Skip to main content

Using Vietnam to Justify No to Economic Reform is Rooted on ECONOMIC IGNORANCE

VNUA

Some time ago, I remember the now-defunct Philippine Anti-Fascist League Facebook page. One of its administrators (and I heard that it's actually run by a group of Gen-Z brats) berated the CoRRECT Movement. I'll put a screenshot of that statement made by one of the administrators (and I heard one of them was just a 13-year-old brat at that time).


For the sake of non-Tagalog speakers (although the Philippines is my default target readers), I will translate what this prick of an administrator wrote on their now-defunct Facebook page. Although it's already been taken down, I believe the need to continue refuting their past arguments along with other similar pages. Refute them using common sense and research data from economists from first-world countries! The translation goes like this:
Vietnam won the revolution, and they had a national industrialization and agrarian reform. What Vietnam's "Open FDI" means that the koriktor (a mockery of Corrector) actually means is that, those are finished products that are sold in the world market.

Meanwhile, in the Philippines, we don't have industries meaning that if it's open FDI here in the Philippines, our raw materials will be consumed by the greedy foreigners. 

This is just one argument. I've read other arguments that still believe Vietnam is a protectionist state. They may say, "Look at Vietnam! It's a protectionist command economy state! Why is it doing better than the Philippines?" I believe this argument comes from people with distorted views of what FDI means. Since when did a foreign investment involve sexual relations with foreigners (read here), borrowing money from another country (read here), or selling the country to foreigners? A simple definition of foreign investment shoots down such ridiculous thinking! 

However, knowing the history of Doi Moi, orchestrated by the late Nguyen Duy Cong aka Do Muoi, one can say that Vietnam actually accepted foreign investment, while it was still growing. Do Muoi struck up an interesting conversation with another great leader, the late Lee Kuan Yew. LKY even wrote this in From Third World to First after he saw Vietnam rise:

In fact, the Vietnamese had made progress. As a result of more contacts with foreigners and greater information on the market economy, ministers and officials had better understanding of the workings of the free market. Greater street activity, more shops, foreign businesspeople, hotels--these were all signs of prosperity in Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi.  

Vietnam went in a different direction compared to the supposedly more democratic Philippines! The Vietnam Briefing mentions this one, a far cry from the overly restrictive policies as stated by the Official Gazette of the Philippines. 

Investors from ASEAN, the United States and Europeand countries are increasingly moving capital into projects in Vietnam, because of its highly attractive environment, and strategic business location.

Vietnam allows 100% foreign ownership in most of its sectors, including trading, manufacturing, IT, education sectors and more. For this reason, the country is viewed as being relatively wide open for foreign investors to enter the market and setup an LLC or other type of business entity.

However, a small number of business fields are limited for foreign-investment, and require that a foreign investor form a joint-venture with a local partner. These include:

  • Advertising services;
  • Agriculture, hunting, and forestry related services;
  • Telecommunication services;
  • Travel agencies; Tour operator services; Entertainment services;
  • Electronic gaming businesses;
  • Container handling; Customs clearance services; Auxiliary transport services;
  • Internal waterways transport, rail and road transport services.

That "negative list" in Vietnam is a lot shorter than the negative list of the Philippines! Even more, Vietnam's law on foreign investment also says that these businesses need a minimum entry of 30% but they can own more than 30%. Pretty much, doing agricultural business in Vietnam where one can own more than 30% is more feasible than going to a country that refuses to be flexible with equity restrictions. It's really not feasible to do business with someone who demands a huge slice of the profits from you, now is it? 

Even more, to say that certain industries have restrictions for "security reasons" is stupid (read here). It's not as if regulatory laws such as data privacy, environmental laws, and employment laws can't be used. All investors, whether Filipino or foreign, are required to follow laws. FDIs will still be required to pay taxes to continue doing business. That's why I throw the mocking question, "Why aren't people from ASEAN visiting Hilario Davide Jr.? Why are they visiting Kishore Mahbubani of Singapore instead?" Another mocking question I ask is, "If it's true that Carlos P. Garcia made us a tiger economy, where's the memoir to back it up?" LKY didn't only say things but he also proved things. Mahbubani didn't only talk but also walked the talk better than Davide. Davide's statements that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is the "best in the world" fall flat in the face of the National University of Singapore (NUS). I could even imagine if Mahbubani had a vacation in Cebu City, ran into Davide (and I believe the two know each other since they were both diplomats), and said, "Man, you're outdated Hilario! You should've joined the World Economic Forum!" Davide might answer, "You know what Kishore, I pity you, Singapore is now a colony of foreign investors!" Mahbubani might even said, "Wrong! You are so dead wrong Hilario!" 

The Philippines already has an edge over Vietnam, that is the Philippines is run under democratic principles. However, having a democracy without economic substance is dangerous (read here). The Philippines may have more freedom than Vietnam since the latter is still considered a Communist state. Communism often paints pictures of guns and tanks. However, the Philippines needs to resolve its economic policies. Economic restrictions should be removed from the constitution and placed more into legislation. That would make it easier to restrain and relax at certain times. Israel has a restrictive economy but it's all about financial activities (read here)--not the 60-40 type of policy. I believe the Philippines can do better in Vietnam. However, the extreme restrictions with equity ownership for FDIs really hold it back. It should be considered questionable how a Communist state is outperforming a country that boasts of being a bastion of democracy. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

The Idiocy of Typing Anti-FDI Rants Using IMPORTED Devices, IMPORTED Platforms, and IMPORTED Social Media

Bulatlat It's very easy to open Facebook (or any related platform) and find lots of stupidity , right? There have been idiotic comments I find on Facebook such as FDI is this and that. We can find "thought leader groups" such as Alliance of Concerned Teachers, Anakpawis, Anakbayan, Bayan Muna, IBON Foundation, Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, and Philippine Anti-Fascist League (PH Antifa) who keep ranting about FDI as this and that. I even remember somebody dared to say that FDI caused Egypt to dry up. Ironically, North Korea and Venezuela, two protectionist countries, have very bad pollution problems. I'd blame it that they don't have the money to do a clean-up drive. How can you clean up a polluted river without the right equipment? How can you expect better power efficiency with outdated equipment that keep coughing up, cough, cough, lots of black smoke?  All the talks on social media can be very funny. The big irony is that all calls for "...
Read more

Get Stuck with EDSA, End Up Like Nokia

  Yes, we should never forget what history teaches us. A classmate of mine, back in high school, wrote a simple and blunt essay called "History: A Teacher". I doubt he still has a soft copy, given it was already more than 20 years ago. I'd like to quote Duterte critic Andrew James Masigan wrote this in  Philippine Star --something that should remain relevant: I would never undervalue the 1987 Constitution. It dismantled the legal framework of a repressive regime and established the democratic institutions we enjoy today. For this, I am grateful. The 1987 Constitution was crafted with the best of intentions. It sought to put the Filipino first in all aspects of governance and to level the playing field amongst sectors and peoples.  But it is far from perfect. It failed to consider the importance of foreign capital and technologies and the stiff competition we would have to face to obtain them. In short, its economic provisions were short-sighted . So despite the Constitut...
Read more

[UNPOPULAR OPINION] Why People Power Anniversary Should Be a Special Working Day Instead

  As a blogger, I shouldn't turn on the PC in hopes of becoming popular . It should be to turn on the PC and blog to make a difference . Right now, I think about the controversy when President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. declared the 1986 EDSA Revolution's anniversary as a working holiday . The call for some of the "minority lawmakers" is that they want to return the People Power Anniversary to a regular holiday once more. There are times I feel like, "Should we let it be a regular holiday again, so as not to repeat the Marcos dictatorship?" Sadly, the real answer is that the Philippines has been relying too much on EDSA , so it's practically ending up like Nokia . I was thinking about the reality of February being the most hectic month. February only has 28 days (and February 25 is near the month's end ). I thought that the Philippines also has too many national holidays more often than not. In fact, the Inquirer article written by...
Read more

It's Incredibly Frustrating to Discuss Economics with an Overspender

Overspending is just bad economics, isn't it? Economics is defined as the following for the sake of a review of high school basics: Economics is a social science concerned with the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. It studies how individuals, businesses, governments, and nations make choices about how to allocate resources. Economics focuses on the actions of human beings, based on assumptions that humans act with rational behavior, seeking the most optimal level of benefit or utility. The building blocks of economics are the studies of labor and trade. Since there are many possible applications of human labor and many different ways to acquire resources, it is the task of economics to determine which methods yield the best results. Economics can generally be broken down into macroeconomics, which concentrates on the behavior of the economy as a whole, and microeconomics, which focuses on individual people and businesses. It had me thinking of 2016 wh...
Read more

Talking Economics with an Overeating Glutton

Two years ago, I wrote an entry about why discussing economics with an overspender is frustrating . Now, I was looking at certain fat people who say really dumb things about economics. Just recently, I was looking at a certain fat idiot (fortunately, he only has 1K+ followers) who posted on Facebook that not only will the parliamentary system cause the Philippines to become a dictatorship, but he also says that changing economic provisions will cause the Philippines to collapse and the country to fall into the hands of foreigners. I won't name the person out to avoid getting personal. However, the person is apparently very fat and he blames capitalism day in and day out. The person even says that businessmen do nothing and it's the employers that do everything. Has that fat slob ever heard that businesses are run by bosses and that if the bosses do screw up, they're the ones who are the most answerable? The employees are the cogs and the boss runs the cogs. I was looking at...
Read more