Skip to main content

Why I Find the Statement "Invest Only What You Can Afford to Lose" to be Very SELF-DEFEATING

Back then, I remembered being told to invest only money I can afford to lose. I would confess that's really very bad advice. I decided to dig out an old article from The Philippine Star by Rose Fres Fausto who had written these words of wisdom:

I cringe whenever I hear this advice. Why? Because it is a bad advice! Imagine if Uncle Warren Buffet followed that advice. He wouldn’t have become the world’s best investor. Okay, let’s get more real. Imagine if the regular Juan and Juana would follow that advice. Both would never get to say, “I am ready to have a decent retirement.” And that is even after they have set aside savings religiously from the time they started working! Inflation would have eaten up the purchasing power of their savings leaving them feeling kawawa despite being conscientious in following the first basic law of money, “Pay yourself first.”

It should be remembered that yes, all investments have risks but to invest only the money you are willing to lose? Come on. That is like saying “do not invest!” I am not willing to lose the money I invest. I am willing to take calculated risks. 

If we're talking about investing only what you can lose--it's just like gambling. This reminds me that I previously wrote a post on the irony of gambling but not investing. The big difference between gambling and investing is this. Gambling is all about getting ready to lose that money should you lose the bet. Investing is all about getting ready to receive more returns even if there will be losses. Some may lose money to a bad customer (it happened to me) or make a bad deal with direct stock trading. In stocks, there's the index fund alternative which Warren Buffett also recommends. I prefer to use the index fund than direct stock trading due to having low risks. Sure, I'm willing to have an aggressive portfolio but being moderately aggressive--I'd probably prefer to put PHP 1,000.00-PHP 5,000.00 depending on the NAVPU rates. 

If the issue is about stocks--there's always the problem of jumping into it without knowing it. Direct stock trading has its risks. The general rule for traders is to buy low and sell high. Another rule is to do research on the companies you're investing into. Are these blue-chip companies or companies that have stocks but aren't doing well? Some people experience losses in stocks by not following the stock guidelines than because of the stock market. It's like you drive a well-functioning car but you fueled it with impure gasoline or you microwaved your smartphone. 

With that, that's why I felt a better way to say it (and others before me and after me) would say, "Invest only what you don't need right now!" In short, set aside a budget for investing. It's like you get your paycheck. For entrepreneurs, it's their profit sharing or monthly allowance as agreed among business owners. Business owners may agree to receive their monthly allowance for personal expenses while the rest of the profits are kept in a joint account. Regardless, we know there are bills to pay and families to feed in the process. We would need to understand that there's money set aside for necessities. So investing the money set aside for necessities is absolutely not recommended. 

Any sensible person always expects temporary losses such as paying utility bills (phone, electricity, water), tuition fees, any loans they may have needed, and the like. Now, everything's settled and if one's not spending too much--one still has some generous amount of money left. Maybe, the family may want to order Mang Inasal because it's cheap and delicious plus it's a Sunday. Some of the best foods aren't expensive either. However, one may think about setting aside money for investment. It's like how AXA's Chinese Tycoon Fund requires PHP 3,000.02 per month to keep the investment going. This PHP 3,000.02 per month is not set aside for Axie Infinity where returns have a very low guarantee. It's because if I bet PHP 3,000.00 per month--I expect to lose more than to gain more of it. It's set aside for AXA which is there to help with insurance policies. Take note that insurance is more on emergency funding and not for future personal enjoyment. The Variable Universal Life insurance is to protect your loved ones and not for personal enjoyment. Money set in Axie Infinity is expected to be lost when you lose a match. It's no different from a fraudulent insurance company that promises things too good to be true. AXA is registered, monitored, and any temporary losses are spent on the insurance side and are dependent on the stock market performance for some investments. 

Another new piece of advice is to get an index fund. With ATRAM, Seedbox, and the ever-convenient GCash, I think about GInvest. Some think investment requires huge amounts of money. However, some investments may require only a minimum of PHP 5,000.00 to PHP 10.000.00. Maybe, any sensible person who lives paycheck to paycheck may be surprised at how much money they've saved. The children may be wanting to go to Mang Inasal or Jollibee. However, the breadwinner says, "No, not this time. We're going to invest for your future." Maybe, he thinks the monthly PHP 3,000.02 to AXA is too heavy so he decides to start with UITFs that start off with only PHP 1,000.00. What he does is to start a UITF account of his choice (maybe lower risk) then he starts to set aside PHP 1,000.00 per month or invest more than usual if the market is at a low. What the person is doing is, "This money isn't needed now but I'm investing it for money I need later." Eventually, if the family all develops better habits--they may start to invest PHP 2,000.00 per month if the market is high and PHP 4,000 if the market is low.

One thing I felt like saying to myself is, "Do I need this or not?" especially if I've had money saved for it. I remembered wanting to buy this and that with my money but I kept saving up the money. What I did was replace money for wants with investments. Two years of savings for a specific want were transferred to investments. I find I want to buy this and that but I decided to invest some money in the index funds. My target was to reach a specific amount for the Philippine Equity Smart Index Fund. Now, I reached my target goal (for now). I find myself wanting to buy this and that and I realized, "Do I even have time to enjoy it? Nah!" then I decide to set that money aside to be placed in that index fund. I may decide to put money in the feeder funds (for now) since I reached my momentary target--but only if the feeder fund's NAVPUs are lower. Though, I might sell off some investments when they're high while focusing on adding PHP 1,000.00 per month to the Philippine Equity Smart Index Fund.

What I'm investing is not money I can afford to lose. Instead, it's to be invested with valid financial groups like Seedbox and ATRAM. GInvest is using these platforms to power it. Of course, it'd be crazy to invest all my savings at once. It's because some of my savings are meant for emergencies. I can't just sell my index funds to pay hospital bills. Instead, I should claim my Healthmax should ever, God forbid, I get hospitalized. That's why it's all about a diversified portfolio. Have insurance? Check! Have investments? Check! I'm expecting some maturity a few years from now. While at it, I might plan on how to reinvestment any maturities. It's not because I can afford to lose it. Rather, it's because I set aside money for investments to curb my spendthrift tendencies. I also set aside that money for future returns as a form of security.

References

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

#SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics' Understanding of How Gasoline Prices Work

International State College of the Philippines Today is Flor Contempacion Day , and rallies are expected. However, whether it's Flor's death anniversary or not, rallies are expected for the wrongest of reasons. I would like to address this photo from the International State College of the Philippines' Facebook page. The demands here are rather clunky and stupid. We have the following demands that would naturally clash with each other, such as: No to the oil deregulation law while demanding lower oil prices. This is simply ignoring the basic fundamentals of economics, namely the law of supply and demand . They say that oil companies are greedy for gain. These rallyists probably don't really understand the difference between revenues and profits . Let's understand the Oil Deregulation Law  The Oil Deregulation Law, or the Republic Act No. 8479 , passed on February 10, 1998, under the late Fidel Valdez Ramos. Here's how the liberalization works: CHAPTER II  LIBERAL...
Read more

"Will #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics Lower Philippine Gas Prices?

Inquirer Gasoline prices have increased again, haven't they?  A few days ago, I wrote  why #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba's view of gas prices is questionable . Today, I feel like writing this after several complaints on Facebook. I would like to create a follow-up post. People are complaining too much without understanding the real reason why some countries have lower prices of gasoline. Real talk. We need to talk about economic policies,  and  of course, please do a study on supply-demand analysis  on supply chain management . Let's examine the complaints made by Bulatlat Bulatlat Here's a chart from Bulatlat that compares the increase in prices of gasoline between the Philippines, Thailand, and Malaysia. It's always problematic when people ignore simple economics. It's funny, but Bulatlat mentions this on their website: Note also how expensive our diesel and gasoline products are compared to those of our ASEAN neighbors. The estimated common price today of diesel in...
Read more

The Good Old Days when Gasoline was Cheaper Under the Late Noynoy Aquino

Millennials' Voice I would like to clarify first and foremost that this post isn't an attempt to say that the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III's legacy was all bad. Some good things happened. However, let me be clear that it's stupid to say, " We don't need economic cha-cha because of the late Noynoy. " However, let me clear that I decided to write this because of a Facebook post called Millennials' Voice , which wrote this: Did you know that during President Noynoy Aquino's time, the price of oil in the world market was high, between $100 and $110 per barrel. But even with those high prices, gasoline and diesel at local pumps in the country were still relatively affordable.  Under President Duterte, world oil prices went up and down, from a low of $41 to a high of $101 per barrel. The big jump to $101 in 2022 happened because of the war between Russia and Ukraine.   Now, under the current president, world oil prices have gone up again to around $...
Read more

Migrante International: Still Mourning for the Late Flor Contemplacion While Sticking to Third-World Development Economics

Unsurprisingly,  The Flor Contemplacion Story was uploaded a month ago. I wrote that there's a possible political motive behind the film getting uploaded on YouTube . That's why I even wrote a review against the film after I rewatched it in HD . It's no surprise that Migrante International is inducing its own migraines. The evidence against Flor was already overwhelming, as presented by the Singaporean court . Do these people act as if there was no injustice in the Philippines? What about how the Vizconde Massacre was handled where, until now, the real perpetrators have not been found? Two years after Flor's execution, the Chiong Sisters case arrested the wrong people,  and a doubtful Supreme Court of the Philippines' decision was released. Yes, a murder happened in all three cases. Singapore convicted the real killer of the slayings of Delia Maga and Nicholas Huang. Meanwhile, the Philippines had wrongly convicted Hubert Jeffry P. Webb (whose 15 years were wasted) ...
Read more

The Tragic Windfall of the Late Flor Contemplacion's Family

PEH.ph Last year, I wrote an article talking about Flor Contemplacion crybabies spreading fake news for 30 years . I noticed that the movie could be watched for free on YouTube (which is one hour and 52 minutes long), and the one that you had to pay for via rent or personal soft copy ( which is two hours and two minutes long). I was looking into the film and realized the "for free" version lacks the exaggerated water dunking and electrocution torture scene, which I believe is available, which is a ten-minute difference. I remember seeing the old version where Flor was tortured by Singaporean police via water dunking and electrocution, to get an answer out of her. The famous line by the late Nora Aunor was, "I did not kill anybody!" It's 31 years, and I don't expect the fake news about Flor to stop just because  it's past 30. No, fake news is that hard to kill even in the digital age. It reminds me of the fate of Flor's sons , where one of them, Sandr...
Read more