Skip to main content

It Might Be Better To Save Up a Bit First Before Investing on GInvest

I have decided to try GInvest and I ended up selling a few investments off with little gain or at a minimal loss. The offer of starting to invest for as low as PHP 50.00 or PHP 1,000.00 is rather new. Most of the time, investment is focused on huge amounts. This is pretty much petty cash investments for beginners. The big hang is GInvest doesn't offer that your PHP 50.00 will become high. Instead, the reality is the market value of the money is based on the number of units x Net Asset Value Per Unit (NAVPU). So, buying only PHP 50.00 may be barely a unit meaning it's not going to yield much. Only a scam will offer a PHP 50.00 investment that will multiply itself rather fast.

What I did (at first) was to put some money here and there to give them a shot. What I figured out it's not a feasible thing to do. It might be better to slowly plan even before making one single GInvest purchase. It would be good to look at some factors like "Is the NAVPU low today?" A lower NAVPU would mean having more units bought at the minimum. GInvest would have a certain number of days before buying or selling so think properly. How much money do you intend to put? I made a messy portfolio before because of that. We learn from mistakes, right? It's a good thing I decided not to put too much money in it either not, especially after I got phished. 

The recent products of GInvest have different units. The Philippine Stock Index fund means investing for only PHP 50.00 will mean you get only 0.053 units as of recent. That's barely one unit because the current NAVPU is PHP 936.99. Meanwhile, if you decide to save up to PHP 5,000.00 then you get 5.34 units estimated with the NAVPU of PHP 936.99. Some investments have lower NAVPU which means buying more units. Right now, a lot of the investments are down so it might be a good idea to invest a bigger amount that's not needed for now. That is, don't invest the money you need to pay for bills. Instead, invest the money that was set aside for investment. 

I think it might be best to invest every quarter. Maybe set aside PHP 2,500.00 for investment (for every quarter) if PHP 5,000.00 is too big. I think it would be best to look at which investment will get you more units. One mistake I did was to simply put the money in when it was at a high. Buy high, sell higher isn't for everyone. Some people do that because they have the money or capacity to do so. Buying low and selling higher might be better for some. It's not a one size fits all arrangement. It might be time to modify the budget. Budget for necessities, budget for wants, and now add a budget for investment. It might be time to reduce the wants for the time being. It's like how I decided to forego buying stuff I wanted in exchange for an investment. 

Right now, I think the monthly investment reminder may not work for me. I might as well think of saving more money again. I decided to forego buying more of my wants in exchange for budgeting needs. It might be best not to even invest at all if the NAVPU is at an all-time high though money cost averaging (for one particular investment only) may be better. I want to diversify and I plan to put a minimum certain amount of money (won't tell, should've done it earlier) per GInvest product. It would be to reach a target diversified aim. That way, things can be planned than just dropping that PHP 50.00 or PHP 1,000 for the sake of it. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...
Read more

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...
Read more

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...
Read more

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...
Read more