Skip to main content

Refuting the Claim That Workers, Not Entrepreneurs, Own the Means of Production

Another ongoing nonsense by leftists is that the workers, not the entrepreneurs, are the ones who own the means of production. This would be complete nonsense spreading on social media. Having graduated from the College of Commerce (now the School of Business and Economics) makes me cringe at the idea. I've had some business marketing classes, accounting classes, and operations management classes which can help refute this idea. I keep hearing, "If only the poor will unite altogether--you rich are no more." Well, let's try and think about how the idea of workers, not entrepreneurs, owning the means of production can't work.

Defining what capital really means

Image by Sabrina Jiang © Investopedia 2020

The sample income statement by Investopedia tells you the capital. Capital is defined by the Investopedia as:
Capital is a broad term that can describe any thing that confers value or benefit to its owner, such as a factory and its machinery, intellectual property like patents, or the financial assets of a business or an individual. While money itself may be construed as capital is, capital is more often associated with cash that is being put to work for productive or investment purposes.

In general, capital is a critical component of running a business from day to day and financing its future growth. Business capital may derive from the operations of the business or be raised from debt or equity financing. When budgeting, businesses of all kinds typically focus on three types of capital: working capital, equity capital, and debt capital. A business in the financial industry identifies trading capital as a fourth component.

Investopedia also defines working capital as:

A company's working capital is its liquid capital assets available for fulfilling daily obligations. It is calculated through the following two assessments:

Current Assets – Current Liabilities

Accounts Receivable + Inventory – Accounts Payable

Working capital measures a company's short-term liquidity. More specifically, it represents its ability to cover its debts, accounts payable, and other obligations that are due within one year.

Note that working capital is defined as current assets minus its current liabilities. A company that has more liabilities than assets could soon run short of working capital. 

What we see is that capital in itself is what runs the business. The entrepreneur sets aside a certain sum of money to run a business. The entrepreneur buys the building, equipment, the raw materials for production, and employs people to get everything running into action. The entrepreneur has to make sure that revenues exceed expenses. Expenses include the wages of all employees whether they are part of direct labor or indirect labor. Any good entrepreneur will know that treating employees right, getting the best machinery, getting the best raw materials, and any best means of production will yield more quality products than bad ones. If workers are treated well, paid accordingly, and have good working conditions then they will be motivated to do better. A research team that's paid well and has good working conditions will be motivated to make better products. 

In short, entrepreneurs need their workers. The workers need to be hired. The capital is money set aside for all operations expenses. The workers become partakers of the capital when the entrepreneur pays them their salary. If they aren't paid well then there's the right to quit. If employers mistreat their workers then the latter have the right to quit and the duty to call in labor rights. Employees can complain to the government that they're mistreated while they present proof of it. If entrepreneurs treat their workers right such as giving them good working conditions--workers will have the duty to fire workers who don't do their work right. Entrepreneurs should fire incompetent workers to keep the labor force in check and to avoid bad influence. It's a two-way street for success when entrepreneurs treat workers right and workers submit to their entrepreneurs.

Capitalism means the emphasis on private ownership and businesses to fill in demand. Any good entrepreneur will have to find the best ways to create the best products. No good entrepreneur will believe that fear produces results. Instead, a good entrepreneur will focus on making sure that the employees are in good condition. It would mean making sure every capital is wisely allocated such as giving proper compensation to the workers. A worker who doesn't get a fair share of the capital (i.e. proper wages) has the right to quit and look for a better job. 

Debunking the claim that they can do better if they owned the means of production

One of the most ridiculous claims is that "The last capitalist we hang is the one who sold us the rope." I could only say, "After businesses are closed, will you celebrate?" They think that if they owned the means of production--they would do better and create a national industry. Yet, that claim was easily refuted during the time of Mao Zedong during the "Great Leap Forward". Mao had seized all the means of production. Mao foolishly felt that his methods could industrialize China. Instead, the results were cringeworthy as this was the end result:
The Great Leap Forward ended up being a massive failure. Tens of millions died by starvation, exposure, overwork, and execution in just a few years. It broke families apart, sending men, women, and children to different locations, and destroyed traditional communities and ways of life. Farmland was damaged by nonsensical agricultural practices and the landscape denuded of trees to fuel the steel furnaces. Thirty to 40% of the housing stock was demolished to obtain raw materials for collective projects. In industry, massive quantities of capital goods and raw materials were consumed in projects that yielded no additional output of final goods. 

The Great Leap Forward was officially halted in Jan. 1961 after three brutal years of death and destruction.

Mao's so-called "industrial revolution" ended in failure. So much for saying that foreign direct investments (FDI) will just harm the country. Mao tried his formula by "self-industrialization" and as the late Lee Kuan Yew said it--it failed miserably! Families were torn apart (reminds me of sending Filipinos to work abroad is doing the same). Farmland was destroyed because of overproduction and the killing of the sparrows. The sparrows only ate a few grains and ate many pests. Mao could've chosen to import raw materials but his stubborn pride didn't allow him. Three years later, the Great Leap Forward was nothing more than a failed realization.

It wasn't until the great Deng Xiaoping took over China at the age of 74. Reading Lee's book From Third World to First interestingly wrote a lot about China under Deng. Deng who is infamous as his regime was involved in Tiananmen Square Massacre was also the man who brought back Chinese entrepreneurship. Although Deng considered himself a socialist--his modifications by adding Chinese characteristics somehow worked. Deng allowed free markets in Communist China to do business. As he said in America, "China is open for business." Deng's policies allowed China to progress into an awakened sleeping dragon. It was a big difference from Mao's so-called "Great Leap Forward".

If there was any real Great Leap Forward--it was Deng's. Deng wasn't afraid to import raw materials, import employment, import anything, to achieve the China he dreamed of. Deng said that he wasn't too particular about the cat--it's all about if it catches the mice that are causing trouble. Deng's methods had proven that private enterprises work better. The same went for Vietnam and Do Muoi.  Samsung from democratic South Korea has some of its units manufactured in Communist Vietnam. Deng's China proves that competition, not state-run monopolies, will create better products. 

References 

Books 

"From Third World to First--The Singapore Story: 1965-2000) by Lee Kuan Yew
Harpers Collins Publishers

Websites

"Capital" by Marshall Hargrave, reviewed by Bryan Barnier, fact-checked by Yarilet Perez (Updated: April 3, 2022)

"DENG XIAOPING'S EARLY ECONOMIC REFORMS"

"What Was the Great Leap Forward?" Written by The Investopedia Team, Reviewed by Michael J. Byle (Updated: September 22, 2021)

Popular posts from this blog

It's More Fun In The Philippines Thanks to the Filipino First Policy

I guess it can be called a day, right? This April 1, 2023 , I'm finally calling it quits with fighting for economic liberalization! Yes, that's right! All the advocacy for economic liberalization is just garbage. Why did I even spend so much time writing this blog only to find out that I've been duped? I hereby renounce everything I wrote here. I finally saw how brilliant the Filipino First Policy is. Man, what have I done? How much damage have I caused in advocating for economic liberalization?  The greatest president we ever had was... High School Philippine History Movement It's time to listen to the economic genius known as the late Carlos P. Garcia. Yes, he has to be one of the greatest presidents that ever existed.  I took this note from the Bohol Provincial Library and found this about CPG's Filipino First Policy ; CPG adopted the “Filipino First” Policy to promote greater Filipino participation in business, and to put the Filipinos in control of the economy...

Learning from the Late Lee Kuan Yew's Proving Protectionist-Driven Economists Wrong About Multinational Corporations

Reading the book From Third World to First is really a must. The late Lee Kuan Yew was faced with the mentality of the development economists of his day. Here's an excerpt from "Chapter 4--Surviving Without a Hinterland" which I'd like to share from Pages 57-58: After several years of disheartening trial and error, we concluded that Singapore's best hope lay with the American multinational corporations (MNCs). When the Taiwanese and Hong Kong entrepreneurs came in the 1960s, they brought low technology such as textile and toy manufacturing, labor-intensive but not large-scale. American MNCs brought higher technology in large-scale operations, creating many jobs. They had weight and confidence. They believed that their government was going to stay in Southeast Asia and their businesses were safe from confiscation or war loss. I gradually crystallized my thoughts and settled on a two-pronged strategy to overcome our disadvantages. The first was to leapfrog the reg...

The Myth of "Invading" Other Countries Through Foreign Investors and Overseas Filipino Workers

BoardGameGeek Years ago, I could remember how "Filipino pride" seems to be required by the DECS. Some songs in the Filipino subject (or called Tagalog) tend to glorify it. One of the songs was called "Ako'y Isang Pinoy" (or "I'm Pinoy") feels ironic since it was played on an imported music player. We had discussions for years about how Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) are often the unsung heroes or the new heroes. The mentality kept going on with how people desired to take a particular course not because they wanted to--it's because they wanted to go abroad. Why I wanted to take Bachelor of Science in Information Technology (BSIT) was not just to impress people but also to go abroad . However, more people shifted away from BSIT either because they were eliminated (common cause) or because it was too hard for them. Some of them flat out admitted that they took BSIT in hopes of going abroad. Some were taking nursing in hopes of again-- going abro...

The Good Old Days when Gasoline was Cheaper Under the Late Noynoy Aquino

Millennials' Voice I would like to clarify first and foremost that this post isn't an attempt to say that the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III's legacy was all bad. Some good things happened. However, let me be clear that it's stupid to say, " We don't need economic cha-cha because of the late Noynoy. " However, let me clear that I decided to write this because of a Facebook post called Millennials' Voice , which wrote this: Did you know that during President Noynoy Aquino's time, the price of oil in the world market was high, between $100 and $110 per barrel. But even with those high prices, gasoline and diesel at local pumps in the country were still relatively affordable.  Under President Duterte, world oil prices went up and down, from a low of $41 to a high of $101 per barrel. The big jump to $101 in 2022 happened because of the war between Russia and Ukraine.   Now, under the current president, world oil prices have gone up again to around $...

Pinoy Pride Economics Helps in Drug Mule Recruitment

Al Jazeera Who can remember the execution of three drug mules in China on March 30, 2011 ? These were three separate cases where the three convicts were  Sally Villanueva , Ramon Credo (who was cremated before his remains were brought home, and Elizabeth Batain (whose face was never shown). Sally had an episode in the GMA-7 TV show Magpakailanman,  where her husband was personally interviewed by Mel Tiangco. We never got Sally on the big screen. The husband's side of the story said that his wife was guilty of a frame-up, while Mel herself said, "If the offer is too good to be true, don't take it, or you could end up in the same pickle." Take note that I'm just paraphrasing Mel's words, not saying the words she said.  Reviewing the three drug mules who got arrested, based only on what's available for public viewing on the Internet If we read through the circumstances , this is how they were arrested, proving they weren't a trio: China has brushed aside...