How a Parliamentary Philippines Setup Would've Better Discussed Economics and Agriculture

No gossip, no hearsay, face-to-face debates,
liars are slapped in the parliamentary system!

Right now, I'm still a member of the CoRRECT Movement Moderated Public Forum. For me, I'm really "trolling" the boomers since they're the ones spreading disinformation. Facebook has some interesting fights such as Diehard Duterte Supporters (DDS) vs. Dilawan (Yellow). Today, we have the whole Marcos vs. Robredo dichotomy. Some Dilawans (now termed as Kakampinks, a combination of kakampi meaning comrade and pink). Fortunately, CoRRECT Movement now has some Kakampinks for constitutional reform. I'll never forget how a blatant Yellow, Charles Edward P. Celdran aka Carlos Cedran, had been an advocate for constitutional reform. Meanwhile, some Kakampinks still need education as to how a parliamentary system will work. Previously, I wrote an article on that which discusses why the Philippines should become a parliamentary republic.

Some say that we can just focus on better economic policies but not a change in governance. Some cite that the Philippines can remove the economic restrictions and still boom. They cite South Korea (where presidents only serve one term for five years) and Taiwan (which is semi-presidential). However, I aim that the Philippines, to become another Singapore, should really shift to a parliamentary system. A certain bitter Kakampink still think it's just a "pipe dream". Other Kakampinks are whining and saying that things would be "much better" if former Philippine vice president, Atty. Maria Leonor Sto. Tomas Gerona-Robredo, was the Philippine president right now. If they wanted to give her a chance, a parliamentary system would be better because it's not a winner takes all scenario. Instead, we would have a better representation.

Economist Andrew James Masigan makes his political views no secret. Masigan and I belong to different spectrums (and I personally want to meet and talk with him). Masigan mentions the following regarding charter change and why a parliamentary system would make it better:

FEDERAL-PARLIAMENTARY GOVERNMENT
As mentioned earlier, the Duterte administration plans to a shift our form of government from a Unitary-Presidential form to a Federal-Parliamentary form. To better appreciate how a Federal-Parliamentary system works, it s best to look at it in contrast to a Federal-Presidential system.
A Federal-Presidential system offers no change to the current system where the President is elected through a national election and heads the executive branch. He has no sway on the judicial or legislative branches except through party-line influence. The United States operates under a Federal-Presidential framework.
A Federal-Parliamentary system , on the other hand, encourages people to vote according to political parties. Here, the citizens elect their Members of Parliament (their representatives), most often, based on the ideology of the party they belong to, not on their personalities. The party with the most number of elected representatives is declared “the parliament.” The parliament elects its Prime Minister (PM) from among themselves. The PM, in turn, selects the members of his Cabinet (his ministers) from among the members of the parliament.
There are multiple advantages to this. First, the system does away with expensive and divisive presidential elections. It puts an end to the vicious cycle of presidential candidates resorting to corruption and incurring political debts just to raise funds for their campaign.
Even the poor can run for office so long as they are capable. This is because elections are funded by the party. In a federal-parliamentary system, we do away with people who win on the back of guns goons and gold.
Moreover, since the members of parliament selects the Prime Minister, they can easily remove him through a vote of no-confidence should he fail to fulfill his mandate. We do away with the tedious process of impeachment. And since the ministers are selected from the Parliament, no one gets a free ticket to the Cabinet just because they are friends with the President or nominated by a political ally. The ministers all have mandates and are accountable not only to the PM but to their constituents.
The parliament is a unicameral legislative body. Thus, bills can be made into law faster and cheaper.
A parliamentary system is one where a “shadow Cabinet” exists. A shadow Cabinet is the corresponding, non-official Cabinet composed of members of the opposition. Each Cabinet minister has a shadow equivalent who is mandated to scrutinize every policy done by the official minister. The shadow minister may offer alternative policies which can be adopted if it is deemed superior.
In the end, the systems allows policies to be better thought out with appropriate safeguards to protect the interest of the people.
Among the seven wealthiest democracies (the G7 nations), only US and France follow a presidential system. the rest subscribe to a parliamentary system.
The intentions of charter change is good. Done right, it could be a game changer for the nation.

How will a parliamentary system make discussing the current economic issues easier?

This is an illustration of what should've been. The colors here made me imagine the Government section is held by Prime Minister Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. and Deputy Prime Minister Sara Z. Duterte-Carpio. Meanwhile, the colors pink and blue should've represented Opposition Leader Maria Leonor S. Gerona-Robredo and Deputy Opposition Leader Francis Pangilinan. The Government is ran by Uniteam. The Opposition is ran by the Liberal Party of the Philippines. It's never a winner takes all scenario. Sticking to the presidential system means sticking to a scenario where winner takes all. Instead, it wouldn't be a winner-takes-all scenario.

How will the pink opposition work? Mrs. Robredo is given the task of scrutinizing the Marcos Jr. Not only that, Mrs. Robredo has the entire Liberal Party of the Philippines with her to serve as her cabinet. Marcos Jr. will have his own cabinet of appointees. Each of Marcos Jr.'s appointees will be mirrored by Mrs. Robredo. Every minister of a specific function will have a shadow minister of a specific function. The scrutiny will be done on a weekly basis. The job of the Opposition is to offer alternatives that will be adopted if deemed superior. It means that the Opposition isn't going to be, "They make the solutions, not us!" Instead, the Opposition is, "Instead, we propose we do this instead."

The weekly question hour is aired live every week. It means screwing up on live television can be very embarassing. Looking at the news with Marcos Jr. makes me wish, "If only we were a parliamentary system." If only more Kakampinks will realize that a parliamentary system would've given them a better chance. Mrs. Robredo would have her mandatory duty to scrutinize Marcos Jr. because she's the Opposition Leader. Marcos Jr. would have the responsibility to show the Opposition that he's fit to be the prime minister of the Philippines. If a member of the Government fails to uphold confidence, the solution becomes to host a motion of no confidence on live television. That would be more efficient and effective than the tedious impeachment trial. Watching the impeachment of former Philippine president Joseph Marcelo Ejercito aka Joseph Estrada was very tedious. It would've been easier if Estrada was removed by a vote of no confidence.

We can think of Marcos Jr.'s failed promise of selling rice at PHP 20.00 per kilo. It's just absurd to aim for it but some people bought it anyway. It's stupid how some Kakampinks decided to sell at a loss instead of proposing solutions. In a parliamentary system, Mrs. Robredo would have her Shadow Minister of Agriculture scrutinize the Minister of Agriculture. The Minister of Agriculture may propose this plan to import. However, the Shadow Minister of Agriculture will say, "We can import but that is short-term. We must open agriculture to more foreign investment to learn new technology." We can make it so that importation will be done while we implement accepting more foreign investment to improve farming in the Philippines.

I could imagine what if Mrs. Robredo finally opened her superior solution. In a sense, the result of the debates can be in. We can have the best of Uniteam and the best of Kakampink sorted out. As mentioned earlier, importation will be allowed while new technology will be adapted. Maybe, the Philippines can learn from India's agriculture. I did write about if whether or not it was a coincidence that FDI-friendly countries sell cheaper onions. Maybe, one can learn from India's and Vietnam's pro-FDI agriculture stance to develop Philippine agriculture. India is a land that uses more onions than the Philippines yet they could fill the supply and demand. The Philippines can learn from it. The Opposition can throw that in as a better alternative than just importing onions.

Right now, I want to invite the pro-reforms. I don't care if they voted for Marcos Jr. or Mrs. Robredo. What I want to see is there would be better discussion. It would be better to have opposing parties settle things in a weekly question hour. Weekly questioning will force politicians to do better. It will build up for more long-term thinking. Economics and agriculture aren't exempt from the weekly questioning. That's why I want to shift to a parliamentary system.

References

Websites

"Understanding Charter Change" by Andrew J. Masigan (January 22, 2018)

https://www.bworldonline.com/editors-picks/2018/01/22/112658/understanding-charter-change/

Comments

Vietnam's Doi Moi Disproves the Philippines' Trust Me Bro School of Economics

Vietnam is now enjoying the benefits of open FDI Source: Quan Doi Nhan Dan Some fools on Facebook are using Vietnam as a reason why the Philippines shouldn't open to FDI. The Philippine Anti-Fascist League (whose original Facebook page has been deleted) spread the misinformation that Vietnam progressed through protectionism. According to PAFL--Vietnam's real "FDI" is in distributing its products worldwide and not by accepting FDI. The idea is absurd on so many levels. Why would countries around the world want to buy Vietnamese products if Vietnam wouldn't even allow their MNCs to do business in Vietnam?! Instead of listening to what fools say that Vietnam is a protectionist country, let's dig into an important part of its history. This important part of its history is called Doi Moi--which literally translates to restoration . Before that, I encourage you to read my article on why using Vietnam as an excuse against economic charter change for the Philippines, ...

Five Reasons Why I Advocate Buying Local Where You Go, as an Multinational Investor and/or Tourist

Getaway.PH A few years ago, I wrote an article where I talked about how multinational companies can help in the Buy Local Go Lokal campaign . Tourism may be at an all-time high (depending on the months), so some people may travel out of the country. Some people may be going out of the country or to some places in the Philippines. Much of my travel plans were squashed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Now, I'd like to talk about another aspect of international marketing. It's all about buying local where you go. Of course, this means doing some study about the place where you're going, what places to avoid, and the best recommendations for their local products. In life, it's a give-and-take principle, not a take-and-take principle. Various world religions and philosophies advocate the Golden Rule. This is, "Do not do unto others what you don't want others to do unto you." It can also be said, "Do unto others as you want others to do unto you." The princip...

Thinking About My Journey with Calculus: Initial Panic Attack to Learning Its Value in Business

I could remember how mathematics was once my most hated subject. Right now, it can be said most students hate mathematics. I complained about how hard it was. Again, mathematics is meant to be hard. No pain, no gain, right? However, I think I could point out how what's wrong with how math is taught or how math was taught. I was a graduate under the K+10 curriculum and the Philippines was left behind with K+12. It really makes Filipino students lack the skills that the other ASEAN countries had aside from lagging with the investment scale. I think about the biggest mistake with mathematics education today is how it's taught. Too much time is focused on studying the properties of numbers instead of teaching students that all mathematics is part of life. Another thing is students have the panic attack that if they don't do good with mathematics in high school--they will be forced to take "substandard courses" like Hotel and Restaurant Management. Yet, even the HRM co...

My Thoughts on the NOT So Surprising Downfall of "Axie Infinity"

llustration: Daniel Guerrero Fernandez for Bloomberg Businessweek I remembered some time ago when I wrote about Axie Infinity . One article I wrote about why I never bothered to enter the Axie Infinity arena was the poor security . I compared it to a cockfighting game--a game where so few win and so many lose. A previous article I wrote was all about why play-to-earn games are too good to be true . What's not too surprising is the collapse of Axie Infinity . It's pretty much too good to be true. A casual gamer can testify that they buy online passes not to earn but to play . It's like buying a Playstation Plus card to play online for an entire year. You buy games out of the money you earn. You don't earn money out of gaming. What truly never surprised me was how Axie Infinity crashed. It promised riches but onoy resulted to disaster. I even wrote that there could be an ironic moment somebody says that AXA is a scam while playing Axie Infinity thinking that it's an...

Why I Feel "Play-to-Earn" Games are Too Good to be True

I've been running into ads that promise the "play to earn" games even before the pandemic. Some of them featured a game that all I needed was to merge this and that or pop bubbles and boom--I get money! I remembered finding ways to make money online and they encouraged gambling. There's always the rule of thumb in finances--if it's too good to be true then run from it. It reminds me of how I get irritated by those fake game ads and now these new fake game ads? It's already bad enough I was duped into downloading Gardenscape with the fake ads. Now, these fake ads are probably the worst offenders over mobile demos that irritate us with annoying display of stupidity. Any gamer who probably owned a Playstation 3 or an XBox 360 (or any seventh generation console) would remember having to buy credits to buy extra content. A buyer may have had to buy Playstation Points (or the like) to purchase additional content. Later, there's the pay to play online which a p...

When the Education Cares TOO MUCH About Grades, Schools Produce Idiots Instead of Intellectuals

During the pandemic, I was left in limbo thinking about my poor performance under K+10. It was something to think about that a classmate of mine who was both a summa cum laude and an honor student, ended up posting on his wall, "Students cheat because the education system cares more about grades instead of learning." The class salutatorian of our batch even commented about the good old days. I always had that feeling of insecurity and envy towards people better than me. But as Warren Edward Buffet would say, "Don't hate successful people. Learn from them instead." One of them is currently a teacher and the other is in Canada. I thought about my insecurities especially when I used to believe I was descended from a fine scholar and my family was a family of scholars. I remembered the time I was taking MBA and got conned. I was asked, "Is that what MBA taught you?" I got touchy and ended up admitting, eventually, that I was only taking MBA for the presti...

The Foolishness (and Hypocrisy) of Wanting Imported Luxury Items as Christmas Gifts While Opposing BADLY NEEDED Economic Reform

I wrote about the Filipino obsession with the iPhone a few months ago . With Christmas being a few days away, I wrote that post to address the foolishness (and hypocrisy ) of wanting imported luxury items for Christmas. One of the greatest wishlists that someone in the Philippines could have composed of imported luxury items. It shouldn't be just a bag--it should be something like the latest Prada or Hermes. It shouldn't just be a smartphone or a new tablet--it should be an iPhone or an iPad. Some Filipinos may have even pestered their OFW relatives to bring them the latest imported luxury item. Never mind that working abroad, separated from loved ones, is anything but glamorous. Ironically, some people who want imported luxury items still oppose economic reform. I mentioned how Apple has a huge factory in Communist Vietnam . I wrote an article where I discussed Lego operating a factory in again, Communist Vietnam . Just think for the moment if I talk to them, who are either ...

Using the Credentials Fallacy to Dismiss Anti-Protectionist, Pro-FDI Arguments

GarthBox I guess it's time for another post, isn't it? I'd like to say that I'm no super-expert in my field. I could remember one time I started talking about the need for constitutional reform. What I always choose to speak about first is the need to liberalize the economy, let more FDIs come in, and allow FDIs to own 100% of their businesses . Instead, get shot down by arguments like, "Why let them invest here? Only they will be rich!" Even worse, they'll have the credentials fallacy which can go with these kinds of insults that I can get every now and then: "Shut up! You're not an economist!" "Do you know Sonny Africa of IBON Foundation graduated from the London School of Economics and you didn't?" "Do you have a degree from the University of the Philippines, Ateneo De Manila University, or any of the Greenbelt universities?" "The school you graduated from is not one of the hardest to enter!" "You ...

Why I Support Taiwanese Politician Yeh Yi Jin's Proposal for Taiwan to Drop Zhuyin Entirely (in Favor of Pinyin)

Taiwan News It may be news from 2018 (meaning, five years ago) but as a person who sees the importance of Mandarin in the international market, I still want to react. Not surprisingly, Yeh Yi Jin lost the Tainan mayoral bid because of her controversial statement to abolish Zhuyin from Taiwan altogether . She may have lost the race but I'm still supporting her for this. It's not because I kept failing hard in Zhuyin back in my days. It's because I feel that as time goes on, some things need to be dropped like asking students to submit their reports written via typewriter or asking documents to be faxed when email (and modern standard mail) are more reliable. Like I argued with an investment before, I said, "You can't fax a book. Can I just mail it?" The bank kept arguing it had to be faxed. Unfortunately stubborn boomers, stubborn boomers, everywhere, right? From The Free China Post , this is what's said about Yeh's argument: Yeh argues that using zhuyi...

Talking Economics with an Overeating Glutton

Two years ago, I wrote an entry about why discussing economics with an overspender is frustrating . Now, I was looking at certain fat people who say really dumb things about economics. Just recently, I was looking at a certain fat idiot (fortunately, he only has 1K+ followers) who posted on Facebook that not only will the parliamentary system cause the Philippines to become a dictatorship, but he also says that changing economic provisions will cause the Philippines to collapse and the country to fall into the hands of foreigners. I won't name the person out to avoid getting personal. However, the person is apparently very fat and he blames capitalism day in and day out. The person even says that businessmen do nothing and it's the employers that do everything. Has that fat slob ever heard that businesses are run by bosses and that if the bosses do screw up, they're the ones who are the most answerable? The employees are the cogs and the boss runs the cogs. I was looking at...

Shaun T. Dy's Business & Economics Perspective Blog

Search This Blog