Skip to main content

When a Merry Christmas Leads to an Unhappy New Year Due to FINANCIAL DEBT

WWD

Christmas is near and I could rant about everything I hate about the season. I could think of heavy traffic and overcrowded malls. It's understandable if there are office Christmas parties. The bigger problem lies with people who end up wasting their paychecks all year round (read here). It's just a few days before Christmas and I can see the excitement. For some, they're all waiting for the gifts people have to give them and what to give to people. In the Philippines, it tends to focus on partying which is somewhat similar to the American view of Christmas. 

I could remember living downtown in Cebu City for a good portion of my life. Some neighbors would party until dusk. I could remember huge crowds with their chatter together with loud music. Some people even hire a band to add to the merriment. Granted that some people have very little financial discipline. I'm not surprised that they would celebrate for the sake of celebrating. The mentality that they have loving fiestas too much (which was introduced when the Philippines was part of the Spanish empire as a distraction) is all year. It's no wonder they try to be as festive as possible.

When Christmas arrives, there's really the mentality of "If it's bitter then just add sugar." (read here) played in full blast. How do they add sugar to the bitter? I could compare financial obligations to the bitter. Rather than try to work hard to make lemons out of lemonade--they just add sugar to the situation. They can figuratively and literally add incredible amounts of sugar. A lot of Christmas feasts tend to serve a lot of unhealthy food. The lechon or roasted pig (which is the star of the show) is not enough. They would have huge amounts of soft drinks and a lot of desserts. We can also have liquor to add to the mayhem. It's often said that people attend fiestas to "forget the problem". In reality, it just adds up to the problem. You can talk about buying expensive gifts one can't afford (which gives short-term happiness). You can talk about renting an expensive band to add that figurative sugar. 

What happens next is that December 31 is coming. It's New Year's Eve and they find out that they don't have money. With the same mentality, "If it's bitter then just add sugar." then you can expect more problems. They haven't finished paying the first debt. Now, it's time to borrow more money. The cartoon above is where a person says, "You can do it. Please reach the goal." and "Just a bit more." The end goal says "New Year". An expensive Christmas party was there. Now, the finances are piling up. The best "solution" yet again to "add sugar to the bitter" is to borrow more money. Is it me or is there joy in some people in borrowing and never returning the money?

December 31 arrives and similar stupidity happens. They decide to add more excessive sugar into the bitter in a similar way. The lechon arrives, the unhealthy amounts of desserts and soft drinks arrives, the expensive band arrives, the mayhem arrives, and they start screaming to have a good time. While they do so, they might be forgetting that they already owe several people. They think that their feasting will make them forget their problem. Instead, they will end up compounding their problem. Talk about soon having interest on their interest in the debt! In finance, that's compounded interest. Compounded interest is good on the investment but bad for the debtor. 

I remember the statements made by taxi drivers. I usually took a taxi where the jeepneys can't enter. I was laughing thinking about the taxi driver saying, "Somebody hasn't paid their debt." It was because an Indian guy, wearing a turban and riding a motorcycle, was there. I feel like saying that the song "Dayang Daya" (Cheating cheating) by the late Yoyoy Villame. Although Dayang Dayang seems to be Indonesian or Malaysian in origin, the song was mistaken to be Indian. I remembered hearing Dayang Dayang while eating in a Middle Eastern restaurant. I feel like the song "Dayang Daya" might play in full blast every January. It's because these five-six lenders are eager to get the money back. 

The obvious case is no legitimate creditor (in the right mind) will give a new loan except if the old one was paid back. Banks will examine the financial history of those who borrow. Some people who overspend either have no bank account. It's either because of not opening one or their bank account was deleted due to a lack of balance. The "solution" is to get loans from where it's the easiest such as five-six lenders. That's why every time I drive around and see an Indian riding a motorcycle, I end up saying to myself that someone has debt to pay. However, that was nothing but speculation since that Indian guy riding a motorcycle might just be delivering spices to a customer.

As Christmas approaches (and I remember my first cheerless Christmas due ot Odette), I'd like to write this post as well. It's more than time to think about how we manage money. What do you plan to do with your Christmas bonus and 13th month's pay? How do you plan to celebrate Christmas without getting buried in debt? Those are very important questions to ask yourself. 

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...