Skip to main content

Why I Can't Take Sonny Africa's Latest Statement About Foreign Investments Seriously


I guess I can't always engage in direct debate especially if these protectionist think tanks belong to elite schools. Sadly, I wasn't qualified to enter the University of the Philippines (UP) or Ateneo De Manila University (ADMU). I was reading through IBON Foundation and found this statement about foreign investments by its executive director, Sonny Africa:

Investors

The obsession with foreign investment as if it’s some kind of magic bullet for development is also expected. Even as BSP governor, the incoming finance secretary has been among the strongest advocates of the Retail Trade Liberalization Act (RTLA), Foreign Investment Act (FIA), and Public Service Act (PSA) amendments. He echoes relentless hype that these are somehow “game-changing” reforms. He also recently gushed about how these will make the country a “preferred investment destination” and “sustain growth”.

The rest of the team are of the same mind. The incoming planning secretary, trade and industry secretary, and BSP governor have all lauded these investment liberalization measures. Yet for all their expertise, this is based on dogmatic belief more than evidence.

There’s more than enough evidence that hyped foreign investment hasn’t developed the Philippines and that it isn’t decisive for national development. Just here in Asia, the last real industrializers, South Korea, Taiwan and China, actually had less foreign investment in their periods of economic take-off than the Philippines does today.

I really find the statement idiotic especially since I've read From Third World to First. It's indeed a marvelous book by the late Lee Kuan Yew. Reading through the book and the history of other countries will prove Africa wrong. I wonder where did Africa get its data namely "There’s more than enough evidence that hyped foreign investment hasn’t developed the Philippines and that it isn’t decisive for national development. Just here in Asia, the last real industrializers, South Korea, Taiwan and China, actually had a less foreign investment in their periods of economic take-off than the Philippines does today."? I read the post where he said it and wonder if he has any empirical data to back up his claims? Seriously? Where did he get his information? It might be from some falsified evidence for all we know. Granted, Africa is an economics graduate so it's possible he's using his degree to promote his blunder. 

The big difference between Lee and Africa is empirical evidence. Lee himself went all the way for 31 years to build Singapore into the way it's now today. What about Africa? I feel like the guy is just into mindless ranting. Lee's book had shown much evidence of how foreign direct investments (FDIs) had helped develop countries. That's why I previously wrote an entry devoted to Lee's proving the economic protectionist "economists" wrong. On the contrary, South Korea, Taiwan, and China were welcoming foreign investment as part of their development. Reading through pages and pages of Lee's book really disproves Africa's current statement. It's not because Lee is way older and died at a ripe age of 91. It's because Lee established a country and wrote a real success story over a fabricated one. An old man can either be a testament to glory or a testament to stupidity. Some old men can't be taken seriously because they lived their youth wantonly and still do in their old age. Old people who lived their youth wisely and still live wisely in their old age are the ones whom the youth should listen to. 

Besides, another person worthy of attention is Kishore Mahbubani of the National Singapore University (NUS). I always found Mahbubani's statements to be strong, especially with how he described third-world country economists. The strong language in the video The Singapore Economic Model by VRPO is that third-world economists say foreign investment is bad and that it will rape the country. Yet, Mahbubani can speak from experience that foreign investments create jobs, bring capital, teach new skills, and help the country. I wonder if Africa is ever open to proving Mahbubani wrong? The empirical data of the NUS and the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy would blast off claims made by Africa regarding foreign investments. It's because Singapore has proven that accepting foreign investments is part of developing the national economy. 

That's why I wrote why I can't even take IBON Foundation as an economic think tank. Since when did presidents even have the power to alter the prices of gasoline? The world market problems such as the War in Ukraine are contributing to the increase in gas prices. Outgoing Philippine President Rodrigo R. Duterte had to borrow a lot of money for COVID-19 expenses too aside from infrastructure for future use. Some of the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino's projects had to be completed or they would go to waste. Yet, these same groups are seriously asking for more cash handouts while complaining about increasing national debts. I don't expect them to come up with a sound solution either. Yet, some people still believe them and quote them. That's why I feel like writing posts like these every now and then. 

References 

Books

"From Third World to First--The Singapore Story: 1965-2000) by Lee Kuan Yew
Harpers Collins Publishers

Videos

"The Singapore economic model - VPRO documentary - 2009"  by VRPO Documentary (September 8, 2018)

Websites

"Miracle on the Han River Part II, or Regression to the Mean? South Korea’s Economy in Transition" by Yoon-shik Park (December 2014)

"No Mavericks Among Economic Top Guns" by Sonny Africa

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

#SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics' Understanding of How Gasoline Prices Work

International State College of the Philippines Today is Flor Contempacion Day , and rallies are expected. However, whether it's Flor's death anniversary or not, rallies are expected for the wrongest of reasons. I would like to address this photo from the International State College of the Philippines' Facebook page. The demands here are rather clunky and stupid. We have the following demands that would naturally clash with each other, such as: No to the oil deregulation law while demanding lower oil prices. This is simply ignoring the basic fundamentals of economics, namely the law of supply and demand . They say that oil companies are greedy for gain. These rallyists probably don't really understand the difference between revenues and profits . Let's understand the Oil Deregulation Law  The Oil Deregulation Law, or the Republic Act No. 8479 , passed on February 10, 1998, under the late Fidel Valdez Ramos. Here's how the liberalization works: CHAPTER II  LIBERAL...
Read more

"Will #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics Lower Philippine Gas Prices?

Inquirer Gasoline prices have increased again, haven't they?  A few days ago, I wrote  why #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba's view of gas prices is questionable . Today, I feel like writing this after several complaints on Facebook. I would like to create a follow-up post. People are complaining too much without understanding the real reason why some countries have lower prices of gasoline. Real talk. We need to talk about economic policies,  and  of course, please do a study on supply-demand analysis  on supply chain management . Let's examine the complaints made by Bulatlat Bulatlat Here's a chart from Bulatlat that compares the increase in prices of gasoline between the Philippines, Thailand, and Malaysia. It's always problematic when people ignore simple economics. It's funny, but Bulatlat mentions this on their website: Note also how expensive our diesel and gasoline products are compared to those of our ASEAN neighbors. The estimated common price today of diesel in...
Read more

The Good Old Days when Gasoline was Cheaper Under the Late Noynoy Aquino

Millennials' Voice I would like to clarify first and foremost that this post isn't an attempt to say that the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III's legacy was all bad. Some good things happened. However, let me be clear that it's stupid to say, " We don't need economic cha-cha because of the late Noynoy. " However, let me clear that I decided to write this because of a Facebook post called Millennials' Voice , which wrote this: Did you know that during President Noynoy Aquino's time, the price of oil in the world market was high, between $100 and $110 per barrel. But even with those high prices, gasoline and diesel at local pumps in the country were still relatively affordable.  Under President Duterte, world oil prices went up and down, from a low of $41 to a high of $101 per barrel. The big jump to $101 in 2022 happened because of the war between Russia and Ukraine.   Now, under the current president, world oil prices have gone up again to around $...
Read more

Migrante International: Still Mourning for the Late Flor Contemplacion While Sticking to Third-World Development Economics

Unsurprisingly,  The Flor Contemplacion Story was uploaded a month ago. I wrote that there's a possible political motive behind the film getting uploaded on YouTube . That's why I even wrote a review against the film after I rewatched it in HD . It's no surprise that Migrante International is inducing its own migraines. The evidence against Flor was already overwhelming, as presented by the Singaporean court . Do these people act as if there was no injustice in the Philippines? What about how the Vizconde Massacre was handled where, until now, the real perpetrators have not been found? Two years after Flor's execution, the Chiong Sisters case arrested the wrong people,  and a doubtful Supreme Court of the Philippines' decision was released. Yes, a murder happened in all three cases. Singapore convicted the real killer of the slayings of Delia Maga and Nicholas Huang. Meanwhile, the Philippines had wrongly convicted Hubert Jeffry P. Webb (whose 15 years were wasted) ...
Read more

The Tragic Windfall of the Late Flor Contemplacion's Family

PEH.ph Last year, I wrote an article talking about Flor Contemplacion crybabies spreading fake news for 30 years . I noticed that the movie could be watched for free on YouTube (which is one hour and 52 minutes long), and the one that you had to pay for via rent or personal soft copy ( which is two hours and two minutes long). I was looking into the film and realized the "for free" version lacks the exaggerated water dunking and electrocution torture scene, which I believe is available, which is a ten-minute difference. I remember seeing the old version where Flor was tortured by Singaporean police via water dunking and electrocution, to get an answer out of her. The famous line by the late Nora Aunor was, "I did not kill anybody!" It's 31 years, and I don't expect the fake news about Flor to stop just because  it's past 30. No, fake news is that hard to kill even in the digital age. It reminds me of the fate of Flor's sons , where one of them, Sandr...
Read more