Skip to main content

Why I Believe Following the Crowd All the Time is REALLY BAD Investment Advice

I was thinking about how often following the crowd is bad advice. This isn't to say that you shouldn't follow the crowd if the crowd is right. This is rather to say, that it's ill-advised to follow the crowd all the time. Besides, the majority can be wrong such as how the crowd can demand the release of a guilty person over the innocent, right? This reminds me of how I almost got into a pyramid scam in college more than once. It was a direct-selling team promising returns to a certain extent. It really made me unaware of how pyramids work. Shouldn't they teach it in schools? Sadly, I feel schools are becoming more and more overly theoretical that a degree may become toilet paper for some. One can get a doctorate in economics or a degree in law in very prestigious schools and still be a fool in real life. Some fools are, in fact, highly educated, and tend to think that their being highly educated makes them right all the time. The late John Gokongwei Jr., a class valedictorian for a long time, said that we should never stop learning at all.  


This meme above from Facebook group CERTAMBAYAN shows the sad reality. It's how crowd mentality is more often than not, a fool's or a foolish decision pattern. It was pretty much why I nearly bought into pyramid scams. Later, I got hit by bad credit because I thought of returns without thinking of the risk. Greed makes people stupid, doesn't it? What would totally be, not-so-surprising, is that crowds tend to line up more with pyramid scams (such as direct selling scams), Ponzi scams, gambling dens, cryptocurrency, playing Axie Infinity to earn money, and the list can go on. These are promises too good to be true yet people fall for them, right? It's very easy to feel out of the crowd and lonely when you're lining up with so few people.  You may be lining up in a financial institution to get an investment or insurance. Maybe, the line gets so sparse because more people get into the get rich quick scheme one way or another. 

What goes next is emotions over knowledge. I remembered how often my emotions overpower my head knowledge. I can study hard and get good grades on an exam. However, it becomes a very powerful detractor. Suddenly, all that stock knowledge gets into what I might call emotional brain fog. I know it's a high risk to let someone borrow that much money yet I did it believing in my emotions over logic. It's a very deadly thing to decide on emotions. Fear also caused me to bet phished off what was in my GCash wallet. Thankfully, it wasn't my GSavings but still--I need to be careful with my emotions. Yet, it's these emotions that cause people to join the crowds that are following the get-rich-quick schemes. It's because they want instant gratification. Maybe, somebody playing Axie Infinity is bragging about the earnings and others want to join. Charles Ponzi also operated that way when he operated a scheme that got named after him. The late Bernard Madoff outdid Ponzi in many ways. Either way, we know how emotional judgment makes fools out of educated people. I'm no exception to that rule either.

Whether we want to admit it or not--bandwagoning is a very real thing. We have people who start to bully others for not being "part of the majority". Since when has majority vs. minority been about being right or wrong? That's why I believe that a real democracy hears the voices of the minority and that the minority should win if it's right. Democracy is, after all, a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. These bandwagons happen so often and people get insulted so they join the bandwagon. Insults are very hard to bear if one's an extremely emotional person. Learning to overlook an insult might help one avoid the bad investment crowd. Some could brag about their short-term returns but keep in mind--easy come is an easy go. Others also end up doing the opposite of what Warren Buffett or any stock adviser says--buy low and sell high. In some cases, better buy and hold for a certain period of time. Some people end up buying stocks when the prices are too high and panic-selling when the prices are low based on a bandwagon mentality. 

This is where we should think it over. The crowd is a very fickle thing. There are times the crowd is right such as overthrowing a tyrant or making constitutional amendments for the better. However, the crowd can also be very wrong such as how elections tend to do. It was wrong of me that I actually wanted to take information technology because of, again, the crowd. Then the same crowd exited the course either out of difficulty or were eliminated from the course. Instead, it would be better to stand out from the crowd than blend in with the crowd. Sure, the crowd can jeer and scorn if they're in the wrong. However, the fickleness of crowds means that maybe, if someone stands up differently, the crowd can then be led in the right direction. 

Popular posts from this blog

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...

External Validations, like Masters and Doctorate, Mean NOTHING with a LOUSY Education System

I have the tendency to use my MBA as a license to avoid criticism. It's a real problem that some people use their credentials and/or academic achievements to try and win an argument. One incident I wrote about was Rep. Raoul Abellar Manuel flexing his "smarts" by using his cum laude degree to win the argument . It was all about how I would often say, "You're the moron because I have the MBA and you don't." There are times I felt like taking an MBA would make up for my "moral shortcomings" during high school when I was barely passing (and the passing rate was 80% , which is rather high), that I wasn't having honors, and that there was this saying, " Thou grades shalt determine thy future! " That, of course, has led to the reality where cheating is prevalent .  I wanted to make a review. I took my MBA in 2011 and graduated in 2014. I always felt that the MBA program was what I needed to become "invincible". It was also at ...

No Hard-to-Earn Economics Degree is Required to Know That a Welfare, Anti-FDI Philippines is Destined to FAIL

GMA News When it comes to constitutional reform, I'm afraid one of the worst sources quoted would come from the Makabayan Bloc. Some people I face who are so against FDI also want to end the OFW program. The solution comes out rather absurd, as the Philippines must have its own state where it's all beg and beg . It would be like: "Free education for all! No to FDI for schools!"  "Free lunch in school!" "No to open FDI! The government must fund our local production!"  " Increase the salaries, lower the prices of goods! " (which is just plain bad accounting ) That's just a few of the crazy demands that have been given! My favorite question has always been, "Where will you get the funding?" The usual answers can be: " Print more money! " "The government should just make it a law!" "Tax the rich all the more!" which can often be accompanied by, " After all, it's the fault of the rich that p...

Why I'm Not in Favor of Nationalization of Utilities Mixed with Protectionism

ToonPool There's the call of leftist fools to stop privatization. Many still believe that utilities should be run by nationalization rather than privatization . I've been reading on Facebook where some fools believe that allowing foreign telecommunications companies (telcos) to invest in the Philippines will "risk security". Any telco will risk security if there are no laws to regulate it like the Data Privacy Law. Just because I support private enterprises doesn't mean that I say the government is hands-off. On the other hand, the government has the duty to set rules such as fair compensation, proper employee treatment, safety measures, and the like to make sure that we remain in healthy competition. Some people who keep protesting against the privatization of industries I believe (1) want the government to provide for all the needs of the people (which leads to dictatorship, eventually), (2) have some agenda as to why they're doing it, or (3) these people ar...

COMMUNIST Vietnam Has Defeated DEMOCRATIC Philippines Again This 2025

Cổng thông tin Trung ương Đoàn TNCS Hồ Chí Minh A few days ago, I wrote about warning Filipinos that they shouldn't wait for more unmitigated typhoon disasters, before realizing that the Filipino First Policy isn't working ! There's a statement that says, "Just because being tanga (inattentive) is libre (free), doesn't mean you should be tanga!"  Analyzing the different policies: why policies  matter I found a Business World article, written by Cesar Polvorosa, Jr., on my Facebook news feed discussing the Vietnamese economy . In fact, it would be better to share some hard truths that the article offers about what really went wrong with the  democratic Philippines compared to Communist Vietnam : DIVERGENT ECONOMIC MODELS  Vietnam pursued an export-oriented manufacturing strategy which has proven significantly more successful over the past half century than the Philippines’ service-heavy, remittances-dependent model . Export performance alone tells a compe...