Skip to main content

I Could've Easily Fallen for Cryptocurrency Myself

Casino.org

I was looking for a new topic to write about. Apparently, my post on Robin Padilla who I didn't vote for but now agree upon (read here) is catching wind on Facebook. However, I didn't want to resist writing about the cryptocurrency hype. I recall some of my biggest mistakes aside from letting a family friend buy in huge credit or taking offers without asking. Another thing that I could've gotten into is cryptocurrency. The reason is I've been into hype-riding, praise addiction, or afraid of being left out. It didn't matter how much theoretical information I learned if my temperament is bad. As Warren Edward Buffet said the following:
The most important quality for an investor is temperament, not intellect. You need a temperament that neither derives great pleasure from being with the crowd or against the crowd.

The issue is people tend to take pleasure in going against the crowd or for the crowd. I've experienced both of them and who hasn't? I remembered wanting to take B.S. Information Technology only because it was the trend. I remembered going against the latest fashions because I find that the majority tend to be wrong. This is where temperament plays a role. Do you join the majority or minority because you take pleasure in going for or against a crowd? If so, it's time to change that. Countless innocents have been blamed for what they didn't do because of that. Some people become annoying minorities because of that. It's sticking to what's right. Besides, a lot of stupid things I did is because I decided to rely on intellect over temperament. You can be very intelligent yet fall for scams because of poor temperament. It's something I fight with daily because I tend to take great pleasure in either mixing with the crowd or fighting the crowd.

One of my previous articles was about why following the crowd is a bad idea (read here). Who doesn't wants to be left out? It's a very odd feeling to be left out. Yet, such mentality is the temperament of a child. Who can remember getting mad because everyone has this but you don't? I certainly did and I remembered I fought with my parents a lot over that. Even more, there are celebrities endorsing cryptocurrency. Celebrity endorsements can be good or bad. Liza Soberano is endorsing GCash. Globe has BTS endorsement. So far, GCash has been a reliable platform for Filipinos during this pandemic. I'm using GInvest to take advantage of the dips by investing extra money in the Philippine Equity Smart Index Fund (read here). If I continued in my mentality of not being "left out" then I would've decided to buy Bitcoins. However, the news left and right of Bitcoin falling apart is making me say, "No thanks!" 

Charlie Munger, a business partner of Buffett even dares to call it a dirty sewer. The Markets Insider also gives this about Munger's view on cryptocurrency:

"I think anybody that sells this stuff is either delusional or evil," he said. "I'm not interested in undermining the national currencies of the world."

Warren Buffett's business partner, who has previously described crypto as a venereal disease and a tool for criminals, issued another damning indictment during the AFR interview.

"I just avoid it as if it were an open sewer, full of malicious organisms," he said. "I just totally avoid and recommend everybody else follow my example."

Bitcoin, ether, and other popular coins have plunged more than 70% from their November peak, sparking a wave of layoffs, record withdrawals, and bankruptcies in the crypto industry.

I think one of the reasons why people bought cryptocurrency is also because of social media gossipers. One article I wrote is about how social media gossipers make terrible financial advisers (read here). I think their "best source" is just "Trust me bro/sis" which is really not a valid source. The hype of cryptocurrency built itself up. It's pretty much what happened with the late Gerald Cotten of the Quadriga-X Scam (read here). Just watching the Netflix documentary Trust No One: Hunt for the Crypto King makes me think about how the hype allowed the crime to happen in the first place. Another example is the hype built by the missing Ruja Ignatova who was called the Bitcoin queen (read here). I'm simply thinking about the hype can be described by BBC News as:

Why have so many people continued to believe in OneCoin, despite all the evidence? 

Investors often told us that what drew them in initially was the fear that they would miss out on the next big thing. They'd read, with envy, the stories of people striking gold with Bitcoin and thought OneCoin was a second chance. Many were struck by the personality and persuasiveness of the "visionary" Dr Ruja. Investors might not have understood the technology, but they could see her talking to huge audiences, or at the Economist conference. They were shown photographs of her numerous degrees, and copies of Forbes magazine with her portrait on the front cover. 

The degrees are genuine. The Forbes cover isn't: it was actually an inside cover - a paid-for advertisement - from Forbes Bulgaria, but once the real cover was ripped off, it looked impressive. 

But it seems it's not just the promise of riches that keeps people believing. After Jen McAdam invested into OneCoin she was constantly told she was part of the OneCoin "family". She was entered into a Whatsapp group, with its own "leader" who disseminated information from the headquarters in Sofia. And McAdam's leader prepared her carefully for conversations with OneCoin sceptics. "You're told not to believe anything from the 'outside world'," she recalls. "That's what they call it. 'Haters' - Bitcoiners are 'haters'. Even Google - 'Don't listen to Google!'" Any criticism or awkward questions were actively discouraged. "If you have any negativity you should not be in this group," she was told.

The lack of good temperament became a cause. I really felt that could've been me as well who fell for the Bitcoin scam. I've experienced bad purchases. I experienced being phished when I fell for an email scam. Cryptocurrency feels so legitimate (at first) but like every get-rich-quick scheme--it's too good to be true.  Watching Cyber Hell: Exposing an Internet Horror also reveals another scary thing. The crime in South Korea also had criminals who accepted only cryptocurrency. I guess the use of legitimate cash makes it so easy to trace. I guess if I were a drug dealer--maybe my safest bet these days is to use cryptocurrency due to the anonymity. A bank could suspect how much drugs I may have been dealing with hypothetically. Hiding my hypothetical money from hypothetical drug proceeds isn't easy. I believe that if I were a criminal--my "best bet" is cryptocurrency.

Right now, I evaluate some of my mistakes. Hopefully, I don't fall into cryptocurrency. Good thing I avoided Axie Infinity because it's too good to be true. One of the reasons why I fell for scams before are falling for promises too good to be true. If it's too good to be true then it must be another scam. 

References

Websites

"Charlie Munger says buying crypto is investing in nothing - and he avoids it like a dirty sewer" by Theron Mohamed (July 12, 2022)

"Cryptoqueen: How this woman scammed the world, then vanished" (November 24, 2019)

Popular posts from this blog

The Irony the Philippines Starts the Christmas Season in September BUT Many Filipinos Love Last-Minute Christmas Shopping

  Uproxx As Christmas is just around the corner--I feel more stress coming in! It doesn't help when people try to use the late Andy Williams' "It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year" to try and skip the problem. It's already known that most Filipinos love to start Christmas in September . However, the irony is that Filipinos start Christmas early but do their Christmas shopping late. If they began the Christmas Season early, shouldn't they think about what to do before December strikes?  Two years ago, I wrote a post discussing last-minute Christmas shopping . Many Filipinos tend to do last-minute Christmas shopping. They had all of November (when the Christmas sale usually begins) but why do the Christmas shopping in December ? One of the things I blame is the one-day paycheck lifestyle (see here ). It can be observed that many Filipinos never learn to prioritize more important things . One can get their stars when they see their paychecks. However, the...

Is Christmas Toxic Positivity a Cause or an Effect of the Philippines' Lack of Progress?

Lessandra When it's Christmas, it's so easy to think of the song of the late Andy Williams, "It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year". The music itself reeks of toxic positivity,  whether one likes it or not. It's a shame, really, because December 20 was also the anniversary of Asia's Titanic, the sinking of the Doña Paz ! We live in a society that somehow never learns from its mistakes, like a person who's stuck in gambling debt, is still hoping to get rich gambling . Despite all that, Christmas toxic positivity still abounds in the Philippines. We still have a lot of ongoing bad habits, such as starting Christmas in September and then doing last-minute Christmas shopping during the week of Christmas. That's why every time I drive on the road on Christmas, I tend to shout, "Isn't it any wonder why the Philippines never improves?" The term Noche Buena has evolved over time . For some, it's simply the Christmas dinner. However, so...

Christmas Toxic Positivity May Be Your Biggest Holiday Financial Killer

Christmas is just around the corner, isn't it? It's easy to tell me, "Stop being a Scrooge! Lighten up! It's Christmas!" Some people can't tell the difference between positivity and when positivity becomes toxic . If you think about it, toxic positivity is defined as: ...the belief that people should maintain a positive mindset no matter how dire or difficult a situation is. While there are benefits to being optimistic and engaging in positive thinking, toxic positivity rejects all difficult emotions in favor of a cheerful and often falsely positive façade . Every time I talk about Christmas foolishness (read here ), it's always pointed out that I love being negative. Honestly, there are times I'd rather be negative than to be overly positive. I always talk about mentioning the silly notions that my countrymen have like, "If the situation is bitter, just add sugar (read here )." In Cebuano, it's said, "Kung pait, butangi lang ug asu...

Can Anti-FDI Proponents Prove Their Claim That Economic Liberalization Will Just Benefit the Filipino Oligarchs?

The same old narration has been made over and over again . I'd dare say that the narration out the Facebook pages of the likes of Atty. Teddy Casiño, Atty. Neri Colmenares, Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, Migrante International, IBON Foundation, etc. are more or less the same. It's already a broken record based on the facts that they've been refuted. I've read the book From Third World to First . I guess Migrante International hates that book because Singapore is often associated with the execution of Flor Contemplacion, at least on their watch. What they're doing is nothing more than still hating Japan, Germany, and Italy because of the Second World War. I'm not surprised at another lie that's often repeated--economic liberalization (or 100% FDI shares ownership) will only  benefit the oligarchs . I guess it'll be easy to nail on me because I'm not a summa cum laude and Rep. Raoul Abellar Manuel is and he's a graduate of the Uni...

It's UTTER IGNORANCE to Say that the Philippines Needs to Self-Industrialize First Before Allowing FDIs to Own 100% Equity

It's often said by idiots on Facebook that allowing FDIs to own 100% of their shares is just going to leave the Philippines with nothing. I don't know how long I can keep my patience with such fools. To explain it, FDIs get rich based on net profits after taxes (read here ). FDIs will still end up paying VAT and income taxes if they want to continue investing in the Philippines. It's like if you want to continue doing business in the commercial space--you need to pay the rental fee to your lessor. The idea of 100% FDI ownership should be spelled out as, "Allowing FDIs to own 100% of their shares." They wouldn't need to find a Filipino partner before they can do business in the Philippines. They may not be allowed to own land  but they can operate without a Filipino partner. The even bigger stupidity is when FDIs are required to split 60-40 of the partnership. Meaning, that they must split 60% of the net income after taxes with the local Filipino partner. That...