Skip to main content

Why I Can't Take Sonny Africa's Latest Statement About Foreign Investments Seriously


I guess I can't always engage in direct debate especially if these protectionist think tanks belong to elite schools. Sadly, I wasn't qualified to enter the University of the Philippines (UP) or Ateneo De Manila University (ADMU). I was reading through IBON Foundation and found this statement about foreign investments by its executive director, Sonny Africa:

Investors

The obsession with foreign investment as if it’s some kind of magic bullet for development is also expected. Even as BSP governor, the incoming finance secretary has been among the strongest advocates of the Retail Trade Liberalization Act (RTLA), Foreign Investment Act (FIA), and Public Service Act (PSA) amendments. He echoes relentless hype that these are somehow “game-changing” reforms. He also recently gushed about how these will make the country a “preferred investment destination” and “sustain growth”.

The rest of the team are of the same mind. The incoming planning secretary, trade and industry secretary, and BSP governor have all lauded these investment liberalization measures. Yet for all their expertise, this is based on dogmatic belief more than evidence.

There’s more than enough evidence that hyped foreign investment hasn’t developed the Philippines and that it isn’t decisive for national development. Just here in Asia, the last real industrializers, South Korea, Taiwan and China, actually had less foreign investment in their periods of economic take-off than the Philippines does today.

I really find the statement idiotic especially since I've read From Third World to First. It's indeed a marvelous book by the late Lee Kuan Yew. Reading through the book and the history of other countries will prove Africa wrong. I wonder where did Africa get its data namely "There’s more than enough evidence that hyped foreign investment hasn’t developed the Philippines and that it isn’t decisive for national development. Just here in Asia, the last real industrializers, South Korea, Taiwan and China, actually had a less foreign investment in their periods of economic take-off than the Philippines does today."? I read the post where he said it and wonder if he has any empirical data to back up his claims? Seriously? Where did he get his information? It might be from some falsified evidence for all we know. Granted, Africa is an economics graduate so it's possible he's using his degree to promote his blunder. 

The big difference between Lee and Africa is empirical evidence. Lee himself went all the way for 31 years to build Singapore into the way it's now today. What about Africa? I feel like the guy is just into mindless ranting. Lee's book had shown much evidence of how foreign direct investments (FDIs) had helped develop countries. That's why I previously wrote an entry devoted to Lee's proving the economic protectionist "economists" wrong. On the contrary, South Korea, Taiwan, and China were welcoming foreign investment as part of their development. Reading through pages and pages of Lee's book really disproves Africa's current statement. It's not because Lee is way older and died at a ripe age of 91. It's because Lee established a country and wrote a real success story over a fabricated one. An old man can either be a testament to glory or a testament to stupidity. Some old men can't be taken seriously because they lived their youth wantonly and still do in their old age. Old people who lived their youth wisely and still live wisely in their old age are the ones whom the youth should listen to. 

Besides, another person worthy of attention is Kishore Mahbubani of the National Singapore University (NUS). I always found Mahbubani's statements to be strong, especially with how he described third-world country economists. The strong language in the video The Singapore Economic Model by VRPO is that third-world economists say foreign investment is bad and that it will rape the country. Yet, Mahbubani can speak from experience that foreign investments create jobs, bring capital, teach new skills, and help the country. I wonder if Africa is ever open to proving Mahbubani wrong? The empirical data of the NUS and the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy would blast off claims made by Africa regarding foreign investments. It's because Singapore has proven that accepting foreign investments is part of developing the national economy. 

That's why I wrote why I can't even take IBON Foundation as an economic think tank. Since when did presidents even have the power to alter the prices of gasoline? The world market problems such as the War in Ukraine are contributing to the increase in gas prices. Outgoing Philippine President Rodrigo R. Duterte had to borrow a lot of money for COVID-19 expenses too aside from infrastructure for future use. Some of the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino's projects had to be completed or they would go to waste. Yet, these same groups are seriously asking for more cash handouts while complaining about increasing national debts. I don't expect them to come up with a sound solution either. Yet, some people still believe them and quote them. That's why I feel like writing posts like these every now and then. 

References 

Books

"From Third World to First--The Singapore Story: 1965-2000) by Lee Kuan Yew
Harpers Collins Publishers

Videos

"The Singapore economic model - VPRO documentary - 2009"  by VRPO Documentary (September 8, 2018)

Websites

"Miracle on the Han River Part II, or Regression to the Mean? South Korea’s Economy in Transition" by Yoon-shik Park (December 2014)

"No Mavericks Among Economic Top Guns" by Sonny Africa

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Wanting Wealth WITHOUT Financial Discipline

Many people want to be rich, but not so many people want the discipline on how to be rich. Isn't that the plain hard truth ? As I do this sideline blog , I contemplated whether I should write another post after writing several posts years back, or when I wrote about Venezuela as a cautionary tale . Back on topic, I thought about how financial discipline is something often overlooked. It's easy to talk about Christmas since that's probably the most wonderful time of the year to be spendthrift , only to find out that one's broke by the New Year . The cycle of reckless financial habits tends to restart in January, even when January becomes that time of reckoning between debtors and creditors! January 2026 will end, February 2026 comes, and then the cycle of financial recklessness continues. It's the same cycle over and over! Last Christmas, I remember how DTI Secretary Christina Roque spoke about the PHP 500.00 noche buena, for a family of four . I called it tactless b...
Read more

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...
Read more

Communist Vietnam's Great Leap Forward in Agricultural Production

I remember reading through Third World to First by the late Lee Kuan Yew. It's very easy to use the book to badmouth the Marcoses but not to learn from the rest of it. The book also talks about Vietnam and LKY's encounter with the late Nguyen Duy Cong aka Do Muoi. It's often said that Singapore only opened because of its lack of natural resources. On the contrary, Do Muoi decided to learn from Singapore how to turn the Communist Party of Vietnam into a powerhouse. Do Muoi, though a communist , was impressed by Singapore during his October 1993 state visit. Vietnam, unlike Singapore, is a country rich in natural resources. The third-world mentality said that MNCs are there to rape the resources .  A very huge misconception especially if you know Singapore's history Some Filipinos on social media even say that FDIs will destroy agriculture and nature. This is a meme by the Philippine Anti-Fascist League on Facebook. They say that FDIs equals environmental degradation. Yet...
Read more

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more

The Saying "The Customer is Always Right" isn't Right

I remember being chastised and said, "The customer is always right!" It became hypocritical because the same person who told me that later chastised me for yelling at the service provider in public . I'd admit that I screamed at the phone or even in person because things didn't go my way. My favorite excuse would be, "You said the customer is always right, right?" Going by the logic that the customer is always right, I'm right in doing the wrong that I did to service providers. It also reminds me of some rude manager lady (who I believe got fired sometime later, not going to mention her name or the company) who's heard to be highly unreasonable . She would scream in public louder than the late Miriam Defensor-Santiago.  I'd like to give an illustration of the fault of that phrase. The news of a raging customer who threw hot soup at the manager can create debate . Was she in the right when she threw the hot soup at the manager instead of talking t...
Read more