Skip to main content

Why I Still Support the K+12 Education System

I was thinking about how people are still looking to abolish the K+12 system because it's just an additional expense. Funny enough, some people who are demanding for the abolition of K+12 are also against economic liberalization. Some people still delude themselves with David Guerrero's tagline "It's more fun in the Philippines" which is taken from "It's more fun in Switzerland". It would be more fun in the Philippines if we were serious about improvement. Otherwise, a tagline is just a tagline. K+12 education looks like it's just adding the number of years. However, the way things look is that it isn't. Besides, the education system in the Philippines is long outdated (read my article on that here). I would like to think about how K+12 would be more beneficial. Most people just never saw its benefits. I still wish that K+12 was implemented back then.

K+12 was implemented during the reign of the late former Philippine President Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino III. I may not be a supporter of the late former Philippine President. However, I felt K+12 was something he did right. The implementation made me think about what was wrong with the old curriculum. I would like to share my stress in high school (and why I hated it). I remembered how the four year of high school are stressful. I always felt I was a moron in high school because of my bad grades. I frequently took my frustration out on others believing I was never good enough. I would develop some questioning and all I got was, "Well just study it. The DECS (now DepEd) requires it!" Yet, we fail to see that studying mathematics and sciences are important not just to get a job or a profession--it's to understand the world around us better. I used to hate trigonometry during my fourth year in high school. Now, I see trigonometry has built a lot of stuff. The distance formula helps me understand how land surveyors do their job in part. That's why I changed my original desire (as an angry teenager) to abolish trigonometry from the high school curriculum.

I would think of what I hated about K+10 in high school. I feel everything is rushed. One good example is how can anybody expect to learn economic literacy in the fourth year (read here)? We had a teacher pretty much like the late Miriam P. Defensor-Santiago. She was highly intelligent but can she impart her knowledge on a very last-minute subject? Sure, it was one whole year but I had to really get economics subjects in college before I learned their practical application. It wouldn't be like if I graduated Grade 6, went to three years of Middle School, and finally three years of High School. If we had all the maths, sciences, economics, and every related subject taught (and please do teach mathematics more practically, read here) in both middle school and high school--I think better proficiency can be developed. For example, I feel that my hatred for math in high school was more pressure on my short attention span since I don't have dyscalculia. Right now, I end up seldomly doing basic trigonometric and calculus problems to try and keep my brain sharp.

Meanwhile, K+12 would mean the following things which would change how education is done:

  1. Sometimes, we need more time to accomplish a task. I was thinking about how learning mathematics at my own pace has been better than the pressure of high school mathematics. Learning about chemistry and physics at my own pace now (which I do for fun even if I was weak in those back in high school). I think K+12 can easily spread this out to at least slowly build confidence in mathematics and sciences. I think having economics for both middle school and high school will build better economic literacy. I felt so stupid that even after taking high school economics, college economics, and graduate school economics--I still felt that I haven't grasped that literacy without having to self-learn.
  2. Graduating high school at the age of 18 means people can easily find a job while studying college. I always felt that some people couldn't get a job until second year college. Let's think about people who work to pay their high school fees. However, they can't get a higher paying job because they are below 18 years old. One could think that being able to graduate and get a job means two things. A person could either decide not to pursue a college degree or to pursue one. Some jobs today may not even require college degrees thanks to K+12.
  3. It would mean knowing the right course fo you. I'd confess so many people (including myself) wanted to take B.S. Information Technology (BSIT). Sadly, my mathematics GPA in high school was one point lower. Many wanted to take BSIT at the University of San Carlos-Talamban Campus (USC-TC). I was among that crowd and ended up not getting admitted. The next thing that happened was so many people exited BSIT for other courses such as B.S. Business Administration (BSBA) and for math lovers who hate programming--they probably decided to pursue B.S. Mathematics and B.S. Management Accounting. I really should've stopped insisting on taking BSIT just to avoid being labeled as stupid. So what if I'm labeled as stupid? Some people may have had graduated from highly difficult courses but are stupid with real life matters. It reminded me I knew someone who may have graduated from a difficult course but her messy history with men is something to think about.
  4. The three tracks (Academic, Technical-Vocational-Livelihood, and, Sports and Arts) may even determine the best courses in life. Vocational education might be more helpful than a college degree for some. I could imagine if a college graduate who laughed at carpenters in high places one day had to get a carpenter to fix his roof. There's nothing shameful about being a carpenter. Otherwise, without carpenters, I'd probably drop down dead trying to fix my own roof. 
If the Philippines truly want to become another Singapore--adopt the K+12 education system. While at it, learn from Singapore. Having something similar to Singapore's education system in the Philippines can be only possible through K+12. 

References

Websites

"K1-12 Basic Education Curriculum"
https://k12philippines.com

"Why is Singapore’s school system so successful, and is it a model for the West?" by Jo Adetunji
Editor, The Conversation UK, (February 11, 2014 2.49pm GMT)
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...
Read more

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...
Read more

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...
Read more

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more

Filipino Businesses Need More Competition Than Democracy

Enterprise League Oftentimes, I remembered the number of complaints I get such as the Internet being so slow, the recent Typhoon Odette restoration being rather slow, high-cost but low-quality services, and that there's just not enough supply. However, the same people who are complaining about what I just mentioned earlier also said that I'm crazy when I told them to invite foreign direct investments (FDI) such as multinational corporations to invest here. Their line of reasoning goes from every weird direct line such as saying that multinational corporations (MNCs) are the form of the new "imperialism", that only the MNCs will get rich if we let them do business in the Philippines, that MNCs will exploit the people, that it will be overly relying on foreigners, and I don't know where they get such thinking. When I ask them for the solution--they just say that "Let's just do everything ourselves and rely on ourselves." Such logic is really stupid one...
Read more