Skip to main content

Refuting the Claim That Workers, Not Entrepreneurs, Own the Means of Production

Another ongoing nonsense by leftists is that the workers, not the entrepreneurs, are the ones who own the means of production. This would be complete nonsense spreading on social media. Having graduated from the College of Commerce (now the School of Business and Economics) makes me cringe at the idea. I've had some business marketing classes, accounting classes, and operations management classes which can help refute this idea. I keep hearing, "If only the poor will unite altogether--you rich are no more." Well, let's try and think about how the idea of workers, not entrepreneurs, owning the means of production can't work.

Defining what capital really means

Image by Sabrina Jiang © Investopedia 2020

The sample income statement by Investopedia tells you the capital. Capital is defined by the Investopedia as:
Capital is a broad term that can describe any thing that confers value or benefit to its owner, such as a factory and its machinery, intellectual property like patents, or the financial assets of a business or an individual. While money itself may be construed as capital is, capital is more often associated with cash that is being put to work for productive or investment purposes.

In general, capital is a critical component of running a business from day to day and financing its future growth. Business capital may derive from the operations of the business or be raised from debt or equity financing. When budgeting, businesses of all kinds typically focus on three types of capital: working capital, equity capital, and debt capital. A business in the financial industry identifies trading capital as a fourth component.

Investopedia also defines working capital as:

A company's working capital is its liquid capital assets available for fulfilling daily obligations. It is calculated through the following two assessments:

Current Assets – Current Liabilities

Accounts Receivable + Inventory – Accounts Payable

Working capital measures a company's short-term liquidity. More specifically, it represents its ability to cover its debts, accounts payable, and other obligations that are due within one year.

Note that working capital is defined as current assets minus its current liabilities. A company that has more liabilities than assets could soon run short of working capital. 

What we see is that capital in itself is what runs the business. The entrepreneur sets aside a certain sum of money to run a business. The entrepreneur buys the building, equipment, the raw materials for production, and employs people to get everything running into action. The entrepreneur has to make sure that revenues exceed expenses. Expenses include the wages of all employees whether they are part of direct labor or indirect labor. Any good entrepreneur will know that treating employees right, getting the best machinery, getting the best raw materials, and any best means of production will yield more quality products than bad ones. If workers are treated well, paid accordingly, and have good working conditions then they will be motivated to do better. A research team that's paid well and has good working conditions will be motivated to make better products. 

In short, entrepreneurs need their workers. The workers need to be hired. The capital is money set aside for all operations expenses. The workers become partakers of the capital when the entrepreneur pays them their salary. If they aren't paid well then there's the right to quit. If employers mistreat their workers then the latter have the right to quit and the duty to call in labor rights. Employees can complain to the government that they're mistreated while they present proof of it. If entrepreneurs treat their workers right such as giving them good working conditions--workers will have the duty to fire workers who don't do their work right. Entrepreneurs should fire incompetent workers to keep the labor force in check and to avoid bad influence. It's a two-way street for success when entrepreneurs treat workers right and workers submit to their entrepreneurs.

Capitalism means the emphasis on private ownership and businesses to fill in demand. Any good entrepreneur will have to find the best ways to create the best products. No good entrepreneur will believe that fear produces results. Instead, a good entrepreneur will focus on making sure that the employees are in good condition. It would mean making sure every capital is wisely allocated such as giving proper compensation to the workers. A worker who doesn't get a fair share of the capital (i.e. proper wages) has the right to quit and look for a better job. 

Debunking the claim that they can do better if they owned the means of production

One of the most ridiculous claims is that "The last capitalist we hang is the one who sold us the rope." I could only say, "After businesses are closed, will you celebrate?" They think that if they owned the means of production--they would do better and create a national industry. Yet, that claim was easily refuted during the time of Mao Zedong during the "Great Leap Forward". Mao had seized all the means of production. Mao foolishly felt that his methods could industrialize China. Instead, the results were cringeworthy as this was the end result:
The Great Leap Forward ended up being a massive failure. Tens of millions died by starvation, exposure, overwork, and execution in just a few years. It broke families apart, sending men, women, and children to different locations, and destroyed traditional communities and ways of life. Farmland was damaged by nonsensical agricultural practices and the landscape denuded of trees to fuel the steel furnaces. Thirty to 40% of the housing stock was demolished to obtain raw materials for collective projects. In industry, massive quantities of capital goods and raw materials were consumed in projects that yielded no additional output of final goods. 

The Great Leap Forward was officially halted in Jan. 1961 after three brutal years of death and destruction.

Mao's so-called "industrial revolution" ended in failure. So much for saying that foreign direct investments (FDI) will just harm the country. Mao tried his formula by "self-industrialization" and as the late Lee Kuan Yew said it--it failed miserably! Families were torn apart (reminds me of sending Filipinos to work abroad is doing the same). Farmland was destroyed because of overproduction and the killing of the sparrows. The sparrows only ate a few grains and ate many pests. Mao could've chosen to import raw materials but his stubborn pride didn't allow him. Three years later, the Great Leap Forward was nothing more than a failed realization.

It wasn't until the great Deng Xiaoping took over China at the age of 74. Reading Lee's book From Third World to First interestingly wrote a lot about China under Deng. Deng who is infamous as his regime was involved in Tiananmen Square Massacre was also the man who brought back Chinese entrepreneurship. Although Deng considered himself a socialist--his modifications by adding Chinese characteristics somehow worked. Deng allowed free markets in Communist China to do business. As he said in America, "China is open for business." Deng's policies allowed China to progress into an awakened sleeping dragon. It was a big difference from Mao's so-called "Great Leap Forward".

If there was any real Great Leap Forward--it was Deng's. Deng wasn't afraid to import raw materials, import employment, import anything, to achieve the China he dreamed of. Deng said that he wasn't too particular about the cat--it's all about if it catches the mice that are causing trouble. Deng's methods had proven that private enterprises work better. The same went for Vietnam and Do Muoi.  Samsung from democratic South Korea has some of its units manufactured in Communist Vietnam. Deng's China proves that competition, not state-run monopolies, will create better products. 

References 

Books 

"From Third World to First--The Singapore Story: 1965-2000) by Lee Kuan Yew
Harpers Collins Publishers

Websites

"Capital" by Marshall Hargrave, reviewed by Bryan Barnier, fact-checked by Yarilet Perez (Updated: April 3, 2022)

"DENG XIAOPING'S EARLY ECONOMIC REFORMS"

"What Was the Great Leap Forward?" Written by The Investopedia Team, Reviewed by Michael J. Byle (Updated: September 22, 2021)

Popular posts from this blog

The Idiocy of Typing Anti-FDI Rants Using IMPORTED Devices, IMPORTED Platforms, and IMPORTED Social Media

Bulatlat It's very easy to open Facebook (or any related platform) and find lots of stupidity , right? There have been idiotic comments I find on Facebook such as FDI is this and that. We can find "thought leader groups" such as Alliance of Concerned Teachers, Anakpawis, Anakbayan, Bayan Muna, IBON Foundation, Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, and Philippine Anti-Fascist League (PH Antifa) who keep ranting about FDI as this and that. I even remember somebody dared to say that FDI caused Egypt to dry up. Ironically, North Korea and Venezuela, two protectionist countries, have very bad pollution problems. I'd blame it that they don't have the money to do a clean-up drive. How can you clean up a polluted river without the right equipment? How can you expect better power efficiency with outdated equipment that keep coughing up, cough, cough, lots of black smoke?  All the talks on social media can be very funny. The big irony is that all calls for "...

Get Stuck with EDSA, End Up Like Nokia

  Yes, we should never forget what history teaches us. A classmate of mine, back in high school, wrote a simple and blunt essay called "History: A Teacher". I doubt he still has a soft copy, given it was already more than 20 years ago. I'd like to quote Duterte critic Andrew James Masigan wrote this in  Philippine Star --something that should remain relevant: I would never undervalue the 1987 Constitution. It dismantled the legal framework of a repressive regime and established the democratic institutions we enjoy today. For this, I am grateful. The 1987 Constitution was crafted with the best of intentions. It sought to put the Filipino first in all aspects of governance and to level the playing field amongst sectors and peoples.  But it is far from perfect. It failed to consider the importance of foreign capital and technologies and the stiff competition we would have to face to obtain them. In short, its economic provisions were short-sighted . So despite the Constitut...

[UNPOPULAR OPINION] Why People Power Anniversary Should Be a Special Working Day Instead

  As a blogger, I shouldn't turn on the PC in hopes of becoming popular . It should be to turn on the PC and blog to make a difference . Right now, I think about the controversy when President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. declared the 1986 EDSA Revolution's anniversary as a working holiday . The call for some of the "minority lawmakers" is that they want to return the People Power Anniversary to a regular holiday once more. There are times I feel like, "Should we let it be a regular holiday again, so as not to repeat the Marcos dictatorship?" Sadly, the real answer is that the Philippines has been relying too much on EDSA , so it's practically ending up like Nokia . I was thinking about the reality of February being the most hectic month. February only has 28 days (and February 25 is near the month's end ). I thought that the Philippines also has too many national holidays more often than not. In fact, the Inquirer article written by...

It's Incredibly Frustrating to Discuss Economics with an Overspender

Overspending is just bad economics, isn't it? Economics is defined as the following for the sake of a review of high school basics: Economics is a social science concerned with the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. It studies how individuals, businesses, governments, and nations make choices about how to allocate resources. Economics focuses on the actions of human beings, based on assumptions that humans act with rational behavior, seeking the most optimal level of benefit or utility. The building blocks of economics are the studies of labor and trade. Since there are many possible applications of human labor and many different ways to acquire resources, it is the task of economics to determine which methods yield the best results. Economics can generally be broken down into macroeconomics, which concentrates on the behavior of the economy as a whole, and microeconomics, which focuses on individual people and businesses. It had me thinking of 2016 wh...

Talking Economics with an Overeating Glutton

Two years ago, I wrote an entry about why discussing economics with an overspender is frustrating . Now, I was looking at certain fat people who say really dumb things about economics. Just recently, I was looking at a certain fat idiot (fortunately, he only has 1K+ followers) who posted on Facebook that not only will the parliamentary system cause the Philippines to become a dictatorship, but he also says that changing economic provisions will cause the Philippines to collapse and the country to fall into the hands of foreigners. I won't name the person out to avoid getting personal. However, the person is apparently very fat and he blames capitalism day in and day out. The person even says that businessmen do nothing and it's the employers that do everything. Has that fat slob ever heard that businesses are run by bosses and that if the bosses do screw up, they're the ones who are the most answerable? The employees are the cogs and the boss runs the cogs. I was looking at...