Skip to main content

Why I've Chosen to Invest in Indexes, Not Axies

I guess it's more than time to tackle on Axie Infinity again. Last time, I wrote a post where I talked about how Axie Infinity promised riches but brought disaster. I even laughed writing about how someone may be dismissing AXA but playing Axie Infinity thinking that it's an "investment". Instead, it might be wise to get an Index Fund that will start with a minimum of PHP 1,000.00 or higher. GInvest (which has both ATRAM and Seedbox involved) allows some people to start investing for as low as PHP 50.00 though it might be wise to spare PHP 1,000.00 instead. There are two index funds namely the Philippine Stock Index Fund and the Philippine Equity Smart Index Fund--both focused on the Philippine Stock Exchange Index (PSEI). 

I still remember I wrote about the irony of gambling but not investing. I guess people will find buying index funds or indexes boring. What I noticed after I bought my indexes (and again, I wouldn't tell how much I've placed and neither should you)--it does start to get "boring". It's because the plan is investing long-term and I can't magically turn the hands of time. Yet, I've had a bad habit of checking the investments nearly daily because I might plan to buy yet on a dip or because I check my virtual tree on GCash on a daily basis. It does get "boring" after buying because the prices don't automatically go up or down. Instead, the one thing about stocks is that you may even have to wait longer before you can score big with the buy low then sell high. That's why some people lose the stock trade. It's because of a lack of patience.

I think people "invest" in Axies because it's more exciting. They want the thrill and excitement like people in cockfighting. I call the game like it's cockfighting. Yet, the problem of the exciting part is when the excitement dies. Sure, it's exciting to bet money but that excitement ends when you lose the bet. The Axies are just like fighting cocks--you can't always guarantee your win. It's like betting on horseracing where the outcome is more random than stock performance. You can't guarantee your win. That's why I've avoided Axie Infinity like a plague. I once fell into a pyramid scheme in college and had bad customer credit 10 years ago. Why should I let Axie Infinity be my next mistake? 

Sure, investment can be "boring". I can't help but fidget (at times) when the money I placed isn't moving up yet. Yet, that's something I must expect because I plan to invest long-term. It's a downward cycle right now with the stocks. Yet, Warren Buffett's advice is to buy undervalued stocks and hold them. Buffett also suggests buying index funds because of the lower management feeds. Mutual funds end up having higher fees due to how they try to outperform the market. Index funds simply try to mirror the market which lowers the risk overall. The index fund is best bought and held. I intend to invest for at least five years then maybe pull it out and reinvest it in the banks. I plan to put at least PHP 1,000.00 per month in any of the funds which are at a "dip". I reached my target for one fund, but I feel I need to reach the target amount for another. It might be "boring" at first but there's something to look forward to. 

At the same time, setting some money aside for investment curbs my spendthrift tendencies. I remembered having some money I was tempted to splurge. I wanted to buy this and that. The solution became to invest some money in bonds since I was still scared of stocks. I ended up getting a long-term negotiable certificate of deposit (LTNCD) next. Now, I feel I have some confidence to indirectly get into stocks with the index fund program. I'm just starting small for now but I hope to make it bigger overtime with a monthly or quarterly commitment. 

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...