Skip to main content

Learning More About ATRAM's Feeder Funds on GInvest


If there was one thing the COVID-19 pandemic did--I was practically forced to learn how to invest beyond showing up in person. I still prefer showing up in person to invest or to process transactions for more transparency. Given the conditions, it would be sometimes better to do some things online. I decided to get GCash (to pay restaurants that have deliveries but not through Grab and Foodpanda) and found GInvest. Previous features made it hard to count the number of units. I placed a few pesos to test my skill. I had to watch videos on how to invest effectively. Granted, it's my first time in so long to invest excess savings--I had made mistakes. Now, I decided to start buying a little more index funds and feeder funds. I decided to diversify my basket with two equity feeder funds from GInvest namely the Global Consumer Trends Feeder Fund and Global Technology Feeder Fund. 

The Peso Lab - Money Guide for Filipinos explains the feeder fund (which is also a Unit Investment Trust Fund or UITF) in this way:
What is the purpose of feeder fund? 
There are ways to purchase securities. People can buy stocks from the stock market and retail treasury bonds from the government. They can also go to banks, trust companies, and mutual fund companies. There are funds too that allow investors exposure to foreign securities.

So why is there a need for a feeder fund? Because it allows people to get exposed to diversified portfolio here and abroad.

Say that you’d like to invest in US stocks. You have two options: open an account with a stock broker that accepts non-US customers. There are several outlets like Charles Schwab, Interactive Brokers, TD Ameritrade, etc. And you’d go through an account opening process that is longer, requires various documents, requires a high starting capital, etc.

And the other option is through feeder funds. It can be relatively easy and there is no need to open an international stock brokerage account to be able to invest in foreign shares.

It would be very time-consuming if I decided to fly to the US just to get US-based stocks. I want to invest also in international stocks (which both ATRAM feeder funds in GInvest now have higher NAVPU, for now). I looked at the PDF documents from the ATRAM website and found out where the money possibly goes.

Investment allocation of the feeder funds

It would be good to know where it goes. Just don't put money into funds. I was looking at these funds and I'm convinced why I might focus on growing them too. Right now, both funds now have a higher NAVPU which means it's back to cost averaging over value cost averaging. It would mean investing less (at the same amount such as PHP 1,000.00 per month) when the market is high and investing more when the market is low. Both funds also have a 1.15% per annum trust fund. 

ATRAM Global Consumer Trends Feeder Fund

For the ATRAM Global Consumer Trends Feeder Fund, the money would go into companies (based on the April 2022 report) like:

  1. Amazon
  2. EPR Properties
  3. Lowes
  4. Nintendo
  5. Travel + Leisure
  6. US Foods
  7. Prologis
  8. Tractor Supply
  9. Electronic Arts
  10. Sony 
Having an Alexa Dot--it would be good to know that some of money that I pay for the feeder fund would go to Amazon. It means I'm indirectly holding some stocks from Amazon. Other companies there like Sony and Nintendo would also help in the feeder fund. 

What would be interesting is to see the exposure to the consumer trends are as follows:
  1. Hotel, restaurants, and leisure
  2. Internet and direct marketing retail
  3. Entertainment
  4. Equity real estate investment trusts
  5. Specialty retail
  6. Interactive media and services
  7. Food and staples retailing
  8. Household durables
  9. Other sectors

ATRAM Global Technology Feeder Fund

Now, we can also take a look at the ATRAM Global Technology Feeder Fund's allocation last April 22:
  1. Microsoft Corporation
  2. Apple Inc.
  3. Salesforce Inc.
  4. Amazon.com Inc
  5. Alphabet Inc. (Google)
  6. Samsung Electronics
  7. Texas Instruments
  8. Visa Inc.
  9. NXP Semiconductors Nv
  10. Fiserv Inc.
I would be glad to know that most of the funds are allocated to information technology. Speaking of which, I wanted to foolishly ride on the course even if I wasn't technologically inclined. Though, it doesn't mean I'm no IT expert but I can invest in IT-related stocks indirectly through this feeder fund. Microsoft is continually innovating. Apple products are a status symbol coveted by many. I still feel that I'm safe due to the constant innovation of Microsoft and Apple as two competing firms. Both will keep innovating in order to stay relevant. In turn, that may lead to an appreciation in the stock units which will drive up demand and might be best for long-term cost-averaging investments.

The rest of the Global Technology Feeder Fund involves the following:
  1. Communication services
  2. Consumer discretionary
  3. Industrials
  4. Energy
  5. Real estate

What's in it for both funds?

So far, I've reached the minimum target but I don't intend to stop there. I intend to invest in a long-term horizon of maybe five to ten years. I want to reach a little higher whenever possible. If the market gets lower again then it's time to buy more. If not, stick to cost averaging to minimize losses. Though, with the slow regrowth--it might be time to consider selling the investment if the NAVPUs will increase after some time. However, having a horizon might be more feasible because investment is money that I don't need for now but the money I'm planning to have later

Why do I want to invest in both consumer and technology funds? Both funds are growing. Investing in local stocks via the Philippine Equity Smart Index Fund may be a good start. I personally feel like the direct trading is scary or that my on/off short attention span is a problem. I may never become Warren Buffett but I can learn financial tips from him on how not to be broke. There'll only be one Buffett and I'm fine with it. Buffett also talks about index funds and that's why I got into the Philippine Equity Smart Index Fund. The fund in itself focuses on the stocks that comprise the Philippine Stock Exchange's index. You mean read about me wanting to learn more about that investment here.

In short, I've become an indirect stockholder but not a shareholder of foreign companies. So, I don't own a share of these companies--I only own stocks. The Accounting Tools website also would help me see where my portfolio is taking me based on units of participation:
The terms stockholder and shareholder both refer to the owner of shares in a company, which means that they are part-owners of a business.  Thus, both terms mean the same thing, and you can use either one when referring to company ownership.

To delve into the underlying meaning of the terms, "stockholder" technically means the holder of stock, which can be construed as inventory, rather than shares. Conversely, "shareholder" means the holder of a share, which can only mean an equity share in a business. Thus, if you want to be picky, "shareholder" may be the more technically accurate term, since it only refers to company ownership.

References

Websites

"Philippines Feeder Fund What It Is And How To Invest"

"The difference between a stockholder and a shareholder" (May 18, 2022)

Popular posts from this blog

The Idiocy of Typing Anti-FDI Rants Using IMPORTED Devices, IMPORTED Platforms, and IMPORTED Social Media

Bulatlat It's very easy to open Facebook (or any related platform) and find lots of stupidity , right? There have been idiotic comments I find on Facebook such as FDI is this and that. We can find "thought leader groups" such as Alliance of Concerned Teachers, Anakpawis, Anakbayan, Bayan Muna, IBON Foundation, Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, and Philippine Anti-Fascist League (PH Antifa) who keep ranting about FDI as this and that. I even remember somebody dared to say that FDI caused Egypt to dry up. Ironically, North Korea and Venezuela, two protectionist countries, have very bad pollution problems. I'd blame it that they don't have the money to do a clean-up drive. How can you clean up a polluted river without the right equipment? How can you expect better power efficiency with outdated equipment that keep coughing up, cough, cough, lots of black smoke?  All the talks on social media can be very funny. The big irony is that all calls for "...

Get Stuck with EDSA, End Up Like Nokia

  Yes, we should never forget what history teaches us. A classmate of mine, back in high school, wrote a simple and blunt essay called "History: A Teacher". I doubt he still has a soft copy, given it was already more than 20 years ago. I'd like to quote Duterte critic Andrew James Masigan wrote this in  Philippine Star --something that should remain relevant: I would never undervalue the 1987 Constitution. It dismantled the legal framework of a repressive regime and established the democratic institutions we enjoy today. For this, I am grateful. The 1987 Constitution was crafted with the best of intentions. It sought to put the Filipino first in all aspects of governance and to level the playing field amongst sectors and peoples.  But it is far from perfect. It failed to consider the importance of foreign capital and technologies and the stiff competition we would have to face to obtain them. In short, its economic provisions were short-sighted . So despite the Constitut...

It's Incredibly Frustrating to Discuss Economics with an Overspender

Overspending is just bad economics, isn't it? Economics is defined as the following for the sake of a review of high school basics: Economics is a social science concerned with the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. It studies how individuals, businesses, governments, and nations make choices about how to allocate resources. Economics focuses on the actions of human beings, based on assumptions that humans act with rational behavior, seeking the most optimal level of benefit or utility. The building blocks of economics are the studies of labor and trade. Since there are many possible applications of human labor and many different ways to acquire resources, it is the task of economics to determine which methods yield the best results. Economics can generally be broken down into macroeconomics, which concentrates on the behavior of the economy as a whole, and microeconomics, which focuses on individual people and businesses. It had me thinking of 2016 wh...

[UNPOPULAR OPINION] Why People Power Anniversary Should Be a Special Working Day Instead

  As a blogger, I shouldn't turn on the PC in hopes of becoming popular . It should be to turn on the PC and blog to make a difference . Right now, I think about the controversy when President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. declared the 1986 EDSA Revolution's anniversary as a working holiday . The call for some of the "minority lawmakers" is that they want to return the People Power Anniversary to a regular holiday once more. There are times I feel like, "Should we let it be a regular holiday again, so as not to repeat the Marcos dictatorship?" Sadly, the real answer is that the Philippines has been relying too much on EDSA , so it's practically ending up like Nokia . I was thinking about the reality of February being the most hectic month. February only has 28 days (and February 25 is near the month's end ). I thought that the Philippines also has too many national holidays more often than not. In fact, the Inquirer article written by...

Talking Economics with an Overeating Glutton

Two years ago, I wrote an entry about why discussing economics with an overspender is frustrating . Now, I was looking at certain fat people who say really dumb things about economics. Just recently, I was looking at a certain fat idiot (fortunately, he only has 1K+ followers) who posted on Facebook that not only will the parliamentary system cause the Philippines to become a dictatorship, but he also says that changing economic provisions will cause the Philippines to collapse and the country to fall into the hands of foreigners. I won't name the person out to avoid getting personal. However, the person is apparently very fat and he blames capitalism day in and day out. The person even says that businessmen do nothing and it's the employers that do everything. Has that fat slob ever heard that businesses are run by bosses and that if the bosses do screw up, they're the ones who are the most answerable? The employees are the cogs and the boss runs the cogs. I was looking at...