Skip to main content

How a Parliamentary Philippines Setup Would've Better Discussed Economics and Agriculture

No gossip, no hearsay, face-to-face debates,
liars are slapped in the parliamentary system!

Right now, I'm still a member of the CoRRECT Movement Moderated Public Forum. For me, I'm really "trolling" the boomers since they're the ones spreading disinformation. Facebook has some interesting fights such as Diehard Duterte Supporters (DDS) vs. Dilawan (Yellow). Today, we have the whole Marcos vs. Robredo dichotomy. Some Dilawans (now termed as Kakampinks, a combination of kakampi meaning comrade and pink). Fortunately, CoRRECT Movement now has some Kakampinks for constitutional reform. I'll never forget how a blatant Yellow, Charles Edward P. Celdran aka Carlos Cedran, had been an advocate for constitutional reform. Meanwhile, some Kakampinks still need education as to how a parliamentary system will work. Previously, I wrote an article on that which discusses why the Philippines should become a parliamentary republic.

Some say that we can just focus on better economic policies but not a change in governance. Some cite that the Philippines can remove the economic restrictions and still boom. They cite South Korea (where presidents only serve one term for five years) and Taiwan (which is semi-presidential). However, I aim that the Philippines, to become another Singapore, should really shift to a parliamentary system. A certain bitter Kakampink still think it's just a "pipe dream". Other Kakampinks are whining and saying that things would be "much better" if former Philippine vice president, Atty. Maria Leonor Sto. Tomas Gerona-Robredo, was the Philippine president right now. If they wanted to give her a chance, a parliamentary system would be better because it's not a winner takes all scenario. Instead, we would have a better representation. 

Economist Andrew James Masigan makes his political views no secret. Masigan and I belong to different spectrums (and I personally want to meet and talk with him). Masigan mentions the following regarding charter change and why a parliamentary system would make it better:

FEDERAL-PARLIAMENTARY GOVERNMENT

As mentioned earlier, the Duterte administration plans to a shift our form of government from a Unitary-Presidential form to a Federal-Parliamentary form. To better appreciate how a Federal-Parliamentary system works, it s best to look at it in contrast to a Federal-Presidential system.

A Federal-Presidential system offers no change to the current system where the President is elected through a national election and heads the executive branch. He has no sway on the judicial or legislative branches except through party-line influence. The United States operates under a Federal-Presidential framework.

A Federal-Parliamentary system , on the other hand, encourages people to vote according to political parties. Here, the citizens elect their Members of Parliament (their representatives), most often, based on the ideology of the party they belong to, not on their personalities. The party with the most number of elected representatives is declared “the parliament.” The parliament elects its Prime Minister (PM) from among themselves. The PM, in turn, selects the members of his Cabinet (his ministers) from among the members of the parliament.

There are multiple advantages to this. First, the system does away with expensive and divisive presidential elections. It puts an end to the vicious cycle of presidential candidates resorting to corruption and incurring political debts just to raise funds for their campaign.

Even the poor can run for office so long as they are capable. This is because elections are funded by the party. In a federal-parliamentary system, we do away with people who win on the back of guns goons and gold.

Moreover, since the members of parliament selects the Prime Minister, they can easily remove him through a vote of no-confidence should he fail to fulfill his mandate. We do away with the tedious process of impeachment. And since the ministers are selected from the Parliament, no one gets a free ticket to the Cabinet just because they are friends with the President or nominated by a political ally. The ministers all have mandates and are accountable not only to the PM but to their constituents.

The parliament is a unicameral legislative body. Thus, bills can be made into law faster and cheaper.

A parliamentary system is one where a “shadow Cabinet” exists. A shadow Cabinet is the corresponding, non-official Cabinet composed of members of the opposition. Each Cabinet minister has a shadow equivalent who is mandated to scrutinize every policy done by the official minister. The shadow minister may offer alternative policies which can be adopted if it is deemed superior.

In the end, the systems allows policies to be better thought out with appropriate safeguards to protect the interest of the people.

Among the seven wealthiest democracies (the G7 nations), only US and France follow a presidential system. the rest subscribe to a parliamentary system.

The intentions of charter change is good. Done right, it could be a game changer for the nation.

How will a parliamentary system make discussing the current economic issues easier?


This is an illustration of what should've been. The colors here made me imagine the Government section is held by Prime Minister Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. and Deputy Prime Minister Sara Z. Duterte-Carpio. Meanwhile, the colors pink and blue should've represented Opposition Leader Maria Leonor S. Gerona-Robredo and Deputy Opposition Leader Francis Pangilinan. The Government is ran by Uniteam. The Opposition is ran by the Liberal Party of the Philippines. It's never a winner takes all scenario. Sticking to the presidential system means sticking to a scenario where winner takes all. Instead, it wouldn't be a winner-takes-all scenario.

How will the pink opposition work? Mrs. Robredo is given the task of scrutinizing the Marcos Jr. Not only that, Mrs. Robredo has the entire Liberal Party of the Philippines with her to serve as her cabinet. Marcos Jr. will have his own cabinet of appointees. Each of Marcos Jr.'s appointees will be mirrored by Mrs. Robredo. Every minister of a specific function will have a shadow minister of a specific function. The scrutiny will be done on a weekly basis. The job of the Opposition is to offer alternatives that will be adopted if deemed superior. It means that the Opposition isn't going to be, "They make the solutions, not us!" Instead, the Opposition is, "Instead, we propose we do this instead."

The weekly question hour is aired live every week. It means screwing up on live television can be very embarassing. Looking at the news with Marcos Jr. makes me wish, "If only we were a parliamentary system." If only more Kakampinks will realize that a parliamentary system would've given them a better chance. Mrs. Robredo would have her mandatory duty to scrutinize Marcos Jr. because she's the Opposition Leader. Marcos Jr. would have the responsibility to show the Opposition that he's fit to be the prime minister of the Philippines. If a member of the Government fails to uphold confidence, the solution becomes to host a motion of no confidence on live television. That would be more efficient and effective than the tedious impeachment trial. Watching the impeachment of former Philippine president Joseph Marcelo Ejercito aka Joseph Estrada was very tedious. It would've been easier if Estrada was removed by a vote of no confidence. 

We can think of Marcos Jr.'s failed promise of selling rice at PHP 20.00 per kilo. It's just absurd to aim for it but some people bought it anyway. It's stupid how some Kakampinks decided to sell at a loss instead of proposing solutions. In a parliamentary system, Mrs. Robredo would have her Shadow Minister of Agriculture scrutinize the Minister of Agriculture. The Minister of Agriculture may propose this plan to import. However, the Shadow Minister of Agriculture will say, "We can import but that is short-term. We must open agriculture to more foreign investment to learn new technology." We can make it so that importation will be done while we implement accepting more foreign investment to improve farming in the Philippines. 

I could imagine what if Mrs. Robredo finally opened her superior solution. In a sense, the result of the debates can be in. We can have the best of Uniteam and the best of Kakampink sorted out. As mentioned earlier, importation will be allowed while new technology will be adapted. Maybe, the Philippines can learn from India's agriculture. I did write about if whether or not it was a coincidence that FDI-friendly countries sell cheaper onions. Maybe, one can learn from India's and Vietnam's pro-FDI agriculture stance to develop Philippine agriculture. India is a land that uses more onions than the Philippines yet they could fill the supply and demand. The Philippines can learn from it. The Opposition can throw that in as a better alternative than just importing onions. 

Right now, I want to invite the pro-reforms. I don't care if they voted for Marcos Jr. or Mrs. Robredo. What I want to see is there would be better discussion. It would be better to have opposing parties settle things in a weekly question hour. Weekly questioning will force politicians to do better. It will build up for more long-term thinking. Economics and agriculture aren't exempt from the weekly questioning. That's why I want to shift to a parliamentary system. 

References

Websites

"Understanding Charter Change" by Andrew J. Masigan (January 22, 2018)


Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Has Passing Down Hatred for Singapore (Because of Flor Contemplacion) Economically Helped the Philippines?

PEH.ph It was on March 17, 1995, when Flor Contemplacion was executed in Singapore. I've noticed that I've been addressing her as the late many times, even if the late is a statement that may be ony appropriate if the person has been recently deceased within 10 years. It's about to become 30 years since Flor was hanged in Singapore. However, generational hatred would've been passed down from 1995 up to 2025. Some people are still tagging #JusticeFor Flor. These traits may be passed down from the Batang 1990s to their children in this generation. It may also be passed down from parent to child, even if the child was born in the 2000s to 2010s. Somebody born in 2000s and beyond might even say, "Papa and mama told me about Flor Contemplacion! That's why I hate Singapore!" Talk about a child born in 2004 who's probably angry with Singapore, because his parents kept telling him about how Flor was supposedly "unjustly treated" over there.  Some tim...
Read more

It's A Myth: First World Countries Self-Industrialized and Only Opened to FDI, After They Succeeded

The Straits Times As the battle for economic charter change goes on, another lie often spread: "First world countries, first industrialized by themselves, before they opened their economy to FDI." I'm seeing it ironically on Facebook. I tell them, "If you hate foreigners so much, why don't you get out of the Internet?" Some of them give replies like, "We're not hypocrites for badmouthing FDI on Facebook. We're simply forced to use imported equipment because foreigners unfairly own the means of production (read rebuttal here )." When I ask for their sources, they give sources like people from Bayan Muna (Nation First), the League of Filipino Students, the IBON Foundation, Kabataan Partylist (Youth Partylist), the Alliance of Concerned Teachers (ACT), and maybe even the Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines (CBCP). Most of these sources (not all) are the favorite sources of those going against badly needed economic cha-cha.  I...
Read more

Why FDIs are Choosing COMMUNIST Vietnam Over DEMOCRATIC Philippines

China Daily HK Tomorrow is Ho Chi Minh's birthday. I would like to raise another FDI issue between democratic Philippines and Communist Vietnam. I remember with a certain woman I'll call Miss Clueless, to respect her privacy. Miss Clueless probably never saw a map, called FDI as Favored Duterte-China Investments, and I told her the bigger problem with the constitutional restrictions. Miss Clueless kept talking about that the late Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino III made us a tiger economy, regardless. However, I wrote that relying too much on Noynoy's economic legacy, is pretty much landing into the same fatal mistake that Nokia did . Relying on past successes is a surefire recipe for failure. As Miss Clueless blamed former president Rodrigo R. Duterte, the person still believes that people must change first before systems. I asked her, "Why are people choosing Communist Vietnam over the Philippines." The reason I heard from Miss Clueless was something...
Read more

Is Jollibee "Invading" South Korea Now as It's About to Acquire 70% of Shabu All Day?

I must confess that I find this new rather hilarious . It's because the word shabu is often associated with drugs. All the while, shabu shabu is a Korean delicacy! Well, I'm going to say that Jollibee Foods Corporation has now become a multinational buyer . Jollibee acquired 70% of Compost Coffee back in 2024 . This year, Jollibee as a multinational corporation is now acquiring Shabu All Day for PHP 5.1 billion pesos. Is Jollibee checkmating South Korea or is the Philippines conquering South Korea not just by OFWs but als through Jollibee? The answer is still no. From GMA News , we can read this article by Jon Viktor D. Cabuenas: Under the deal, Shabu All Day will be consolidated into Jollibee Foods Corp.’s (JFC) financial statements immediately upon completion of the acquisition for a total consideration equivalent to KRW127 billion. Completion of the transaction is subject to closing and financing conditions. The acquisition is expected to lead to a 2% jump in revenues, incre...
Read more

Helping Others is Good But Not to One's Own Expense

I advocate for helping others. I believe in helping others but there were times I overdid it. One time, I gave up so much that I had to be stopped. I was told, "If you gave everything now, how can you help others later?" I would donate some sums here and there, without thinking much. I'm not going to write them all. Some of them left me good while others left a bad taste (and a bad record) for me to endure. Sure, I want to help people but I tend to overlook the consequences. Some of the bad habits I had in the name of helping others are like: Being too generous with buying with credit. Eventually, I lost a lot of money which was never recovered . Some seasoned entrepreneurs may admit their own falls including the credit trap pitfall. Being too willing to give a discount without thinking about how it'd affect profits. Sure, a cheap price can draw people near. However, there are times when the prices of goods and services need to be raised to keep a business running. I ...
Read more