Skip to main content

Using Vietnam to Justify No to Economic Reform is Rooted on ECONOMIC IGNORANCE

VNUA

Some time ago, I remember the now-defunct Philippine Anti-Fascist League Facebook page. One of its administrators (and I heard that it's actually run by a group of Gen-Z brats) berated the CoRRECT Movement. I'll put a screenshot of that statement made by one of the administrators (and I heard one of them was just a 13-year-old brat at that time).


For the sake of non-Tagalog speakers (although the Philippines is my default target readers), I will translate what this prick of an administrator wrote on their now-defunct Facebook page. Although it's already been taken down, I believe the need to continue refuting their past arguments along with other similar pages. Refute them using common sense and research data from economists from first-world countries! The translation goes like this:
Vietnam won the revolution, and they had a national industrialization and agrarian reform. What Vietnam's "Open FDI" means that the koriktor (a mockery of Corrector) actually means is that, those are finished products that are sold in the world market.

Meanwhile, in the Philippines, we don't have industries meaning that if it's open FDI here in the Philippines, our raw materials will be consumed by the greedy foreigners. 

This is just one argument. I've read other arguments that still believe Vietnam is a protectionist state. They may say, "Look at Vietnam! It's a protectionist command economy state! Why is it doing better than the Philippines?" I believe this argument comes from people with distorted views of what FDI means. Since when did a foreign investment involve sexual relations with foreigners (read here), borrowing money from another country (read here), or selling the country to foreigners? A simple definition of foreign investment shoots down such ridiculous thinking! 

However, knowing the history of Doi Moi, orchestrated by the late Nguyen Duy Cong aka Do Muoi, one can say that Vietnam actually accepted foreign investment, while it was still growing. Do Muoi struck up an interesting conversation with another great leader, the late Lee Kuan Yew. LKY even wrote this in From Third World to First after he saw Vietnam rise:

In fact, the Vietnamese had made progress. As a result of more contacts with foreigners and greater information on the market economy, ministers and officials had better understanding of the workings of the free market. Greater street activity, more shops, foreign businesspeople, hotels--these were all signs of prosperity in Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi.  

Vietnam went in a different direction compared to the supposedly more democratic Philippines! The Vietnam Briefing mentions this one, a far cry from the overly restrictive policies as stated by the Official Gazette of the Philippines. 

Investors from ASEAN, the United States and Europeand countries are increasingly moving capital into projects in Vietnam, because of its highly attractive environment, and strategic business location.

Vietnam allows 100% foreign ownership in most of its sectors, including trading, manufacturing, IT, education sectors and more. For this reason, the country is viewed as being relatively wide open for foreign investors to enter the market and setup an LLC or other type of business entity.

However, a small number of business fields are limited for foreign-investment, and require that a foreign investor form a joint-venture with a local partner. These include:

  • Advertising services;
  • Agriculture, hunting, and forestry related services;
  • Telecommunication services;
  • Travel agencies; Tour operator services; Entertainment services;
  • Electronic gaming businesses;
  • Container handling; Customs clearance services; Auxiliary transport services;
  • Internal waterways transport, rail and road transport services.

That "negative list" in Vietnam is a lot shorter than the negative list of the Philippines! Even more, Vietnam's law on foreign investment also says that these businesses need a minimum entry of 30% but they can own more than 30%. Pretty much, doing agricultural business in Vietnam where one can own more than 30% is more feasible than going to a country that refuses to be flexible with equity restrictions. It's really not feasible to do business with someone who demands a huge slice of the profits from you, now is it? 

Even more, to say that certain industries have restrictions for "security reasons" is stupid (read here). It's not as if regulatory laws such as data privacy, environmental laws, and employment laws can't be used. All investors, whether Filipino or foreign, are required to follow laws. FDIs will still be required to pay taxes to continue doing business. That's why I throw the mocking question, "Why aren't people from ASEAN visiting Hilario Davide Jr.? Why are they visiting Kishore Mahbubani of Singapore instead?" Another mocking question I ask is, "If it's true that Carlos P. Garcia made us a tiger economy, where's the memoir to back it up?" LKY didn't only say things but he also proved things. Mahbubani didn't only talk but also walked the talk better than Davide. Davide's statements that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is the "best in the world" fall flat in the face of the National University of Singapore (NUS). I could even imagine if Mahbubani had a vacation in Cebu City, ran into Davide (and I believe the two know each other since they were both diplomats), and said, "Man, you're outdated Hilario! You should've joined the World Economic Forum!" Davide might answer, "You know what Kishore, I pity you, Singapore is now a colony of foreign investors!" Mahbubani might even said, "Wrong! You are so dead wrong Hilario!" 

The Philippines already has an edge over Vietnam, that is the Philippines is run under democratic principles. However, having a democracy without economic substance is dangerous (read here). The Philippines may have more freedom than Vietnam since the latter is still considered a Communist state. Communism often paints pictures of guns and tanks. However, the Philippines needs to resolve its economic policies. Economic restrictions should be removed from the constitution and placed more into legislation. That would make it easier to restrain and relax at certain times. Israel has a restrictive economy but it's all about financial activities (read here)--not the 60-40 type of policy. I believe the Philippines can do better in Vietnam. However, the extreme restrictions with equity ownership for FDIs really hold it back. It should be considered questionable how a Communist state is outperforming a country that boasts of being a bastion of democracy. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...
Read more

Communist Vietnam's Great Leap Forward in Agricultural Production

I remember reading through Third World to First by the late Lee Kuan Yew. It's very easy to use the book to badmouth the Marcoses but not to learn from the rest of it. The book also talks about Vietnam and LKY's encounter with the late Nguyen Duy Cong aka Do Muoi. It's often said that Singapore only opened because of its lack of natural resources. On the contrary, Do Muoi decided to learn from Singapore how to turn the Communist Party of Vietnam into a powerhouse. Do Muoi, though a communist , was impressed by Singapore during his October 1993 state visit. Vietnam, unlike Singapore, is a country rich in natural resources. The third-world mentality said that MNCs are there to rape the resources .  A very huge misconception especially if you know Singapore's history Some Filipinos on social media even say that FDIs will destroy agriculture and nature. This is a meme by the Philippine Anti-Fascist League on Facebook. They say that FDIs equals environmental degradation. Yet...
Read more

Wanting Wealth WITHOUT Financial Discipline

Many people want to be rich, but not so many people want the discipline on how to be rich. Isn't that the plain hard truth ? As I do this sideline blog , I contemplated whether I should write another post after writing several posts years back, or when I wrote about Venezuela as a cautionary tale . Back on topic, I thought about how financial discipline is something often overlooked. It's easy to talk about Christmas since that's probably the most wonderful time of the year to be spendthrift , only to find out that one's broke by the New Year . The cycle of reckless financial habits tends to restart in January, even when January becomes that time of reckoning between debtors and creditors! January 2026 will end, February 2026 comes, and then the cycle of financial recklessness continues. It's the same cycle over and over! Last Christmas, I remember how DTI Secretary Christina Roque spoke about the PHP 500.00 noche buena, for a family of four . I called it tactless b...
Read more

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more

The Saying "The Customer is Always Right" isn't Right

I remember being chastised and said, "The customer is always right!" It became hypocritical because the same person who told me that later chastised me for yelling at the service provider in public . I'd admit that I screamed at the phone or even in person because things didn't go my way. My favorite excuse would be, "You said the customer is always right, right?" Going by the logic that the customer is always right, I'm right in doing the wrong that I did to service providers. It also reminds me of some rude manager lady (who I believe got fired sometime later, not going to mention her name or the company) who's heard to be highly unreasonable . She would scream in public louder than the late Miriam Defensor-Santiago.  I'd like to give an illustration of the fault of that phrase. The news of a raging customer who threw hot soup at the manager can create debate . Was she in the right when she threw the hot soup at the manager instead of talking t...
Read more