Skip to main content

Refuting the Claim That Workers, Not Entrepreneurs, Own the Means of Production

Another ongoing nonsense by leftists is that the workers, not the entrepreneurs, are the ones who own the means of production. This would be complete nonsense spreading on social media. Having graduated from the College of Commerce (now the School of Business and Economics) makes me cringe at the idea. I've had some business marketing classes, accounting classes, and operations management classes which can help refute this idea. I keep hearing, "If only the poor will unite altogether--you rich are no more." Well, let's try and think about how the idea of workers, not entrepreneurs, owning the means of production can't work.

Defining what capital really means

Image by Sabrina Jiang © Investopedia 2020

The sample income statement by Investopedia tells you the capital. Capital is defined by the Investopedia as:
Capital is a broad term that can describe any thing that confers value or benefit to its owner, such as a factory and its machinery, intellectual property like patents, or the financial assets of a business or an individual. While money itself may be construed as capital is, capital is more often associated with cash that is being put to work for productive or investment purposes.

In general, capital is a critical component of running a business from day to day and financing its future growth. Business capital may derive from the operations of the business or be raised from debt or equity financing. When budgeting, businesses of all kinds typically focus on three types of capital: working capital, equity capital, and debt capital. A business in the financial industry identifies trading capital as a fourth component.

Investopedia also defines working capital as:

A company's working capital is its liquid capital assets available for fulfilling daily obligations. It is calculated through the following two assessments:

Current Assets – Current Liabilities

Accounts Receivable + Inventory – Accounts Payable

Working capital measures a company's short-term liquidity. More specifically, it represents its ability to cover its debts, accounts payable, and other obligations that are due within one year.

Note that working capital is defined as current assets minus its current liabilities. A company that has more liabilities than assets could soon run short of working capital. 

What we see is that capital in itself is what runs the business. The entrepreneur sets aside a certain sum of money to run a business. The entrepreneur buys the building, equipment, the raw materials for production, and employs people to get everything running into action. The entrepreneur has to make sure that revenues exceed expenses. Expenses include the wages of all employees whether they are part of direct labor or indirect labor. Any good entrepreneur will know that treating employees right, getting the best machinery, getting the best raw materials, and any best means of production will yield more quality products than bad ones. If workers are treated well, paid accordingly, and have good working conditions then they will be motivated to do better. A research team that's paid well and has good working conditions will be motivated to make better products. 

In short, entrepreneurs need their workers. The workers need to be hired. The capital is money set aside for all operations expenses. The workers become partakers of the capital when the entrepreneur pays them their salary. If they aren't paid well then there's the right to quit. If employers mistreat their workers then the latter have the right to quit and the duty to call in labor rights. Employees can complain to the government that they're mistreated while they present proof of it. If entrepreneurs treat their workers right such as giving them good working conditions--workers will have the duty to fire workers who don't do their work right. Entrepreneurs should fire incompetent workers to keep the labor force in check and to avoid bad influence. It's a two-way street for success when entrepreneurs treat workers right and workers submit to their entrepreneurs.

Capitalism means the emphasis on private ownership and businesses to fill in demand. Any good entrepreneur will have to find the best ways to create the best products. No good entrepreneur will believe that fear produces results. Instead, a good entrepreneur will focus on making sure that the employees are in good condition. It would mean making sure every capital is wisely allocated such as giving proper compensation to the workers. A worker who doesn't get a fair share of the capital (i.e. proper wages) has the right to quit and look for a better job. 

Debunking the claim that they can do better if they owned the means of production

One of the most ridiculous claims is that "The last capitalist we hang is the one who sold us the rope." I could only say, "After businesses are closed, will you celebrate?" They think that if they owned the means of production--they would do better and create a national industry. Yet, that claim was easily refuted during the time of Mao Zedong during the "Great Leap Forward". Mao had seized all the means of production. Mao foolishly felt that his methods could industrialize China. Instead, the results were cringeworthy as this was the end result:
The Great Leap Forward ended up being a massive failure. Tens of millions died by starvation, exposure, overwork, and execution in just a few years. It broke families apart, sending men, women, and children to different locations, and destroyed traditional communities and ways of life. Farmland was damaged by nonsensical agricultural practices and the landscape denuded of trees to fuel the steel furnaces. Thirty to 40% of the housing stock was demolished to obtain raw materials for collective projects. In industry, massive quantities of capital goods and raw materials were consumed in projects that yielded no additional output of final goods. 

The Great Leap Forward was officially halted in Jan. 1961 after three brutal years of death and destruction.

Mao's so-called "industrial revolution" ended in failure. So much for saying that foreign direct investments (FDI) will just harm the country. Mao tried his formula by "self-industrialization" and as the late Lee Kuan Yew said it--it failed miserably! Families were torn apart (reminds me of sending Filipinos to work abroad is doing the same). Farmland was destroyed because of overproduction and the killing of the sparrows. The sparrows only ate a few grains and ate many pests. Mao could've chosen to import raw materials but his stubborn pride didn't allow him. Three years later, the Great Leap Forward was nothing more than a failed realization.

It wasn't until the great Deng Xiaoping took over China at the age of 74. Reading Lee's book From Third World to First interestingly wrote a lot about China under Deng. Deng who is infamous as his regime was involved in Tiananmen Square Massacre was also the man who brought back Chinese entrepreneurship. Although Deng considered himself a socialist--his modifications by adding Chinese characteristics somehow worked. Deng allowed free markets in Communist China to do business. As he said in America, "China is open for business." Deng's policies allowed China to progress into an awakened sleeping dragon. It was a big difference from Mao's so-called "Great Leap Forward".

If there was any real Great Leap Forward--it was Deng's. Deng wasn't afraid to import raw materials, import employment, import anything, to achieve the China he dreamed of. Deng said that he wasn't too particular about the cat--it's all about if it catches the mice that are causing trouble. Deng's methods had proven that private enterprises work better. The same went for Vietnam and Do Muoi.  Samsung from democratic South Korea has some of its units manufactured in Communist Vietnam. Deng's China proves that competition, not state-run monopolies, will create better products. 

References 

Books 

"From Third World to First--The Singapore Story: 1965-2000) by Lee Kuan Yew
Harpers Collins Publishers

Websites

"Capital" by Marshall Hargrave, reviewed by Bryan Barnier, fact-checked by Yarilet Perez (Updated: April 3, 2022)

"DENG XIAOPING'S EARLY ECONOMIC REFORMS"

"What Was the Great Leap Forward?" Written by The Investopedia Team, Reviewed by Michael J. Byle (Updated: September 22, 2021)

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...