Skip to main content

Why I Still Support the K+12 Education System

I was thinking about how people are still looking to abolish the K+12 system because it's just an additional expense. Funny enough, some people who are demanding for the abolition of K+12 are also against economic liberalization. Some people still delude themselves with David Guerrero's tagline "It's more fun in the Philippines" which is taken from "It's more fun in Switzerland". It would be more fun in the Philippines if we were serious about improvement. Otherwise, a tagline is just a tagline. K+12 education looks like it's just adding the number of years. However, the way things look is that it isn't. Besides, the education system in the Philippines is long outdated (read my article on that here). I would like to think about how K+12 would be more beneficial. Most people just never saw its benefits. I still wish that K+12 was implemented back then.

K+12 was implemented during the reign of the late former Philippine President Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino III. I may not be a supporter of the late former Philippine President. However, I felt K+12 was something he did right. The implementation made me think about what was wrong with the old curriculum. I would like to share my stress in high school (and why I hated it). I remembered how the four year of high school are stressful. I always felt I was a moron in high school because of my bad grades. I frequently took my frustration out on others believing I was never good enough. I would develop some questioning and all I got was, "Well just study it. The DECS (now DepEd) requires it!" Yet, we fail to see that studying mathematics and sciences are important not just to get a job or a profession--it's to understand the world around us better. I used to hate trigonometry during my fourth year in high school. Now, I see trigonometry has built a lot of stuff. The distance formula helps me understand how land surveyors do their job in part. That's why I changed my original desire (as an angry teenager) to abolish trigonometry from the high school curriculum.

I would think of what I hated about K+10 in high school. I feel everything is rushed. One good example is how can anybody expect to learn economic literacy in the fourth year (read here)? We had a teacher pretty much like the late Miriam P. Defensor-Santiago. She was highly intelligent but can she impart her knowledge on a very last-minute subject? Sure, it was one whole year but I had to really get economics subjects in college before I learned their practical application. It wouldn't be like if I graduated Grade 6, went to three years of Middle School, and finally three years of High School. If we had all the maths, sciences, economics, and every related subject taught (and please do teach mathematics more practically, read here) in both middle school and high school--I think better proficiency can be developed. For example, I feel that my hatred for math in high school was more pressure on my short attention span since I don't have dyscalculia. Right now, I end up seldomly doing basic trigonometric and calculus problems to try and keep my brain sharp.

Meanwhile, K+12 would mean the following things which would change how education is done:

  1. Sometimes, we need more time to accomplish a task. I was thinking about how learning mathematics at my own pace has been better than the pressure of high school mathematics. Learning about chemistry and physics at my own pace now (which I do for fun even if I was weak in those back in high school). I think K+12 can easily spread this out to at least slowly build confidence in mathematics and sciences. I think having economics for both middle school and high school will build better economic literacy. I felt so stupid that even after taking high school economics, college economics, and graduate school economics--I still felt that I haven't grasped that literacy without having to self-learn.
  2. Graduating high school at the age of 18 means people can easily find a job while studying college. I always felt that some people couldn't get a job until second year college. Let's think about people who work to pay their high school fees. However, they can't get a higher paying job because they are below 18 years old. One could think that being able to graduate and get a job means two things. A person could either decide not to pursue a college degree or to pursue one. Some jobs today may not even require college degrees thanks to K+12.
  3. It would mean knowing the right course fo you. I'd confess so many people (including myself) wanted to take B.S. Information Technology (BSIT). Sadly, my mathematics GPA in high school was one point lower. Many wanted to take BSIT at the University of San Carlos-Talamban Campus (USC-TC). I was among that crowd and ended up not getting admitted. The next thing that happened was so many people exited BSIT for other courses such as B.S. Business Administration (BSBA) and for math lovers who hate programming--they probably decided to pursue B.S. Mathematics and B.S. Management Accounting. I really should've stopped insisting on taking BSIT just to avoid being labeled as stupid. So what if I'm labeled as stupid? Some people may have had graduated from highly difficult courses but are stupid with real life matters. It reminded me I knew someone who may have graduated from a difficult course but her messy history with men is something to think about.
  4. The three tracks (Academic, Technical-Vocational-Livelihood, and, Sports and Arts) may even determine the best courses in life. Vocational education might be more helpful than a college degree for some. I could imagine if a college graduate who laughed at carpenters in high places one day had to get a carpenter to fix his roof. There's nothing shameful about being a carpenter. Otherwise, without carpenters, I'd probably drop down dead trying to fix my own roof. 
If the Philippines truly want to become another Singapore--adopt the K+12 education system. While at it, learn from Singapore. Having something similar to Singapore's education system in the Philippines can be only possible through K+12. 

References

Websites

"K1-12 Basic Education Curriculum"
https://k12philippines.com

"Why is Singapore’s school system so successful, and is it a model for the West?" by Jo Adetunji
Editor, The Conversation UK, (February 11, 2014 2.49pm GMT)
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

The 2026 Iran War Audit vs. OFW-Reliant Pinoy Pride Economists

It's a shame, really, that I didn't think about writing this article on OFWs again. I got somewhat fixated on the  gas prices , and my mind was exhausted. I thought about how I even asked, " Will #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba economics even lower down the prices of gasoline? " It's one thing that the Philippines has been overly reliant  on the Middle East for gasoline. What I overlooked was the OFW phenomenon again . It was so easy to hype on the OFW phenomenon, like what happened with the Filipino nurse, Ello Ed Mundsel Bello, way back in 2015. The OFW hype would've compounded the Philippine economy's "reliance model" to a whole new level of bottleneck!  Analyzing the bottleneck of relying on the Middle East It's already a known fact that several OFWs are sent to the Middle East. I even remember running across a presumably retired dancer who would be 64 today, on Facebook. The guy actually bragged about how he was a dancer at the Excelsior Hotel in...
Read more

A Destructive Obsession with Ayuda (Cash Handouts)

IBON Foundation Yesterday, I decided to write about how Pinoy Pride won't help pay that enormous PHP 13.42 Trillion debt . I thought I'd probably take a bit of a break to do some more research. However, I feel the need to write this post today since one of IBON Foundation's articles says that there's a destructive fetish for foreign investment . Then, another of IBON Foundation's articles says that there's money for Ayuda . I really feel insulted reading these since I'm a Masters Degree graduate in the School of Business and Economics. This really shows the destructive obsession with ayuda (cash handouts) and protectionism. IBON Foundation Above is one of IBON Foundation's charts. Some people on Facebook have gone as far as to call them Birdbrain Foundation. So what if there's money for ayuda or cash handouts? The problem here is that "think tanks" like IBON Foundation want to make it look like ayuda is more important. If asked to account ...
Read more

How is IBON Foundation Viewing and/or Representing FDI in Their Articles?

Some time ago, I wrote about why I can't take IBON Foundation seriously . As the battle for economic charter change is on, I believe it's time to tackle them again. They're tweeting here and there. Okay, I'm no researcher or organization. However, it doesn't mean that I can't do some basic research, share the research of others, and read other books. Even an intellectually stupid person can actually make sense if they gather the best materials. I even recall someone I know who's not intelligent but he actually spoke well about career opportunities, in the very school where he wasn't performing well! Trying to understand IBON's data presentation  I would like to address how IBON Foundation presents FDI growth. They would say stuff such as the claim job creation weakened despite FDI growth .  I was looking at IBON Foundation's claim (above) where it says that job creation allegedly weakened despite FDI inflows. Sure, they named sources but do they ...
Read more

"Will #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics Lower Philippine Gas Prices?

Inquirer Gasoline prices have increased again, haven't they?  A few days ago, I wrote  why #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba's view of gas prices is questionable . Today, I feel like writing this after several complaints on Facebook. I would like to create a follow-up post. People are complaining too much without understanding the real reason why some countries have lower prices of gasoline. Real talk. We need to talk about economic policies,  and  of course, please do a study on supply-demand analysis  on supply chain management . Let's examine the complaints made by Bulatlat Bulatlat Here's a chart from Bulatlat that compares the increase in prices of gasoline between the Philippines, Thailand, and Malaysia. It's always problematic when people ignore simple economics. It's funny, but Bulatlat mentions this on their website: Note also how expensive our diesel and gasoline products are compared to those of our ASEAN neighbors. The estimated common price today of diesel in...
Read more

Why I Don't See IBON Foundation as a Real Economic "Think TanK'

It's one thing to criticize presidents for their performance. It's another without analyzing the data. Sure, we need to study mathematics but the way it's presented can be a reason why it's hated. I felt that high school mathematics focused too much on numbers. Mathematics, in all its aspects, is part of life. Trigonometry is part of life. Calculus is part of life. Statistics is part of life. Speaking of statistics, I was thinking about how IBON Foundation has given its assessment of Duterte's administration. This isn't to say that outgoing President Rodrigo R. Duterte hasn't made mistakes. Rather, this is to point out how IBON Foundation has that tendency to be illogical. IBON Foundation (click to enlarge) This data by IBON Foundation was gathered. I'm not saying that the figures are lies or manipulated. My problem with how IBON Foundation works is their failure to account for the cause and effect  more often than not.  Malaya Business Insight It's ...
Read more