Skip to main content

Why I Can't Take Sonny Africa's Latest Statement About Foreign Investments Seriously


I guess I can't always engage in direct debate especially if these protectionist think tanks belong to elite schools. Sadly, I wasn't qualified to enter the University of the Philippines (UP) or Ateneo De Manila University (ADMU). I was reading through IBON Foundation and found this statement about foreign investments by its executive director, Sonny Africa:

Investors

The obsession with foreign investment as if it’s some kind of magic bullet for development is also expected. Even as BSP governor, the incoming finance secretary has been among the strongest advocates of the Retail Trade Liberalization Act (RTLA), Foreign Investment Act (FIA), and Public Service Act (PSA) amendments. He echoes relentless hype that these are somehow “game-changing” reforms. He also recently gushed about how these will make the country a “preferred investment destination” and “sustain growth”.

The rest of the team are of the same mind. The incoming planning secretary, trade and industry secretary, and BSP governor have all lauded these investment liberalization measures. Yet for all their expertise, this is based on dogmatic belief more than evidence.

There’s more than enough evidence that hyped foreign investment hasn’t developed the Philippines and that it isn’t decisive for national development. Just here in Asia, the last real industrializers, South Korea, Taiwan and China, actually had less foreign investment in their periods of economic take-off than the Philippines does today.

I really find the statement idiotic especially since I've read From Third World to First. It's indeed a marvelous book by the late Lee Kuan Yew. Reading through the book and the history of other countries will prove Africa wrong. I wonder where did Africa get its data namely "There’s more than enough evidence that hyped foreign investment hasn’t developed the Philippines and that it isn’t decisive for national development. Just here in Asia, the last real industrializers, South Korea, Taiwan and China, actually had a less foreign investment in their periods of economic take-off than the Philippines does today."? I read the post where he said it and wonder if he has any empirical data to back up his claims? Seriously? Where did he get his information? It might be from some falsified evidence for all we know. Granted, Africa is an economics graduate so it's possible he's using his degree to promote his blunder. 

The big difference between Lee and Africa is empirical evidence. Lee himself went all the way for 31 years to build Singapore into the way it's now today. What about Africa? I feel like the guy is just into mindless ranting. Lee's book had shown much evidence of how foreign direct investments (FDIs) had helped develop countries. That's why I previously wrote an entry devoted to Lee's proving the economic protectionist "economists" wrong. On the contrary, South Korea, Taiwan, and China were welcoming foreign investment as part of their development. Reading through pages and pages of Lee's book really disproves Africa's current statement. It's not because Lee is way older and died at a ripe age of 91. It's because Lee established a country and wrote a real success story over a fabricated one. An old man can either be a testament to glory or a testament to stupidity. Some old men can't be taken seriously because they lived their youth wantonly and still do in their old age. Old people who lived their youth wisely and still live wisely in their old age are the ones whom the youth should listen to. 

Besides, another person worthy of attention is Kishore Mahbubani of the National Singapore University (NUS). I always found Mahbubani's statements to be strong, especially with how he described third-world country economists. The strong language in the video The Singapore Economic Model by VRPO is that third-world economists say foreign investment is bad and that it will rape the country. Yet, Mahbubani can speak from experience that foreign investments create jobs, bring capital, teach new skills, and help the country. I wonder if Africa is ever open to proving Mahbubani wrong? The empirical data of the NUS and the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy would blast off claims made by Africa regarding foreign investments. It's because Singapore has proven that accepting foreign investments is part of developing the national economy. 

That's why I wrote why I can't even take IBON Foundation as an economic think tank. Since when did presidents even have the power to alter the prices of gasoline? The world market problems such as the War in Ukraine are contributing to the increase in gas prices. Outgoing Philippine President Rodrigo R. Duterte had to borrow a lot of money for COVID-19 expenses too aside from infrastructure for future use. Some of the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino's projects had to be completed or they would go to waste. Yet, these same groups are seriously asking for more cash handouts while complaining about increasing national debts. I don't expect them to come up with a sound solution either. Yet, some people still believe them and quote them. That's why I feel like writing posts like these every now and then. 

References 

Books

"From Third World to First--The Singapore Story: 1965-2000) by Lee Kuan Yew
Harpers Collins Publishers

Videos

"The Singapore economic model - VPRO documentary - 2009"  by VRPO Documentary (September 8, 2018)

Websites

"Miracle on the Han River Part II, or Regression to the Mean? South Korea’s Economy in Transition" by Yoon-shik Park (December 2014)

"No Mavericks Among Economic Top Guns" by Sonny Africa

Popular posts from this blog

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...

Can Anti-FDI Proponents Prove Their Claim That Economic Liberalization Will Just Benefit the Filipino Oligarchs?

The same old narration has been made over and over again . I'd dare say that the narration out the Facebook pages of the likes of Atty. Teddy CasiƱo, Atty. Neri Colmenares, Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, Migrante International, IBON Foundation, etc. are more or less the same. It's already a broken record based on the facts that they've been refuted. I've read the book From Third World to First . I guess Migrante International hates that book because Singapore is often associated with the execution of Flor Contemplacion, at least on their watch. What they're doing is nothing more than still hating Japan, Germany, and Italy because of the Second World War. I'm not surprised at another lie that's often repeated--economic liberalization (or 100% FDI shares ownership) will only  benefit the oligarchs . I guess it'll be easy to nail on me because I'm not a summa cum laude and Rep. Raoul Abellar Manuel is and he's a graduate of the Uni...

External Validations, like Masters and Doctorate, Mean NOTHING with a LOUSY Education System

I have the tendency to use my MBA as a license to avoid criticism. It's a real problem that some people use their credentials and/or academic achievements to try and win an argument. One incident I wrote about was Rep. Raoul Abellar Manuel flexing his "smarts" by using his cum laude degree to win the argument . It was all about how I would often say, "You're the moron because I have the MBA and you don't." There are times I felt like taking an MBA would make up for my "moral shortcomings" during high school when I was barely passing (and the passing rate was 80% , which is rather high), that I wasn't having honors, and that there was this saying, " Thou grades shalt determine thy future! " That, of course, has led to the reality where cheating is prevalent .  I wanted to make a review. I took my MBA in 2011 and graduated in 2014. I always felt that the MBA program was what I needed to become "invincible". It was also at ...

Having the BADLY NEEDED Tenacity to Hold My PSEi Related Investments During INEVITABLE Paper Losses

I decided to do a portfolio review, especially because Christmas to New Year is around the corner . I thought about checking my AXA Chinese Tycoon Fund. For the sake of confidentiality , I wouldn't give out the exact loss. I was tempted to sell my AXA Chinese Tycoon Fund (which was at a paper loss , not an actual loss) and go for cryptocurrency . However, after looking at the ghost of Quadriga-CX Crypto Scam  made I said, "I need to stick to what Warren Buffett said about the stock market." Buffett's advice doesn't require an MBA or even a PhD in business administration to understand them. Instead, I was looking at these lessons that Buffett such as: If I'm not willing to open to own a stock for 10 minutes, I shouldn't think of owning it for ten years! Definitely no day trading for me! The stock market is a device that transfers money from impatient people to patient people. I have to be more patient as the stock market inevitably corrects itself, unless t...

No Hard-to-Earn Economics Degree is Required to Know That a Welfare, Anti-FDI Philippines is Destined to FAIL

GMA News When it comes to constitutional reform, I'm afraid one of the worst sources quoted would come from the Makabayan Bloc. Some people I face who are so against FDI also want to end the OFW program. The solution comes out rather absurd, as the Philippines must have its own state where it's all beg and beg . It would be like: "Free education for all! No to FDI for schools!"  "Free lunch in school!" "No to open FDI! The government must fund our local production!"  " Increase the salaries, lower the prices of goods! " (which is just plain bad accounting ) That's just a few of the crazy demands that have been given! My favorite question has always been, "Where will you get the funding?" The usual answers can be: " Print more money! " "The government should just make it a law!" "Tax the rich all the more!" which can often be accompanied by, " After all, it's the fault of the rich that p...