Skip to main content

Using Vietnam to Justify No to Economic Reform is Rooted on ECONOMIC IGNORANCE

VNUA

Some time ago, I remember the now-defunct Philippine Anti-Fascist League Facebook page. One of its administrators (and I heard that it's actually run by a group of Gen-Z brats) berated the CoRRECT Movement. I'll put a screenshot of that statement made by one of the administrators (and I heard one of them was just a 13-year-old brat at that time).


For the sake of non-Tagalog speakers (although the Philippines is my default target readers), I will translate what this prick of an administrator wrote on their now-defunct Facebook page. Although it's already been taken down, I believe the need to continue refuting their past arguments along with other similar pages. Refute them using common sense and research data from economists from first-world countries! The translation goes like this:
Vietnam won the revolution, and they had a national industrialization and agrarian reform. What Vietnam's "Open FDI" means that the koriktor (a mockery of Corrector) actually means is that, those are finished products that are sold in the world market.

Meanwhile, in the Philippines, we don't have industries meaning that if it's open FDI here in the Philippines, our raw materials will be consumed by the greedy foreigners. 

This is just one argument. I've read other arguments that still believe Vietnam is a protectionist state. They may say, "Look at Vietnam! It's a protectionist command economy state! Why is it doing better than the Philippines?" I believe this argument comes from people with distorted views of what FDI means. Since when did a foreign investment involve sexual relations with foreigners (read here), borrowing money from another country (read here), or selling the country to foreigners? A simple definition of foreign investment shoots down such ridiculous thinking! 

However, knowing the history of Doi Moi, orchestrated by the late Nguyen Duy Cong aka Do Muoi, one can say that Vietnam actually accepted foreign investment, while it was still growing. Do Muoi struck up an interesting conversation with another great leader, the late Lee Kuan Yew. LKY even wrote this in From Third World to First after he saw Vietnam rise:

In fact, the Vietnamese had made progress. As a result of more contacts with foreigners and greater information on the market economy, ministers and officials had better understanding of the workings of the free market. Greater street activity, more shops, foreign businesspeople, hotels--these were all signs of prosperity in Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi.  

Vietnam went in a different direction compared to the supposedly more democratic Philippines! The Vietnam Briefing mentions this one, a far cry from the overly restrictive policies as stated by the Official Gazette of the Philippines. 

Investors from ASEAN, the United States and Europeand countries are increasingly moving capital into projects in Vietnam, because of its highly attractive environment, and strategic business location.

Vietnam allows 100% foreign ownership in most of its sectors, including trading, manufacturing, IT, education sectors and more. For this reason, the country is viewed as being relatively wide open for foreign investors to enter the market and setup an LLC or other type of business entity.

However, a small number of business fields are limited for foreign-investment, and require that a foreign investor form a joint-venture with a local partner. These include:

  • Advertising services;
  • Agriculture, hunting, and forestry related services;
  • Telecommunication services;
  • Travel agencies; Tour operator services; Entertainment services;
  • Electronic gaming businesses;
  • Container handling; Customs clearance services; Auxiliary transport services;
  • Internal waterways transport, rail and road transport services.

That "negative list" in Vietnam is a lot shorter than the negative list of the Philippines! Even more, Vietnam's law on foreign investment also says that these businesses need a minimum entry of 30% but they can own more than 30%. Pretty much, doing agricultural business in Vietnam where one can own more than 30% is more feasible than going to a country that refuses to be flexible with equity restrictions. It's really not feasible to do business with someone who demands a huge slice of the profits from you, now is it? 

Even more, to say that certain industries have restrictions for "security reasons" is stupid (read here). It's not as if regulatory laws such as data privacy, environmental laws, and employment laws can't be used. All investors, whether Filipino or foreign, are required to follow laws. FDIs will still be required to pay taxes to continue doing business. That's why I throw the mocking question, "Why aren't people from ASEAN visiting Hilario Davide Jr.? Why are they visiting Kishore Mahbubani of Singapore instead?" Another mocking question I ask is, "If it's true that Carlos P. Garcia made us a tiger economy, where's the memoir to back it up?" LKY didn't only say things but he also proved things. Mahbubani didn't only talk but also walked the talk better than Davide. Davide's statements that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is the "best in the world" fall flat in the face of the National University of Singapore (NUS). I could even imagine if Mahbubani had a vacation in Cebu City, ran into Davide (and I believe the two know each other since they were both diplomats), and said, "Man, you're outdated Hilario! You should've joined the World Economic Forum!" Davide might answer, "You know what Kishore, I pity you, Singapore is now a colony of foreign investors!" Mahbubani might even said, "Wrong! You are so dead wrong Hilario!" 

The Philippines already has an edge over Vietnam, that is the Philippines is run under democratic principles. However, having a democracy without economic substance is dangerous (read here). The Philippines may have more freedom than Vietnam since the latter is still considered a Communist state. Communism often paints pictures of guns and tanks. However, the Philippines needs to resolve its economic policies. Economic restrictions should be removed from the constitution and placed more into legislation. That would make it easier to restrain and relax at certain times. Israel has a restrictive economy but it's all about financial activities (read here)--not the 60-40 type of policy. I believe the Philippines can do better in Vietnam. However, the extreme restrictions with equity ownership for FDIs really hold it back. It should be considered questionable how a Communist state is outperforming a country that boasts of being a bastion of democracy. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Yes to Filipinas Marrying Foreign Men, No to 100% FDI Shares Ownership?!

Today is Valentine's Day. I feel Valentine's Day is plain overrated. Some people just get a date for the sake of it--even if it means enduring that materialistic girlfriend or abusive boyfriend! Isn't romance a year-round thing? A few Valentine's Day ago, I wrote about Filipinas marrying foreigners and that FDI doesn't include Filipinas dating foreigners . This time to add some comedy, I wrote this post. It's something to say, "Yes! Somebody is married to a foreigner!" It's the hype to get job opportunities abroad or to marry a foreigner. Blossoms Why do Filipinos want to marry foreigners? The Blossoms blog writes down the following: Love and Affection: Love is often the primary reason for marriage, and Filipinas who marry foreigners may do so because they have fallen in love with someone from another country.  Financial Stability: Some Filipinas may marry foreigners because they believe a foreign husband can provide financial stability and secur...
Read more

Facts vs. Gossip: Did Vietnam (According to Filipino MARITESes) Develop from Its Own Treasury Before Opening Up to FDI?

Vietnam Youth Union It's been 80 years since Vietnam achieved its independence in 1945. Some time ago, I wrote about how Vietnam's Doi Moi actually disproves the Trust Me Bro School of Economics . I wasn't too accustomed to researching Vietnam's ironic economic miracle . Vietnam is a one-party state ruled by the Communist Party of Vietnam. The word Communism would evoke fear and terror. What I find funny is that some people are using Vietnam as an excuse not to open up the Philippine economy (read here ). Such misinformed  people think that Vietnam "won this revolution," supposedly self-industrialized from its own treasury before opening up to FDI. In short, some people either believe that (1) Vietnam is an example of how a highly protectionist economy works, or (2) that Vietnam made itself rich before opening to FDI. Both of them are lies. I'll focus on the second point for this new blog post!  Right now, some people say that I'm just another marites...
Read more

China's Real Great Leap Forward and Economic Cultural Revolution Under Deng Xiaoping

Nobody can dare deny that China has become a big superpower. I remembered I went to China last 2007 (which would be more than 10 years ago). China had become such a huge metropolis of power that I'm amazed at it. I was thinking about how Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Beijing were truly magnificent cities before the pollution problem (which should call for eco-capitalist measures). I was thinking about how I never realized China was once dirt poor.  Did you know China used to be so dirt-poor? The "economic legacy" of Mao Zedong was a disaster with the so-called "Great Leap Forward". It was a great leap forward all right--a great leap forward to ruin. Mao seeking to avoid the use of foreign resources to launch China proved disastrous. The 1970s would see a dramatic change when Deng Xiaoping finally took over the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The beginning of the rise of Communist China under Deng's new political policy would pave the way to China becoming a great s...
Read more

Going from Tet Offensive in 1968 to Doi Moi in 1986

Foreign Trade University The Lunar New Year isn't just celebrated by the Chinese. Chinese New Year is one form of the Chinese New Year. Other forms of Lunar New Year follow   the Chinese New Year cycle, such as the Tết Nguyên Đán of Vietnam, the Japanese Lunar New Year, and the Seollal in South Korea. There's also the Tibetan New Year and the Mongolian New Year. I remember when talking about Vietnam celebrating the Lunar New Year together with the Chinese, my fellow Chinoy made the squity-eyed gesture to talk about most Vietnamese looking like Chinese. Should we even be surprised that there's a Vietnamese student who looks like the deposed Alice Guo, aka Guo Hua Ping?  What was the Tet Offensive about? Right now, I want to talk about the infamous Tet Offensive , which was a Lunar New Year attack of January 31, 1968. The Western concept would prefer to talk about it on January 31 instead of the Lunar New Year. A Filipino would probably say, "So what if it was Lunar Ne...
Read more

Honoring the Recently Deceased Jose de Venecia Jr. in a Business/Economics Perspective

That's right. Jose de Venecia  recently passed away yesterday. As an advocate for reform, it's sad but true that de Venecia didn't win because he was boring . It was easy to think of him as a boring guy. I remember the time when he was called in ISPUP as Yoda De Venecia (after the Star Wars character). I was just a clueless college student at that time when the ISPUP episode was shown. I was only 13 years old when de Venecia ran for president. It was also that era when Joseph Estrada (who's now 88 years old) ran for president, and it was that time when Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (who turned 90 last year) became the chief justice.  Just recently, I found this eulogy   for JDV. I will not post the whole eulogy, but only the one from the one that would "fit better" for a business-economics blog: He helped advance policies that enabled major infrastructure projects through public private partnerships, converted former military bases into thriving economic centers...
Read more