." since the use of obvious force isn't going to work. They could also send emails that look legitimate like they could copy the template from where they work. If you know any, better screenshot that email or report that employee over to management. Such people legally employed in legitimate financial institutions might as well work for cryptocurrency companies if they want a fast buck. Though, I believe they're using their legitimate employment as a cover for their illegal activities since it's one of the best ways criminals can do their business--having a legal front to hide the illegal behind. 

References

"A-Z of Internal Banking Fraud" (July 07. 2021)
https://netguardians.ch/internal-banking-fraud/

"Customers cheated of millions in scam by bank employee: Santiago"
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more

External Validations, like Masters and Doctorate, Mean NOTHING with a LOUSY Education System

I have the tendency to use my MBA as a license to avoid criticism. It's a real problem that some people use their credentials and/or academic achievements to try and win an argument. One incident I wrote about was Rep. Raoul Abellar Manuel flexing his "smarts" by using his cum laude degree to win the argument . It was all about how I would often say, "You're the moron because I have the MBA and you don't." There are times I felt like taking an MBA would make up for my "moral shortcomings" during high school when I was barely passing (and the passing rate was 80% , which is rather high), that I wasn't having honors, and that there was this saying, " Thou grades shalt determine thy future! " That, of course, has led to the reality where cheating is prevalent .  I wanted to make a review. I took my MBA in 2011 and graduated in 2014. I always felt that the MBA program was what I needed to become "invincible". It was also at ...
Read more

No Hard-to-Earn Economics Degree is Required to Know That a Welfare, Anti-FDI Philippines is Destined to FAIL

GMA News When it comes to constitutional reform, I'm afraid one of the worst sources quoted would come from the Makabayan Bloc. Some people I face who are so against FDI also want to end the OFW program. The solution comes out rather absurd, as the Philippines must have its own state where it's all beg and beg . It would be like: "Free education for all! No to FDI for schools!"  "Free lunch in school!" "No to open FDI! The government must fund our local production!"  " Increase the salaries, lower the prices of goods! " (which is just plain bad accounting ) That's just a few of the crazy demands that have been given! My favorite question has always been, "Where will you get the funding?" The usual answers can be: " Print more money! " "The government should just make it a law!" "Tax the rich all the more!" which can often be accompanied by, " After all, it's the fault of the rich that p...
Read more

How Foreign Direct Investments Can Also Help in Local Philippine Agriculture

I must admit that I'm getting tired of all the misrepresentations of foreign direct investment (FDI) on Facebook. Such misrepresentations can come from "think-tanks" such as IBON Foundation, Bayan Muna, and the Philippine Anti-Fascist League. That's why I wrote a couple of posts such as (1) how we need to focus on environmentally-friendly business practices (read here ), (2) that FDIs don't always lead to environmental degradation (read here ), and (3) asking the question if you're willing to support local businesses that destroy the environment (read here ). Besides, economic protectionism isn't a guarantee that environment will be friendly. Both North Korea and Venezuela are known to have very bad environmental practices. Just reading about them can make you dizzy. Protectionism ended up destroying agriculture than protecting it Mao Zedong's "great leap forward" was evidence In contrast to what those "think tanks" want us to belie...
Read more

Why I'm Not in Favor of Nationalization of Utilities Mixed with Protectionism

ToonPool There's the call of leftist fools to stop privatization. Many still believe that utilities should be run by nationalization rather than privatization . I've been reading on Facebook where some fools believe that allowing foreign telecommunications companies (telcos) to invest in the Philippines will "risk security". Any telco will risk security if there are no laws to regulate it like the Data Privacy Law. Just because I support private enterprises doesn't mean that I say the government is hands-off. On the other hand, the government has the duty to set rules such as fair compensation, proper employee treatment, safety measures, and the like to make sure that we remain in healthy competition. Some people who keep protesting against the privatization of industries I believe (1) want the government to provide for all the needs of the people (which leads to dictatorship, eventually), (2) have some agenda as to why they're doing it, or (3) these people ar...
Read more