Skip to main content

Should We Wait Until All Filipinos Straighten Up Their Act Before Opening Up the Economy to 100% Shares Ownership for Foreign Investments?

CoRRECT Movement

I remembered how often I complain about the lack of discipline in the Philippines. I went to Singapore in 1998 and it was a very disciplined, clean country. In fact, it's a very fine country because petty offenses do get fined such as littering. Doing such will encourage peace and order. I felt it was what Filipinos needed--more discipline! I was only 13 years old when I first went to Singapore. Even worse, high school economics was only taught during the graduating year--something that felt stupid and very last minute even if it was one whole year of discussion. It was a waste, really, to have a teacher who was as brilliant and strict as the late Miriam Palma Defensor-Santiago (MDS), if economics was taught as a "last-minute subject". I even flunked the first grading though I did get better with her help. I even feel that teacher of mine is better off teaching abroad because she was too brilliant to be left in a dull country. Education should've been upgraded to K+12 years ago. 

I only learned more about economics in college. I did get better grades in college economics but I still felt stupid that, somehow, schools just fail to impart economic knowledge. I had my international marketing subject which I did well but not too well. I graduated from the University of San Carlos last 2007 with a Bachelor of Business Administration.  I ended up taking my Master in Business Administration degree last June 2011 and graduated around October 2014. However, I didn't march on to my graduation due to real-life issues. 

A check on the current dominant dysfunctionality with Filipino culture

I decided to recall some stuff I learned from the international marketing class. We had a professor who was strict as she can get but at reasonable levels. I remembered how students complained about her because she was strict. I felt like I had my old economics teacher in high school so I decided to study harder. Some stuff in her syllabus wrote, "Filipino time is not acceptable." which is just one. I don't want to call it "Filipino time" but just being tardy. Filipino time should be simply said, "Filipinos on time based on Philippine time." She rose the passing rate from 50% to 60% which I think was a bit just. Sometimes, standards need to be raised and I decided not to protest like the others. I only protested when teachers started to go against the school rules. Too often, the teacher said that the country doesn't improve because of its bad habits. Bad habits like habitual tardiness and mediocrity hold the Philippines back. I remembered how I kept saying such habits are holding the Philippines back from becoming a first-world country. I even felt that investor confidence may be lowered due to bad habits which almost feel very cultural in nature. 

Somebody might say that Filipinos need to change their bad habits first before the government should open up the Philippines to 100% shares ownership to FDI from multinational corporations. It's because there are so many bad habits that are very common among my fellow Filipinos. Some of these habits are such as a poor understanding of basic business principles and economic principles. Some people display it by blaming presidents for the prices of gasoline, wishing for more government subsidies, thinking that only foreign investors will get rich if you let them invest here in the Philippines, and demand for salary increases while lowering the prices of finished products. Poor monetary habits are very hard to deny such as blowout during payday, spending one's paycheck on nonsense stuff instead of paying the important stuff, borrowing tons of money (seldomly from five-six lending) to celebrate the Christmas and New Year lavishly, and getting into more debt than one should support a lavish lifestyle one can't afford. 

It would be very easy to give out more excuses. These excuses can be like:
  1. "Filipinos have poor money habits and they will just waste the money offered by MNCs like they did with the money from local investors. It will never change!"
  2. "Filipino businesses have no power to last against MNCs. Do you want them to get squashed? Let's wait for them to get better before letting MNCs enter!"

What international economics did in regards to their wayward countries may surprise some

Reading the late Lee Kuan Yew's book From Third World to First (which can be ordered online such as Shopee and Lazada) has given me newer insights. In fact, Lee even stated on page 66 of his book the following about MNCs:
Our job was to plan the broad economic objectives and the target periods within which to achieve them. We reviewed these plans regularly and adjusted them as new realities changed the outlook. Infrastructure and the training and education of workers to meet the needs of employers had to be planned years in advance. We did not have a group of readymade entrepreneurs such as Hong Kong gained in the Chinese industrialists and bankers who came fleeing from Shanghai, Canton, and other cities when the communists took over. Had we waited for our traders to learn to be industrialists we would have starved. It is absurd for critics to suggest in the 1990s that had we grown our own entrepreneurs, we would have been less at the mercy of the rootless MNCs. Even with the experienced talent Hong Kong received in Chinese refugees, its manufacturing technology level is not in the same class as that of the MNCs in Singapore.

Instead, what Lee did was invite MNCs while Singapore was still a third-world country. Waiting for Singaporeans to learn to be industrialists before opening to the MNCs would be economic suicide. It was already a country in need of more money. Lee needed money before he could even green up Singapore into a cleaner country. Lee didn't wait until the Singaporeans became better in economics and business. Instead, Lee decided to invite more people such as the late Albert Winsemius to help out. Both Lee and the late Go Kweng See weren't impressed at what the "development economists" of their time said about MNCs. They knew what they were doing by inviting MNCs to invest while Singapore was still in shambles.

Deng Xiaoping was left with a China that was culturally crippled by Mao Zedong's rule. Mao's Communist regime ended up punishing the diligent and rewarding the lazy. Mao's rule ended up introducing impunity. Deng was 72 years old when he ruled China. Most people would've wanted to retire. Instead, Deng was focused on modernizing China from the culture Mao gave it. What Deng did was go to America and told them, "China is open for business." He never waited for the Chinese to be better after Mao's poor economic policies left them ignorant. Deng, as an old man, went all the way to invite MNCs to China to do the same thing. 

Vietnam was also a country once of a lower rank.  Yet, the economist who is known as the late Do Muoi (perhaps where Doi Moi program got its name) also didn't wait for the Vietnamese to be more business savvy. Reading Chapter 19 of From Third World to First can introduce one to what Vietnam was and became. Vietnam became another economically successful country because of free markets. Vietnam became another manufacturing hub.

The countries I just mentioned didn't wait until their citizens "straightened up". In contrast, they decided to get people to straighten up their act by introducing free markets as part of their plan. Lee couldn't have established Singapore the way it is by discipline alone. It's almost impossible to discipline the poor especially if they have to work several jobs a day to feed their families. Some become Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) which separates them from their families just to earn money. How can these families really discipline the family if they're hardly there? 

I could also answer the objectives I get by saying this. True, Filipinos might waste their salary from the MNCs that they're employed. However, if there were more job opportunities then more Filipinos will start to develop a sense of self-sufficiency. More Filipinos understand economics better if they are seeing it applied all the more. If OFWs started to return home and get locally employed because MNCs are now in the Philippines--they could now start to teach their children how to value the money. That means the days of free riding on the OFW family member will come to an end. The leeches will have to look for jobs when there will be more job opportunities available. The norm of being jobless will no longer be the norm when more people have jobs. If more people have jobs and have money then that will actually lessen crime. Some people enter into crime because they're easily manipulated when they're starving. They're also mentally weaker because being hungry also makes one stupid whether one notices it or not. It's like how studying on an empty stomach is really just as ill-advised as doing heavy cardio or heavy work in that condition. 

Instead, let's talk about the symptoms and the cause of the symptoms. A person is sick but you need to understand if it was a symptom or not. A person may just have a fever or the fever could be a symptom of something like dengue. If a person has dengue then hospitalization is urgent. I believe that a lot of problems of Filipino bad habits stem from not having a competitive free market. Why would people want to do business properly or work properly if the economy is restrictive? If the local businesses have very little competition then would they want to be competitive? A weak boss will have a weak system creating weaker employees. A weak boss is a result of a weak economic system. However, in a competitive economy, local businesses will need and want to do better. Besides, some local businesses are now world-class such as Jollibee is no longer confined to the Philippines but has become a worldwide franchise like its competition McDonald's. Bo's Coffee Club is still standing strong even after Taiwanese milk tea franchises entered the Philippines. The only businesses that die (whether local or foreign) are those that don't improve themselves. 

If we had to wait for Filipinos to straighten up their act then that will take several generations. Yes, I'm not kidding. How are we going to even get each and every Filipino to straighten up? In my experience, no matter how I stressed dup, "People like you are why we don't improve!" to such people is just stressful. Do you think they could even change if there's hardly any free-market competition? Not everyone will change but introducing a change in the economic system can change things. It can take a way that the majority will swing in the right direction. What used to be a majority of people who are unruly will either change their ways or perish. This change may introduce change without waiting for several generations before it would ever happen. 

References

Books

"From Third World to First--The Singapore Story: 1965-2000) by Lee Kuan Yew
Harpers Collins Publishers

Websites

"5 Primal reasons why is competition good for business"

"DENG XIAOPING'S EARLY ECONOMIC REFORMS"

"Glocalization" by Adam Hayes, reviewed by Gordon Scott (Updated: March 26, 2020)

Popular posts from this blog

Is Christmas Toxic Positivity a Cause or an Effect of the Philippines' Lack of Progress?

Lessandra When it's Christmas, it's so easy to think of the song of the late Andy Williams, "It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year". The music itself reeks of toxic positivity,  whether one likes it or not. It's a shame, really, because December 20 was also the anniversary of Asia's Titanic, the sinking of the Doña Paz ! We live in a society that somehow never learns from its mistakes, like a person who's stuck in gambling debt, is still hoping to get rich gambling . Despite all that, Christmas toxic positivity still abounds in the Philippines. We still have a lot of ongoing bad habits, such as starting Christmas in September and then doing last-minute Christmas shopping during the week of Christmas. That's why every time I drive on the road on Christmas, I tend to shout, "Isn't it any wonder why the Philippines never improves?" The term Noche Buena has evolved over time . For some, it's simply the Christmas dinner. However, so...

Christmas Toxic Positivity May Be Your Biggest Holiday Financial Killer

Christmas is just around the corner, isn't it? It's easy to tell me, "Stop being a Scrooge! Lighten up! It's Christmas!" Some people can't tell the difference between positivity and when positivity becomes toxic . If you think about it, toxic positivity is defined as: ...the belief that people should maintain a positive mindset no matter how dire or difficult a situation is. While there are benefits to being optimistic and engaging in positive thinking, toxic positivity rejects all difficult emotions in favor of a cheerful and often falsely positive façade . Every time I talk about Christmas foolishness (read here ), it's always pointed out that I love being negative. Honestly, there are times I'd rather be negative than to be overly positive. I always talk about mentioning the silly notions that my countrymen have like, "If the situation is bitter, just add sugar (read here )." In Cebuano, it's said, "Kung pait, butangi lang ug asu...

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...

It's UTTER IGNORANCE to Say that the Philippines Needs to Self-Industrialize First Before Allowing FDIs to Own 100% Equity

It's often said by idiots on Facebook that allowing FDIs to own 100% of their shares is just going to leave the Philippines with nothing. I don't know how long I can keep my patience with such fools. To explain it, FDIs get rich based on net profits after taxes (read here ). FDIs will still end up paying VAT and income taxes if they want to continue investing in the Philippines. It's like if you want to continue doing business in the commercial space--you need to pay the rental fee to your lessor. The idea of 100% FDI ownership should be spelled out as, "Allowing FDIs to own 100% of their shares." They wouldn't need to find a Filipino partner before they can do business in the Philippines. They may not be allowed to own land  but they can operate without a Filipino partner. The even bigger stupidity is when FDIs are required to split 60-40 of the partnership. Meaning, that they must split 60% of the net income after taxes with the local Filipino partner. That...

Overspending as a Narcotic of the Filipino Masses

Harvard Health Publishing It's almost time for the New Year, right? However, there's the problem that so many Filipinos just refuse to do any financial New Year's resolutions . It's a continued series of broken New Year's resolutions year after year , such as not doing anything about one's financial and economic literacy . Then again, can Filipinos learn financial literacy when the school environment is  too theoretical ? As I observe the same cycle in the Philippines, from January to December, it has always been a financial mess for many Filipinos. The problem starts with mishandling money, such as how paychecks are often handled by people .  There's always some joy in spending, whether we want to admit it or not We can't deny that if we bought what we want (especially with one's own money), there's some feeling of satisfaction . For example, a person who stops begging from their parents and starts buying what they want, with  their money , can ...